Data Analysis using parameters Mean:

1- General Linear Model: No of Peaks AUX versus Product, Preparation, Time

Factor Type Levels Values

Product fixed 4 Liquid Brew, Overnight Liquid Sponge, Overnight
Sponge, Panarome
Preparation fixed 3 Slice, whole Bread, Whole Bread a
Time fixed 4 4, 24, 48, 72

* * Normality Test = 0.113 so p-value is > 0.05

Analysis of Variance for No of Peaks AUX, using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P

Product 3 900.9 900.9 300.3 1.63 0.197
Preparation 2 5916.0 5916.0 2958.0 16.09 0.000
Time 3 27294.7 27294.7 9098.2 49.50 0.000
Error 39 7168.6 7168.6 183.8
Total 47 41280.2

From the table it can be seen that there is not a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom)
From other hand there are significant differences between Time and Preparations.

2- General Linear Model: Area versus Product, Preparation, Time

Factor Type Levels Values

Product fixed 4 Liquid Brew, Overnight Liquid Sponge, Overnight
Sponge, Panarome
Preparation fixed 3 Slice, whole Bread, Whole Bread a
Time fixed 4 4, 24, 48, 72

* * Normality Test = 0.059 so p-value is > 0.05

Analysis of Variance for Area, using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P

Product 3 403.5 403.5 134.5 3.99 0.014
Preparation 2 111.8 111.8 55.9 1.66 0.204
Time 3 13248.5 13248.5 4416.2 130.95 0.000
Error 39 1315.3 1315.3 33.7
Total 47 15079.1

From the table it can be seen that there is a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom)
and Time, while no significant different between preparation.

Tukey Simultaneous Tests

Response Variable Area
All Pairwise Comparisons among Levels of Product
Product = Liquid Brew subtracted from:

Difference SE of Adjusted
Product of Means Difference T-Value P-Value
Overnight Liquid Sponge -1.011 2.371 -0.426 0.9736
Overnight Sponge 3.936 2.371 1.660 0.3582
Panarome -4.185 2.371 -1.765 0.3052

Product = Overnight Liquid Sponge subtracted from:

Difference SE of Adjusted
Product of Means Difference T-Value P-Value
Overnight Sponge 4.946 2.371 2.086 0.1755
Panarome -3.174 2.371 -1.339 0.5445

Product = Overnight Sponge subtracted from:

Difference SE of Adjusted
Product of Means Difference T-Value P-Value
Panarome -8.120 2.371 -3.425 0.0077

Liquid Brew 45.30ab

Overnight Liquid Sponge 44.29ab
Overnight Sponge 49.24a
Panarome 41.12b

3- General Linear Model: Count Peaks+ versus Product, Preparation, Time

Analysis of Variance for Count Peaks+, using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P

Product 3 10.642 10.642 3.547 0.77 0.520
Preparation 2 179.340 179.340 89.670 19.35 0.000
Time 3 398.609 398.609 132.870 28.67 0.000
Error 39 180.741 180.741 4.634
Total 47 769.333

* Normality Test = 0.398 so p-value is > 0.05

From the table it can be seen that there is not a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom)
From other hand there are significant differences between Time and Preparations.

4- General Linear Model: Average Drop Off versus Product, Preparation, Time

Analysis of Variance for Average Drop Off, using Adjusted SS for Tests
Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P
Product 3 0.015291 0.015291 0.005097 0.64 0.592
Preparation 2 0.005146 0.005146 0.002573 0.32 0.724
Time 3 0.158014 0.158014 0.052671 6.65 0.001
Error 39 0.308768 0.308768 0.007917
Total 47 0.487218

* Normality Test = 0.007 so p-value is < 0.05 therefore this parameter’s analysis does not fit with
Anaova.

5- General Linear Model: Average Gradient versus Product, Preparation, Time

Analysis of Variance for Average Gradient, using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P

Product 3 0.007410 0.007410 0.002470 2.29 0.094
Preparation 2 0.088609 0.088609 0.044304 41.01 0.000
Time 3 0.223651 0.223651 0.074550 69.00 0.000
Error 39 0.042135 0.042135 0.001080
Total 47 0.361805

* Normality Test = 0.209 so p-value is > 0.05

From the table it can be seen that there is not a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom)
From other hand there are significant differences between Time and Preparations.

6- General Linear Model: Fit Distance versus Product, Preparation, Time

Analysis of Variance for Fit Distance, using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P

Product 3 239.3 239.3 79.8 0.59 0.624
Preparation 2 2684.2 2684.2 1342.1 9.95 0.000
Time 3 22371.3 22371.3 7457.1 55.31 0.000
Error 39 5258.3 5258.3 134.8
Total 47 30553.0

* Normality Test = 0.439 so p-value is > 0.05

From the table it can be seen that there is not a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom)
From other hand there are significant differences between Time and Preparations.

7- General Linear Model: Aux1 Maxima ) versus Product, Preparation, Time

Factor Type Levels Values

Product fixed 4 Liquid Brew, Overnight Liquid Sponge, Overnight
Sponge, Panarome
Preparation fixed 3 Slice, whole Bread, Whole Bread a
Time fixed 4 4, 24, 48, 72
Analysis of Variance for Aux1 Maxima ), using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P

Product 3 31.954 31.954 10.651 5.19 0.004
Preparation 2 2.897 2.897 1.449 0.71 0.500
Time 3 298.862 298.862 99.621 48.56 0.000
Error 39 80.010 80.010 2.052
Total 47 413.723

* Normality Test = 0.521 so p-value is > 0.05

From the table it can be seen that there is a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom).

Tukey Simultaneous Tests

Response Variable Aux1 Maxima )
All Pairwise Comparisons among Levels of Product
Product = Liquid Brew subtracted from:

Difference SE of Adjusted
Product of Means Difference T-Value P-Value
Overnight Liquid Sponge -0.843 0.5847 -1.441 0.4820
Overnight Sponge 0.876 0.5847 1.498 0.4483
Panarome -1.246 0.5847 -2.131 0.1612

Product = Overnight Liquid Sponge subtracted from:

Difference SE of Adjusted
Product of Means Difference T-Value P-Value
Overnight Sponge 1.7188 0.5847 2.9394 0.0271
Panarome -0.4034 0.5847 -0.6899 0.9003

Product = Overnight Sponge subtracted from:

Difference SE of Adjusted
Product of Means Difference T-Value P-Value
Panarome -2.122 0.5847 -3.629 0.0044

Liquid Brew 80.39ab

Overnight Liquid Sponge 79.55a
Overnight Sponge 81.27b
Panarome 78.86a

8- General Linear Model: Force Maxima versus Product, Preparation, Time

Factor Type Levels Values

Product fixed 4 Liquid Brew, Overnight Liquid Sponge, Overnight
Sponge, Panarome
Preparation fixed 3 Slice, whole Bread, Whole Bread a
Time fixed 4 4, 24, 48, 72

Analysis of Variance for Force Maxima, using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P
Product 3 1.6434 1.6434 0.5478 3.97 0.015
Preparation 2 1.0247 1.0247 0.5124 3.71 0.033
Time 3 56.0277 56.0277 18.6759 135.24 0.000
Error 39 5.3856 5.3856 0.1381
Total 47 64.0814

* Normality Test = 0.060 so p-value is > 0.05

From the table it can be seen that there is a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom).

Tukey Simultaneous Tests

Response Variable Force Maxima
All Pairwise Comparisons among Levels of Product
Product = Liquid Brew subtracted from:

Difference SE of Adjusted
Product of Means Difference T-Value P-Value
Overnight Liquid Sponge -0.1036 0.1517 -0.683 0.9029
Overnight Sponge 0.1454 0.1517 0.959 0.7734
Panarome -0.3614 0.1517 -2.382 0.0975

Product = Overnight Liquid Sponge subtracted from:

Difference SE of Adjusted
Product of Means Difference T-Value P-Value
Overnight Sponge 0.2491 0.1517 1.642 0.3678
Panarome -0.2577 0.1517 -1.699 0.3380

Product = Overnight Sponge subtracted from:

Difference SE of Adjusted
Product of Means Difference T-Value P-Value
Panarome -0.5068 0.1517 -3.341 0.0096

Liquid Brew 2.736ab

Overnight Liquid Sponge 2.632ab
Overnight Sponge 2.878a
Panarome 2.265b

9- General Linear Model: Firmness versus Product, Time

Analysis of Variance for Firmness, using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P

Product 3 30717 30717 10239 8.66 0.005
Time 3 197947 197947 65982 55.80 0.000
Error 9 10643 10643 1183
Total 15 239307

* Normality Test = 0.290 so p-value is > 0.05

From the table it can be seen that there is a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom).

Tukey Simultaneous Tests

Response Variable Firmness
All Pairwise Comparisons among Levels of Product
Product = Liquid Brew subtracted from:

Difference SE of Adjusted
Product of Means Difference T-Value P-Value
Overnight Liquid Sponge 35.672 24.32 1.46706 0.4933
Overnight Sponge 108.105 24.32 4.44590 0.0072
Panarome 1.582 24.32 0.06508 0.9999

Product = Overnight Liquid Sponge subtracted from:

Difference SE of Adjusted
Product of Means Difference T-Value P-Value
Overnight Sponge 72.43 24.32 2.979 0.0620
Panarome -34.09 24.32 -1.402 0.5285

Product = Overnight Sponge subtracted from:

Difference SE of Adjusted
Product of Means Difference T-Value P-Value
Panarome -106.5 24.32 -4.381 0.0079

Liquid Brew 247.4a

Overnight Liquid Sponge 283.1a
Overnight Sponge 355.5b
Panarome 249.0a

Data Analysis using parameters Coefficient of Variation (CV):

1- General Linear Model: No of Peaks AUX versus Product, Preparation, Time

Factor Type Levels Values

Product fixed 4 Liquid Brew, Overnight Liquid Sponge, Overnight
Sponge, Panarome
Preparation fixed 3 Slice, whole Bread, Whole Bread a
Time fixed 4 4, 24, 48, 72

* Normality Test = 0.077 so p-value is > 0.05

Analysis of Variance for No of Peaks AUX, using Adjusted SS for Tests
Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P
Product 3 79.99 79.99 26.66 0.63 0.601
Preparation 2 223.12 223.12 111.56 2.63 0.085
Time 3 802.56 802.56 267.52 6.30 0.001
Error 39 1655.63 1655.63 42.45
Total 47 2761.30

From the table it can be seen that there is not a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom)
And preparations .From other hand there are significant differences between Time.

2- General Linear Model: Area versus Product, Preparation, Time

* Normality Test = 0.120 so p-value is > 0.05

Analysis of Variance for Area, using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P

Product 3 427.06 427.06 142.35 3.57 0.023
Preparation 2 113.45 113.45 56.72 1.42 0.254
Time 3 274.19 274.19 91.40 2.29 0.093
Error 39 1556.69 1556.69 39.92
Total 47 2371.39

From the table it can be seen that there is a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom)
And Time .From other hand there is not significant differences between Time.

Tukey Simultaneous Tests

Response Variable Area
All Pairwise Comparisons among Levels of Product
Product = Liquid Brew subtracted from:

Difference SE of Adjusted
Product of Means Difference T-Value P-Value
Overnight Liquid Sponge -5.509 2.579 -2.136 0.1598
Overnight Sponge -2.940 2.579 -1.140 0.6676
Panarome -8.030 2.579 -3.113 0.0175

Product = Overnight Liquid Sponge subtracted from:

Difference SE of Adjusted
Product of Means Difference T-Value P-Value
Overnight Sponge 2.570 2.579 0.9962 0.7524
Panarome -2.521 2.579 -0.9775 0.7630

Product = Overnight Sponge subtracted from:

Difference SE of Adjusted
Product of Means Difference T-Value P-Value
Panarome -5.091 2.579 -1.974 0.2153

Liquid Brew 19.33a

Overnight Liquid Sponge 13.82ab
Overnight Sponge 16.39ab
Panarome 11.30b

3- General Linear Model: Count Peaks+ versus Product, Preparation, Time

* Normality Test = 0.981 so p-value is > 0.05

Analysis of Variance for Count Peaks+, using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P

Product 3 197.15 197.15 65.72 0.76 0.525
Preparation 2 707.88 707.88 353.94 4.07 0.025
Time 3 3673.31 3673.31 1224.44 14.09 0.000
Error 39 3388.86 3388.86 86.89

From the table it can be seen that there is not a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom).
From other hand there are significant differences between Time and preparations.

4- General Linear Model: Average Drop Off versus Product, Preparation, Time

Factor Type Levels Values

Product fixed 4 Liquid Brew, Overnight Liquid Sponge, Overnight
Sponge, Panarome
Preparation fixed 3 Slice, whole Bread, Whole Bread a
Time fixed 4 4, 24, 48, 72

* Normality Test = 0.925 so p-value is > 0.05

Analysis of Variance for Average Drop Off, using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P

Product 3 1079.8 1079.8 359.9 0.52 0.668
Preparation 2 7989.6 7989.6 3994.8 5.82 0.006
Time 3 6355.7 6355.7 2118.6 3.09 0.038
Error 39 26750.2 26750.2 685.9
Total 47 42175.3

From the table it can be seen that there is not a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom).
From other hand there are significant differences between Time and preparations.

5- General Linear Model: Average Gradient versus Product, Preparation, Time

* Normality Test = 0.005 so p-value is < 0.05

Analysis of Variance for Average Gradient, using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P

Product 3 3267 3267 1089 0.99 0.407
Preparation 2 2407 2407 1203 1.10 0.344
Time 3 15129 15129 5043 4.59 0.008
Error 39 42806 42806 1098
Total 47 63609
6- General Linear Model: Fit Distance versus Product, Preparation, Time

* Normality Test = 0.056 so p-value is > 0.05

Analysis of Variance for Fit Distance, using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P

Product 3 1.5 1.5 0.5 0.00 1.000
Preparation 2 323.3 323.3 161.6 0.84 0.440
Time 3 1095.8 1095.8 365.3 1.89 0.147
Error 39 7520.0 7520.0 192.8
Total 47 8940.6

From the table it can be seen that there is not a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom)
and Time and preparations.

7- General Linear Model: Aux1 Maxima ) versus Product, Preparation, Time

* Normality Test = 0.119 so p-value is > 0.05

Analysis of Variance for Aux1 Maxima ), using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P

Product 3 6.101 6.101 2.034 1.59 0.208
Preparation 2 4.427 4.427 2.213 1.73 0.191
Time 3 39.952 39.952 13.317 10.39 0.000
Error 39 49.989 49.989 1.282
Total 47 100.469

From the table it can be seen that there is not a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom).

8- General Linear Model: Force Maxima versus Product, Preparation, Time

* Normality Test = 0.061 so p-value is > 0.05

Analysis of Variance for Force Maxima, using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P

Product 3 327.83 327.83 109.28 1.73 0.177
Preparation 2 688.79 688.79 344.40 5.44 0.008
Time 3 452.00 452.00 150.67 2.38 0.084
Error 39 2468.34 2468.34 63.29
Total 47 3936.97

From the table it can be seen that there is not a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom).

9- General Linear Model: Firmness versus Product, Time

Factor Type Levels Values

Product fixed 4 Liquid Brew, Overnight Liquid Sponge, Overnight Sponge,
 Panarome
Time fixed 4 4, 24, 48, 72

* Normality Test = 0.47 so p-value is > 0.05

Analysis of Variance for Firmness, using Adjusted SS for Tests

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P

Product 3 120.84 120.84 40.28 0.89 0.484
Time 3 636.80 636.80 212.27 4.67 0.031
Error 9 409.15 409.15 45.46
Total 15 1166.79

From the table it can be seen that there is not a significant different between
products (Liquid Brew, Overnight Sponge, Overnight Liquid Sponge and Panarom).