Chapter 4

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SUMMARY

Based on the result from this study, it can be concluded that the use of the

crushed glass bottle is a potential alternative to coarse aggregate since the

interlocking block that has crushed glass attains more strength than the

interlocking block that has crushed stone. It was found out that the maximum

strength of the tested block was 1073 psi after several testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Interlocking concrete blocks were studied through a series of physical and

mechanical tests. Based on the results and findings, the researchers, therefore,

conclude the following:

1. Interlocking blocks with crushed glass are stronger in terms of

compressive strength compared to interlocking blocks with gravel.

2. Crushed glass can be a substitute to gravel in making interlocking blocks.

3. The price of the interlocking blocks with crushed glass is lower than the

usual interlocking block.

4. Using crushed glass in making interlocking blocks can eliminate

environmental issues.
 Urdaneta City University Conclusions and
College of Engineering and Architecture Recommendations | 51

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the results and findings, the following are recommended by the

researchers:

1. The use of crushed glass bottles as a substitute for gravel in making

interlocking blocks is recommended since our society is facing a lot of

environmental issues; in this way, the waste glass bottles can be

lessened.

2. Conduct a study of the interlocking blocks using crushed glass as fine

aggregate.

3. Since the interlocking block with crushed glass got high compressive

strength, it is recommended to reduce the amount of cement to

produce more blocks.

4. Try other recycled materials that can be used as a substitute for

aggregates.

Comparative Study of Interlocking Concrete Blocks Using Standard Aggregates and

Crushed Glass