Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Dasharatha Achani
MECHOCEAN
Eng. Solutions
Pipeline
On-bottom
Stability Design
13-Aug-16
13-Aug-16 Page 2 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani
MECHOCEAN
Eng. Solutions
1.Introduction
2.Waves
3.Current
Agenda
4.Hydrodynamic Loads
5.Resistances
• Design guidelines
• How to transform surface wave height and period to velocity and up-
crossing period at the sea bed
Wave Energy
40
20
0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Wave frequency
The JONSWAP spectrum is often used (Wind generated, developed for North Sea
conditions)
• Significant wave height, Hs (is only a statistical measure for the wave elevation
process,
approximately the average of the 1/3 largest waves)
– Increasing significant
wave height
increases wave energy 120
and is the potential
for instability 100
Increasing H s
80
Wave energy
60
40
20
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Wave period
• Peak period, Tp (is the wave period for which the maximum energy density
appears):
– Increasing the
peak period shifts the
wave energy towards
larger waves which 120
Increasing T p
80
Wave energy
60
40
20
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Wave period
120
g =5
100
g = 3.3
80
Wave energy
60
40 g =1
20
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Wave period
Transfer function: From surface elevation (Hs , Tp , g) to particle flow at bottom (Us , Tu)
Assuming linear wave theory, Us and Tu can be taken from the charts below.
From surface wave (Hs and Tp) to significant wave From surface wave (Hs and Tp) to zero up-crossing
induced velocity Us at seabed period Tu at seabed
0.5 1.4
Tn d/g
0.4
1.2
0.3 g = 1.0
U s Tn 3.3 Tu g = 1.0
Hs 5.0 Tp 3.3
0.2
5.0
1.0
0.1
0.0 0.8
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Tn/Tp Tn/Tp
Significant flow velocity amplitude Us at sea bed level Mean zero up-crossing period of oscillating flow Tu at
sea bed level
• Wave direction
Wave crests
• Wave spreading
Only the
perpendicular
Pipe
component will try
to move the pipe
Main direction
Wave crests
If reliable spreading data do not exist, apply long crested waves
Tstorm
Tu
• Maximum wave height during a storm with t waves:
Hs 0.5772
H max 2 ln
2 2 ln
Directionality:
– Only the perpendicular component introduces significant
loads
z D
1 0 ln 1 1
Seabed roughness
D z0 Seabed Grain size Roughness z0
UD Ur Sin(θc) [mm] [m]
z
ln r 1 Silt 0.0625 5.2·10-6
z0 Fine sand 0.25 2.1·10-5
Medium sand 0.5 4.2·10-5
Coarse sand 1.0 8.3·10-5
Gravel 4.0 3.3·10-4
Pebble 25.0 2.1·10-3
Cobble 125.0 1·10-2
Boulder 500.0 4.2·10-2
Current direction:
Uc,perp = Uc∙sin
2
Constant current Total
1 Oscillating wave
Velocity
-1
-2
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Time
Uc
M
Us
1
Us Uc
Velocity
0
-1
-2
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time
Increasing concern
2
Constant current Total
1 Oscillating wave
Velocity
0
-1
Lift force; FL
Flow Drag force; FD
+
Inertia force; FI
Morrison’s Equations
1
FD W DC D (U S cos( ) U C ) (U s cos U c ) Propotional to flow velocity square,
2 change dirction with flow
FI D 2 W C m AS sin( ) Propotional to flow acceleration,
4 change dirction with acceleration
1
FL W DC L (U S cos( ) U C ) 2 Propotional to flow velocity square,
2 always upward
• Generally consists:
- one pure Coulomb friction part and
- passive resistance FR due soil penetration
- anchors etc. which is rare
ws FL ws FL
R ws FL R ws FL FR
RP-F109: ws ≥ 0.1∙ b
ws
Buoyancy, b = w ∙g∙ A
Submerged weight, ws = wd – b wd b
Dry weight, wd
(The pipe is normally empty during laying, but may be laid water filled to avoid stability problems)
Make sure the pipe does not sink too deep into the soil
May be a problem in
very soft clay
Buoyancy, b = s ∙ g∙ A
...
Soil shear strength but soil density and
strength is most often
increasing with depth
and sinking will be
Dry weight, wd
limited
Buoyancy, b = rs ∙ g∙ A
Soil shear strength
Dry weight, wd
• Driving Forces
– Drag and inertia forces from flowing water, waves and current
• Resisting Forces
– Interaction with soil, friction plus passive resistance (due to penetration)
The pipe will move if the driving forces are larger than the resisting forces!!
Design objective: Make sure that the pipe does not move too much
Key parameters:
• Design Procedure
Assess input data
Set up relevant load case and condition
Decide on design method and acceptance criteria
Are the acceptance criteria met?
DNV-RP-F109:
20.0
10.0
0.0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
Time [s]
• Typical load input; irregular flow velocity, Uw(t) + Uc(t) generated from the
surface wave spectrum
1.0
0.8
0.6
Water particle velocity [m/s]
0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
Time [s]
25.0
20.0
Lateral Displacement [m]
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
Time [s]
If it is assumed that there is no load reduction from permeable seabed, pipe penetrating the
seabed, and trenching:
• Waves:
– Height, period, peakedness, direction and spreading
– Transformation from surface waves to velocity and period at the seabed
• Current:
– Velocity, boundary layer, direction
• Hydrodynamic Loads:
– Hydrodynamic loads due to wave and current
• Resistance:
Sand and clay
Pure friction + passive resistance
• Design:
- Design input data
- Design load condition
- Design method and acceptance criteria
Vertical Stability
Dynamic Stability Analysis
Generalised Stability Method
Absolute Stability Method
Trenching
Burial
Structural Anchor