Sunteți pe pagina 1din 1

Rubric for Written Report

Criterion 4 (Excellent) 3 (Good) 2 (Marginal) 1 (Inadequate)


Title of the experiment  Title completely and clearly  Title incomplete but clearly  Title incomplete and somewhat  Title incomplete and does not
(and the authors) describes the experiment describes the experiment describes the experiment clearly describe the experiment
Abstract(Short statement  Proper content and well  Have some errors  Not well constructed abstract  Lacks proper content and
of the problem, short constructed abstract  Problem properly explained  Problem somewhat unclear construction
description of the  Problem properly explained  Shows only the essence of the  Shows confused description of  Problem was not stated
procedure and results  Shows only the essence of the procedure and result the procedure and result  Does not show the essence of
obtained) procedure and result the procedure and result
Background information  Well constructed and coherent  Coherent content but with some  Not well constructed with  Lacks content and poor
about the experiment content relevant to the experiment errors in the construction incomplete content construction
Objective and  Shows advanced understanding of  Shows basic understanding of  Shows confused  Does not understand principles
significance of the principles principles understanding of principles involved
experiment  Scientifically rigorous and well  Well researched  Poorly researched  No evidence of research
researched  Most figures / tables taken from  Some figures/tables taken  Figures/tables taken from
 All figures/tables taken from references are properly from references are properly references are not properly
references are properly acknowledged acknowledged acknowledged
acknowledged  Objectives clearly stated  Objectives unclear  Objectives not stated
 Objectives clearly stated  Significance clearly stated  Significance somewhat unclear  Does not understand
 Significance clearly stated significance of work
Procedure is the Detailed  Well constructed procedure  Have some errors in the  Not well constructed  Badly constructed procedure
description of the actual  Shows advanced understanding of construction  Shows confused  Does not understand the
procedure performed. the experimental procedure  Shows basic understanding of the understanding of the experimental procedure
Written in paragraph  Complete and correct set up experimental procedure experimental procedure  Wrong set up or no set up
form, third person, past illustration including proper labels  Set up illustration with minor  Incomplete set up illustration illustration
passive voice. Illustration errors
of set up (if applicable).
Use of Tables, Graphs,  Data and results are summarized  Figures/tables not properly  Figures/tables with no labels  No figures/tables shown
Figures to show / in figures/tables and are properly labeled  Data and results stated but  Does not understand result or
summarize Results. labeled  Limited evaluation of data and not critically evaluated recognize its implications
Discussion  Critically evaluates data and results  Discrepancies are analyzed  Discrepancies are not analyzed
(Interpretation and results  Discrepancies of results are poorly and given a general
analysis of data)  Discrepancies of results are analyzed poorly and given a reason
Analysis of errors (if analyzed properly and given a specific reason
applicable) specific reason
The conclusion answer  Well constructed conclusion and  Have some errors  NOT well constructed  Conclusion has no basis and
the objectives based on the data and discussion  Recommendation has a sound  Recommendation is baseless does not answer the objectives
Recommendation to  Recommendation has a sound scientific basis but impractical and impractical  No recommendation at all
minimize or prevent scientific basis and feasible  References written in alphabetical  References written in  References not written in
errors  References written in alphabetical order alphabetical order alphabetical order
References written in order  Some journals used as reference  No journal used as reference  No journal used as reference
proper format (APA)  Majority of references comprised  Books published after 2000  Some books published before  Some books published before
of journals  URL comprise only 1/3 2000 2000
 Books published after 2000  No encyclopedia/dictionary  URL comprise more than1/3  URL comprise more than1/3
 URL comprise only 1/3  Lab manual not used as reference  With encyclopedia/dictionary  With encyclopedia/dictionary
 No encyclopedia/dictionary  Lab manual used as reference  Lab manual used as reference
 Lab manual not used as reference

S-ar putea să vă placă și