Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
https://youtu.be/ym9gMC-Bv80
- Time constraints
• Services high in credence characteristics may cause consumers to use process factors and
tangible cues as proxies to evaluate quality—halo effect
The Gaps Model—A Conceptual Tool to Identify and Correct Service Quality Problems
6. Interpretation gap: Pretest communications to make sure message is clear and unambiguous
• Fishbone diagram
• Pareto Chart
- Separating the trivial from the important. Often, a majority of problems is caused by a
minority of causes (i.e. the 80/20 rule)
• Blueprinting
- Visualization of service delivery, identifying points where failures are most likely to
occur
Blueprinting
• Used to identify potential fall points—where failures are most likely to appear
• Shows how failures at one point may have a ripple effect later
https://youtu.be/2O_30zbjYv4
• Customers who experience a service failure that is satisfactorily resolved more likely to make
future purchases than customers without problems (Note: not all research supports this
paradox)
• If second service failure occurs, the paradox disappears—customers’ expectations have been
raised and they become disillusioned
• Severity and “recoverability” of failure (e.g., spoiled wedding photos) may limit firm’s ability to
delight customer with recovery efforts
• Post-transaction surveys
• Employee surveys/panels
• Focus groups
• Mystery shopping
• Complaint analysis
• Frontline employees
• Intermediaries acting for original supplier
• Telephone or e-mail
https://youtu.be/nNc_zoHi3AA
Summary
• Customer can complain by taking public action, private action or no action at all