TITLE _______________________________________________________________________ YEAR: __________________________________________

RESEARCHER_________________________________________________________________ SCHOOL/PUBLISHED BY: ___________________________

STUDENT’S NAME_____________________________________________________________

Chap 1 Background of the Study

Introduction Theoretical Framework Conceptual Framework Statement of the Problem Hypothesis/Assumption Scope and Limitation Significance of the
Study
At present, the This study was This study was This study aims to assess the custodial The researchers will The study was This study aims to

number of Children covered by the anchored by investigation on the Children in Conflict with test the following null focused only and determine the

in Conflict with the Maslow Hierarchy Republic Act the Law in the area of Sampaloc and Tondo hypotheses: covered the effectiveness of

Law (CICL) was development no.9344 and Manila 1. There is following: Custodial

seriously Theory, Social Philippine National Specifically, it seeks to answer the following significant difference Investigation on

increasing in the Process Theory, Police Manual in questions: on the perception of Children in Conflict

past four years in and Sociological Handling Cases of the respondents on with the Law. The
1. What is the profile of respondents
our country, based Theories. Children at Risk the handling of result of the study
in terms of:
on Department of and Children in custodial will be beneficial to
1.1 Offense Involved
Social Welfare and Conflict with the investigation of the the following;
1.2 Sex
Development Law. In the R.A CICL by the law
1.3 Age
(DSWD). As time 9344 (Sec.4) (m) enforcement
1.4 Educational background
passed by, crimes "Juvenile Justice personnel; and
1.5 Number of years in the
or illegal activities and Welfare 2. There is
custody
committed by System" refers to a significant difference
2. How does the respondents
minors or children system dealing with on the perception of
perceived the custodial
in conflict with the children at risk and the respondents on
investigation of Children in
law is one of the children in conflict the effects of
Conflict with the law (CICL) to the
major problems in with the law, which custodial
law enforcement/authority during
our country since provides child- investigation upon
the following stages:
they have the right appropriate the well-being of the
2.1 Custodial Investigation;
not to be proceedings, CICL.
and
imprisoned or including programs
2.2 Custodial Facilities
charged by any and services for
3. What are the perceived effects of
penalties by the prevention,
the custodial investigation upon
law. In some diversion,
the following:
cases, some rehabilitation, re-
3.1 Psychological well-being
individuals use or integration and
3.2 Physical well-being
repress minors to after care to ensure
3.3 Emotional well-being
do crimes or illegal their normal growth

activities for their and development. 4. Is there significant difference on

own sake. The the perception of the respondents on the

most common handling of custodial investigation of the

crimes committed CICL by the law enforcement authority?

by minors are 5. Is there any significant difference

theft / robbery, on the perception of the respondents on the

vandalism, effects of custodial investigation upon the

disorderly conduct, well-being of the CICL?

assault, marijuana

possession,

tobacco offense,

curfew violation,

school discipline,

traffic violation,

murder, homicide

and others

common city

ordinance based

on the latest news.

Chap 3 Research Methods

Research Design Respondents of the Study Sampling Technique Instrumentation Data Gathering Procedures Statistical Treatment of
(include the demographic Data
profile in case)
1. Survey In order to obtain the In order to analyze

Questionnaire - necessary information and interpret the data,

This study used needed in the research, the following Statistical

self-constructed the researcher followed tool will be used in

questionnaires. the following procedures. order to answer the

The questionnaire question raised in

1. The
is composed of Chapter 1:
researchers
three parts:
drafted a
A. The first part is
request letters
the
for the conduct
demographic
of survey
profile of the
together with
Children in
the survey
Conflict with the
questionnaire
Law
to be
respondents,
distributed to
consisting of
the
question with
 regards, to their respondents.

category, 2. The letter and

gender, age, survey

educational questionnaire

attainment, and were

number of submitted to

years in the panel for

custody. validation.

B. The second 3. The

part is researchers

consisted of disseminated

questions with to the

regards to their respondents

Custodial the approved

Investigation request letter

and Custodial from the

Facilities that chairmens or

led the kagawads in

researchers to the area for

 determine if identification of

Children in children who

Conflict with the underwent

Law (CICL) custodial

abuse their investigation

rights and if and with

they have bad consent letter

experience of their

apprehended guardian for

by authority/law the conduct of

enforcer. the study

together with
C. The last part of
the survey
the
questionnaire
questionnaire is
and were
for the
given time for
perceived
them to
effects of the
answer the
Custodial
survey
Investigation to
the Children in accordingly

Conflict with the with the guide

Law in the area of researcher.

of Tondo and Some

Sampaloc respondents

Manila. were assisted

by the

researcher for

clear data

gathering. The

survey

questionnaires

which

contained the

needed

information

essential to

this study were

collected by
 the

researchers.

4. Lastly, all

collected

information

and gathered

data on the

survey

questionnaire

were

evaluated, and

were analyzed

by the

researcher

using

evaluative

statistics.
Chap 5 Summary, Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations

Summary Findings Conclusion Recommendation

From the data gathered the following Based on the analysis of the Derive from conclusions drawn, the
The study aimed to assess the Custodial
were findings: study, the following conclusions are following are hereby recommended.
Investigation on the Children in Conflict with
1. Profile of the respondents drawn: 1. The law enforcement or the
the Law
1.1. Offense Involved. Out of 1. Based on the profile of the authorities of custody must maintain
Specifically, it sought to answer in terms of
30 Children in Conflict with the Law respondents (CICL), most are males or enhance their knowledge and
the following:
respondents, 11 or 37% with the majority age of 15 to 18 and capability in order to develop proper

1. What is the profile of respondents committed Crimes Against Person, 6 at low level of educational attainment due process and proper

in terms of: or 20% were on Crimes Against are involves in crime. reconsideration on the rights of the

1.1 Offense Involved Property, 6 or 20% committed 2. More than half, the respondents Children in Conflict with the Law.

1.2 Sex Violations to City Ordinance and 7 or (CICL) agreed to the positive or good 2. The law enforcement or authorities

1.3 Age 23% are Dangerous Drugs. implementation of law of custody must have temperance,

1.4 Educational background 1.2 Gender. Out of 30 Children enforcer/authorities of custody to the patience and knowledge in performing

1.5 Number of years in the in Conflict with the Law respondents, Custodial Investigation on the their duties in handling Children in

custody 24 or 80% are Male and 6 or 20% are Children in Conflict with the Law. Conflict with the Law because CICL

2. How do the respondents perceive Female. 3. Majority of the respondents (CICL) have special rights and special needs.

the custodial investigation of 1.3 Age. Out of 30 agree/said that Custodial Investigation 3. The custody must provide or

Children in Conflict with the law respondents, 1 or 3.33% is 13 years on the Children in Conflict with the maintain the good and clean

(CICL) to the law old, 1 or 3.33% is 14 years old, 4 or Law did not affect their well-being. environmental facilities because good
 13.33% are 15 years old, 10 or 4. There is no significant difference on and clean environmental facilities are
enforcement/authority during the
33.33% are 16 years old, 10 or the perception of the respondents on very important factors in terms of
following stages:
33.33% are 17 years old and 4 or the handling on custodial investigation children development.
2.1 Custodial Investigation;
13.33% are 18 years old. of the CICL by the Law enforcement 4. The public must be aware to the
and
1.4 Educational Attainment. authorities because Sampaloc and latest happening to the society and
2.2 Custodial Facilities.
Out of 30 Children in Conflict with the Tondo, Manila is under the control of must react or inform the agency
3. What are the perceived effects of
Law respondents, 14 or 47% Attained the custody of the city of Manila. responsible for the protection of
the custodial investigation upon
Elementary, 14 or 47% Attained High 5. There is no significant difference on children in terms of the abused rights
the following:
School and 2 or 6% reached College. the perception of the respondents of the children.
3.1 Psychological well-being.
1.5 Number of Months or (CICL) on the effects of custodial 5. The law enforcement and custodies
3.2 Physical well-being.
Years in Custody. Out of 30 Children investigation upon the well-being of of authority must show good image to
3.3 Emotional well-being
in Conflict with the Law respondents, the CICL because more law be a role model in the society in terms

4. Is there significant difference on 13 or 43% are 1 day to 1 week in the enforcement know that CICL have of crime prevention.

the perception of the respondents on the Custodial Facilities, 3 or 10% are 1 special rights and have special needs. 6. Further research is required in this

handling of custodial investigation of the week to 1 month in the Custodial study to widen the area of this

CICL by the law enforcement personnel? Facilities, 5 or 17% are 1month to research in terms of public

5. Is there any significant difference 3months in the Custodial Facilities, 6 awareness.

on the perception of the respondents on the or 20% are 4 months to 6 months in

effects of custodial investigation upon the the Custodial Facilities, and 0% in 7

well-being of the CICL? months to 9 months, 3 or 10% are 10

 months to 1 year in their Custodial

The study will be significant to the Facilities and 0% in 1 year and above.

following: media, parents/guardian, minors,

law enforcement, criminology student and to 2. Perception of the Children in

future researcher. Conflict with the Law (CICL)

respondents to the Custodial

The study utilized the descriptive Investigation.

evaluative method. 2.1. Custodial Investigation.

The respondents assessed the

The population of the study is Custodial Investigation of Custodial

composed of 30 Children in Conflict with the Investigation on the Children in

Law (CICL) in the area of Sampaloc and Conflict with the Law as “Agree” with a

Tondo, Manila. weighted mean of 2.98.

The research instrument used in 2.2. Custodial Facilities. The

collecting data for the study is a Self Made respondents assessed the Custodial

Survey Questionnaire. Facilities of Custodial Investigation on

the Children in Conflict with the Law

The descriptive statistics used in as “Agree” with a weighted mean of

treating the data were the Weighted Mean 2.96.

which was used in answering sub-problem 3. Perceived effects on the Children

no. 2 and 3 and the T-test which was used in Conflict with the Law (CICL)

in answering sub-problem no.4 and 5. respondents to their Psychological,

Physical and Emotional well-being

on the Custodial Investigation of

Children in Conflict with the Law.

3.1. Psychological well-

being. The respondents assessed the

Psychological well-being of Custodial

Investigation on the Children in

Conflict with the Law as “Agree” with a

weighted mean of 2.77.

3.2. Physical well-being. The

respondents assessed the Physical

well-being of Custodial Investigation

on the Children in Conflict with the

Law as “Agree” with a weighted mean

of 2.99.

3.3 Emotional well-being. The

respondents assessed the Emotional

well-being of Custodial Investigation

on the Children in Conflict with the

Law as “Agree” with a weighted mean

of 2.9

4. Significant Difference in the

Custodial Investigation and

Facilities on Custodial Investigation

of Children in Conflict with the Law.

4.4. Custodial investigation

and Facilities. The Computed T-Test

which is 1.51 is lower than the T-Test

Critical Value which is 2.05.

5. Significant Difference in the

Psychological, Physical and

Emotional well-being on Custodial

Investigation of Children in Conflict

with the Law.

5.5 Psychological, Physical

and Emotional well-being. The

Computed T-Test which is -0.32 is

lower than the T-Test Critical Value

which is 2.05.