Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CRIMINAL LAW
Green Notes 2019
Green Notes 2019 Criminal Law
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CRIMINAL LAW I 1
GENERAL PRINCIPLES 2
MALA IN SE VS. MALA PROHIBITA 3
APPLICABILITY AND EFFECTIVITY OF THE RPC 3
Generality 3
Territoriality 3
Prospectivity 5
PRO REO PRINCIPLE 6
FELONIES 6
CRIMINAL LIABILITIES AND FELONIES 9
Grave vs. less grave vs. light felonies 9
Aberratio ictus, error in personae, and praeter intentionem 10
Impossible crime 11
Stages of execution 11
Continuing crimes 14
Complex crimes and composite crimes 14
CIRCUMSTANCES AFFECTING CRIMINAL LIABILITY 17
Justifying circumstances 18
Exempting circumstances 22
Mitigating circumstances 25
Aggravating circumstances 31
Alternative circumstances 43
Absolutory causes 45
PERSONS LIABLE AND DEGREE OF PARTICIPATION 45
Principals, accomplices, and accessories 45
Conspiracy and proposal 52
PENALTIES 53
PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED AND RETROACTIVE EFFECT OF PENAL LAWS 53
CLASSIFICATION 55
DURATION AND EFFECTS 57
APPLICATION 60
RPC provisions 60
Indeterminate Sentence Law (Act No. 4103) 66
Three-fold rule 68
Subsidiary imprisonment 68
GRADUATION OF PENALTIES 69
ACCESSORY PENALTIES 72
EXECUTION AND SERVICE 74
RPC provisions 74
Probation Law (PD 968, as amended) 75
Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act (RA 9344, as amended) 77
EXTINCTION OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY 78
CIVIL LIABILITY IN CRIMINAL CASES 81
CRIMINAL LAW II 84
CRIMES AGAINST NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE LAW OF NATIONS 84
CRIMES AGAINST FUNDAMENTAL LAWS OF THE STATE 89
CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER 94
CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC INTEREST 109
CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC MORALS 124
CRIMES COMMITTED BY PUBLIC OFFICERS 129
CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS 148
CRIMES AGAINST PERSONAL LIBERTY AND SECURITY 165
CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY 180
CRIMES AGAINST CHASTITY 196
CRIMES AGAINST THE CIVIL STATUS OF PERSONS 204
CRIMES AGAINST HONOR 206
QUASI-OFFENSES 212
SPECIAL LAWS
ANTI-ARSON LAW (PD 1613, AS AMENDED BY PD 1744) 215
ANTI-CHILD PORNOGRAPHY ACT OF 2009 (RA 9775) 216
ANTI-FENCING LAW OF 1979 (PD 1612) 217
ANTI-GRAFT AND CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT (RA 3019, AS AMENDED) 218
ANTI-HAZING ACT OF 2018 (RA 8049, AS AMENDED BY RA 11053) 220
ANTI-HIJACKING LAW (RA 6235) 221
ANTI-PHOTO AND VIDEO VOYEURISM ACT OF 2009 (RA 9995) 222
ANTI-PLUNDER ACT (RA 7080, AS AMENDED BY RA 7659) 222
ANTI-SEXUAL HARASSMENT ACT OF 1995 (RA 7877) 223
ANTI-TORTURE ACT OF 2009 (RA 9745) 224
ANTI-TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS ACT OF 2003 (RA 9208, AS AMENDED) 226
ANTI-VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN ACT OF 2004 (RA 9262) 228
BOUNCING CHECKS LAW (BP 22) 230
COMPREHENSIVE DANGEROUS DRUGS ACT OF 2002 (, RA 9165, AS AMENDED BY RA 10640) 230
COMPREHENSIVE FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION REGULATION ACT (RA 10591) 233
CYBERCRIME PREVENTION ACT OF 2012 (RA 10175) 234
HUMAN SECURITY ACT OF 2007 (RA 9372) 236
NEW ANTI-CARNAPPING ACT OF 2016 (RA 10883) 236
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE LAW (PD 1829) 237
SPECIAL PROTECTION OF CHILDREN AGAINST ABUSE, EXPLOITATION, AND DISCRIMINATION ACT (RA 7610) 238
CRIME; DEFINED
An act committed or omitted in violation of law forbid-
ding or commanding it.
Characteristics:
a. The basis of criminal liability is human free will;
purpose of penalty is retribution.
b. That man is essentially a moral creature with an
absolute free will to choose between good and
evil, thereby placing more stress upon the effect
or result of the felonious act than upon the man,
the criminal himself.
c. It has endeavored to establish a direct and
mechanical proportion between the crime and
the liability.
d. There is scant regard to the human element.
As to Stages in Execution
Mala In Se Mala Prohibita
There are three stages: No such stages of
As to Nature
attempted, frustrated, and execution.
Wrong from its very nature; Wrong because it is consummated.
inherenty evil prohibited by statute.
As to Persons Criminally Liable
Use of Good Faith Defense
There are three persons Unless otherwise
Good faith is a valid defense; Good faith is NOT a criminally liable: principal, provided, only the
unless the crime is the result defense. accomplices, and accessories. principal is liable.
of culpa.
As to Division of Penalties
Use of intent as an element
Penalties may be divided into There is NO such
Intent is an element. Criminal intent is degrees and periods. division of penalties.
immaterial.
MALA PROHIBITA
Degree of Accomplishment of the Crime
General Rule
(3) Should be liable for act in connection with the intro-
Crimes committed aboard Crimes committed duction of the obligations and securities mentioned
a vessel within the aboard a vessel within in the preceding number.
territorial waters of a the territorial waters of (1) Those who introduced the counterfeit items are
country are triable in the a country are not criminally liable even if they were not the ones
courts of such country. triable in the courts of who counterfeited the obligations and securities.
said country. (2) This paragraph only refers to obligations and
Note: The three-mile limit: securities issued by the Government of the
Territorial waters cover Philippine Island, not coin or currency note of
until three miles from the Philippine Islands.
coastline, starting from (3) Introduction of coin or currency note of the
the low water mark. Philippine Islands is not subject to this para-
(Reyes) graph.
PROSPECTIVITY
General Rule: The provisions of the Revised Penal Code
are supplementary to special laws.
GENERAL RULE: A penal law cannot make an act
punishable in a manner in which it was not punishable
Exceptions:
when committed.
(1) Where the special law provides otherwise.
(2) When the provisions of the RPC are impossible
REASON: Under Art. 366 of the RPC, crimes are punished
of application, either by express provision or by
under the laws in force at the time of commission.
necessary implication.
• Article 12, paragraph 3 (regarding exempting NOTE: Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege.. There
circumstance of minority was applied to R.A. is no crime where there is no law punishing it.
509, the Anti-Profiteering Law.)
• Article 17 (regarding the participation of the c. That the act is performed or the omission incurred
principal in the commission of the crime) by means of dolo or culpa.
• Article 22 (with reference to the retroactive
effect of penal law if they favored the accused) INTENTIONAL FELONIES (DOLO)
• Article 100 and 39 (regarding the indemnity and The act or omission is performed with deliberate intent or
subsidiary imprisonment were applied to the malice to do an injury.
Motor Vehicle Law)
The offender has the intention to cause injury to the
person, property, or right of another.
PRO REO PRINCIPLE
Requisites: (FII)
Penal laws are strictly construed against the Government a. “Freedom” Voluntariness on the part of the person
and liberally in favor of the accused. to commit the crime.
NOTE: The offender must have freedom while doing
The in dubio pro reo principle is the rule of lenity. It is the an act or omitting to do an act. Actus me invito factus
doctrine that "a court, in construing an ambiguous non est meus actus. An act done by me against my
criminal statute that sets out multiple or inconsistent will is not my act
punishments, should resolve the ambiguity in favor of the
more lenient punishment." Thus, whenever a situation b. “Intelligence” Capacity to know and understand the
obtains where two interpretations are possible, one consequences of one’s act.
exculpatory and the other inculpatory, the former shall NOTE: The offender must have the intelligence while
prevail, consistent with the rule on presumption of doing the act or omitting to do the act. Without such
innocence intelligence, it becomes necessary to determine the
morality of human acts, and no crime can exist. Thus,
In the construction or interpretation of the provisions of an imbecile or the insane and the infant under 15
the RPC, the Spanish text is controlling. years of age, as well as the minor over 15 but less than
18 who acted without discernment have no criminal
liability, because they acted without intelligence (Art.
B. FELONIES 12, par. (1), (2), and (3))