Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Jianjun Yao
In his graduate thesis, Jianjun Yao explores the difference in the United States media’s portrayal
of countries prior to and after hosting the Olympic Games. Yao compared the media coverage of
four different Olympic Games: Moscow, Seoul, Barcelona, and Beijing. The media outlets he
reviewed publications from were the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and the
Washington Post. His overall conclusion is that media in which the host countries were
negatively portrayed decreased after they hosted the Olympics. Additionally, he noticed a
correlation between countries hosting the Olympics and a rise in positive media coverage
regarding the nations. This is significant to my research question because it shows how media
coverage prior to, during, and after the Olympic Games can change drastically. The general U.S.
population may shift their views regarding other countries after being exposed to the news that
This study focused on how media coverage within an Olympic host nation influenced the
population. This data was collected by surveying people who lived in London when it hosted the
2012 Olympics. The authors of this article found that there was an increase in nationalism
displayed by the people who were surveyed. It was determined that the media coverage was a
major factor in this change. This is relevant to my topic because a spike in nationalism could
cause citizens to have increasingly positive views of their own country and potentially more
negative ones of others. While my question addresses how nations view one another, I think that
this source gives an interesting perspective about how the media coverage can alter the public’s
Kaori Hayashi
In this source, Kaori Hayashi explores how media coverage of the 2012 London Olympics
differed between five world nations: China, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the
United States. Hayashi determined that each country’s media had a distinct attitude. While some
countries were very political, others took a more nationalistic approach. I thought that this
information was very relevant to me because it highlights how a person’s perception of the
Olympics and the participating countries can be influenced by the media. The fact that there is
data that explains how reporting can vary country to country is extremely significant. This shows
that there is often bias in the media and that very rarely it is something that remains totally
objective.
Andrew K. Rose
This source examines the impact that hosting a major sports event has on a nation’s economy and
its international relations. Rose goes beyond just the Olympics, discussing different types of
major sports events and how they stimulate development and trade within a country. He explains
that countries often need to advance their infrastructure when they sign on to host one of these
events. Nations agree to take on this initial burden because of the money the event itself will
bring, as well as the potential to show other nations that they are ready to become more advanced
and successful. The information in this source is relevant because it gives insight to the financial
aspect of hosting events such as the Olympics. The perceived economic success of a country can
Did the Olympics Help the Nation Branding of China? Comparing Public Perception of
China with the Olympics Before and After the 2008 Beijing Olympics in Hong Kong
In this article, Annisa Lai Lee focuses specifically on the 2008 Olympic games and how it
altered the Hong Kong population’s opinions regarding China. While Hong Kong is technically a
part of China, it is also considered to be an independent entity. As a result, the people of Hong
Kong have a unique national identity. As a result, this study provides an interesting perspective
into how the Olympics can have a major impact on people’s perception of a country. Lee
compared data from an initial 2005 survey with data from a survey taken one year after the
Olympics in 2009 to find a difference in Hong Kong’s views of China. Lee’s data concluded that
China’s image improved in the eyes of the people after the Olympics. This is important to my
research because it supports the claim that the Olympics can increase nationalism and support for
the host nation from both within and outside of the country. Ultimately, this research shows how
influential the publicity and press regarding the Olympics can be.