RUBRIC IN SCORING STUDENT TEACHING PORTFOLIO

Student Teacher:_____________________________________ Date & Time: ________________

School: ____________________________________________ Year/Grade Level: ____________
Evaluator:__________________________________________ Subject: ____________________

Note to the Evaluator: Please check (/) the indicators that you observe in the first column; if not observed, put a cross (x)
mark. Then write on the evaluator’s column the corresponding performance level of the student teacher being observed
based on the descriptions given.

There are generally five (levels describing performance in each of the dimensions, namely: 5- exceeds expectations; 4-
meets expectations; 3- in progress; 2- novice; and 1- poor.

First Dimension: VISUAL APPEAL (20%)

In this dimension, students are expected to show creativity and resourcefulness in developing their portfolio.
Present
Indicators
/ Performance Level Score
The student teacher…
Absent
( )  The cover is durable and is expected to last long for the future reference of the 5- Satisfies all the indicators
student-owner of the portfolio. 4- fails to satisfy only 1 of the
indicators
( )  The lay-out of the portfolio shows:
a. simplicity; 3- fails to satisfy 2 of the
indicators
( ) b. neatness;
c. enthusiasm; 2- to satisfy 3 of the indicators
( ) d. creativity (i.e., the output is done uniquely and with style); and
e. resourcefulness (i.e., recycled materials). 1- fails to satisfy more than 3
( )  Others: of the indicators

Second Dimension: ORGANIZATION (20%)

Present
Indicators
/ Performance Level Score
The student teacher…
Absent
( )  The entries are arranged in order (i.e., entries flow from introduction, to the 5- Satisfies all 10 the
body, to concluding words of the portfolio owner). indicators

( )  The student used color/symbol code which guides the readers makes sense of 4- fails to satisfy only 2-3 of
the content. the indicators

( )  There is a table of contents. 3- fails to satisfy 4-5 of the

indicators
( )  The entries are all legible.
2- to satisfy 5-6 of the
( )  All entries manifest correct use of English language indicators
a. free from grammatical flaws 1- fails to satisfy more than 6
of the indicators
b. correct choice of words

c. shows unity and coherence of thoughts and ideas

d. utilizes transitional devices to shift from one line of thought to another

( )  Over-all the portfolio is well-organized and has a clear focus.

( )  Others:

Third Dimension: CONTENT (35%)

Present
Indicators
/ Performance Level Score
The student teacher…
Absent
( )  All basic, pre-agreed contents are contained in the portfolio. 5- Satisfies all 10 the
indicators
( )  Activities are evidenced/supported by pictures, certificates, among others, (if
necessary). 4- fails to satisfy only 2-3 of
the indicators
( )  The introduction contains a statement of purpose.

( )  The entries are varied and capture the entirety of students’ teaching experience. 3- fails to satisfy 4-5 of the
indicators
( )  All entries are complete and comprehensive. 2- to satisfy 5-6 of the
indicators
( )  The entries reflect the student teacher’s use of resources and materials.
1- fails to satisfy more than 6
( )  Others: of the indicators

Fourth Dimension: REFLECTIONS (25%)

Present
Indicators
/ Performance Level Score
The student teacher…
Absent
( )  Display evidence of self-assessment. 5- Satisfies all the indicators

( )  The entries are futuristic (i.e., the student indicates the area where he/she can 4- fails to satisfy only 1 of the
still improve on the basis of past experiences). indicators
3- fails to satisfy 2 of the
( )  Entries identified the competencies where the student finds himself/herself indicators
strong at; and areas where he/she needs improvement.
2- to satisfy 3 of the indicators
( )  The entries are scholarly (i.e., reflections are anchored on sound theoretical
constructs/bases which guide the student’s teaching behavior and total 1- fails to satisfy more than 3
performance) of the indicators
( )  The reflections show student’s depth of understanding of his/her
duties/responsibilities and experiences as a student teacher.

( )  The reflections provide evidence/s of enthusiasm, creativity, extensive

investigation, and analysis of information.

Key Strengths:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Areas for Improvement: -

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Scoring Procedure: Below are the steps in grading the portfolio using the rubric.

1. In evaluating the student’s performance against the set of criteria articulated in this rubric, the evaluator is expected to be very
objective by going through each item in every dimension and identify if the said item is clearly observed.

2. To determine the grade for each dimension, count the number of items with X mark and identify the performance level
corresponding to the score. Indicate in the matrix below are the corresponding scores for the dimension. Take note that the highest
score is 5 while the lowest is 1. Transmute the dimension scores by referring to the table below in order to determine the equivalent
rating.

Equivalent Rating
Rubric Score
(in percent)
5- exceeds expectation 95
4- meets expectation 85
3- in progress 75
2- novice 65
1- poor 55

3. Take note that there is a corresponding percentage for every dimension. Multiply the percentage rating score by the weight of the
dimension. Add all the weighted ratings to get the over-all rating.

Grade Computation
Dimension Equivalent Rating Weighted Rating
Weight Raw Score
(in %) (in %)
1. Visual appeal 0.20

2. Organization 0.20

3. Content 0.35

4. Reflection 0.25

Total 1.00
Rated by:

_____________________________ ____________________
Name and Signature of Evaluator Date