Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Barbara Horn has been the director of operations at Museum Victoria since February 2005.
A member of the executive management team of Museum Victoria, she is responsible for
implementation of Museum Victoria’s Strategic Plan through the provision of daily access
for various audiences to a range of innovative, high quality experiences and programmes at
Melbourne Museum, Science works, the Immigration Museum, IMAX Melbourne, and the
Royal Exhibition Building, as well as through the Discovery Programme across Victoria.
78 ISSN 1350-0775, No. 231 (Vol. 58, No. 3, 2006) ª UNESCO 2006
Published by Blackwell Publishing, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ (UK) and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148 (USA)
Barriers and Drivers: building audience at the Immigration Museum, Melbourne, Australia
Barbara Horn
80 Published by Blackwell Publishing, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ (UK) and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148 (USA)
Barriers and Drivers: building audience at the Immigration Museum, Melbourne, Australia
Barbara Horn
information given to them in ‘official’ documents received industry recognition in 2003: a Museum
and, after witnessing the interview, give their Industry Recognition Award (Museums Australia,
opinion on whether interviewees should be Vic.); an Arts Victoria Portfolio Leadership Award;
granted permission to come to Australia. They are an American Association of Museums Media and
then able to hear the official decision. Technology Committee Silver Muse Award
(Education/Interpretive – History and Culture);
During development, two formative and an Australian Writers’ Guild Award for the
evaluations were conducted to assist in meeting the script.
aim of producing an interactive that was intuitive
to use and would allow visitors to feel as if they Motivational segmentation: barriers and drivers
were involved in the interview - not struggling
with technology. Findings of the research were Museum Victoria, the parent organization of which
‘workshopped’ with the curator, producer, the Immigration Museum is a part, first explored
designer and others involved in development. The market segmentation in 1997 using demographic,
visitor was at the centre of this discussion of ideas attitude and leisure-choice variables to understand
for improvements. The resulting interactive allows visitors. More recently there has been a transition
for individual or group use; it also invites people to a motivational segmentation model. This
to use their own preferences for the way they approach explores motivations of consumers,
approach the content: to start at the beginning including some of which they may not be
(historical), to see what happens now conscious. In doing so, it bypasses a common
(contemporary), or to make a choice based on problem with surveying methodology: we like to
their own family immigration history (either by think of ourselves as rational and logical, and will
period or nationality). Visitors also have a choice explain our behaviour and choices in such a way
how much government policy they read. if asked directly. Motivational segmentation goes
beyond such surface responses to uncover
Even as it was being tested, Getting In underlying needs, physical and psychological, and
engaged participants who became involved in the motivations.
lives of those applying for residence in Australia.
They were able to empathize with applicants; A key principle of the motivational
wanted them to have a chance; and felt sad when segmentation model is that there will be a
they were rejected. This project was an outstanding consumer need providing an underlying
example of how research can be integrated motivation for the selection of a particular product
throughout exhibition development (not just at the type on any given occasion. The model is able to
beginning), and how, through collaboration, relate motivations to usage occasions, and thus
excellence can be achieved. provides a powerful tool for developing marketing
strategy, new products, and managing and
Getting In has been a great success with positioning a brand portfolio. It has been used
visitors to the Immigration Museum. It also effectively by Museum Victoria for these purposes.
The approach assists in thinking more ‘duty bound’ visitors seek from a museum visit.
clearly about our market overall, understanding Their need for an experience that incorporated full
the needs of visitors and potential visitors, engagement with content, and opportunities to
identifying target groups, designing products, reminisce and feel a sense of belonging was met.
services, brands and communications which will The experience is absorbing and meets an
meet the needs of specific segments. It provides a orientation ‘for others’ as the visitor empathizes
visual map, which is a powerful tool for strategic and feels connected to the people whose stories are
thinking. There are four segments: a manageable represented. Visitors identified the greatest
number with each of meaningful size in the total strengths of the Immigration Museum as: an
population and clearly differentiated in terms of interpretive style that explored immigration
motivational needs. experiences through personal stories; an
emotional, empathic connection; and the
The segmentation model was developed in presentation of trustworthy factual information.
late 2002 and has been effectively used for the
three campuses of Museum Victoria. The model This information was vitally important
must, of course, be regularly updated so that it when the Immigration Museum found itself
stays in line with market changes – subsequent needing to build its local audience, in response to
research has validated the original model and declining numbers after the initial successful years:
proved its continuing applicability. It is also 45,000 visitors in 1999/2000, 30,000 in 2000/01,
critical that staff understand the model and its 26,000 in 2001/02, and less than 20,000 in 2002/03.
application, and are able to use the segmentation
correctly. By understanding the motivational needs
of a key target market of the Immigration Museum,
It was in 2004 that the model was first marketing strategies could be developed,
reviewed against the Immigration Museum. This highlighting the personal stories and emotional
boutique museum was found to cater for the needs journeys that it features. The research also found
of a market segment described as ‘duty bound’. The that the Immigration Museum lacked a clearly
research established that needs of this segment articulated brand identity and that this formed a
include a desire to share experiences with others barrier to visitors’ understanding of what the
and to receive an emotional benefit from their museum was trying to convey. Further, the
experiences. museum’s name, while not seen as inappropriate,
was not appealing, and did not help visitors to
Barriers and drivers: how the Immigration identify the offer. This was all information that
Museum meets the needs of the ‘duty bound’ could assist in working to attract visitors from
metropolitan Melbourne to the museum.
The research found that the Immigration Museum
can deliver an emotional journey incorporating Alternative names were tested, but none
self-discovery and the creation of memories that preferred – it was established that changing the
82 Published by Blackwell Publishing, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ (UK) and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148 (USA)
Barriers and Drivers: building audience at the Immigration Museum, Melbourne, Australia
Barbara Horn
name would not attract more visitors from • Winner Drama Victoria’s Best Event 2004:
metropolitan Melbourne. However, development involving drama and theatre for students
of a tagline to indicate the personal stories and • Winner Museum Industry Award – Best
emotional experience the museum delivers would Project 2005: ‘Station Pier: Gateway to a
do so. As a result, the words ‘moving stories’ were New Life’
tagged to the name and used in a brand advertising • Winner Cultural Diversity Week Volunteer
campaign. The campaign employed a mixture of Award 2005.
media presenting a suite of images showing the
human face of the immigration experience, and The Immigration Museum experience now
emphasizing the ease of access of the museum at its
central city location. The tone was light, the theme And what do our visitors think now about their
of journey and travel suiting the positioning of visit to the Immigration Museum? Dedicated
advertisements in various locations where people research was conducted in January 2006 to find out
were in transit, as well as the content of the what project would have the greatest impact on the
museum. Immigration Museum visitor experience. We
invited visitors – older, younger, families and
The success of this approach can be tourists – to the museum to take part in a series of
measured in recall and visitation impact. Results focus groups to tell us about their experience in the
from a Visitor Profile Survey in November 2004 museum. The research revealed a surprising gap
indicated that the campaign had a significant between expectation and experience.
impact, with 13 per cent of visitors noting that they
had seen transit panels. The research establishes that visitors’ first
impression of the Immigration Museum is fairly
The initial brand campaign was followed undifferentiated beyond the obvious delivery of an
by two significant exhibition campaigns in October immigration message. It can be considered ‘just
2004 and October 2005. All worked to positively another museum’, with objects and perhaps some
impact on visitation that rose again, from 87,000 in new information to be learned. And it is relatively
2002/03, to 101,600 in 2003/04 and 123,000 in unconnected to their lives. Furthermore, there is
2004/05. little urgency to visit, especially for the local
audience. Their perception of museums as never
Industry awards have also recognized the changing permits them to hold off visiting – ‘Can’t
Immigration Museum’s achievements: go this weekend, maybe next weekend’. There is
no ‘call to action’ from a museum that is always
• Winner National Tourism Awards 2005, there and virtually always open. In sum, visitors
2006 (Heritage and Cultural Tourism) expect that their visit, driven by curiosity, interest
• Winner Victorian Tourism Awards 2003, and duty, will result in an understanding of
2004, 2005 (Best Cultural Attraction) immigration and migrants in Australia – this
outcome is rational, expected and The results gave us pause to reflect, and are
undifferentiated. challenging us to make a choice that may well
change the nature of the museum experience. The
However, once having visited the research strongly indicates that we can successfully
Immigration Museum our visitors found that they continue to deliver more of the same kinds of
had experienced much more: the actual outcome is experience through development of the resource
unexpected and emotional. The Immigration centre and of exhibitions dealing with new topics
Museum engages and involves visitors beyond and using improved methods of delivery. Both will
their expectations providing an element of serve to deliver more of the same highly
surprise, an experience of being moved and a sense satisfactory experiences currently on offer so they
of global connections. It is these emotional benefits can evolve and continue to answer the needs and
that are specific to the Immigration Museum. expectations of visitors.
At this time, then, the Immigration However, neither will shift the ‘brand
Museum is in an extremely fortunate position. expectations’ or alter the current ‘brand story’. And
Visitor numbers are adequate and sustainable, the we might expect that visitor levels will remain
visitor experience delivers beyond the visitor’s fairly constant and repeat visitation would
expectations (satisfaction levels are at 97 per cent) continue to be low, perhaps even fall. If, however,
and the communications about it reflect strongly we wish to shift perceptions of the Immigration
the nature of the museum. Awareness, defined as Museum, we could consider introducing a new
knowledge of the location of the museum has dimension that was identified through our visitor
been the major barrier for the Immigration research: a performance space offering ever-
Museum but it too has grown from 19 per cent of changing, highly interactive opportunities for
the Victorian population in 2003 to 33 per cent celebration, debate and events. The introduction of
by 2005. this unexpected but very interesting experience
could revolutionalize the Immigration Museum
However, things cannot be allowed to offer, significantly exceeding expectations of our
stand still! While the research revealed to us some visitors and therefore shifting brand perceptions,
very reassuring things it also extended a challenge. encouraging repeat visits and attracting new
Part of the research brief was to identify any gaps audiences.
in the visitor experience – things they would like
to see as part of the offer, experiences that might The question facing us now is: What choice
tap into our visitor needs and expectations. To will we make as we continue on the Immigration
explore this we described proposed projects such Museum journey? We can offer our visitors
as a resource centre and extensions to our familiar, albeit interesting and enjoyable, routes, or
exhibition programme. We also wanted to provide opportunities to set out in new directions
entertain any ideas that were brought forward by which may surprise, delight and transform their
the research participants. experience.
84 Published by Blackwell Publishing, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ (UK) and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148 (USA)