Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Promotion
By Mark Anthony Llego on February 28, 2019
DepEd Order No. 29, s. 2002 (Merit Selection Plan of the Department of Education (DepEd)) clearly
states that it is the policy of the department to strictly adhere to the principles of merit, competence,
fitness, and equality, and that the selection and promotion of employees shall always be based on
their relative qualifications and competence to perform die duties and responsibilities of the position.
To achieve this objective, various issuances were issued by the Department of Education for the
selection, promotion, and appointment of various levels of position available in the department. For
School Heads, DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2007was established; while for other Other-Teaching,
Related-Teaching and Non-Teaching positions, DepEd Order No. 66, s. 2007 is being utilized. On
the other hand, various references are being used in the selection and promotion of Master Teacher
position, such as MEC Order No. 10, s 1979, MEC Order No. 29, s 1979, and DECS Order No. 70, s.
1988.
However, most of the said issuances have gray areas that often lead to the different interpretation of
the personnel selection board. Thus, to further achieve the principles of merit and fitness, and the
objectivity and uniformity in the assessment and evaluation, these clarificatory guidelines are issued.
1. Only those who are actually teaching shall be considered for Master teacher position. This
includes teachers who besides assuming special assignments have regular teaching loads.
2. Positions for Master Teacher (MT) shall be allotted proportionally on the basis of number of
teachers. The number for the division shall likewise be distributed proportionally among all
districts.
3. An allotment of one (1) MT position per subject area for at least 5-7 teachers should be the
basis in the secondary level (DECS Order No. 70, s. 1998)
4. If there are not enough qualified teachers in the district to fill the number of MT position
allotted to it, the positions may be filled by a qualified teacher from other districts; provided,
however, that such teacher shall serve in the district where the MT position have been
allotted.
1. All claims for criterion “a” shall be supported with proofs/evidences for validation where
applicable or to attest to utilization, usefulness or effectiveness.
2. The project proposal shall be supported by evidence of data, data analysis in indicators and
the terminal report shall contain statistical results.
3. The project should have been acknowledged/noted/endorsed by the school head/education
program Supervisor (specific area) and duly recommended and approved by the Assistant
School Division Superintendent and School Division Superintendent respectively.
4. Each claim shall be supported with an approved project proposal and a terminal report after
project completion.
5. A certification should be given by the School Head/ PSDS on the project utilization,
usefulness or effectiveness and should be corroborated by at least 5 teachers to attest to the
veracity of the claim
6. Any one (1) of the following shall be given 20 points. For group claims, the points shall be
divided equally among the proponents.
1. Curriculum or Instructional Materials
1. Instructional Materials content and development and its effect after
implementation shall require supporting evidences of data, data analysis and/
or statistical validation.
2. Effective Teaching Technique or Strategies
1. This may be a developed intervention program/ technique/ strategies based on
a result of a research finding.
3. Simplification of work as in reporting system, records keeping, etc. or procedures in
cost reduction.
1. This maybe a result of a Continuous Improvement (CI) project, a research
findings or an offshoot of results of comparative studies.
4. A worthwhile Income-Generating Project (IGP) for pupils given recognition by
higher officials in the division.
1. The IGP shall be for the learners
2. The IGP shall have been sustained or in existence for at least two (2)
consecutive years with a minimum Net Income of P5,000.00
3. The terminal report shall include among others how the income was
generated, how much was generated, where the income were used.
4. Fund-raising activities are not considered as Income-Generating Project.
b. Served as Subject Coordinator or Grade level chairman for at least one (1) year, or as
adviser of school publication and not considered part of the regular teaching load ~ 12 points
1. Community Project or Activity may include feeding program in the community health and
wellness and nutrition program, agro-industrial fair, ecological/ environmental preservation
project, Rural Improvement Project, Community Literacy Program among others.
2. The community project is community-based, not school-based and sponsored by any of the
following: LGU or Barangay, RIC, other government agency or a non-government
organization.
3. Project lead/project organizer shall be given 12 points; while a member of the project or
program as certified shall be given 7 points.
4. Supporting documents shall be as follows:
1. A designation as coordinator/project focal person/project proponent/ chairman duly
signed by the head/chair/president of the lead agency or sponsor.
2. Project proposal/write-up and terminal accomplishment report for the project duly
approved by approving authorities, and approved/noted by the ASDS/SDS.
3. A certification of commendation/ recognition awarded to the proponent or member
for the project may be included.
f. Organized/ managed as in-service activity or other similar activities at least in the school
level – 12 points
1. The In-Service activity shall mainly be for the improvement of instructions and/ or
professional development of teachers based on development needs.
2. Participants to the INSET are teachers/School Heads/parents/community or a combination of
both/each group.
3. Supporting documents shall include:
1. Training design duly recommended and approved by the ASDS and SDS
respectively.
2. Memorandum for the conduct of the INSET
3. Certificate of recognition/commendation maybe included.
4. Certification of conduct of INSET by the School Head corroborated by 5 teachers
5. Documents shall clearly show that the claimant is the organizer/initiator and/or
program manager of the INSET
Such as:
Firs Secon Thir Fourt Fift Sixt Seven Eig Nint Tent
8. t d d h h h th ht h h
National 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Regional 7 6 5 4 3 – – – – –
Division/Provin
5 4 3 2 1 – – – – –
cial
District 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 – – – – –
Municipal 15 1 .5 .25 – – – – – –
8. Coordinator of BSP and GSP activities or Scouts which gained awards will be
given points as follows:
National 10
Regional 5
Division 3
h. Authorship – 10 points
B. DEMONSTRATION TEACHING
Share
Related Posts
Only the Senior High School Shall Conduct the Graduation Rites
DepEd Statement on ‘Momo challenge’ and similar threats to the online safety of children
School Improvement
Quality Plan (SIP) Instructional Videos, Styleguide, Appraisal Process, and
Assessment Tool
Home
About Us
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
View Desktop Version