Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Academic and Research Vice-rector

Activities guide and evaluation rubric
Step : Task 3- Final evaluation

1. General description of the course

Faculty or
Health Sciences School
Academic Unit
Academic Level Undergraduate
Academic Field Elective disciplinary specific
Course Name Geopolitics and environment
Course Code 151021
Course Type Theoretical Can be yes ☒ No ☐
enable
d
Number of Credits 2

2. Description of the activity

Number
Type of the
Individual ☒ Collaborative ☒ of 2
activity:
weeks
Moment of Unit
Initial ☐ ☐ Final ☒
evaluation: Intermediate:
Delivery Environment of the
Evaluative score of the
activity: Monitoring and evaluation
activity: 125 points
environment
Starting date of the activity: Deadline of the activity: May 22,
May 9, 2020 2020.
Competence to develop:
The competence to be achieved by the student is leads inter-sectoral
processes for the prevention and promotion of health in problematic
environments generated by geopolitical decisions that affect the
environment.
Topics to develop:

Geopolitics and the environment, impacts on health, human

development, environmental dimension.
Steps, phases of the learning strategy to develop

The task-based learning strategy (ABT) will be used for the

management of learning in response to the course problem nucleus.
The ABT involves the students in a process that contributes significant
meaning to the development of the task. In this way, the work is not
of memorization but exploration, organization and transfer of the best
solution to the task will gain. Its implementation involves the definition
of a number of limited, autonomous tasks (micro tasks) that
contribute to the accomplishment of a broader task (macro task)
which in turn motivates development and increases the importance of
micro tasks (Guichon, 2006).

In ABT the activity is oriented by a learning goal in which the students

elaborate a real and authentic product, they seek to achieve one or
several specific objectives that must be reached in a certain time. The
central focus of the ABT is that activities have real meaning for
students. The activities and tasks can be in two ways, one has to do
with what the student needs to do or get done in his real life; And
another that is related to a specific pedagogical objective of a course.
Activities to develop

● Choose a role to develop in the collaborative group and share it on

the forum: Director, Co-Director, Leader of the debate, Rapporteur
and Compiler.

● Assuming the chosen role, generate a debate as a group about the

final work and the important aspects.

● Choose a role and responsibility for the deliverable: Compiler,

Reviewer, Evaluator, Deliveries, Alerts.

● As a group perform a final report, containing:

1. Cover. You must include the adjusted Title.

2. Basic information: A statement of the issues chosen in their

context, which includes the relationships between geopolitics and the
environment and the impacts on health and human development.
Description of the context and issues and impacts on health and
human development, in terms of causes, frequency, and severity. Use
subtitles for each theme.

3. Justification: It supports the reason for which it chose this

 problematic and not another one with data of the context of
occurrence and bibliographical argumentation.

4. Relationships cause - effect of the problematic situation: Make a

diagram showing the causal chain and effects of the problematic
situation (problem tree, fishbone or whatever you choose) from
geopolitics to the environment and showing the effects on individual
and collective health and human development.

5. Definition of problem solution alternatives: Propose and describe at

least three intra- sectoral alternatives and three inter- sectoral
alternatives to solve the problem in the strategic framework of the
Environmental Dimension of the Ten Year Public Health Plan and/or in
the framework of sustainable human development (Justify).

6. Description and development of the intra-sectorial and inter-

sectoral alternative: Make a diagram or outline for each alternative,
with the objectives, program lines, goals and resources needed.
Make a description of the diagram by expanding the information and
description of the alternatives presented.

7. Conclusions: Explain two conclusions on the relationship between

geopolitics and the environment and their effects on health and human
development and a conclusion on the alternatives to solve this type of
problem in the context where you live and/or work.

8. Bibliography: APA standards

Env Kn knowledge environment: Read the material of Units
environment 1 and 2.
 Collaborative learning environment: Develop the
for the roles.
developmen
t Mon Monitoring and evaluation environment: Publish
the final report.
Co Collaborative:
Final work:
● Cover page

● Final work: Basic information, justification,

relationships cause-effect, definition of problem
solution alternatives, description and development
of the intra-sectorial and inter-sectoral alternative.
● Conclusions.
Products to
deliver by ● Bibliographic references
student

Format:
• Document in Word. Maximum 7 (seven) pages.
• Page size: Letter
• Typeface: Arial
• Font size: 12
• Lin interline spacing: 1.5 cm

General guidelines for the collaborative work

Planning of The steps that constitute the exercise of collaborative

activities for work on the part of the students are presented below:
the
development
 First step: recognition of actors as subjects. Students
at the beginning of the course, in the space destined
to do so, will recognize as participants of a
collaborative group, they can present their strengths
to the group's service and define the communication
channels.

Second step: planning of academic activities.

According to the elements that make up the principle
of responsible action, students can design a work plan
of
based on the analytical reflection of the activity
collaborative
agenda, the evaluation plan, the guides and rubrics
work
given for the development of each activity Academic

Third step: the staging of the principles of

collaborative work. It is important that students
internalize each of the principles of collaborative work
and implement from the beginning of the academic
course and with the assurance excellence in their
learning processes and the presentation of written
products that respond to the expected quality in the
Course.
Roles to Director: Organize, coordinate, directing and
perform by evaluate based on their experience on the topic, the
the student debate within the group.
in the
Co-director: Complement and highlight the
collaborative
contributions that are relevant to the final product.
group
The leader of the debate: Generate the academic
debate required to highlight concepts and domains on
the topic of discussion. It permanently questions the
group in the search for bridges between what has
 been learned and what is proposed.
Rapporteur: To argue rigorously to enrich the
subject, is the one that collects and systematizes the
information to be delivered to the compiler.
Compiler: Elaborate the document that is constituted
as the final product of the debate and the academic
synthesis within the collaborative group and the
cooperative and ensures compliance with the criteria
of the rubric.
Roles and Compiler: Consolidate the document that is
responsibilit constituted by the final product of the debate,
y for the considering that the participants included were only
delivery of who intervened in the process. You must inform the
products by person in charge of the alerts to whoever notifies
students those who did not participate, that they are not
included in the product to be delivered.
Reviewer: Ensure that the writing complies with the
presentation rules of the work required by the
teacher.
Evaluator: Ensure that the document contains the
criteria present in the rubric. You must inform the
person in charge of the alerts so that you inform the
other members of the team in case any adjustments
need to be made on the subject.
Deliveries: Alert on the delivery times of the
products and send the document in the stipulated
times, using the resources destined for the shipment,
and indicate to the other partners that the delivery
has been made.
Alerts: Ensure that the members of the group are
notified of new developments at work and inform the
 documents in the work forum and messaging of the
course, which has sent the document.
Use of the APA standard, version 3 in Spanish
(Translation of the English version 6)
Use of
references For the presentation of written works must consider
the criteria of the form presented in each of the
guides of activities.
In the agreement 029 of December 13, 2013, article
99, the mistakes that infringe upon the academic
order, among others, are the following: paragraph e)
“To plagiarize is to present as your own work the
whole or part of a writing, report, task or document of
invention performed by another person. It also implies
the use of cites or lack of references, or includes cites
where there is no coincidence between them and the
reference” and paragraph f)” To reproduce, or copy
Plagiarism for profit, educational resources or results of research
policy products, which have intellectual rights reserved for
the University”.
The academic punishments that the student will face
are:
a) In case of academic fraud proved in the
academic work or evaluation, the score achieved will
be zero (0.0) without leading to disciplinary measures.
b) In case of plagiarism proved in the academic
work of any nature, the score achieved will be zero
(0.0), without leading to disciplinary measures.
4. Evaluation rubric
Evaluation rubric

Activity Individual ☒ Collaborati ☒

type: Activity ve Activity
Moment of Unit
the Initial ☐ Intermedia ☐ Final ☒
evaluation te:
Performance levels of the individual
Assessed 45
activity
Aspects points
High score Media score Low score
The student
The student
did not
opportunely The student
choose their
chose their chose roles,
Choice roles in the
roles (first but did not
and collaborative 20
week) and perform them
performan work forum or points
performed satisfactorily
ce of roles did not
them or on time.
perform
satisfactorily
them.
20 points 10 points 0 points
The student The student
make at make at least The student
Contributi least 4 (four) 2 (two) do not make
25
ons in the contributions contributions the
points
forum in the forum in the forum in contribution in
in the first the second the forum
week week
25 points 10 points 0 points
Performance levels of the collaborative
Assessed 80
activity
Aspect points
High score Media score Low score
Final The final The final There is no 70
report report of the report of the evidence of points
proposal proposal participation
presents all presents in the
the elements incompletely preparation of
requested the elements the final
according to requested report or does
the guide according to not deliver
 the guide final report
70 points 30 points 0 points
The
handling of
Bibliographic
references is Bibliographic
references are
Bibliogr satisfactory. al sources are
presented but 10
aphic The APA not
APA standards points
references referencing referenced
are not used
standards
are used.
10 points 5 points 0 points
Final score 125