Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Fire Tube A
Fire Tube B
Background
GA Drawing
Background
Burner side
Tube Drawing
METHODOLOGIES & REFERENCES
Methodologies of inspection :-
1. Visual Internal and external inspection as per API 510, Pressure Vessel Inspection Code and
ASME Section I, Rules for construction of power boiler.
2. NDE – such as DPI, MPI, UT and RT as per ASME Section V, Non Destructive Examination and
acceptance/rejection criteria as per ASME Section I, Rules for construction of power boiler.
3. SHELL - Design and Engineering Practices DEP31.22.20.31 2001, SMEP.EP72.GL.0186 and
IMP 0.03.
Inspection & Findings
Visual internal and external inspection was done supplement with UT wall thickness
examination.
Fire tube A findings:-
- Corrosion and pitting observed on fire tube burner side, one pit already leak. Max pit depth
approx. 4.0mm – 5.0mm.
- General corrosion on fire tube exhaust stack side.
Fire tube B findings:-
- Corrosion and pitting observed on burner side. Max pit depth below 2.0mm.
- General corrosion on fire tube exhaust stack side.
Inspection & Findings
General Corrosion
General Corrosion
Burner side
Conclusion
From the inspection findings and results, we can conclude that the main damaged mechanism
with this boiler tube are CO2 corrosion.
The function of this boiler to re-boil the glycol from contactor tower used to separate HC gas
and water. As natural gas contain Wet HC gas + H20 vapor + CO2, some of the CO2 gas dissolved
in glycol and re-boiled inside of boiler. This CO2 gas then dissolved with water to form carbonic
acid, H2CO3 and promote general and pitting/localize corrosion on boiler tube.
This corrosion become severe when the boiler tube temperature increase.
Others recommendation is to replace the tube material with higher resistance material to CO2
such as austenitic stainless steel. Also need to consider material that resistant when operating at
high temperature.