Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
[28] R e g u l a t i o n o f I n t e r n a l p H in A c i d o p h i l i c a n d
Alkalophilic Bacteria
By T. A. KRULWICH and A. A. GUFFANTI
caldarius, first isolated and described by Darland and Brock.14 The obli-
gate alkalophiles have included Bacillus alcalophilus 15and Bacillus firmus
RAB. j6 Such obligately alkalophilic organisms can be isolated with sur-
prising ease from various soil samples, perhaps reflecting the high alkaline
clay particle content of many soils. In this review of methodology, we will
outline the protocols used to characterize features and mechanisms of pH
homeostasis in the obligately acidophilic and alkalophilic bacilli; informa-
tion derived from studies by other investigators of gram-negative acido-
philes and of alkaline-tolerant organisms (those with a range of growth pH
values that is lower than that of the obligate alkalophiles and includes
near-neutral values) will be introduced only peripherally to indicate where
important differences in experimental detail may obtain. Also, we will
confine this review to those methods that have employed whole cells. It
should be noted, however, that studies of pH regulation in bacteria have
been conducted both in vivo and in vitro. The in vitro studies, using
isolated membrane vesicles of the type first prepared by Kaback, 17 have
made some major contributions to this area. In both the acidophile B.
acidocaldarius and in alkalophilic B. alcalophilus and B. firmus RAB,
work with right-side-out membrane vesicles has provided unequivocal
evidence of outward, respiration-dependent proton translocation, ~8,~9and
has been part of the battery of approaches to the characterization of
antiport activities relevant to pH regulation, t8-2°
Acidophilic Bacteria
It has been clearly established that any one of several acidophilic
bacteria will maintain an almost constant cytoplasmic pH, at some value
between 5.8 and 7.1, over a range of external pH values including pH 2-
3.12.21 There is general agreement that respiration-dependent proton trans-
location is required for the generation of the enormous ApH. 12 It has also
been generally found that acidophiles, in the very acid range of pH, pos-
Determinations o f ApH
The principles involved in measurements of ApH have been elucidated
and described in detail by many others, including a review by Rotten-
berg 26 in an earlier volume; the equations required for calculation can be
found there. In acidophilic as in conventional bacteria, the distribution of
weak acids is used to assay the pH gradient across the membrane; since
the pHout is known, the pHin c a n then be readily ascertained. 26The special
considerations for work with acidophiles include the choice of buffer, the
choice of weak acid, and the controls used to assess binding of the weak
acid (as opposed to its localization, free, within the cytoplasmic compo-
nent). In any measurements of the ApH, it should be recognized that the
amount of the accumulated probe that is truly free in the cytoplasm is not
easily evaluated.
We have used citrate buffer, 25 to 50 mM, to maintain the pHout at low
pH values in experiments with B. acidocaldarius. 27 Matin and his col-
leagues 23 have used 100 mM fl-alanine buffer in some of their determina-
tions of ApH in the gram-negative acidophile Thiobacillus acidophilus,
but it has recently been suggested that use of fl-alanine buffer may not be
optimal if protonophore effects are to be examined as part of the experi-
mental series. 21 The external pH of buffered cell suspensions should be
should filter rapidly (around 5 sec). We have had best results with these
filters in experiments in which the filtered samples were not washed,
thereby avoiding efflux of the accumulated acid. Controls for nonspecific
binding are critical. Organic solvents, especially 5% (v/v) n-butanol, 29,3°
can be used to permeabilize the cells and give a background for nonspe-
cific binding. It should also be possible to use cells treated with
ionophores such as gramicidin as a control, as long as the treatment
reliably abolishes the ApH. We have used 2,4-dinitrophenol treatment of
B. acidocaldarius, and found the results to be the same with pro-
tonophore (50 /xM, 2,4-dinitrophenol) alone as with protonophore to-
gether with either NaSCN (5 mM) or valinomycin (2/zM). 27 In a different
protocol, Michels and Bakker 21 found that 2,4-dinitrophenol decreases
the ApH by greater than 80% in B. acidocaldarius, leaving a small residual
pH gradient. If uncouplers are to be used as a binding control in experi-
ments with acidophiles, however, it is important to consider that pro-
tonophores may be less effective at very low pH values than in the neutral
range, 12 requiring higher than usual concentrations and substantial incu-
bation times for effective use with at least some acidophiles. Some gram-
negative and archaebacterial acidophiles, especially, may retain a sub-
stantial pH even after treatment with protonophores ~2 unless a high
protonophore concentration is used and the specific buffering conditions
allow counterion movement to offset the effect of proton influx on the Ark.
For example, abolition of at least 85% of the ApH of Thermoplasma
acidophilum has been observed by Michels and Bakker 2~ using high con-
centrations of 2,4-dinitrophenol and citrate buffer, but lower pro-
tonophore concentrations or use of fl-alanine buffer resulted in a much
more substantial residual ApH. Their experimental findings may provide
the basis for explaining a number of earlier observations of a much larger
residual ApH in some gram-negative acidophiles upon protonophore
treatment or extensive starvation in/3-alanine buffer or water. 23,24 How-
ever, such observations are still suggestive of the ability of at least certain
gram-negative acidophiles to maintain an appreciable ApH by passive
means under some conditions. It will be of interest to try to examine the
relative importance of passive mechanisms to both viability and pH ho-
meostasis under ionic conditions that approximate those of growth media.
Determinations of viability are critical, since a passive mechanism for
maintaining a constant pHi. which does not facilitate the preservation of
viability could hardly represent a true adaptation of the organism, and is
more likely to be a laboratory phenomenon.
from the total buffering capacity (Bt) and the buffering capacity of the
outside surface(s) of the cell (Bo).
In a recent study, 35 we have employed both experimental approaches
to measurements in bacilli that grow in various ranges of pH and in
Escherichia coli. In methods using permeabilized cells, the Bo is first
determined on an untreated cell suspension of bacteria at about 5 mg cell
protein/ml of water or 200 mM KCI. Bo is calculated from the initial, rapid
change in the pH of the medium upon addition of successive, small ali-
quots of HCI (usually 10 to 20/xl of 0.05 M HCI). For determinations of B~,
the cell suspensions are then treated with 5-10% Triton X-100, 25'35 5% n-
butanol,3,35 o r with a combination of agents that abolishes the ability of the
cells to maintain a protonmotive force. 36 The changes in pH caused by
aliquots of acid are then recorded for the treated suspension. In our
hands, the presence or absence or carbonate dehydratase in these suspen-
sions made no difference. However, it is important that additions of KOH
(titrating up) give the same results as HCI (titrating down) over the same
range and that several cell concentrations are examined. It is also desir-
able to employ several different methods for permeabilizing the cells,
since at least some bacteria seem to open up more fully, for example, with
n-butanol than with Triton (see Table I). For comparisons between differ-
ent bacteria, care should be taken to calculate from measurements taken
at the same initial and final pH values since Bo and Bi are highly pH
dependent. In connection with the data shown in Table I, it is notable that
alkalophiles, at alkaline pH, exhibit among the highest cytoplasmic buff-
ering capacities found in our survey, values that are comparable to the
relatively high Bi of the acidophile in our study at acid pH. Nonetheless,
as described in the next section, a failure of the active mechanisms of pH
homeostasis results in an immediate rise in the pH~n of B. firmus RAB so
that it equals the pHout, usually 10.5. Thus while a high Bi (and the sub-
stantial Bo found in all the species we have examined) might play a role in
buffering minor perturbations in pHin or in protecting some specific organ-
elle or molecule, it is unlikely to be of importance in resisting large perma-
nent shifts in pH.
The second approach to measurements of cytoplasmic buffering ca-
pacity employs intact cells suspended in 200 mM KCI, and involves fol-
lowing the decay of the pH perturbation caused by a small acid pulse.
Scholes and MitchelP4 and Maloney37 have described this method and the
0
0
r~
o
<
<
r,..)
z
m
EL
EL
0
¢,q
)"
r..)
0
m
[.., oo
.,..2
0 q)
m
-1
< L~
>
m
c¢
<
%
Z
• ~. o o
m
¢o
.~ O ..~ e'~
~ N
[28] REGULATIONOF INTERNALpH 361
Alkalophilic Bacteria
Obligately alkalophilic bacteria maintain a cytoplasmic pH of no
higher than 9.6 when suspended in Na+-containing alkaline buffers at pH
values as high as 11 (Table If). 16'38 Under growth conditions, or if a sub-
strate such as L-malate is added to the buffer, an even lower pHi, of about
8.5 is maintained. 39 Cells of B. firmus RAB that have been equilibrated at
pH 8.5 also exhibit impressive homeostasis after a rapid shift in pHout to
10.5 as long as Na ÷ is present in the medium. 4° Evidence from in vitro
studies 18,2° and in vivo experiments with both wild type and mutant
strains 39-41 supports the conclusion that (1) Na ÷ is required for pH homeo-
stasis in obligate alkalophiles; (2) Na~+. is exchanged electrogenically for
Ho+t ( H + translocated in > Na ÷ translocated out) by a Na+/H + antiporter
38 A. A. Guffanti, P. Susman, R. Blanco, and T. A. Krulwich, J. Biol. Chem. 253, 708 (t978).
39 M. Kitada, A. A. Guffanti, and T. A. Krulwich, J. Bacteriol. 152, 1096 (1982).
40 T. A. Krulwich, J. G. Federbush, and A. A. Guffanti, J. Biol. Chem. 260, 4055 (19851.
41 M. L. Garcia, A. A. Guffanti, and T. A. Krulwich, J. Bacteriol. 156, 1151 (1983).
362 BACTERIAL TRANSPORT [28]
T A B L E 11
CYTOPLASMIC pH OF BUFFERED CELL SUSPENSIONS OF
ALKALOPHILIC BACTERIA
pHin
" Guffanti et a l ) 8
b Guffanti et al. ~6
Determinations of ApH
The pHin of alkalophiles is calculated from measurements of the ApH
using the same principles and methods as described above except that the
probe, buffers, and controls require accommodation to the alkaline pH
Unless cells were kept phosphate free, the combined effects of residual
Na + and residual phosphate might well facilitate the regulation of pHin.
Finally, in a third experimental design, cells equilibrated at pH 8.5 as
above are again shifted to pH 10.5, but only in potassium carbonate
buffer. After 1 or 2 min, with pHin already at 10.5, the suspensions are
"treated" with various concentrations of Na +, with added K + as a con-
trol, in some instances also adding AIB. While the cells under these
conditions can still regulate pHin, viability has been compromised, indi-
cating that the most pH sensitive process(es) is other than an alkali-
induced loss of the capacity for pH regulation.
While the protocols described will indicate Na + (or perhaps, with
other species, different ion) involvement in pH homeostasis, they do not
distinguish between the involvement of a secondary Na+/H ÷ antiporter
and, for example, a primary Na + pump. Distinction between possible
mechanisms of Na + function is generally made using inhibitors. Thus
evidence for an electrogenic Na+/H ÷ antiporter in obligately alkalophilic
bacilli includes: requirement of a A~b per se for Na + fluxes--22Na + efflux
from cells at high pH 41 and 22Na+ uptake by energized, everted vesi-
cles2°,49--and associated proton fluxes38A9; and inhibition of the Na+-de -
pendent acidification of the interior by protonophores, at least at the
moderately alkaline pH that can be tested. 38'4°
Acknowledgment
The work in our laboratory was supported by Research Grant PCM 8121557 from the
National Science Foundation.
[29] P e p t i d e T r a n s p o r t in B a c t e r i a
By CHRISTOPHER F. HIGGINS and MARGARETM. GIBSON
Introduction
Three genetically distinct transport systems with overlapping sub-
strate specificities serve to mediate the transport of small peptides across
the cytoplasmic membrane and into the cytoplasm of both E. coli and S.
typhimurium.l This multiplicity of systems makes measurement of trans-