Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
To cite this article: M.E. ABOU-EL-HASSAN (1983): A GENERALIZED BUBBLE RISE VELOCITY CORRELATION, Chemical Engineering
Communications, 22:3-4, 243-250
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to
anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents
will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should
be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims,
proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in
connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Chem. Eng. Commun. Vol. 22 pp. 243-250 Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, Inc., 1983
0098-6445/83/2203-0243SI8.50/0 Printed in the U.S.A.
A generalized bubble rise velocity correlation is developed to cover the range of conditions:
Downloaded by [University of Stellenbosch] at 17:00 01 May 2013
Previous studies 1 - lion the motion of single gas bubbles in liquids were inclined to
correlate the dala as drag coefficient (CD) versus Reynolds number (Re). Comparison
with solid sphere behaviour, Figure I, indicates that the drag coefficient and Reynolds
number may not be the best correlating parameters. To develop a generalized
correlation for bubble rise velocity the effect of the interaction of the forces: buoyancy,
viscous, inertial and interfacial tension must be included in the correlating parameters.
The direct use of the simple parameters like: density (p), density difference (L1p),
viscosity (Il), equivalent spherical diameter (d), gravity (g), and velocity (u), will lead to
the drag coefficient (CD) and the Reynolds number (Re).
Since it is common to use dimensionless parameters as force ratios, e.g. Reynolds
number is the ratio of inertial to viscous forces, and since the buoyancy force is the only
force responsible about bubble (drop or solid bodies) motion in fluids, therefore
the following force ratios will be considered: (Buoyancy/Viscous), (Buoyancy/Inertia),
and (Buoyancy/Interfacial Tension). As a result of force interaction a measure of
interaction may be taken as the geometric mean of the above three ratios, i.e.
((Buoyancy/Viscous) (Buoyancy/Inertia) (Buoyancy/Interfacial Tension))1/3 and in
equation form it is:
(g(L1p)d S / 3/ u(Plla )' /3) (I)
In order to select the basic parameters associated with bubble motion, the work
appeared in the literature was examined and the following parameters seemed to be
reasonable:
I-the bubble equivalent spherical diameter (d),
2-the kinematic viscosity of the continuous liquid phase (v),
3-a proposed physical parameter (aIl 2 ) developed from the Mendelson wave
analogy 12 and Stokes law of settling to include the interaction of the effect of
interfacial tension (a) and viscosity (Il) at the upper and lower limits of Reynolds
number.
Downloaded by [University of Stellenbosch] at 17:00 01 May 2013
100 i ""'" i i i i I
'\., , ~
-I>-
'\.',
'..........
.....' So r .
...... /0'
(3)
and
(4)
The developed flow and velocity numbers may be written in terms of bubble
Reynolds number (Re), drag coefficient (CD) and the term of interaction (Equation (I))
as:
F = Re(Interaction Term, Equation (I)) (5)
and
v= (4/3C DHInleraction Term, Equation (I)) (6)
where: Re = (pud/Il), and CD = (4gdlip/3pu 2 )
The flow and velocity numbers were calculated from the data of the literature' -II)
for the ranges:
Liquid phase density (p) = 45.1 - 74.7Ib/ft 3,
Liquid phase viscosity (11) = 0.233 .- 59 centiPoise,
Interfacial tension (c) = 15 - 72 dynes/em.
The gas phase is air and the bubble size ranged from 1.2 to 15 mm, the bubble shape is:
spherical, oblate spheroids, and mushroom-like with spherical cap. The bubble size
(diameter) is taken as the equivalent spherical diameter (d = ((6/n) (bubble volume))'!3.
The results are plotted on a log-log pa per, Figure 2, and the data fall on a single curve.
The analytical form of a generalized correlation, Figure 3, is:
v = 0.75 (log F)2 (7)
for the above range of physical parameters t p.u,«, and d) and for: Re = 0.1 - 104 ,
CD = 0.1 - 102 , F = I - 106 , and V,= 0.1 - 40.
The above treatment, although originated from a trial-and-error procedure, was
successful to correlate:':'
I-Settling of solid spheres in Newtonian fluids,
2- Drop motion in liquids and gases,
3-Pipeline flow,
4- Flow of single-phase, Newtonian fluids in porous media,
Downloaded by [University of Stellenbosch] at 17:00 01 May 2013
100 I I I I I I
BUBBLE RISE VELOCITY 247
100
80
V 0.7S110g F}2
20
Ran g es ;
Downloaded by [University of Stellenbosch] at 17:00 01 May 2013
10 3
jJ = 4S.1 - 71..7 lb/ft
8 )l = 0.233 - S9 c.P.
()'= IS - 72 dyne/cm
6 Re = 0.1 - 10000
CO= 0.1 - 100
I. 6
F 1 - 10
IV) V-0.l-1.0
Where
.P = liquid d en s i ty
0.1.
u = liquid viscosity
...sr: ~ interfacial
tension
Re= Reynolds number of
single bubble
0.2 Drag coefficient of
single bubble
F bubble f I ow number
V bubble velocity No·
0.1
0.1 0.2 0.1. 0.6 1 I. 6 8 10 20
110g F J
The exponent (n) may be regarded as an index for flow regime, e.g. if /1 = I, this
corresponds to the laminar (viscous) regime where the effect of viscosity is appreciable
and of interfacial tension is negligible, and Equation (II) reduces to Stokes law of
settling. If n = 0.25, this corresponds to the turbulent regime where the effect of
viscosity becomes negligible, and Equation (II) becomes:
(12)
BUBBLE RISE VELOCITY 249
If n = 0.4375, i.e. an intermediate value between I and 0.25, this corresponds to a
transition regime, where equation (II) gives that: UCI)jd, a result in agreement with
Haberman and Morton," Maneri and Mendelson," Davidson,' S also predictable from
the Mendelson wave analogy'? and the Davis-Taylor theory.!"
To compare with results of air bubble motion in non-Newtonian (pseudo-
plastic) fluids, 17 Equation (II) may be used and the viscosity (Il) is replaced by:
K F(n')(u/ d)n'- I, where: K is the consistency, n' is the pseudo plasticity index, and F(n')
is a correction term. Equation (II) is then rearranged to give:
3" -(4"-1) -(n-l)
LlCI)(y!J.p)J+14n 1)ln' LI(KF(n'»)J+14n l)(n' II (0")3+(4n I)(n' I)
Downloaded by [University of Stellenbosch] at 17:00 01 May 2013
2("-1) (4n-l)("'+I)
(p)J+14n 1)('" I) (d)J+(4n I)(n' I) (13)
If n' = I, Equation (13) reduces to Equation (II) applicable for bubble motion in
Newtonian fluids.
If II' = 1, Equation (13) becomes:
1 -1 (n'+ 1)
uoo(g!J.p);;' (KF(n'»)7 (dl-n-' (14)
Equation (14) when rearranged reduces to the Stokes drag formula for the non-
Newtonian fluid behaviour, i.e. CDoo F(n')(pu 2 -n'd n'!K).
At large Reynolds numbers the bubble velocity (u) becomes less sensitive to
fluid rheology and for II' = 0.4375, and I ;;. II' ;;. 0.5, Equation (13) gives: uooJYci,
approximately, a result supported by the Mendelson wave analogy,'? and the
Davis-Taylor theory.!"
CONCLUSION
LITERATURE CITED
1. O'Brient, M.P., and Gosline, J.E.. Ind. Eng. Chem., 27, 1436 (1935).
2. Bryn, T., Forsch. Gebiete lngenieurw., 4, No.1, 27 (1933).
3. Rosenberg, B., Navy Department Report 727 (1950).
4. Peebtes, F.N., and Garber, H.J.• Chem. Eng. Progress, 49, 88 (1953).
5. Datta, R.L., Napier, D.H., and Newitt, D.M., Trans. Insrn. Chem. Engrs. (London), 28, 3 (1950).
6. Kojima, E., Akehata, T., and Shirai, T., J. Chem. Eng. Japan, 1,45 (1968).
7. Haberman. W.L., and Morton, R.K.• Trans, Am. Soc. Civil Engrs., 121, 227 (1956).
8. Maneri, c.c, and Mendetson, H.D., A.I.Ch.E.J., 14,295 (1968).
9. Davenport, W.G., Richardson, F.D., and Bradshaw, A.V., Chem. Eng. Sci., 22,1221 (t967).
to. Grace, J.R., Trans, lnstn. Chem. Engrs. (Lo"don), 51, 116 (1973).
t 1. Clift, R., Grace, J.R., and Weber, M.E., "Bubbles, Drops and Particles", Academic Press. N,Y. (t978).
t 2. Mendelson, H.D., A.I.Ch.E.J., 13,250 (1967).
250 M.E. ABOU-EL-HASSAN
13. Abou-El-Hassan, M.E., The First Conference on Applied Modelling and Simulation (AMSE), Lyon,
France, Sept. (1981).
14. Abou-El-Hassan, M.E., Unpublished work (in progress).
15. Davidson, J.F., Trans, lnsin. Chern. Enqrs. (London), 39, 230 (1961).
16. Davis, R.M., and Taylor, G.I., Proc. Roy. Soc.. A 200, 375 (1950).
17. Acharya, A., Mashelkar. R.A., and Ulbrecht, J., Chern. Eng. Sci., 32, 863 (1977).
Downloaded by [University of Stellenbosch] at 17:00 01 May 2013