Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Report Summary
The report examines the epidemiological evidence of the Qom outbreak and the possible origin
of the virus circulation processes. The structural weaknesses of Qom University of Medical
Sciences health system have been analyzed in the areas of crisis management of care system,
reporting, hospital treatment management system, laboratory structure, and health education.
The outcome of the 6-day investigation of the evaluation team is presented. To address system
challenges, it has been suggested that changes be made to the patient registration process, follow-
up of patient contacts, documentation of results and findings, and the university hospital crisis
management within the university system. The problems facing the university lab need to be
addressed forcefully. It is expected that the results of this assessment could also be helpful to
other cities in the country.
Table of Contents
A majority of the shoe industry workers in Qom are of Afghan origin. Families of Afghan and
Pakistani workers live in various parts of town. They have a very close relationship together and
all live in below standard sanitary conditions. The occupants of one of the afflicted communities
in Qom were about 25% Afghan and 25% of Pakistani Descent.
In consideration to these observations, it was postulated that the illness was in correlation with
one of the Chinese merchants traveling to Iran and the Afghani and Pakistani Citizens played a
role in its distribution. A follow up analysis in the stored samples obtained during the months of
Dey and Bahman which were saved under the suspicion of Flu revealed five additional cases.
Sample which were positively identified were collected on or after February 9th. Access to
samples of prior dates were not possible since they were not saved in the respective sample
banks. Among the 186 patients associated with acute pulmonary syndrome (SARS1) who had
been hospitalized in Qom, 8 cases of death (3.4%) was observed. This compared to 0% observed
cases a year earlier.
In consideration to the evidence gathered and the fact that the death of primary patients were
identified towards the end of month of Bahman (Feb, 19th, 2020) it is probable to assume that the
virus was introduced to the City of Qom in the early Bahman period. If we accept the probability
that these patients were not necessarily the earliest cases of death, the propagation of the virus in
the city would be connected to the beginning of the month of Dey (December, 23rd). In this case
the virus had enough opportunity to distribute throughout the town and even other communities
in the country.
Suggestions
1. A follow-up process is undergoing to trace the locations and travel paths of the 20
identified patients. This process is done via tracing their mobile phones during the two
weeks period prior to their hospitalization. The objective is to assess and judge the extent
of contamination of various neighborhoods of the city and country.
2. Suggestions have been presented in the context of changing the procedures for
identification of patient cases. It is expected to validate the patient bedside care in
addition to a validated chest scan of an infected person.
3. In consideration to the estimates, it is expected that the cases in Qom will be increasing in
the next days and weeks. It is suggested to improve the facilities at the university lab in
the most expedient manner such that they can support the testing protocol by themselves.
4. It is suggested to strengthen the tracking mechanisms in the network of positively
identified patients and identification of the potential carriers within their communities
and families
5. In consideration to the recording of all the information at the urgent care facilities and
hospitals more support is needed to strengthen the communication and reporting tools of
these information systems.
Immediately after the reporting of the coronavirus epidemic in Qom, on February ***, the
Institute of Infectious Diseases Management at the Pasteur Institute in Iran sent a team to
evaluate the outbreak in Qom. This report addresses a brief summary of the findings of the team
and the list of activities that have taken place so far.
Evaluation Objectives
● Evaluation of preventive and control measures taken
● Clinical evaluation of patients
● Investigation of possible origins of the Epidemic in Qom
● Assistance in the implementation and launch of Contact Tracing system
● Prediction of possible future trends of the disease
Evaluation method
During the evaluation process, the team held numerous meetings with the Honorable President
of the University, Director General of the State Crisis Management Team, the Deputy Director of
University Health System, and the deputies and experts responsible for the Health Department.
In addition, the team conducted visits to the hospital, al-Mustafa University Laboratory, the Holy
Masumah shrine, and the homes of the patients. The team evaluated the standard practices used
as well as the operations protocols, reviewed the evaluations forms, methods of care, as well as
the reporting of case histories in the context of the crisis management framework at the
university. After the process was completed, the results were reviewed and practical and
operational suggestions were presented to the university.
The main challenges and suggestions of this evaluation are as follows:
A. Weak crisis management at university level
The university's vice president of health care seems to be unable to manage the current crisis.
One of the challenges in this crisis is the involvement of senior and middle management in
unrelated affairs and, consequently, the neglect of quality management of health care delivery at
operational level.
It was determined that since the identification of the COVID-19 epidemic, the Risk Management
Office, at the Health Department has been active and has been conducting coordination
meetings. Evaluation of Operation Command Chart however revealed that despite appointing
Chart members and their successors, notification of issues relevant to personnel responsibilities
were not justified and explained by the description of assigned tasks.
Crisis Management has also been conducted outside the protocol and principles of (IOP).
In the current crisis, the components of the most important activities required in the form of an
operational plan has been designed. In this plan, the list of action items during the planning
period and the required answers in the preparation of response phase have been clearly listed. A
number of activities have been implemented, but some have not been operational since the start
of the epidemic.
After reviewing the performance of the designated components of the accident command chart,
the following corrective points were recommended to the colleagues in the field of health deputy
to improve the crisis management:
● A review of the ICS Chart of the Deputy Minister of Health
● Create a crisis management organization with a new corrective approach in the health
department.
● The emergency plan prepared by the provincial health center should be reviewed again
● Based on the scientific and practical experience of colleagues, the operational procedures
throughout the city need to be divided into smaller areas and one representative be
designated for each specific area.
● The Crisis Headquarters of the Deputy Minister of Health should hold a daily meeting in
the presence of the liaison among these areas and make the necessary interventions in
accordance with the received reports.
B. Weaknesses of the evaluation and reporting system
Lack of attention to the syndromic care system
● Had the syndromic care system was taken more seriously, it would be expected that such
an epidemic could be detected through the fever and pneumonia at least a few weeks
earlier in Qom and that the necessary follow-up would be performed to determine the
pathogen. Evidence suggests that the virus may have been in circulation as early as a
month prior to the first reporting of the disease. Despite the emphasis on the protocol of
Corona epidemic at a national level, reporting of inpatient pneumonia with an unknown
cause was suspected to be Corona but was not reported at the university level.