Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PHILIPPINES NATIONAL
CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
BRANCH 49, CITY OF MAKATI
Exhibit “2‐B” Demand dated 15 May 2005 This is to serve as proof of demand
letter sent by Plaintiff HTI’s counsel on the defendant’s obligation under
and was duly received by the the above‐mentioned promissory
defendant. note.
Exhibit “3” Promissory dated 16 June Such promissory note will be used
Note 2005 in the amount of as evidence of the indebtedness of
Seven Hundred Fifty herein defendant Mr. William Toh
Thousand Pesos Go.
(P750,000.00)
Exhibit “3‐A” Signature of r. William Toh Go In order to thenticate and
M fully au affirm the execution and handwriting
of the defendant in the aforesaid
promissory note.
Exhibit “4” Final demand ter dated 15 This is to serve as a proof of the
let December 2005 on all the final demand before resort to court
promissory notes issued by action was made.
the defendant.
Exhibit “5” Registry Card addressed to This will show that service of
Return Defendant William Toh summons was duly served upon
Go. the defendant.
Exhibit “6‐A” Registry card indicating This will be used to indicate the
return that such letter was duly received authenticity of the letter received by
by the corporate secretary of the Plaintiff.
HTI.
WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that the foregoing exhibits presented during the
PAGE 3
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES )
CITY OF DAVAO ) S.S.
PAGE 4