Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
_____________________________,
VICENTA JADMAN
Defendant.
x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
RESPONSE
(SAGOT)
Defendant/s state/s:
(c) If it is the plaintiff who owes defendant money, how much and when
did this happen?
(Kung ang Naghahabla ang siyang may utang na salapi sa
Hinahabla, magkano at kailan ito nangyari?)
_________________________________________________.
_________________________________________________. If
no specific date, estimate the time period:
(Kung walang tiyak na petsa, ibigay ang tantiyang panahon)
Date started _______________
(Petsa nagsimula)
Through__________________
(Hanggang)
(d) How did you compute the money owed you? (Do not include court
costs or fees for service.)
(Paano mo kinuwenta ang salaping pagkakautang sa iyo?) (Huwag
isama ang filing fees at bayad sa serbisyo.)
_________________________________________________.
The plaintiff demanded the total amount of Php 234, 354. 66. But plaintiff erroneously included in my account the
amount of Php 22,329.46 under Invoice No. N054018736 and Php 50, 100 under Invoice No. N054019161. Further,
_________________________________________________.
the signature appearing in the said invoice (marked as Annex “B” and “B-8” for plaintiff ) does not belong to
Evelyn Macanas, the authorized signatory. Hence, the said amount were deducted to the total claim of plaintiff.
2. If plaintiff owes you money, did you ask plaintiff to pay you?
(Kung ang Naghahabla ay siyang may pagkakautang sa iyo, siningil mo
ba siya?)
If yes, how?
(Kung oo, paano?)
____ In person ____ Others (specify) ___________
(Sa kanya mismo) (Iba pa) [ano ito?]
____ In writing
(Sa sulat)
____ By phone
(Sa telepono)
____ Actual Damages for the value of the loss suffered by the filing of
the case P _______________.
(Bayad para sa aktwal na pinsalang idinulot ng pagsampa ng
kaso)
VICENTA L. JADMAN
________________________
DEFENDANT
(Hinahabla)
VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION AGAINST NON-FORUM
SHOPPING, SPLITTING A SINGLE CAUSE OF ACTION AND
MULTIPLICITY OF SUITS
(if with permissive counterclaim)