Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1
Historical Context of the Rizal Law
Welcome to the first lesson on the course on the Life and Works of Jose Rizal. This lesson
provides a discussion on the historical context and contents of the Rizal Law and examines the
social, political, and economic conditions in the Philippines in the 19th century. Studying the
historical context of the RIzal Law allows us to better understand the contents, rationale and
importance of the law. Similarly, studying the 19th century is helpful in studying the life, works,
and ideas of Dr. Jose Rizal because this puts him in the appropriate context.
The following are the learning outcomes we are expected to achieve at the end of the lesson:
Accomplish the module exercises. Read the full text of the Rizal Law and the work of
propagandists.
Many Filipino students are curious why they are still required to study the life and
works of Jose Rizal in college despite having studied the biography of Jose Rizal and his
two novels in their high school years. They believe that it might just be a repetition of the
things they have learned and that it would be a waste of their time. Little did they know
that they are mandated by the law to study the life and works of Jose Rizal not only in
high school but also in college and they might not even have an idea what this law had
gone through in order to be passed and approved.
On June 12, 1956, Philippines Independence Day, the Republic Act 1425 (R.A.
1425) also known as the Rizal Law was passed. It is an act “to Include in the Curricula of
All Public and Private Schools, Colleges and Universities courses on the life, works and
writings of Jose Rizal, particularly his novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo.
Authorizing the printing and distribution thereof, and for other purposes”.
Read the contents of the law and answer the following questions:
a. Why was it passed at the same time as the Philippine Independence Day?
b. Why only Jose Rizal was selected to be studied?
c. What are the goals or purpose of this law?
d. How will it be implemented?
At present, the passage of the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012
(Republic Act No. 10354) or popularly known as the R.H. Law was probably one of the most
controversial laws passed due to the opposing reactions of the Filipinos to its passage. There
were those who were anti and pro RG Lawwho rallied for or against its implementation. Half a
century ago, a similar thing happened to the Rizal Law. According to the historian Ambeth
Ocampo (1990), the debate was so intense that it ended in a fist fight between two hot-headed
lawmakers. The strongest opposition came from the Catholic Church, arguing that the law would
violate the freedom of conscience and religion. They argued that “Rizal violated the Church’s
laws specifically Canon Law 1399, which forbids books that attack or ridicule any of the catholic
dogmas or which defend errors condemned by the Holy See.”
They also argued that only 25 passages of Noli Me Tangere were patriotic as compared to the
120 passages that were anti-catholic. Furthermore, they pointed that Rizal retracted his ‘attacks’
on the Catholic Church before he was executed. They maintained that Filipinos could still
venerate him as a national hero even without reading the two novels and that Filipino students
could read other works done by Rizal Instead of the two Novels. The Catholic Church’s
opposition went up to the extent of threatening religious sanctions to all the supporters of the
law. A bishop wrote a letter to Rafael Palma a biographer of Rizal, saying that ‘we prohibit under
the paid of sin and canonical sanctions the reading, keeping or retention of the same [Noli and
El Fili] whether in original or in translation in the Archdiocese of Manila and Cebu.”
Read the full text of the CBCP's statement opposing the Rizal Law in the following website:
http://www.cbcponline.net/documents/1950s/1956-novels_of_rizal.html
Among the prominent ‘defenders’ of the Rizal Law was Sen. Claro M. Recto who was
the author of the law and fought hard for its passage despite the threat of losing votes and
religious sanctions. He assailed the people who opposed the law by saying that fighting against
the law is like fighting Rizal and attempting to “blot out his memory.” The supporters of the bill
maintained that the law would uplift Filipino sense of identity and nationalism especially during
that time when Filipino sense of identity and nationalism was dwindling and the prevalence of
American neo-colonalism in the Philippines.
After long and divisive debates, the Rizal Law was passed with certain provisions that
served as compromise between two opposing sides. One of these compromises is the
exemption given to those who feel that their faith is damaged by reading Rizal's novels provided
that they file a sworn statement stating as such as stated in Sec. 1 of the Rizal Law .
Jose Rizal’s ideas and philosophies in life could be better understood in the context of
his time. The historical context of Jose Rizal allows us to see the prevailing social, economic,
political and cultural conditions of Spanish colonial regime in the Philippines and how these
influenced Rizal.
Conditions in Spain
During the first three quarters of the 19th century, Spain has been in turmoil especially
when it was conquered by France. When the monarchy was restored in 1814, Fernando VII
returned to absolutism [absolute power is vested in the monarch e.i. The king]. When he died he
passed his crown to his infant daughter Isabel, under the regency [a government or period in
which a person/regent rules in place of the king/queen] of her mother Maria Cristina. Civil war
broke out when Don Carlos, the king’s younger brother was claiming the throne. As a result,
revolts between the Liberals (supporters of Maria Cristina) and Carlists (supporters of Don
Carlos) ensued. In 1886, when Isabella became queen, a revolution against her took place and
she was forced to abdicate. Alfonso XII of Spain became king, which finally brought Spain into a
period of stability and reform.
Events in Spain had implications on her colonies. The Philippines and Cuba are two of
the colonies that had waged a revolution for total emancipation from Spain. The political, social,
religious and economic changes in Spain during the latter part of the 19th century have
repercussions in the colonies. In the Philippines Spain has no clear program in uplifting the
country's economy. The Manila-Acapulco Galleon Trade only served the Spanish and Chinese
people in the country but it did not help the colony as a whole. It only served as a trans-
shipment point between China and Mexico thus benefiting very few Filipinos. Governor-generals
initiated reforms in commerce and agriculture but were not enough to boost economic growth.
The social conditions in the Philippines during the 19th century were discussed by the
propagandists. The Propaganda Movement was organized by Filipinos in exile or studying in
Europe. They came from wealthy middle-class families in the Philippines The Propaganda
movement aimed to expose the worsening conditions in the Philippines and ask reforms needed
to improve the lives of the Filipinos. Three of the works done by the propagandists exposed the
‘social ills’ that were perennial and extensive. These works are:
Welcome to the second lesson on the course on the Life and Works of Jose Rizal. This lesson
is about the development of Filipino nationalism. It discusses the historical context of the
development of Filipino nationalism. It also provides a discussion on the events that have
shaped or influenced it and its repercussions to the Spanish colonial regime and to the Filipinos
Objectives
The following are the learning outcomes we are expected to achieve at the end of the
lesson:
● Discuss the development of the meaning or connotation of ‘Filipino’;
● Identify the factors that have led to the evolution of the Filipino consciousness;
● Discuss Filipino nationalism;
● Discuss the relevance and significance of the development of Filipino consciousness at
present time
● Analyze the factors and reason which lead to the development of Filipino consciousness
● Examine the role of Jose Rizal and other propagandists in the development of Filipino
consciousness
Activities/Exercises
Accomplish the module exercises. Watch a documentary about the development of Filipino
consciousness and nationalism
Filipino nationalism is a product of social, economic and political changes during the
19th century. Before the 19th century there was no national consciousness hence, no Filipino
nationalism. As historian Teodoro Agoncillo puts it, “Although united as one heographical unit
called Las Islas Filipinas during the Spanish colonial rule, the people called Filipinos applied
only to the Spaniards born in the Philippines (insulares), and the indigents were derogatorily
called indios. The indios were not united in words and in deeds, as the Spanish church and
state officials, mainly the friars, divided and ruled the natives. Thus, the “indios” became
“Filipino” only during the last years of Spanish regime. (Agocillo, 1990)
It was only in the last century of Spanish rule that Filipino consciousness emerged. The
development of Filipino nationalism was a conglomeration of social, economic and political
phenomena that has happened in the world and in the Philippines.
5. Secularization Movement
● Secularization of the parishes was the transfer of ministries established and run by
regular clergy [Spanish friars] to the secular priests [Filipino priests]. By the midst of the
19th century, the secularization movement was transmuted into a political and separatist
movement which exploded in the Filipinization of the church, and culminated in the
separation of the church from Roem during the Philippines revolution (Agoncillo 1990).
● The secularization was organized secretly by Padre Mariano Gomez and Padre Pedro
Pelaez. The conflict between regular and secular priests arose when the regular priests
(friars) attempted to seice the control of parishes from the secular priests and rampant
abuses and discrimination made by friars to the seculars (Grpaldo, et., al., 2009).