CHI-SQUARE

CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN PERIODIC INCREASE IN SALARY AND JOB

SATISFACTION

TABLE NO: 1

PERIODIC INCREASE * JOB SATISFACTION CROSS TABULATION

job satisfaction
highly
satisfied satisfied neutral dissatisfied Total
periodic strongly agree Count 2 6 0 0 8
increase Expected 1.1 5.2 1.6 .1 8.0
Count
agree Count 5 41 8 0 54
Expected 7.4 34.9 10.8 1.0 54.0
Count
neither agree Count 6 17 10 0 33
Expected 4.5 21.3 6.6 .6 33.0
Count
disagree Count 2 7 4 2 15
Expected 2.0 9.7 3.0 .3 15.0
Count
Total Count 15 71 22 2 110
Expected 15.0 71.0 22.0 2.0 110.0
Count

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no association between periodic increase in salary and job
satisfaction
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is association between periodic increase in salary and job
satisfaction
 CHI-SQUARE TESTS
Asymptotic

INFERENCE: Significance

From the above Value df (2-sided) Chi-Square test

Pearson Chi-Square 21.925a 9 .009
it is inferred Likelihood Ratio 18.605 9 .029 that the
calculated Linear-by-Linear 5.278 1 .022 value is greater
than the Association tabulated
N of Valid Cases 110
value. So, we accept alternate
a. 9 cells (56.3%) have expected count less than 5. The
hypothesis.
minimum expected count is .15.
Thus, there is association
between periodic increase in salary and job satisfaction

CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN JOB SECURITY AND JOB SATISFACTION

TABLE NO: 2

JOB SECURITY * JOB SATISFACTION CROSS TABULATION

job satisfaction Total
 highly
satisfied satisfied neutral dissatisfied
job strongly 6 16 4 0 26
security agree
agree 5 54 14 2 75
neither agree 4 1 4 0 9
Total 15 71 22 2 110

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no association between job security and job satisfaction
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is association between job security and job satisfaction.

CHI-SQUARE TESTS
Asymptotic
Significance
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 19.265a 6 .004
Likelihood Ratio 19.257 6 .004
Linear-by-Linear 1.050 1 .306
Association
N of Valid Cases 110
 a. 6 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .16.

INFERENCE:
From the above Chi-Square test it is inferred that the calculated value is greater than the
tabulated value. So, we accept alternate hypothesis.
Thus, there is association between job security and job satisfaction.

CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITY AND FURTHER

CAREER IN THE ORGANIZATION

TABLE NO: 3

PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITY * FURTHER CAREER IN THIS ORGANIZATION

CROSS TABULATION
further career in this organization
strongly
agree agree neither agree disagree Total
plenty of highly 3 0 5 2 10
opportunity satisfied
 Satisfied 7 41 8 4 60
Neutral 1 23 10 4 38
Dissatisfied 0 2 0 0 2
Total 11 66 23 10 110

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no association between plenty of opportunity and further career
in the organization
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is association between plenty of opportunity and further
career in the organization

CHI-SQUARE TESTS
Asymptotic
Significance
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 22.268a 9 .008
Likelihood Ratio 27.154 9 .001
Linear-by-Linear .103 1 .748
Association
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 9 cells (56.3%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .18.

INFERENCE:
From the above Chi-Square test it is inferred that the calculated value is greater than the
tabulated value. So, we accept alternate hypothesis.
Thus, there is association between plenty of opportunity and further career in the organization.

CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN INNOVATION &CREATIVE AND POSITION AT

THIS COMPANY

TABLE NO: 4

INNOVATION AND CREATIVE * YOUR POSITION AT THIS COMPANY CROSS

TABULATION
your position at this company
highly highly
` satisfied satisfied neutral dissatisfied dissatisfied Total
innovati strongly agree 3 22 2 0 0 27
on and agree 2 45 17 4 3 71
neither agree 2 4 4 0 0 10
creative disagree 0 2 0 0 0 2
Total 7 73 23 4 3 110

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is association between innovation &creative and position at this
company.
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is no association between innovation &creative and position
at this company
 CHI-SQUARE TESTS
Asymptotic
Significance
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 16.496a 12 .170
Likelihood Ratio 18.921 12 .090
Linear-by-Linear 1.892 1 .169
Association
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 15 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .05.

INFERENCE:
From the above Chi-Square test it is inferred that the calculated value is greater than the
tabulated value. So, we accept null hypothesis.
Thus, there is no association between innovation &creative and position at this company
 CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN MAKING DECISION AND POSITION AT YOUR
COMPANY CROSS TABULATION

TABLE NO: 5

MAKING DECISION * YOUR POSITION AT THIS COMPANY CROSS TABULATION

your position at this company
highly highly
satisfied satisfied neutral dissatisfied dissatisfied Total
making strongly agree 2 10 2 0 0 14
decision agree 5 30 6 4 1 46
neither agree 0 26 13 0 2 41
disagree 0 7 2 0 0 9
Total 7 73 23 4 3 110

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is association between making decision and position at your
company.
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is no association between making decision and position at
your company.
 CHI-SQUARE TESTS
Asymptotic
Significance
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 17.212a 12 .142
Likelihood Ratio 21.602 12 .042
Linear-by-Linear 2.148 1 .143
Association
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 14 cells (70.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .25.

INFERENCE:
From the above Chi-Square test it is inferred that the calculated value is greater than the
tabulated value. So, we accept null hypothesis.
Thus, there is no association between making decision and position at your company.
 CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN ACKNOWLEDGE OUR WORK AND JOB
SATISFACTION

TABLE NO: 6

ACKNOWLEDGE OUR WORK * JOB SATISFACTION CROSS TABULATION

job satisfaction
highly
satisfied satisfied neutral dissatisfied Total
acknowledge our strongly 7 16 2 0 25
work agree
Agree 8 49 18 2 77
neither agree 0 6 2 0 8
Total 15 71 22 2 110

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is association between acknowledge our work and job satisfaction
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is no association between acknowledge our work and job
satisfaction.

CHI-SQUARE TESTS
 Asymptotic
Significance
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 8.811a 6 .184
Likelihood Ratio 10.132 6 .119
Linear-by-Linear 6.188 1 .013
Association
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 6 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .15.

INFERENCE:
From the above Chi-Square test it is inferred that the calculated value is greater than the
tabulated value. So, we accept null hypothesis.
Thus, there is no association between acknowledge our work and job satisfaction

CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN OPPORTUNITY TO DO BEST AND POSITION AT

THIS COMPANY

TABLE NO: 7
 OPPORTUNITY TO DO THE BEST * YOUR POSITION AT THIS COMPANY CROSS
TABULATION
your position at this company Total
highly highly
satisfied satisfied neutral dissatisfied dissatisfied
opportunity highly satisfied 2 6 4 2 1 15
to do the satisfied 5 63 17 0 2 87
neutral 0 4 2 0 0 6
best dissatisfied 0 0 0 2 0 2
Total 7 73 23 4 3 110

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no association between opportunity to do best and position at
this company
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is association between opportunity to do best and position at
this company

CHI-SQUARE TESTS
Asymptotic
Significance
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 65.725a 12 .000
Likelihood Ratio 27.961 12 .006
 Linear-by-Linear .375 1 .540
Association
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 16 cells (80.0%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .05.

INFERENCE:
From the above Chi-Square test it is inferred that the calculated value is greater than the
tabulated value. So, we accept alternate hypothesis.
Thus, there is association between opportunity to do best and position at this company.

CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN MOTIVATING THE EMPLOYEES AND JOB

SATISFACTION

TABLE NO: 8

INTERESTEDIN MOTIVATING
THE EMPLOYEES * JOB SATISFACTION CROSS TABULATION
job satisfaction Total
 highly
satisfied satisfied neutral dissatisfied
interested strongly 9 10 0 0 19
in motivating agree
the employees agree 2 52 10 2 66
neither agree 4 7 10 0 21
disagree 0 2 2 0 4
Total 15 71 22 2 110

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no association between motivating the employees and job
satisfaction
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is association between motivating the employees and job
satisfaction.

CHI-SQUARE TESTS
Asymptotic
Significance
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 43.806a 9 .000
Likelihood Ratio 42.960 9 .000
Linear-by-Linear 14.602 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 110
a. 11 cells (68.8%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is .07.
INFERENCE:
From the above Chi-Square test it is inferred that the calculated value is greater than the
tabulated value. So, we accept alternate hypothesis.
Thus, there is association between motivating the employees and job satisfaction.
 CORRELATION ANALYSIS

CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN JOB SECURITY AND FURTHER CAREER

TABLE NO: 9

JOB SECURITY * FURTHER CAREER IN THIS ORGANIZATION CROSS

TABULATION
further career in this organization Total
strongly
agree agree neither agree disagree
job strongly 6 16 2 2 26
security agree
agree 5 49 13 8 75
neither agree 0 1 8 0 9
Total 11 66 23 10 110

CORRELATIONS
Asymptotic Approximate Approximate
Value Standard Error Tb Significance
Interval by Pearson's R .283 .086 3.065 .003c
Interval
Ordinal by Spearman .329 .088 3.620 .000c
Ordinal Correlation
N of Valid Cases 110
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

INFERENCE:

Thus the correlation co-efficient 0.283 shows that there is positive correlation between job
security and further career.

CROSS TABULATION INTERESTED IN MOTIVATING THE EMPLOYEE AND

FURTHER CAREER IN THIS ORGANIZATION

TABLE NO: 10
 INTERESTED IN MOTIVATING
THE EMPLOYEES * FURTHER CAREER IN THIS ORGANIZATION CROSS
TABULATION
further career in this organization Total
strongly
agree agree neither agree disagree
interested strongly 8 10 1 0 19
in motivating agree
the employees agree 3 49 8 6 66
neither agree 0 7 14 0 21
disagree 0 0 0 4 4
Total 11 66 23 10 110

CORRELATIONS
Asymptotic Approximate Approximate
Value Standard Errora Tb Significance
Interval by Pearson's R .571 .076 7.229 .000c
Interval
Ordinal by Spearman .564 .071 7.100 .000c
Ordinal Correlation
N of Valid Cases 110
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

INFERENCE:

Thus the correlation co-efficient 0.571 shows that there is high degree of positive correlation
between interested in motivating the employee and further career in this organization.
 CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN PERIODIC INCREASE IN SALARY AND YOUR
POSITION AT THIS COMPANY

TABLE NO: 11

PERIODIC INCREASE * YOUR POSITION AT THIS COMPANY CROSS TABULATION

your position at this company Total
highly highly
satisfied satisfied neutral dissatisfied dissatisfied
periodic strongly agree 2 4 2 0 0 8
increase agree 3 45 6 0 0 54
neither agree 2 17 11 2 1 33
 disagree 0 7 4 2 2 15
Total 7 73 23 4 3 110

CORRELATIONS
Asymptotic Approximate Approximate
Value Standard Errora Tb Significance
Interval by Pearson's R .404 .084 4.587 .000c
Interval
Ordinal by Spearman .373 .092 4.178 .000c
Ordinal Correlation
N of Valid Cases 110
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

INFERENCE:

Thus the correlation co-efficient 0.404 shows that there is positive correlation between periodic
increase in salary and your position at this company
 CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITY AND JOB
SATISFACTION
TABLE NO: 12
PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITY * JOB SATISFACTION CROSS TABULATION
job satisfaction
highly
satisfied satisfied neutral dissatisfied Total
plenty of highly 5 1 4 0 10
opportunity satisfied
Satisfied 4 46 8 2 60
Neutral 6 22 10 0 38
Dissatisfied 0 2 0 0 2
Total 15 71 22 2 110

CORRELATIONS
Asymptotic Approximate Approximate
Value Standard Errora Tb Significance
Interval by Pearson's R .040 .110 .414 .680c
Interval
Ordinal by Spearman .044 .113 .462 .645c
Ordinal Correlation
N of Valid Cases 110
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

INFERENCE:

Thus the correlation co-efficient 0.404 shows that there is positive correlation between periodic
increase in salary and your position at this company
 PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITY AND FURTHER CAREER CROSS TABULATION
TABLE NO: 13
PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITY * FURTHER CAREER IN THIS ORGANIZATION
CROSS TABULATION
further career in this organization
strongly
agree agree neither agree disagree Total
plenty of highly 3 0 5 2 10
opportunity satisfied
Satisfied 7 41 8 4 60
Neutral 1 23 10 4 38
Dissatisfied 0 2 0 0 2
Total 11 66 23 10 110

CORRELATION
Asymptotic Approximate Approximate
Value Standard Errora Tb Significance
Interval by Pearson's R .031 .109 .320 .750c
Interval
Ordinal by Spearman .066 .109 .684 .496c
Ordinal Correlation
N of Valid Cases 110
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

INFERENCE:

Thus the correlation co-efficient +1 shows that there is high degree of positive correlate between
plenty of opportunity and further career cross tabulation.
CROSS TABULATION BETWEEN HAPPY WITH MY JOB AND FURTHER CAREER
IN THE ORGANIZATION
TABLE NO: 14
HAPPY WITH MY JOB * FURTHER CAREER IN THIS ORGANIZATION CROSS
TABULATION
further career in this organization
strongly
agree agree neither agree disagree Total
happy with my highly satisfied 5 16 3 0 24
job Satisfied 6 37 14 4 61
Neutral 0 7 6 4 17
Dissatisfied 0 6 0 0 6
highly 0 0 0 2 2
dissatisfied
Total 11 66 23 10 110

CORRELATION
Asymptotic Approximate Approximate
Value Standard Errora Tb Significance
Interval by Pearson's R .341 .090 3.766 .000c
Interval
Ordinal by Spearman .323 .081 3.552 .001c
Ordinal Correlation
N of Valid Cases 110
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

INFERENCE:
Thus the correlation co-efficient +1 shows that there is high degree of positive correlation
between happy with my job and further career in the organization

ONE WAY ANOVA

 TABULATION FOR PERIODIC INCREASE IN SALARY AND JOB SATISFACTION
TABLE NO: 15
ANOVA
Job Satisfaction
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between 2.452 3 .817 2.090 .106
Groups
Within Groups 41.448 106 .391
Total 43.900 109

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is association between periodic increase in salary and job
satisfaction.
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is no association between periodic increase in salary and job
satisfaction.

INFERENCE:
From the above Anova one way test, it is inferred that the significant values is greater
than 0.05 value. So accept null hypothesis.
Thus, there is no difference between periodic increase in salary and job satisfaction.
 TABULATION FOR SUPPORT FROM LEADER AND POSITION AT THIS
COMPANY
TABLE NO: 16
ANOVA
Position at this company
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between 6.007 2 3.003 5.629 .005
Groups
Within Groups 57.093 107 .534
Total 63.100 109

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no association between support from leader and position at this
company
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is association between support from leader and position at
this company

INFERENCE:
From the above Anova one way test, it is inferred that the significant values is lesser than
0.05 value. So accept alternative hypothesis.
Thus, there is difference between support from leader and position at this company

TABULATION FOR INNOVATION AND CREATIVE

 TABLE NO: 17
ANOVA
Job satisfaction
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between 3.802 3 1.267 3.351 .022
Groups
Within Groups 40.098 106 .378
Total 43.900 109

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no association between innovation and creative

Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is association between innovation and creative

INFERENCE:
From the above Anova one way test, it is inferred that the significant values is lesser than
0.05 value. So accept alternative hypothesis.
Thus, there is difference between innovation and creative

TABULATION FOR MANAGER RECOGNIZE OUR WORK AND YOUR POSITION

AT THIS COMPANY
 TABLE NO: 18
ANOVA
Position at this company
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between 1.142 2 .571 .986 .376
Groups
Within Groups 61.958 107 .579
Total 63.100 109

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is association between manager recognize our work and your
position at this company
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is no association between manager recognize our work and
your position at this company

INFERENCE:
From the above Anova one way test, it is inferred that the significant values is greater
than 0.05 value. So accept null hypothesis.
Thus, there is no difference between manager recognize our work and your position at this
company.

TABULATION FOR PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITY AND FURTHER CAREER IN THIS

COMPANY
TABLE NO: 19
ANOVA
further career in this organization
 Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between 3.246 3 1.082 1.867 .140
Groups
Within Groups 61.445 106 .580
Total 64.691 109

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is association between plenty of opportunity and further career in
this company
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is no association between plenty of opportunity and further
career in this company
Inference:
From the above Anova one way test, it is inferred that the significant values is greater than 0.05
value. So accept null hypothesis.
Thus, there is no difference between plenty of opportunity and further career in this company

TABULATION FOR HAPPY WITH MY JOB OVERALL AND FURTHER CAREER IN

THIS ORGANIZATION
TABLE NO: 20
ANOVA
further career in this organization
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
 Between 14.584 4 3.646 7.640 .000
Groups
Within Groups 50.107 105 .477
Total 64.691 109

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no association between happy with my job overall and further
career in this organization
Alternative hypothesis (H1): There is association between happy with my job overall and
further career in this organization.

INFERENCE:
From the above Anova one way test, it is inferred that the significant values is lesser than 0.05
value. So accept alternative hypothesis.
Thus, there is difference between happy with my job overall and further career in this
organization