Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
positioned pedicle groft," and the seems that areas of gingival reces-
double popilla graft,^ sion often occur ad¡acent to areas of
It is nat within our scope to review the thin gingiva and bane or perhaps a
mony excellent publicotions dealing dehiscence. Therefore, the laterally
with mucogingival procedures; much positioned flap has its limitations
is not germane to root coverage, arising from inadequate donor
hlowever, various orticles have dealt areas, and one must be selective in
specifically with root exposure. performing the procedure for root
coverage.
Suturing
^ ~ \/ \ r ^
We prefer silk suture material with a
tapered otraumatic needle (Ethicon
5-0 N266H).* It is also beneficial to
have a proper needle holder such as
—N
G curved Costroviego instrument.'*
The initial suture is olways the hori-
zontal cantinucus suture and is
placed approximately midway
carono-apically across the graft.
First, the graft is tied at its distal mar- AG
gin to the underlying periosteum. The
suture is not cut, but is carried an- PB ^
teriorly across the graft with the
needle passing through the mesial
margin of the graft and exiting ot its
undersurface. It is helpful to use a
Corn suture plier for stabilizing the
graft so thot the suture can pass Fig 7 The harizantal continuous suture. The gralt is tied al its distal margin. The suture extends -.the
body ol the gralt, passes through the wesiaf balder al the grah and eats ¡ram its undersurface. A la .
through it. Slack is left in the portion remQj'ns in the suture extending across the graft. The suture then passes through the periosteal bed ap-
of the suture that extends across the proximately 2-3 mm mesial ta ihe border ol the graft. The gralt can now be stretched when the loop is tied
to the suture tail. a. Suture loop; b: suture tail; PB: periosteal bed; AC: attached gingiva; C: groft.
body of the graft. Next, it is important
that the needle enter the periosteum
at a sufficient distance from the me-
sial border of the groft sa that the
graft can be stretched adequotely,
ordinorily 2-3 mm. The suture end
that has exited from the periosteum is
tied to the loop formed by the slack
(Fig. 7). The horizontal suture should
be tested for tension with o curette or
similar instrument.
through the periosteum in the depths and the variety of sutures used. This more favarable contact of graft to re-
of the inferdentol concavity unless case is typical of many in which the cipient bed relatianship.
the curvature of the needle is re- suturing is designed at the time of When a graft is sutured only at its
duced. The curved Castroviego surgery to sotisfy the circumstances coronal border in a conventianol
needle holder olso will aid the clini- dictated by the existing onotomy. manner for purposes of increasing
cian in this endeavor. In many in- Coronal marginal sutures are evi- the width of attached gingiva, the
stances, the circumferential and in- dent on the mesial ond distal exten- graft lies in close contact with the
terdental concavity sutures have sions of the graft. A circumferential prominent periasteal bed over the
odapted the coronal marginal tissue suture is present on both canine and raot (Fig. 12|. This factor may be the
and there is no need for a coronal premolar, with an interdental con- prime reason for the survival of many
suture; here, there are only two covity suture on the mesiol of the such grafts. When a graft is placed
needle punctures or holes in the canine. A vertical suture has been in- over a denuded raot, obviously it will
graft. FHowever, if the coronol mar- serted in the interdental concavity be dependent on peripheral sources
gins of the graft are not adapted in between the twa teeth; it loops far its survival. Suturing then be-
the interdental orea, a coronal suture around both teeth and is tied on the comes critical, as the graft must be
can be placed. As a final procedure, buccal. The graft is placed coronally thoroughly odapted to the topog-
one should examine the position and at or neor the cementaenamel ¡unc- raphy of the recipient site ¡Fig. 12a).
tension of all sutures. tion. A four-month postoperative When the coronally sutured graft is
view shows the gingival margin at placed far the purpose of increasing
the level of the cementoenamel ¡unc- the width of attached gingiva, it is the
Application of Suturing Principles tion (Fig. 11 c). The sulcus depth is no convexities that supply the primary
more than 1 mm. nourishment for its survival. How-
A final clinical example demonstrates ever, the concavities supply much of
the suturing procedures ad- the vitality for the gingival graft over
vocated in a difficult situotion. Figure Considerations for Graft Adaptation the denuded root.
11 reveals recession of 3 mm on a
mandibular canine and 4 mm on a It is currently common practice to su- After observing the anatomical to-
first premolar. Notice the promi- ture grafts at their coronal border pography of a cansiderable number
nence of these two teeth as they re- and avoid suturing at their base. The of prepared beds and denuded raot
late to the arch and the concommit- contention is that the centrol area of surfaces, one factar seems rather
ant undulated, washboard effect of the graft retains blood when apical obvious - dead spaces and
the existing gingiva. A two-stage sutures are used. Furthermore, it is hematamas beneath grofts with cor-
procedure with a coranally believed that a dead space is likely anal sutures connot be eliminated by
pasitioned graft could have been at- to result under these circumstances finger pressure techniques in an at-
tempted, but the procedure is less and the groft may become necrotic tempt to express pooled blood and
likely to succeed on the mandibulor from lack of nutritional support. Still adapt the graft properly. While
arch. Experience indicotes that the other clinicians object to apical su- methods of graft suturing for root
graft is difficult to position coronally tures thot oilow movement of the fa- coverage may not need fo be identi-
at the cementoenamel junction on cial musculature to sever or damage cal with those advocated here, it
mandibular onterior areas, ond thot minute capillaries that have invaded would seem that various methods of
much of the graft may be lost in the the graft from the adjocent tissue A graft adaptation that give adequate
process. The bed was prepared as common approach today is to keep cansideration to the anatomy of the
shown (Fig. 1 la). Now 4 mm of ex- suturing simple and minimal. recipient site are necessary.
posed root is present on the cuspid itvingslone}^ concerned with graft
and 5.5 mm exists on the first premo- adoptation, contoured the connec-
lar. The root surfaces have been tive tissue aspect of the graft by Graft Thickness
planed vigorously with a chisel. Fig- creoting concavities ta prevent dead
The thickness of a graft and its influ-
ure l i b illustrates the sutured graft spaces. The concavities produced a
ence an clinical results has been a
Fig. ¡ la Recession involving the mandibular cuspid and firs' premoia Fig. I ¡b The penosteal bed hos been prepared ond Ihcrc n now -1 mm
with praminent roats and thm periodontium. Rolled gingival margins ar of exposed raot an the cuspid and 5.5 mm an the lirst premalar. Note the
evident with an undulated surface lapagtophy. mesiodistal dimension o ' (he raot at Ihe cementaenumel ¡unction af the
first premolar with its pronounced canvexity.
topic of interest for some time. In this Saehren, Allen, Outright and as previously mentioned, owing to
regard, a recent and interesting pub- Selbeti^^ have stated that palatal their anatomical circumstances.
lication by Mormann, Schaer, and epithelium ronges from 0.1 to 0.6 mm Another factor related to groft shrink-
Firestone^^ reports findings with an- in thickness. A graft approximating oge is the beveled margin produced
giogropfiic studies ond graft thick- 1,5 mm thickness seems to have an by various instruments designed to
ness. The current attitude about graft adequate dimension of lamina prop- remove the graft. As discussed previ-
thickness seems to be that the thin rio, ond has been found by the ously, a properly designed graft
graft has less contraction of its capil- authors to have the best survivol rote should be uniform in thickness with its
laries and will revascularize faster over o denuded roat, margins at right ongles to the surface
than a thick graft. Furthermore, Gar- A gingivoi groft with a thickness in epithelium.
giulo ond Arracha indicóte that the the ronge of 1,5 mm creates a rela-
thin graft is more receptive to the dif- tively thick tissue over the root where
fusion of fluids during the critical in many instances a thin gingiva had Fatty Tissue and the Graft
periad of the first 48 hours when the previously existed. Clinical observa- Consideroble emphasis has been
graft is sustained primorily by the tion of grafts aver denuded roots in- placed on the importance of remov-
exúdate of red blood cells, leuko- dicates that they survive fairly well ing any fatty or glondular sub-
cytes, and plasma cells,^* As o thin even after continual use of less than mucosal tissue from the graft, Sulli-
groft is theoretically supposed to sur- ideal toothbrushes by the patient. van and Atkins stated that if this fat is
vive longer without circulation, it Graft potients and porticularly young inadvertently included in the palatol
would seem logicol to choose the individuals, usually have additional graft, it will act as a borrier both to
thin graft where circumstances for areas of thin gingiva over roots that difussion and vascularization and
survivol ore difficult. are candidotes for root exposure therefore should be removed.^"^^ ^'
Grafts of varying thicknesses hove ond may require periodic monitor- Recently, Corn and Marks expressed
been placed over denuded roots by ing. With this type of clinical patient support of this common belief. They
a standardized method of suturing, in mind it seems that groft potients as hove stated, "when the dissection
as described in this paper. It was well as others with thin, frioble gin- (sic, donor tissue) involves the
noted that grafts in the 0,5-0.75 mm giva should receive a brush with the odipose and glandular zones, it is
range have a high mortality rate. least abrasive bristle,* Clinical ob- necessary to dissect these tissues
While grofts of this thickness obvi- servations has indicoted thot 0.007 away from the groft, leaving the
ously survive very well when sutured diameter nylon bristle is less abrasive inner surface as smooth as possi-
over a bed of periosteum-connective than the more commonly used 0,008 ble.'"'^ A different point af view has
tissue, they frequently sloughed diameter bristle ossuming that both been recently expressed by Gront.'^
when placed over a denuded root. have rounded polished ends. In uncompleted studies, he found
Contrary to common belief, the
that fatty tissue in the donor seg-
thicker graft of approximately 1,5
ments survived tronsplontation.
mm will survive very well, especiolly
Graft Shrinkage Furthermore, he has noted an
if the bed is relatively flat. This thicker
odequate even abundant circulation
graft is technicolly more difficult to Graft shrinkoge ossocioted with cur- in palotal adipose tissue and expres-
adapt to a surfoce which has consid- rent coronal suturing has been re- sed that the maintenance of an inner
erable occlusol-apical curvature, in- ported to be OS common as 25- smooth surface and the creation of
terdental cancovities and marked
50%,^^^' Close observation of desired thickness of the graft should
mesio-distal curvature of the root
anatomical curvotures in certain be the principle considerations.
surface. However, diligence and
areas might reveal that the shrinkage
finesse in the suturing technique de-
is related to poor adaptation of the
scribed will focilitate adequate
graft to the recipient site using the
odaptotion to the periodontal liga-
coronol or "clothesline" suturing
ment and adjocent periosteal bed
technique. Tfiis is porticulorly true for
maxillary and mandibulor Conines, ' P.O.H, Toothbrush Comp.
15. Liu, W, J. L andSoit, C. W.: 26. Guinard, E. A. and Caffesse, R. G.: 37. Soehren, S., Alten, A., Cutright, D , ond
A Surgical Procedure for the Treatment Locoiizecl Gingival Recessions. II. Treat- Seibert, J.:
of Localized Gingival Recession in Con- ment J. West. Soc. Periodontoi., 25:10, Clinical and Histologie Studies of
junction with Root Surfoce Citric Acid 1977. Donor Tissues Utilized tor Free Gingival
Conditioning. J. Periodontol., 51;505, 27. Cosiet, J. G., Rosenberg, E. S., and Grafts af Masticotory Mucosa. J.
1980. Tisot, R.: Periodontol., 44 727, 1973.
16. Otomo, J. A. ond Sims, T. N.: The Free Autogenous Gingival Graft. 38. Dreescomp, M. and Flores de Jacoby,
Effect of Citnc Acid Demineroiizotion on Dent. ClJn. N. Am., 24:651, 1980. L.:
Coronolly Repositioned Flaps. J. Dent. 28. Milier, P D.: Breite der Gingiva Propria bei der Ve-
Res., 58:347 (abstt. 1021), 1979. Root Coverage Using a Free Soft Tissue stibulumplastik nach Gingivatransplan-
17. Bjorn, H.; Autogenous Graft Following Citric Acid tat. Deut. Z. Zahn-, Mund-, Kieferheilk.,
Free Transplantotion of Gingivo Pro- Application. I. Technique. Int. J 28:192, 1973.
pria. Odont. Revy, 14:523, 19Ó3. Periodontics Restorotive Dent., 2:65, 39. Word, V.J.:
18. King, K. W, and Pennel, B. M.; 1982. A Clinical Assessment of the Use of the
Evaluation of Attempts to Increose the 29. Workshop Sponsored by the Notional Free Gingivol Graft for Correcting
Widtii of Attached Gingiva. Presented Institute of Dentol Research: Surgical Localiied Recession Associoted witri
before the Philadeiphia Society of Therapy for Periodontitis, Review Panel Frenal Pull. J. Periodontol., 45 78, 1979.
Peri ad onto logy, April, 19Ó4. Recommendations. May, 1981. 40. Egli, W., Vollmer, W. H,, and
19. Nabers, J. M.i 30. Ochsenbein, C and Ross, S.: Rateitschok, K. H.'
A Concept of Osseous Surgery and its Follow-up Studies of Free Gingival
Fiee Gingivai Grafts. Periodontics, Grafts. J Gin. PenodontoL, 2:96,1975.
4;243, 1966. Clinical Application. In Ward, H. L
20 Suliivon, H. ond Adi(ins, J.. (ed.) A Periodontol Point of View 41. Roteitschak, K., Egli, V., ond Fringeli,
Free Autogenous Gingivai Grofts. i. Springfield: Gharles C. Thomas Pub- G.:
lishing Co., 1973. Recessian: A Four-year Longitudinal
Principles of Successfui Grafting. Study After Free Gingival Grofts. J.
Periodontics, Ó121, 19Ó8. 31. Weisgold, A.:
Presented Before the Southwest Society d i n . Periodontol., 6 158, 1979.
21. Sullivon, H. and Adkins, J.: 42. Corn, H. and Marks, M.:
Free Autogenous Ginqival Grofts. ili. of Periodontists, Feb., 1981
32. Davis, S. S. and Traut, H. F. Gingival Grafting for Deep-wide Re-
UtiliïOtion of Grafts m t"he Treatment at cession - a Status Report. Part II. Surgi-
Gingival Recession. Periodonlics, Origin and Development of the Blood
Supply of Whole-thickness Skin Grafts. cal Procedures. Compendium Cont.
6:152, 1968. Ed. in Dent., 4:157, 1983.
Ann. Surg, 82:871, 1925.
22. Mlinek, S. H., Smukler, H., and Bucin- 43. Gront, D.
ner, A • 33. Stark, R. B.' Personal Communicotion. December
The Use ol Free Gingival Grafts for the Plastic Surgery. New York' Harper and 1982.
Goverage of Denuded Roots. J. Row, 1962, pp. 59-79.
Periodontol., 44:248, 1973. 34. Nyman, S., Lindhe, J., Karring, T., ond 44. Davis, J. S. and Trout, H. F.:
Rylonder, H.; "Origin and Development of the Blood
23. Hawley, C and Staffileno, H.; Supply of Whole-Thickness Skin
Clinical Evaiuation of Free Gingivol New Attachment Following Surgical
Treotment of Human Periodontal Dis- Grafts", Annals of Surgen/, 82:871,
Grafts in Periodontai Surgery. J. 1925.
Periodontoi , 40i707, 1969. ease. J. Clin. Periodont., 9:290, 1982.
24 Ward, V. J.: 35. Mormann, W., Schoer, F., ond Fire-
A Ciinicai Assessment of tine Use of the stone, A.:
Free Gingivol Groft for Correcting A Relotionship Between Success of Free
Loco 11 zed Recession Associated witn Gingivol Grafts and Tronsplant Thick-
Frenol Pull. J. Pariodontol., 45.78,1974. ness-Revasculanzation ond Shrinkage
25. Livingston, H.j - A One-year Clinical Study. J.
Totaf Caverage of Multiple and Adjo- Periodoritol., 52:74, 198!.
cent Denuded Root Surfoces with o 36. Gorgiulo, A. and Arrocho, R.:
Free Gingivol Autograft. A Gose Re- Histo-clmical Evaluotion of Free Gingt-
port. J. Periodont., 46:209, 1975. vol Grafts. Periodontics, 5:285, 19Ó7.