Sunteți pe pagina 1din 1

260 Index

Database Delay damages, 174–176


owner’s, 237f clauses, 249
separate, 237f consulting costs, 224–225
Decisions, timely, 3 interest, 225–226
Delay. See also Noncritical delays legal costs, 224–225
analysis of potential changes with bar lost profits, 225–226
charts, 68–71 opportunity costs, 225–226
analyzing schedules for measurement Demobilization, 206
of, 46–50 Department of Veterans Affairs, 128
bar chart with, 180f Departments of Transportation (DOT), 12,
categories, 26f 31–32, 128, 163
compensable, 26f, 28–31 Design discrepancies, 33
concurrent, 31–36 Design services, actual damages, 168f
to critical path activity, 13–14, 25–26 Designer risk management, 254–255
critical v. noncritical, 25–27 changes, 254–255
defined, 25 Diary entries, 118
excusable, 26f, 27–28 Discounted cash flow
home office overhead and, 191–192 home office overhead and, 199–200
improvements and, 88–89 method, 199–200
indirect effect for, 200–203 Dispute claims, 234f
inefficiency and, 205–209 Disputed cash flow, 202f
measuring, after the fact, 42–43 Dollar-based analyses, 155–158
measuring, by identifying schedule DOT. See Departments of Transportation
updates, 80–86 Dried-in buildings, 59
measuring, with as-built data, 44–45 Drywall installation, 76–77
measuring, with “but for” analyses, D-Tunneling
158–159 added work, 149
measuring, with “but for” arguments, baseline schedule, 130–138
158–159 extension request, 149, 153–154
measuring, with “but for” schedules, impacted as-planned example,
158–159 146–154
measuring, with collapsed as-built Dummy logic, 78
analyses, 154–155 Durations
measuring, with contemporaneous material procurement, 19
schedule, 42 reasonable, 18–20
measuring, with CPM schedules, 75–76
measuring, with critical path, 45–46 E
measuring, with float, 107–111 Early Completion Schedules, 22–23,
measuring, with fragnet, 128–138 252–253
measuring, with impacted as-planned Efficiency
analysis, 142–154 Contractors, 206
measuring, with no schedule, 43–44 defined, 205
measuring, with software tools, 86–94 reduced, 223–224
measuring, with windows techniques, Eichleay formula, 192–196
138–142 applying, 195–196
noncompensable, 28–31 in federal government cases, 196
nonexcusable, 27–28 problems with, 193–195
perspective in, 37–42 using, 192–193
quantifying, using bar chart schedules, Electronic copies, 88
63–71 Empire State Building, 55
related direct labor costs, 175 Enforceability of Liquidated Damages,
schedule revision, 91–93 165–166
storage costs, 185f ENG-BCA. See Engineering Board of
subcontractors in measuring, 50–53 Contract Appeals
summary, 50f Engineering Board of Contract Appeals
total, 98 (ENG-BCA), 194
West Street Bridge, 125f Equipment costs, 181–183

S-ar putea să vă placă și