7th April BREXIT 11.

A
Analysis

1)What is the political fallout from Brexit?

 vote to leave the EU was a government crisis
 the latter will interpret the Brexit vote as a hammer blow to Europe’s
unity
 negotiations will be in danger of turning into an acrimonious tug of
war
2) How are financial markets affected?
 a test will be whether Europe’s banking union, including a plan for common
deposit insurance makes progress over the next 12 month
 individual Eurozone countries will be under intensified market security
 yield spreads widened between German government bonds and those of
less financially solid southern European countries
3) What does this mean for populist insurgents?
 anti-establishment political movements, will take inspiration from brexit
 the fai right will not come to pwer in any EU countries, but it will be
capable of attracting enough support to shape political debate
 immigration policy will be a case in point
4) How will the EU respond?
 EU will be under pressure to develope proposals for closer integration
5) How will Brexit affect the EU itself?
 Brexit will disrupt the EU’s internal equilibrium, so the bloc’a seven non-
euro countries will account for only 15 per cent of EU economic output
 It will increase Germany’s political and economic supremacy in the EU
Is the Simon Fraser article objective? Why/ Why not?
No, it is not objective because in the beginning he said ,,it’s no secret that
most people in the British foreign policy establishment favoured staying in the
EU, and I was among them’’.
According to him, what UK will still have in relation to world power?
Leaving the EU will be the biggest shock to our methods of international
influencing and the biggest structural change to our place in the world since the
Second World War and the end of empire.
 Policy beyond Brexit: important or irrelevant?

First of all, I would like to point out that I don’t understand politics and honestly, I don’t like to get
involved, although education is important to me, I don’t know exactly what is good and what is bad
for it.
In this text two members, Theresa May and Neil O’Brien reports have emerged.
In the first part I agree with Theresa’s publication that she reviewed the education because I think it’s
so important to review it because we can find out exactly what’s going on in it. The focus on tuition
fees and their abolition could, in my view, make a big difference. This would allow more students to
allow him or her to continue their studies.

The second part of the text that Neil O’Brien wrote. This first part I didn’t really understand,
but in the other part he also writes about education. Overall, he mentions a lot of things
what kind of subsidies he would create and formulates a serious package of proposals.
However, the Brexit mentioned at the end has already happened since the article was
written. However, depending on this, it was decided what would happen and what wouldn’t.