Sunteți pe pagina 1din 7

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/258224425

Challenges faced By Construction Industry in Accomplishing Sustainablity


Goals

Conference Paper · September 2012


DOI: 10.1109/ISBEIA.2012.6422966

CITATIONS READS

3 4,394

6 authors, including:

Aftab Hameed Memon Ismail Abdul Rahman


Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science and Technology Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
68 PUBLICATIONS   605 CITATIONS    124 PUBLICATIONS   897 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Sasitharan Nagapan Qadir Bux Alias Imran Latif


Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia University of Nizwa
64 PUBLICATIONS   166 CITATIONS    30 PUBLICATIONS   84 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Partnering Strategies for Sustainable Irrigation and Agriculture Infrastructure Development View project

Categorization of Potential Project Cost Overrun Factors in Construction Industries View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Aftab Hameed Memon on 04 April 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


2012 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications

Challenges faced By Construction Industry in


Accomplishing Sustainablity Goals
Ade Asmi Abdul Azis1, Aftab Hameed Memon2, Ismail Abdul Rahman2, Sasitharan Nagapan2, Qadir Bux Alias Imran
Latif2
1
Universitas Bakrie, Jakarta, Indonesia
2
Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Malaysia
86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia

Abstract—Rapid growth of construction projects have benefited i) Economic sustainability – increasing profitability by
mankind by providing social requirement like infrastructure, making more efficient use of resources, including labour,
building etc as well contributing significantly in economic growth materials, water and energy.
of country. At the same time is contributing significantly in ii) Environmental sustainability – preventing harmful and
generating high amount of construction waste, consuming
potential irreversible effects on the environment by careful
resource excessively, and adverse impacts to environment, facing
schedule delay and using excessive budget. These challenges has use of natural resources, minimizing waste, protecting and
put the practitioners to adopt sustainable development principles where possible enhancing the environment.
in construction as traditional design and construction focuses on iii) Social sustainability – responding to the needs of people at
cost, time and quality only and pay very little attention on whatever stage of involvement in the construction process
environmental impacts. On the contrary Sustainable construction (from commissioning to demolition), providing high
merges sound environmentally responsible practices into one customer satisfaction and working closely with clients,
discipline that looks at the environmental, economic and social suppliers, employees and local communities.
effects of a building or building project as a whole. Sustainable
construction benefits by consuming fewer resources in
Sustainability is a relationship, or balancing act, between
construction and operation, reduce negative impacts on
many factors (social, environmental and economic realities and
environment, minimize construction waste, and reduce planning
risk, extended building life and viability. constraints) which are constantly changing [4]. The vision of
sustainable construction must change in adoption of this dynamic
Keywords-sustuiable development, principles of sustainable relationship. Hence, the direction of the industry is now shifting
construction, construction waste, scheule and budget overrun towards development process being integrated within the wider
context of environmental agenda. Thus, the activities of
construction industry must work and comply with the needs to
I. INTRODUCTION
protect and sustain the environment. This shift of ideology is
Construction projects have enabled human to meet the illustrated in Fig. 1.
social needs as well as contributed significantly in economic
growth of state’s GDP. However, it has adverse effects to
environment and through sustainable construction concept; the
construction industry can contribute in a positive and proactive
manner towards environmental protection [1]. Traditional
design and construction focuses on cost, time and quality only
and pay very little attention on environmental impacts. On the
contrary sustainable construction addresses social needs while
taking care to minimize potential negative environmental
impacts [2]. Adoption of sustainable principles in construction
can efficiently reduce negative impact of construction
operations.

II. SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION


In first international conference on sustainable
construction held in Tampa, Florida, USA in November 1994,
the conference convener Kibert [3] defined sustainable
construction as, “Creating a healthy built environment using
resource-efficient, ecologically-based principles”. Sustainable
construction involves a commitment to: Figure 1: Sustainability in construction [1]

628
A. Sustainablity Principles in Construction function of developing, improving and expanding the
Sustainability is a dynamic concept. It requires decision Malaysian construction industry, has identified the
makers to be flexible and willing to modify their approaches. environment and other sustainability-related issues as one of
To achieve sustainable construction, it is very important to the top issues of the construction industry [1]. Traditional
balance the basic principles of sustainability i.e. environment, design and construction focuses on cost, performance and
economic and social aspect together. quality objectives but sustainable design and construction adds
minimization of resource depletion, minimization of
Table 1: Sustainability Principles in Construction [5] environmental degradation, and creating a healthy built
The Principles of The Interpretation of Sustainability environment to these criteria [6]. The shift to sustainability can
Sustainable Principles within Construction be seen as a new paradigm [4] where sustainable objectives are
Development Industry within the building design and construction industry. It is
• Putting people at Show concern for people by ensuring considered for decision making at all stages of the life cycle of
the centre they live in a healthy, safe and the facility. Figure 2 outlines the evolution and challenges of
productive built environment and in the sustainable construction concept in a global context.
harmony with nature

• Taking a long Safeguarding the interests of future


term perspective generations while at the same time,
meeting today’s needs

• Taking account of Evaluate the benefits and costs of the


costs and benefits project to society and environment

• Creating an open Creating a system which can flourish


and supportive trades, improve collaboration and Figure 2: Challenges of sustainable construction in a global
economic system resource efficiency context [7]

• Combating Improving the quality of buildings and


Further, major issues experience in construction projects
poverty and social services, create jobs opportunities and
include construction waste, excessive resources consumption,
exclusion promote social cohesiveness
adverse effect to environment, time overrun and cost overrun.

• Respecting Minimizing damage to the


environment and its resources A. Construction Waste
environmental
Waste is a serious problem in construction projects having
limits
direct impact on the productivity, material loss and completion
Assessing risk and uncertainties before time of project and project cost. Forsberg et al [8] stated that
• The precautionary the amount of waste contributed is around 30-35% of a
any action and rectify possible damage
principle project’s production cost. The amount of construction materials
at source.
wasted on the site is relatively high and equals 9% by weight of
Using technology and expert the purchased materials as identified in investigation of
• Using scientific material waste generated in a Dutch construction project. Study
knowledge to seek information and in
knowledge showed that the average waste per house was 6,860 kg which
improving project efficiency and
effectiveness consisted of 4,480 kg of construction debris and 2,380 kg of
other types of solid waste [9]. Like other countries,
construction waste is severe problem in Malaysia also [10].
• Transparency, The high quantity of construction waste generated in the
Opportunities to improve access to
information country is due to the rapid development of the construction
information and encourage ethics and
participation and industry. Demand of houses and major infrastructure projects
professionalism
access to justice contributed to the increase of construction waste [11-12] and
the major impact of increased construction waste generation
• Making the Legislation compliance and has caused illegal dumping [13]. These illegal dumping has
polluter pay responsibility caused a risk to human health and environment [14-15]. The
issues of illegal dumping arise can be contributed by cost and
location of the project [16]. The contractors intend to maximize
III. ISSUES TOWARDS SUSTAINABILITY
profit by avoiding transportation cost and payment charge to
The Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia the gazette landfill. Distance between the project location and
(CIBD), which is a corporate established with the main the landfill site also hinders the contractor to dispose in legal

629
landfill. Hence, it is timely to adopt a systematic and efficient serious about environmental protection in construction sites.
waste management strategy which would minimize the They assume that a construction site is only a temporary setup
generation of waste at different level. Advanced techniques lasting for two to three years. In fact, the industry is a major
such as lean construction can help in reducing waste at source source of urban air pollutants [39].
and can minimize the waste produced during the operation by
The emission of CO2 by buildings contributed to the global
re-using and re-cycling. Begum et al [17] studied the economic
warming and extreme weather change all over the world. The
feasibility of waste minimization in construction project
harvest of timber leads to the lost of natural forests. Other
showed that by adopting waste minimization strategy like
impacts of constructing a new building include quarrying to
recycling and reusing material can save 2.5% of the total
provide aggregates, production of cement, the wasteful use of
budget.
water and the widespread use of toxic chemicals in materials
Construction wastes were generated because of one or more [40].
reasons including frequent design changes [18-21], poor
quality of materials [9, 22-25], workers' mistakes during D. Construction Schedule Delay
construction [26-28], poor planning [21, 29-31], poor site Construction industry is regarded as schedule driven
management [21-22, 30], ordering errors [12, 22, 28, 32], industry and hence achieving project completion within
material not in compliance with specification [29-30, 33], scheduled duration is basic requirement for success of project.
effect of weather [24-25, 31, 34] and others. However, it seems seldom for projects to be completed within
scheduled time. This has become a worldwide problem. A
B. Excessive Resource Conumption study showed that the Vietnamese government has
Built environment has significant impact on resources acknowledged this issue as a big headache, especially with
where it accounts for one-sixth of the world’s freshwater government-related funded projects [41]. In Nigeria, out of
withdrawals, one-quarter of its wood harvest and two-fifths of 3,407 projects only 24 projects were completed on time, while
its material and energy flows. The structures also have impact 1517 were delayed and 1812 were abandoned [42] and
areas beyond their immediate location, affecting the minimum average percentage escalation period of projects was
watersheds, air quality, and transportation patterns of found to be 188% [43]. A similar research was conducted in
communities [35]. Buildings built without due consideration to Bosnia and Herzegovina on 177 projects and found that the
energy, environmental impact and natural resources contracted date was not met in 51.40 % of the projects [44]. I
conservation will result in detrimental wastage affecting our Jordan, a study of 130 public projects showed that schedule
ecological integrity [36]. delays occurred in 106 (82%) of the projects [45] and 70%
projects faced schedule delay in Ghana and Saudi Arabia [46-
Excessive use of resources, energy and a growing demand
47]. In Malaysia, more than 90% of large MARA construction
for raw materials are largely responsible for the depletion of
projects experienced delay since 1984 [48] and study of 359
natural resources worldwide and the acceleration of global
projects (301 were public projects and 51 private projects)
warming. About 40% of the world's resource and energy used
showed that only 18.2% of the public sector projects and
is linked to the construction and maintenance of buildings
29.45% of private sector projects finished on time [49].
(Global Green, USA). This contributes to one-tenth of the
global economy [35]. Time Delay can be due to one or more reasons including
problems of financing and payment for completed works (46,
Other statistic states that more than half of all resources
50,-52], poor contract management and shortage of materials
consumed globally are used in construction, and 45 per cent of
[53], design changes [54], weather condition [46] among
energy generated across the world is used to heat, light and
others. As an example, Yogeswaran et al [55] scrutinized 67
ventilate our buildings, with a further 5 per cent arising from
civil engineering projects in Hong Kong and found at least 15–
constructing those [37]. As an example, in the European Union,
20% of time overrun was due to inclement weather.
buildings are responsible for more than 40% of the total energy
consumption and the construction sector is estimated to
E. Excessive Budget
generate approximately 40% of all man-made wastes. In
addition, the construction sector is the Union’s largest Achieving project completion within budget is a major
industrial sector, contributing approximately 11% to the GNP criterion for project success. But unfortunately, most of the
and having more than 25 million people directly and indirectly projects fail to achieve project completion within the estimated
engaged [38]. budget. Budget overrun is a major problem both in developed
and developing countries. The trend is more severe in
C. Adverse Impacts to Environment developing countries where these overruns sometimes exceeds
100% of the anticipated cost of the project [56]. In United
Built environment is considered the most environmental
Kingdom’s (UK) construction industry, it was found that
unfriendly human activity because it consumes large amounts
nearly one third of the clients’ complaint that their projects
of natural resources and produces a great deal of pollutants.
generally overran the allocated budget [57]. One
The environmental impact of the construction industry is
comprehensive research regarding budget overruns in 20
extensive and readily identifiable [35]. Most people are not
nations showed that 9 out of 10 projects had the overrun

630
worldwide [58]. In Nigeria, minimum average percentage REFERENCES
escalation cost of projects was found as 14% [43]. Other study [1] N. Zainul Abidin, “Sustainable Construction in Malaysia-Developers’
in Slovenia on 92 traffic structures built showed that 51 % of Awareness,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
contracted construction projects faced price overrun [59]. 53, 2009
While in Uganda, the Northern-by-pass project at Kampala, [2] R.C. Hill and P.A.Bowen, “Sustainable construction: principles and a
framework for attainment”, Construction Management and Economics,
faced cost overrun of more than 100% of the contract price. In 15(3), 1997
Croatia 81% of 333 analyzed projects were suffering from [3] C. J. Kibert, “Preface. In Proceedings of First International Conference
price overrun while in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a study on 177 of CIB TG 16 on Sustainable Construction”, Tampa, Florida, 1994
structural projects found that the contracted price was not met [4] J. Vanegas, J.DuBose and A. Pearce, A. “Sustainable Technologies for
in 41.23% of the projects [44]. In Malaysia also projects facing the Building Construction Industry.” Proc. Symp. on Design for the
budget overrun problem [60-61] and a study on 308 public Global Environment, Atlanta, GA, Nov 2, 1996
projects and 51 private projects concluded discovered that only [5] N. Zainul Abidin and C. L. Pasquire, “Delivering Sustainability through
46.8% and 37.2% of public and private sector projects Value Management: The Concept and Performance Overview”.
Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 12(2), 2005
completed within the budget respectively [49].
[6] C.J Kibert, “Final Session of First International Conference of CIB TG
There are various factors that contribute to cost overrun 16 on Sustainable Construction”, Tampa, Florida, 1994
including lack of contractor’s experience [62-64], poor site [7] P. Huovila and L. Koskela, “Contribution of the Principles of Lean
Construction to Meet the Challenges of Sustainable Development,”
management and supervision [41], inaccurate time and cost Proceedings IGLC, 1998
estimates [46, 65], schedule delay [43, 66], frequent design [8] A. Forsberg and L. Saukkoriipi, “Measurement of waste and
changes [62, 67], fluctuation of prices of materials [56, 60, 63], productivity in relation to lean thinking” Proceedings IGLC-15,
cash flow and financial difficulties faced by contractors [41, Michigan, USA, 2007
61]. [9] A. G. Bossink and H.J.H.Brouwers, “Construction waste: quantification
and source evaluation”. Journal of Construction Engineering and
Management, ASCE, 122(1), 1996.
IV. ROLE OF SUSTIANBLE CONSTRUCTIONS [10] R. A. Begum, S.K.Satari and J.J. Pereira, “Waste Generation and
The concept of sustainability in construction has initially Recycling: Comparison of Conventional and Industrialized Building
focused on issues of limited resources especially energy, and on Systems”, American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 6(4), 2010.
how to reduce impacts on the natural environment with emphasis [11] F.H. Nasaruddin, N.H.M.Ramli and S.D.Ravana, “E-Construction Waste
on technical issues such as materials, building components, Exchange in Malaysia: A Preliminary Study”, Proceedings of
Information Technology International Symposium, Kuala Lumpur,
construction technologies and energy related design concepts. The Malaysia, 2008
appreciation of the significance of non-technical issues (soft [12] N.M.Siti and Z.M.Noor, “Approach in construction industry: A study on
issues) has grown, giving recognition to economic and social prefabrication method as a tool for waste minimization”, Proceeding of
sustainability concerns as well as cultural heritage of the built International Conference on Environmental Research and Technology
environment as equally important. Presently, the concept of (ICERT), Penang, Malaysia, 2008
sustainable construction governs three main pillars: environmental [13] N. Yahaya and I. Larsen, “Federalising Solid Waste Management in
protection, social well-being and economic prosperity [1]. Peninsular Malaysia”, Proceeding of International Solid Waste
Sustainable buildings benefit society and their users by consuming Association (ISWA) World Congress, Singapore, 2008
fewer resources in construction and operation, providing healthier [14] N. S.Rahmat and A.H. Ibrahim, “Illegal Dumping Site: Case Study in
the District of Johor Bahru Tengah, Penang”, Malaysia, 2007
working and living environments. It helps in improving efficiency
of the procurement process with the long-term viability of [15] A.H.Faridah, A.H. Hasmanie and M.I. Hasnain, “A study on
construction and demolition waste from buildings in Seberang Perai”,
projects; reduce planning risk, extended building life and viability Proceeding of 3rd NationalConference in Civil Engineering, Copthorne
[68] Orchid, Tanjung Bungah, Malaysia, 2004
[16] T.W. Seow and A.H. Mohamad, “Construction Waste Management on
V. CONCLUSION Site”. Proceedings of Universiti Perguruan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim,
Perak, 2007
Construction industry has been growing rapidly and plays a [17] R.A.Begum, C.Siwar, J.J.Pereira and A.H.Jaafar, “Factors and values of
vital role in the socio-economic growth. At the same time it is willingness to pay for improved construction waste management-A
major contributor to adverse effects on nature and perspective of Malaysian contractors”. Journal of Waste Management,
environment. The emission of CO2 by buildings contributed to 27, 2007
the global warming and extreme weather change all over the [18] O.O.Faniran and G. Caban, “Minimizing waste on construction project
sites”. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management Journal,
world. About 40% of the world's resource and energy use is 5(2), 1998.
linked to the construction industry. Time overrun, cost overrun [19] H. Yupeng, “Minimization Management of Construction Waste”,
and waste generation are common issues faced by construction International Symposium of Water Resource and Environmental
industry. These issues can be encountered by adoption of Protection (ISWREP), China, 2011.
sustainable development in construction. Sustainable [20] S. Alwi, K. Hampson and S. Mohamed, “Non Value-Adding Activities
construction can be characterized by progressive in Australian Construction Projects”, Proceedings International
Conference on Advancement in Design, Construction, Construction
improvements. Sustainable construction will help in increasing Management and Maintenance of Building Structure, Bali, Indonesia,
project efficiency; reduce construction waste, save energy. This 2002
needs an effective frame work and adoption of latest [21] Y. Zhao and D. K. H.Chua, “Relationship between Productivity and Non
technologies and tools like Lean, BIM etc. Value-Adding Activities”, Proceeding of the 11th annual conference of

631
the international group for lean construction, Blacksburg, Virginia, [43] A.Omoregie and D.Radford, “Infrastructure delays and cost escalation:
USA, 2003 causes and effects in Nigeria”. Proceeding of sixth international
[22] W. Lu, H. Yuan, J.J.Li, J.L.Hao, X.Mi and Z.Ding, “An empirical postgraduate research conference, Delft University of Technology and
investigation of construction and demolition waste generation rates in TNO, the Netherlands. 3-7 April, 2006
Shenzhen city, South China”. Journal of Waste Management, 31, 2011 [44] V. Žujo, D. Car-Pušić and A.Brkan-Vejzović, “Contracted Price
[23] E.M.Nazech, D.Zaldi and B.Trigunarsyah, “Identification of Overrun as Contracted Construction Time Overrun Function”,
construction waste in road and highway construction projects”, Technical Gazette, 17 (1), 2010
Proceedings of 11th East Asia-Pacific Conference on Engineering and [45] A. Al-Momani, “Construction delay: a quantitative analysis”.
Construction, Taiwan., 2008 International Journal of Project Management, 18(1), 2000
[24] S. Alwi, K. Hampson and S.Mohamed, “Waste in the Indonesian [46] Y.Frimpong, J.Oluwoye and L.Crawford, “Causes of delays and cost
construction projects”, Proceedings 1st International Conference of overruns in construction of groundwater projects in developing
Creating a sustainable Construction Industry in Developing Countries countries; Ghana as a case study”. International Journal of Project
(CIB), South Africa, 2002 Management 21, 2003
[25] A. Serpell, A.Venturi and J. Contreras, “Characterization of waste in [47] S.A.Assaf and S.Al-Hejji, “Causes of delay in large construction
building construction projects”, 3rd workshop on lean construction, projects”. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 24(4), 2006
Albuquerque, 1995 [48] M.R Abdullah, A.A.Abdul Azis and I. Abdul Rahman, “Potential effects
[26] R.M.Gavilan and L.E.Bernold, “Source Evaluation of solid waste in on large MARA projects due to construction delay”. International
building construction”. Journal of Construction Engineering and journal of Integrated Engineering (Issue on Civil and Environmental
Management, ASCE, 120(3), 1994 Engineering, 1(2), 2009
[27] C.Llatas “A model for quantifying construction waste in projects [49] I.R.Endut, A.Akintoye and J. Kelly, “Cost and Time Overrun Projects in
according to the European waste list” Journal of waste management, 3, Malaysia”, Retrieved from http://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/
2011 CIB10633.pdf, on February 2012
[28] G. Polat and G. Ballard, “Waste in Turkish Construction: Need for Lean [50] Alaghbari, M.R.A.Kadir, A.Salim and Ernawati, “The significant factors
Construction Techniques”, Proceeding 12th Annual Conference of the causing delay of building construction projects in Malaysia”.
International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC-12), Elsinore, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management Vol. 14(2),
Denmark, 2004 2007
[29] L. L.Ekanayake and G. Ofori, “Construction Material Waste Source [51] G.Sweis, R.Sweis, A. Abu Hammad, and A.Shboul, “Delays in
Evaluation”, Proceeding of Strategies for a Sustainable Built Construction projects: The case of Jordon”, International Journal of
Environment, Pretoria, 2000 Project Management 26, 2008
[30] T.C.Formoso, M.L.Soibelman, D.C.Cesare and E.L. Isatto, “Material [52] F. D. K. Fugar and A.B. Agyakwah-Baah, “Delays in Building
waste in building industry: Main causes and prevention”. Journal of Construction Projects in Ghana”, Australasian Journal of Construction
Construction Engineering and Management, 128 (4), 2002 Economics and Building, Vol 10, No 1, 2010
[31] S. Senaratne and D.Wijesiri, “Lean ,Construction as a Strategic Option: [53] S. O.Ogunlana and K.Promkuntong, “Construction delays in a fast-
Testing its Suitability and Acceptability in Sri Lanka” Lean Construction growing economy: Comparing Thailland with other economies”
Journal, 2008 International Journal of Project Management 14 (1), 1996
[32] C.S.Poon, T.W.Y.Ann and L. Jaillon, “Reducing building waste at [54] N. R.Mansfield, O.O.Ugwu and T.Doran, “Causes of delay and cost
construction sites in Hong Kong”. Journal of Construction Management overruns in Nigerian construction Projects”. International Journal of
and Economics, 22, 2004 Project management 12 (4), 1994
[33] L. G.Garas, R. A.Anis and E. A.Gammal, “Material Waste in the [55] K. Yogeswaran, M. Kumaraswamy and D. Miller, “Claims for extension
Egyptian Construction Industry”, Proceedings of the 9th Annual of time in civil engineering projects”. Construction Management and
Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, National Economics, 16(3), 1998
University of Singapore, 2001 [56] N. Azhar, R.U. Farooqui and S.M. Ahmed, “Cost overrun factors in
[34] Wahab and Lawal, “An evaluation of waste control measures in construction industry in Pakistan”. Proceeding of first international
construction industry in Nigeria”, African Journal of Environmental conference on construction in developing countries (ICCIDE-1),
Science & Technology Vol. 5(3), 2011 Karachi, Pakistan, 4-5 August, 2008
[35] D.Rodman and N. Lenssen, “Our buildings, ourselves”. World Watch, [57] S.Jackson, “Project cost overrun and risk management”. In Greenwood,
7(6), 1994 D. (Ed.) Proceedings of Association of Researchers in Construction
[36] L.Y.Shen and W.Y.Tam, “Implementation of environmental Management 18th Annual ARCOM Conference, Newcastle,
management in the Hong Kong construction industry”, International Northumber University, UK, 2-4 September, 2002
Journal of Project Management 20, 2002 [58] B. Flyvbjerg, M. Holm and S. Buhl, “How common and how large are
[37] B. Edwards, “Rough Guide to Sustainability”, RIBA Publications, cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects? Transport Reviews,
London, 2001 23(1), 2003
[38] CIB Agenda 21 on sustainable construction (July, 1999), CIB Report [59] R. Nikić, “Construction Project Risk Management in a Transition
Publication 237, Rotterdam, the Netherlands : International Council for Country”, master's thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of
Building Research Studies and Documentation, 1999 Zagreb, Zagreb, 1998.
[39] K.L.Chan, “Environmental Awareness: Communicating Needs and [60] A.H.Memon, I.Abdul Rahman, A.A.Abdul Aziz, K. Ravish and
Requirements for the Construction Sector, Building Journal Hong N.I.Mohammad Hanas, “Identifying Construction Resource Factors
Kong”, Paper presented at The 9th Annual Business & Industry Affecting Construction Cost: Case of Johor”, Malaysian Technical
Environment Conference, 2000 Universities International Conference on Engineering & Technology
(MUiCET), 2011
[40] Kin-sun, T Sustainable construction in Hong Kong, 2004
[61] A.H.Memon, I. Abdul Rahman, M.R.Abdullah adnd A.A.Abdul Aziz,
[41] L. Le-Hoai, Y.D.Lee and J.Y.Lee, “Delay and Cost Overruns in Vietnam
“Factors Affecting Construction Cost in MARA Large Construction
Large Construction Projects: A Comparison with Other Selected
Projects: Perspective of Project Management Consultants” International
Countries”. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 12(6), 2008
Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, Vol. 1
[42] O.O.Amu and D.A.Adesanya, “Mathematical Expressions for (2), 2010
Explaining Project Delays in South western Nigeria”. Singapore Journal
of Scientific Research 1 (1), 2011

632
[62] O. J.Ameh, A.A.Soyingbe and K.T.Odusami, “Significant factors [65] S. A.Ali and Kamaruzzaman, “Cost performance for building
causing cost overruns in Telecommunication projects in Nigeria”. construction projects in Klang Vally", Journal of Building performance,
Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, Vol. 15, 2010 Vol 1, 2010
[63] O. Jackson and O. Steven, “Management of Cost Overrun in Selected [66] C. Kaliba, M. Muya and K. Mumba, “Cost escalation and schedule
Building Construction Project in ILOZRIN”. Review of Business and delays in road construction projects in Zambia”. International Journal of
Finance, Volume 3 (1), 2001 Project Management, 27, 2009
[64] P.F.Kaming, P.O.Olomolaiye, G.D. Holt and F.C.Harris, “Factors [67] A. Enshassi, J. Al-Najjar and M. Kumaraswamy, “Delays and cost
influencing construction time and cost overruns on high-rise projects in overruns in the construction projects in the Gaza Strip”. Journal of
Indonesia”, Journal of Construction Management and Economics, Financial Management of Property and Construction 14 (2), 2009
Volume 15 (1), 1997 [68] Taylor and P. Wilkie, “Briefing: Sustainable construction through
improved information flows,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil
Engineers in Engineering Sustainability 161 Issue ES4, 2008

633

View publication stats

S-ar putea să vă placă și