Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
com)
Crl.A.No.2181 of 2009
1
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Versus
J U D G M E N T
R.Subhash Reddy,J.
of 2008.
Crl.A.No.2181 of 2009
2
painter and artist. To improve her proficiency in
Crl.A.No.2181 of 2009
3
respondents under Section 306 IPC and thereafter
Crl.A.No.2181 of 2009
4
against them to frame charge for the alleged offence
C.R.R.No.3473 of 2008.
Crl.A.No.2181 of 2009
5
suggesting that the accused intended by such acts, the
Crl.A.No.2181 of 2009
6
respondents who are the accused are responsible for
Crl.A.No.2181 of 2009
7
10. Having heard learned counsel on both the sides, we
Crl.A.No.2181 of 2009
8
this Court while considering utterances like “to go and
proceedings.
in paragraph 20 as under:
Crl.A.No.2181 of 2009
9
the consequences to actually follow cannot
be said to be instigation.”
”to go and die”, this Court has held that the suicide
note and that the suicide was not the direct result of
Crl.A.No.2181 of 2009
10
14. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant-State
Crl.A.No.2181 of 2009
11
by the accused will constitute direct or indirect act
appeal is dismissed.
...................J.
[Indu Malhotra]
.................J.
[R. Subhash Reddy]
New Delhi;