Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
net/publication/230158258
CITATIONS READS
107 459
2 authors, including:
Charles Stansfield
Language Learning and Testing Foundation
173 PUBLICATIONS 1,181 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Charles Stansfield on 02 May 2018.
Jacqueline Hmsen
Boulder V d k y PuMi Schools
ChrrlcsstrrrsfitM
University of Cdondo, Boulder
Psychologcal literature o n field independence indicates t h a t a fwld-independent
person possesocs enhanced cognitive restructunng abilitws. w h i k a f wld 4 e p e n d e n t
indivrdual is likely t o possess well-dcvelopcd interpersonal skills I t was hypothesized t h a t
f'ld independence would be related to the acquisition of linguistic competence, a n d t h a t
field dependence would be related t o the acquisition of communicative c o m p e t e n a
Approximately 300 students e n r o l k d in a first semester college Spanish class were
administered the G r o u p Embedded Figum Test of field dependence-independence
Those scores were then correlated w t h scom o n tests of linguistic. communrcativc, and
integrative competence Student scx and scholastic aptitude were included in thedesign
as m oderato r varmbks. The results indicate that field independence playsa r o k in stcond
language karnrng. T h i s rok was p r t r c u l r r l y n o tic e a b k in the acquisition of linguistic
competence and integrative competence It was only barely n o tlc e a b k in the acquisition
of communicative competence Some classroom impllcrtions are discussed
METHODS
ofthe authors. Students met for the remaining three classes each week in
small group sections of about 20 people. Here emphasis was placed on
performing communicative competence tasks. Students were graded
separately on their linguistic and communicative competence all semester.
A comprehensive description of the instructional program is available
elsewhere (Stadreld 1974).
Table I
Sampk group scholastic^ ahiiit.\*information+
Toward the end of the semester the researchers met with the course
instructors t o explain the research project and instruments. At that time all
instructors were askad to complete the Oral Skill Evaluation for each
student. The GEFT was administered to all of the students during a large-
group lecture session. One of the researchers discussed the project with the
group and urged everyone t o participate. Only a few didn't, appearing to
study instead. No attempt was made to coerce those individuals. Nor was
thcrc any subsequent effort t o test either them, the people whose booklet
showed confusion about test instructions, or anyone who was absent. As a
result, wobk FD/I scores were obtained for 253 of the 293 students
compkting the course. The language proficiency measures were collected
0s part of the normal course evaluation proceedings.
Hansen and Stansjield 357
Initially, Hoyt reliability estimates were obtained for the GEFT (.90),the
Final Exam (.97), and the Cloze Test (.75). Correlations were also
established among the six measures of language proficiency themselves.
Where possible, the observed correlations were corrected for attenuation
to reduce measurement error (Nunnally 1978). The correlation matrix in
Table 2 suggests a substantial relationship is present among the several
observations of language competence. However, the amount of shared
variance is not extreme in most instances, indicating that a degree of
independence does seem to exist among these measures.
Table 2
Currehriuns b e r w . e e n ihe various
measures of Spanish proficient:,,
Written
exam Oral Oral Final
grade Final grade skill course
average exam average evil. grade
Final exam .86
Oral grade
averap .70 .67
Oral skill
evaluation .70 .70 .76
Final course
.93 .88 .76 73
Clozc test .68 .80 .a .64 .69
p. < .OOl in all instances
Toble 3
CwruhiioEu brtween srudrnr FD/ I (GEFTscore)' and
prfw- on six measures of Spanish proficiency
two moderator variables, student sex and student scholastic ability. The
latter was indicated by A.C.T. Math and English scores for a subgroup of
102 students. The results of that analysis a r e shown in Table 4.
Table 4
observed correiarions k r w n n indqudenr.
modwaror. and depmdenr measures
(number of cases is shown in parentheses)
A.C.1.- A.C.1.-
SCX English Math
FD/ I
GEFT -. I
(253)
Language proficiency
Written exam grade average
Final exam
Cloze test
* p < .os
**p< .01
***p < .ooI
Toble 5
First-or&r portid correlorions between
student FDl I (G EFT score)' and ptrformonce
on six meosures of S w i s h pro/icienc.v.
prtialling OUI student sex
Tab& 6
Firsr-or&r jwrrial corrtlarions k t ween
s r d n r FDI I (GE F T wore)' and performance
on six measures of Spanish proficient:,,.
parrialling our scholasric abi1ir.r
( A .C. T. Math Score)
Observed Disattenuaccd
partial partwrl
Language measure correlation cor rchtion'
~ ~~
Linguistic competence
Written exam grade average .07 ( I ) .07
Final exam .II (2) .I3
Communicative competence
Oral ~ r a d average
e .08
Oral skill evolution .I4
7
Integrativc competence
Final course grade .II ( I ) .I2
Cloze test .I7 (2 ) -22.
n = 102
+ p < .os
'A higher G E F T score indicates a relatively greater degree of field independence
this column ( I ) signifies disattenuation for one variable and ( 2 ) shows a similar
correction o n two varlobks
DISCUSSION
The central hypothesis in this exploratory study was that traits
associated with both field dependence a n d field independence would
enhance various aspects of foreign language skill development. Yet, a m o n g
362 b n g u a g e Laarning V o l . 31. N o . 2
the colkgc students who formed the sample group here, the results indicate
that field independence, o r cognitive restructuring ability, was related to
better performance in a formal, introductory-level Spanish language
course.
This conclusion is evident from the series of significant, positive
correlations between student cognitive style and scores on the foreign
language achievement measures. These correlations reveal the direction
and strength of the relationship between F D / l and performance in the
three areas of L2 competence-linguistic, communicative, and integrative.
One probkm inherent in correlational analysis is that statistically
siQtrrficant correlations may be found when the observed association is
actually rather weak. Another difficulty is that the existence of a
correlational relationship does not necessarily imply a cause-andeffect
connection between the two variables; rather, it attests to an associational
link and m a y furnish clues to the causes. In this case, the existence of
significant and positive correlations is interpreted as a n indication that the
cognitive restructuring abilities linked to field independence are perhaps
being utilized to promote successful performance o n various second
language tasks. Nonetheless, it is interesting to note that the strength of the
relationship between cognitive restructuring skill and second language
achievement varies among the three aspects of language proficiency
examined in this study. Those varying relationships will be discussed, in
order, from the weakest to the strongest.
The lowest correlations were found between student F D / 1 and perfor-
mance on not only the two ratings of communicative competence, Oral
Grade Average and Oral Evaluation, but also the integrative measure Final
Coursc Grade. The latter observation, however, was partially derived
(45%) from each student's oral grades received during the semester and
thus overlaps with the communicative competence assessments. Though
statistically significant, the associational data did not show a notably
strong relati
r hip in this area of language proficiency. Thus, apparently
cognitive res ucturing skills are involved to some extent in successful
classroom communication in another tongue, but in a more minor fashion
than in the other areas of foreign language proficiency, the linguistic and
the integrative. As pointed out by Oller and Hinofotis (1976). overall
second language proficiency seems t o involve a separate "speaking ability"
factor beyond the substantial factor of "general competence', identified in
their research. It is presumed that this speaking factor was evaluated in the
observations of Spanish communicative competence employed in this
Hansen and Stansfield 363
CONCLUSION
Essentially there are two academic implications emerging from the
findings of this study which deserve mention. In one respect. the results
indicate that field independence, or cognitive restructuring ability. is a n
individual learner trait that plays a positive. albeit minor, role in the
development of overall foreign language proficiency. The positive. linear
correlations ranging from .20to .43 between student cognitive style and
performance o n the various measures of Spanish competence suggest that a
relatively greater degree of field independence is associated with a higher
level of achievement. Consequently, thedata imply that educators might be
well advised to be aware of this student FD/ I factor in L2 progress. For
instance, Bialystok a n d Howard (1979) report being able to teach second
language students to refine their inferencing strategies. a n approach to
information-processing which is perhaps not readily utilized o r available to
field-dependent learners without training. Teachers might be trained to
adjust their instructional strategies. materials. and testing methods to
benefit all students.
On the other hand, the observed correlational relationships between
student FD/ I style and Spanish proficiency are generally rather modest. It
c
seems that the association is perhaps not strong enough to merit the design
of elaborate educational programs focused solely o n the individual
variation in FD/I preference. The amount of work in such adaptations
might not yield results commensurate with the effort.
REFERENCES
Aitkcn. K . 1975. TESL applications of the clozc proccdurc: an annotated bibliography.
ERIC Document Reproduction Service N o . ED 109 922.
Aitken. K. 1977. Using cloze procedure as an overall language proficiency test. TESOL
@urterfb* I I :59-67.
Bialystok. E.. and M . Frohlich. 1977. Aspects of second l a n g u a s karning in classroom
settings. Working Pajwrs on Bilingualism. N o . 13. Toronto: Ontario Institute f o r Studies
in Education.
Bialystok. E.. and M . Frohlich. 1978. Variabks of classroom achievement in second longwgc
learning. Mo&m Lpnguage Journal 621327-336.
Bialystok. E.. and J . Howard. 1979. lnferencing as an aspect of cloze t e s t performance.
WorAring P q r s on Bilinguulism. No . 13. Toronto: Institute for Studies in Education.
Brown. H. 1973. Affective variabks in second language acquisition. hnguuge burning
2 3 2 3 1-244.
366 b n g u a g e Learning Vol. 31. No. 2
Brown. H. 1978. The good l a n g u e teacher: coping with the effect of affect. CA TESOL
&cu&nui Pqprrs. No. 4. (ERIC Document Reproduction Scrvice No. E D 166 953)
Carrd. J.. and others. 1967. The foreign language attainments of language majors in the
rnior year. Cambridp. Mass.: Harvard University School of Education.
Candl. J.. a d S. !Upon. 1959. M o d e r n langwp aptitude test: manual. San Francisco.
Calif.: Psycho-l Corporation.
Carstens. P. 1979. Normal clozc scores and multiplechoice cloze scores for testing German
as a second language. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Minnesota.
Cudtn. C.. a n d E. Lcwtt.1976. Culturally responsive education: A response to Lau guide-
lines I I . Paper prepared for conferences on ReKarch and Policy Implications of the Task
Forcc of the U. S. ofcicc of C i v i l Rights: Findings Specifying Remedies for Eliminating
Put Educational Practices Rukd Unlawful Under Lau v. Nichols. Southwest Educational
Development Lab. Austin. Texas. June 17-18. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service
No. E D 135 241)
Cox. J. 1977. Current trends in foreign Iangwp testing. Paper presented at the Fall
Conference of the South Carolina Chapter of the American Association of Teachers of
German, Conway. S.C. (ERIC Document Reproduction Scrvice No. E D 157 379)
Hamen. J. 1980. Ficld-dcpcndent-independent cognitive style and foreign language pro-
fickncy among c o l k p studcnts in a n introductory Spanish course. Unpublished Doctoral
Dissertation. University of Colorado.
Inyun. E. 1968. Testing in the context of a language learning experiment. h n g u ~ g ~
LrWnihg, Spc~iOlISSUC NO. 3. pp. 147-161.
Jonz. J . 1976. I m p r o v i n g on the basic egg: the m-c cloze. hnguage Learning 2 6 2 5 5 - 2 6 5 .
Krashen. S. 1977. Some issues relating to the monitor model. In Brown, H..C. Yorio. and
R. Clymc~(4s). On T&SOL 77. Washington. D.C.: Teachers of English to Speakers of
Other Languages.
Naiman, N.. M. Frohlich. H. Stern. and A. Todesco. 1978. The good language teacher.
ksrarch in Edrccrrrion Srrirs No. 7. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Neufeld. G. 1979. Towards a theory of langwgc learning ability. hnguuge kurnrng
29.227-24 I .
Nunnally, J.C. 1978. Psychometric Throry, 2nd cd. New York: M c G r a w Hill.
OUcr. J.. Jr. 1973. Clozc tests of second language proficiency and what they measure. h n -
burning 23:IOS- I 18.
Olkr. J.. Jr. 1976. A program for language testing research. hnguage Luarning. Special
ISSW NO. 4. pp. 141-166.
Olkr. J., Jr.. and F. Hinofotis. 1976. T w o mutually exclusive hypotheses about second lan-
gw#c ability: factor analytic studies of a variety of language tests. Paper presented at the
A n n u l Meeting of the Ltnguistic Society of America. Philadelphia. ( E R I C Document
Reproduction Service No. E D 139 267)
O n taw .A.. and D. Birckbichler. 1978. Diagnosing and responding to individual learner's
d s . Modern Language Journal 62:336-344.
P 8 l w . A. 1979. Compartmentalized and integrated control: a n assessment of some evidence
for two kinds of competence and implications for the classroom. hnguage Learning
2!kI@-lW.
SUnrfiCld. C. 1974. lndivbdwlited first-year Spanish at the University of Colorado. ADFL..
Bulktin of the Association of Departments of Foreign Languages 6:36-4C.
Suduld. c. Forthcoming. Contemporary Second Language Testing. Concord. Mass.
Hcink and Heink.
Thorndike. R..and E. Hagcn. 1977. Measurement and Evaluation in Ps,vc.holog.t,und Educu-
riun. 4th ed. New York. N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons.
Hansen and Stansfield 367
Tucker. G . . E. Hamayan. and F. Genesee. 1976. Affective. cognitive and social factors in
second language acquisition. Canadion Mo&m 1pngwge Review 32:2 14226.
Upshur. J. 197s. Objective evaluation of oral proficiency in the ESOL classroom. In Palmer.
L.. and B. Spolsky (eds.). Papers on hnguage Testing 1967-1971. Washington. D.C.:
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Longuays.
Walker. J.. and F. Perry. 1978. M a k s versus femaksas sccond-language karncrs. TESL Tulk
9:69-70.
Witkin. H. 1978. Cognitiw Styles in firsono1 and Cultural Adqptation. The Heini Werner
Lecture !Series. vol. 1 1 . Worcester. Mass.: Clark University Press.
Witkin. H..and D. Goodenough. 1977a. Ficld4ependcncc and interpersonal behavior.
Psychological h l & t i n W:66 1-609.
Witkin. H.. and 0. Goodcnough. 1977b. Field I k p m d m t - r Re~isitrd.Princeton. N. J..
Educational Testing Service. (ETS RB-77-16)
Witkin, H..D. Goodcnough. and P. Oltman. 1979. Psychological differentiation. current
status. Journal of Prr.sono1it.v and Social Psyi-hologv 37:I 127- I 145.
Witkin. H.. P. Oltman. E. Raskin. and S. Karp. 1971. A Manw1,for the Drrlwdded F/Ruru.\
Tests. Palo Alto. Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press. Inc. .