Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • Peer Evaluation - (A)

    Încărcat de

    Haris Imran
    14 vizualizări2 pagini
    The document contains reviews from multiple groups (G1-G14) scoring and commenting on business ideas. Group 1 gives a score of 4/5, noting the clear problem and market but lack of innovative solution. Group 2 gives a 3/5, finding the target market too broad and solution not innovative as similar platforms already exist. Group 3 gives a 1/5, stating the problem is invalid as the solution is already implemented by other platforms. Group 4 gives a 1/5, noting the idea is similar to an existing startup but proposed data analytics solution seems difficult to achieve. Group 6 gives a 1/5, finding misalignment between pain points and target market and lack of innovation as the proposed customization is already offered

    Descriere originală:

    fsdfsdfsddfs

    Titlu original

    21010024_Peer Evaluation_(A)

    Drepturi de autor

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formate disponibile

    DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    The document contains reviews from multiple groups (G1-G14) scoring and commenting on business ideas. Group 1 gives a score of 4/5, noting the clear problem and market but lack of innovative solution. Group 2 gives a 3/5, finding the target market too broad and solution not innovative as similar platforms already exist. Group 3 gives a 1/5, stating the problem is invalid as the solution is already implemented by other platforms. Group 4 gives a 1/5, noting the idea is similar to an existing startup but proposed data analytics solution seems difficult to achieve. Group 6 gives a 1/5, finding misalignment between pain points and target market and lack of innovation as the proposed customization is already offered

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    14 vizualizări2 pagini

    Peer Evaluation - (A)

    Încărcat de

    Haris Imran
    The document contains reviews from multiple groups (G1-G14) scoring and commenting on business ideas. Group 1 gives a score of 4/5, noting the clear problem and market but lack of innovative solution. Group 2 gives a 3/5, finding the target market too broad and solution not innovative as similar platforms already exist. Group 3 gives a 1/5, stating the problem is invalid as the solution is already implemented by other platforms. Group 4 gives a 1/5, noting the idea is similar to an existing startup but proposed data analytics solution seems difficult to achieve. Group 6 gives a 1/5, finding misalignment between pain points and target market and lack of innovation as the proposed customization is already offered

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca DOCX, PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 2

    Group Comments Score/5

     The pain point has been well identified and target market
    has also been well specified. However there seems to be a
    G1  4
    lack of innovation in the idea (proposed solution) as its just
    another uber but for printing solutions.
    The overall idea seems lacking connection with ground
    realities. The target market of all companies and all students
    seems too broad and the pain points from organizations side
    also don’t seem realistic. The solution lacks innovation as it
    G2  3
    is something already being done by rozee.pk and other
    platforms as well. Also, the practicality of its
    implementation in terms of quality assurance seems like a
    next to impossible challenge to cater for.
     The idea is already being implemented by FoodPanda and
    also other online plstforms like EatMubarak. There is no
    value proposition whatsoever and hence the problem
    G3 1 
    statement about lack of an online platform is false. The
    identified customer segments hence cannot drive value from
    this venture until some radical innovation happens.
     Although the idea is vey much similar to an already existing
    startup called Screen-It being run by one of my batchmates,
    however the innovation in here is the concept of providing
    real time impressions for data analysis. This in practical
    terms sound extremely difficult to achieve because of
    technological constrains, complexity of implementation and
    G4  1
    area for error in reporting measured impressions (e.g.
    Facebook reports impression even if the post has been just
    scrolled by). This can make MNCs vary of the results
    assuming it is even possible to bring and install such
    technology in rides. Overall the idea seems too ambitious for
    its own good.
    G5    
    I do not agree with the pain points as they are in conflict
    with their target market. The pain points talk about being
    cost effective, but the solution and target segment give a
    G6  1
    vibe of being a premium service. Also there is serious lack
    of innovation as the customization and consultancy they talk
    about is offered by every brand that operates in this market.
    Pain points and target market are well identified but the
    G7 solution sounds like getting a home from any well repeated  2
    builder on turn key basis hance lacks innovation.
    G8    
    G9    
    G10    
    G11    
    G12    
    G13    
    G14    

    S-ar putea să vă placă și