Sunteți pe pagina 1din 62

Subsea Pipeline and Risers

Dasharatha Achani
MECHOCEAN
Eng. Solutions

Pipeline
On-bottom
Stability Design

13-Aug-16
13-Aug-16 Page 2 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani
MECHOCEAN
Eng. Solutions

Pipeline On-bottom Stability Design

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
Eng. Solutions

1.Introduction
2.Waves
3.Current

Agenda
4.Hydrodynamic Loads
5.Resistances

On-bottom Stability Design 6.Design


7.Summary
8.Exercise

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
1. Introduction Eng. Solutions

• What is the purpose of Pipeline On-Bottom Stability Design?

- Control of the pipeline


- Follow regulations (like DNV-OS-F101 etc.)

• What may move this pipe?

- Hydrodynamic loads from water flow


- A too light pipe may float in water
- A heavy pipe may unintentionally sink into the seabed
- A light buried pipe may float up through liquefied soil

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
1. Introduction Eng. Solutions

• A pipe lies on the seabed, what resists the horizontal loads?

 Resistance from the pipe-soil interaction


 Anchors, mattress…

• And what if the pipe moves?

 Some motion is normally no danger


 The pipe will be bent/fatigue
 The pipe may hit something
 etc ...

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
1. Introduction Eng. Solutions

• Design guidelines

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
2. Waves Eng. Solutions

Two questions you need to answer after this section:

• What are the main sea state characteristics for waves

• How to transform surface wave height and period to velocity and up-
crossing period at the sea bed

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
2. Waves – Spectrum Eng. Solutions

How do we describe surface waves? – Wave Spectrum.


• Gives wave energy as a function of wave frequency in a short term wave
condition, typically a three hour storm.
• May vary with wave direction.
• Can incorporate spreading 100
• Short term condition:
- a “short” period, e.g. a
three hour storm, in
80

which Hs, Tp and g


are constant. 60

Wave Energy
40

20

0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Wave frequency

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
2. Waves – Spectrum Eng. Solutions

The JONSWAP spectrum is often used (Wind generated, developed for North Sea
conditions)

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
2. Waves – Spectrum Eng. Solutions

What are the main parameters in the wave spectrum?

– Significant wave height, Hs


– Peak period, Tp
– Peakedness, g
– Direction
– Spreading

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
2. Waves – Spectrum Eng. Solutions

• Significant wave height, Hs (is only a statistical measure for the wave elevation
process,
approximately the average of the 1/3 largest waves)
– Increasing significant
wave height
increases wave energy 120
and is the potential
for instability 100

Increasing H s
80

Wave energy
60

40

20

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Wave period

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
2. Waves – Spectrum Eng. Solutions

• Peak period, Tp (is the wave period for which the maximum energy density
appears):
– Increasing the
peak period shifts the
wave energy towards
larger waves which 120

increases the potential


for instability 100

Increasing T p
80

Wave energy
60

40

20

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Wave period

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
2. Waves – Spectrum Eng. Solutions

• Peakedness, g (determines the peakedness of the spectrum):


– Effect depends on peak period and water depth

120
g =5
100
g = 3.3

80
Wave energy

60

40 g =1

20

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Wave period

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
2. Waves – Spectrum Eng. Solutions

Transfer function: From surface elevation (Hs , Tp , g) to particle flow at bottom (Us , Tu)

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
2. Waves – Spectrum Eng. Solutions

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
2. Waves Eng. Solutions

Assuming linear wave theory, Us and Tu can be taken from the charts below.

From surface wave (Hs and Tp) to significant wave From surface wave (Hs and Tp) to zero up-crossing
induced velocity Us at seabed period Tu at seabed
0.5 1.4
Tn  d/g
0.4

1.2
0.3 g = 1.0
U s  Tn 3.3 Tu g = 1.0
Hs 5.0 Tp 3.3
0.2
5.0
1.0

0.1

0.0 0.8
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Tn/Tp Tn/Tp

Significant flow velocity amplitude Us at sea bed level Mean zero up-crossing period of oscillating flow Tu at
sea bed level

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
2. Waves - Direction Eng. Solutions

• Wave direction

Direction Only the


Pipe perpendicular
component will try
to move the pipe

Wave crests

If reliable directional data do not exist, apply waves perpendicular to pipe

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
2. Waves - Spreading Eng. Solutions

• Wave spreading

Only the
perpendicular
Pipe
component will try
to move the pipe

Main direction

Wave crests
If reliable spreading data do not exist, apply long crested waves

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
2. Waves Eng. Solutions

• Reduction factor RD as a function of main direction and spreading applies to Us

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
2. Waves Eng. Solutions

• If a pipeline is designed to move significantly, the displacement can be assumed


to be proportional with the number of waves t in a storm:

Tstorm

Tu
• Maximum wave height during a storm with t waves:

Hs  0.5772 
H max    2  ln   
2  2  ln  

– Significant wave height is a statistical parameter only, twice the standard


deviation of the process, corresponding approximately to the average of
the one third largest waves.

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
3. Current Eng. Solutions

 Current velocity is normally measured at a certain reference height zr


above the seabed
 zr is often in the range 1 – 3 metres
 Current velocity is most often assumed to be constant in time
(different
from the wave induced velocity which oscillates)
 In on-bottom stability design we account for:
– The boundary layer effect and
– Directionality

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
3. Current Eng. Solutions

 Boundary layer effect:


– The fact that friction towards the seabed reduces the velocity

 Directionality:
– Only the perpendicular component introduces significant
loads

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
3. Current Eng. Solutions

Reference height zr ... ... where the reference velocity Ur is measured

We apply average velocity UD over pipe

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
3. Current Eng. Solutions

Average velocity for Sand:

 z   D  
1  0   ln  1  1
Seabed roughness
 D    z0   Seabed Grain size Roughness z0
UD  Ur  Sin(θc) [mm] [m]
z 
ln r  1 Silt 0.0625 5.2·10-6
 z0  Fine sand 0.25 2.1·10-5
Medium sand 0.5 4.2·10-5
Coarse sand 1.0 8.3·10-5
Gravel 4.0 3.3·10-4
Pebble 25.0 2.1·10-3
Cobble 125.0 1·10-2
Boulder 500.0 4.2·10-2

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
3. Current Eng. Solutions

Current direction:

Only the perpendicular


Current component will try to
direction move the pipe
Pipe

Uc,perp = Uc∙sin

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
3. Current Eng. Solutions

Total flow velocity = Current velocity + Wave induced velocity

2
Constant current Total

1 Oscillating wave
Velocity

-1

-2
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Time

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
3. Current Eng. Solutions

Uc
M
Us
1

Us Uc

Velocity
0

-1

-2
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
3. Current Eng. Solutions

from wave dominated to current dominated

Waves: Oscillating motion, good Current: Uni-directional motion, bad

Increasing concern

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
4. Hydrodynamic Loads Eng. Solutions

2
Constant current Total

1 Oscillating wave

Velocity
0

-1

Transform wave and current to loads -2


through Morrison’s equation: 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Time

Lift force; FL
Flow Drag force; FD
+
Inertia force; FI

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
4. Hydrodynamic Loads Eng. Solutions

Morrison’s Equations
1
FD  W DC D (U S cos( )  U C ) (U s cos  U c ) Propotional to flow velocity square,
2 change dirction with flow

FI  D 2  W C m AS sin( ) Propotional to flow acceleration,
4 change dirction with acceleration

1
FL   W DC L (U S cos( )  U C ) 2 Propotional to flow velocity square,
2 always upward

Commonly used values for pipeline sitting on seabed:


CD = 0.7
Cm = 3.29
CL = 0.9

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
4. Hydrodynamic Loads Eng. Solutions

• Reduction factor for trenching:

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
4. Hydrodynamic Loads Eng. Solutions

• DNV-RP-F109 – Reduction factor for permeable seabed:

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
4. Hydrodynamic Loads Eng. Solutions

• DNV-RP-F109 – reduction factor due to penetration:

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
4. Hydrodynamic Loads Eng. Solutions

• DNV-RP-F109 – reduction factor due to penetration:

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
4. Hydrodynamic Loads Eng. Solutions

• DNV-RP-F109 – Absolute Lateral Stability Method:

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
5. Resistance Eng. Solutions

• Generally consists:
- one pure Coulomb friction part and
- passive resistance FR due soil penetration
- anchors etc. which is rare

ws  FL ws  FL

R    ws  FL  R    ws  FL   FR

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


slide 37
MECHOCEAN
Eng. Solutions

6. On-bottom Stability Design


• Four Failure Modes
 The pipeline moves excessively sideways under the action of
hydrodynamic forces (most challenging and often a relevant
problem)
 The pipeline floats in water (important but simple)
 The pipe sinks (more than intentionally) into the seabed
(normally not a problem)
 The pipe floats in liquefied soil when it is intended to be buried
(relatively simple, but has on some occasions been overlooked)

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design – Sink in Water Eng. Solutions

Make sure the pipe sinks in water

RP-F109: ws ≥ 0.1∙ b

ws
Buoyancy, b = w ∙g∙ A

Submerged weight, ws = wd – b wd b
Dry weight, wd

(The pipe is normally empty during laying, but may be laid water filled to avoid stability problems)

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design – Do Not Sink in the Soil Eng. Solutions

Make sure the pipe does not sink too deep into the soil

May be a problem in
very soft clay
Buoyancy, b = s ∙ g∙ A
...
Soil shear strength but soil density and
strength is most often
increasing with depth
and sinking will be
Dry weight, wd

limited

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design – Do Not Float in Liquefied Soil Eng. Solutions

Ensure that a buried pipe stays buried

Soil may be liquefied


in the burial process
and have little or no
strength, may behave
more or less as a
heavy fluid

Buoyancy, b = rs ∙ g∙ A
Soil shear strength

Dry weight, wd

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
Eng. Solutions

6. On-bottom Stability Design – Lateral Stablity


• Analyses Methods

– Full Dynamic Lateral Stability Analysis


Gives general requirements to time domain simulation of pipe response, including
hydrodynamic loads from an irregular sea-state and soil resistance.

– Generalised Lateral Stability Method


– Based on an allowable displacement in a design spectrum of oscillatory wave-
induced velocities perpendicular to the pipeline at the pipeline level.

– Absolute Lateral Static Stability Method


Ensures absolute static stability for a single design (extreme) wave-induced oscillation.

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
Eng. Solutions

6. On-bottom Stability Design – Lateral Stablity

• Driving Forces
– Drag and inertia forces from flowing water, waves and current
• Resisting Forces
– Interaction with soil, friction plus passive resistance (due to penetration)

The pipe will move if the driving forces are larger than the resisting forces!!
Design objective: Make sure that the pipe does not move too much

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design – Lateral Stablity Eng. Solutions

• Modern Stability Design


– Relies on some (two) major research programmes in 80-ies
– Based on full dynamic analyses
– Pipe modelled by finite beam elements
– Irregular sea state
– Force coefficients account for wave action (varying with K and M)
– Boundary layer effects for current
– Complex soil model with penetration and thus increased passive
resistance due to pipe motion
– Can calculate the actual (expected) displacement.

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design – Lateral Stablity Eng. Solutions

Key parameters:

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design – Lateral Stablity Eng. Solutions

• Design Procedure
 Assess input data
 Set up relevant load case and condition
 Decide on design method and acceptance criteria
 Are the acceptance criteria met?

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
Eng. Solutions

6. On-bottom Stability Design – Lateral Stablity


• Assess input data
– Environment
– Soil data
– Pipe data
• Set up relevant load case and condition
• Decide on design method and acceptance criteria
• Are the acceptance criteria met?

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design Eng. Solutions

• Assess input data


• Set up relevant load case and condition
• Decide on design method and acceptance criteria
• Are the acceptance criteria met?

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design – Design load condition Eng. Solutions

DNV-RP-F109:

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design Eng. Solutions

• Assess input data


• Set up relevant load condition
1.0
0.8
0.6

Water particle velocity [m/s]


• Decide on design method and acceptance criteria
0.4
0.2
0.0

• Are the acceptance criteria met?


-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
25.0
Time [s]

20.0

Lateral Displacement [m]


15.0

10.0

– Dynamic Stability Analysis


5.0

0.0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
Time [s]

– Generalized Stability Method

– Absolute Stability Method

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design Eng. Solutions

• RP-F109 provides some general guidelines


• Full dynamic Finite Element analysis
• Most accurate – least conservative (if made correct)
• Requires a sophisticated soil model that can account for increased resistance due to
penetration
• Requires a sophisticated load model with variable hydrodynamic force coefficients

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design – Dynamic Analysis Eng. Solutions

• Typical load input; irregular flow velocity, Uw(t) + Uc(t) generated from the
surface wave spectrum

1.0
0.8
0.6
Water particle velocity [m/s]

0.4
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
Time [s]

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design – Dynamic Analysis Eng. Solutions

• Typical result; lateral displacement

25.0

20.0
Lateral Displacement [m]

15.0

10.0

5.0

0.0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
Time [s]

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design – Generalised Method Eng. Solutions

Generalised Lateral Stability (GLS)

Based on an allowable displacement in a design spectrum of oscillatory wave-induced


velocities perpendicular to the pipeline at the pipeline level

– Virtual Stability (GLS 0.5xOD)


Allows some small displacements under the largest waves in a sea state. Maximum
Displacement is small, less than about half a diameter, which ensures that the pipe
does not move out of its cavity.

– Generalized Lateral Stability (GLS 10xOD)


Limits the sum of the lateral displacement obtained during temporary condition and
during operation up to a maximum of 10 diameters.

• Note that this generalised method covers a narrow band of input


(in terms of K and M), typical North Sea conditions
• Hence, most designers apply the absolute lateral method to ensure
the result is conservative ...

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design – Absolute Method Eng. Solutions

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design – Absolute Method Eng. Solutions

If it is assumed that there is no load reduction from permeable seabed, pipe penetrating the
seabed, and trenching:

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design – Absolute Method Eng. Solutions

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design Eng. Solutions

Assess input data


Set up relevant load case and condition
Decide on design method and acceptance criteria
Are the acceptance criteria met?
– If yes → stop
– If no → increase weight and re-analyse

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
7. Summary Eng. Solutions

• Waves:
– Height, period, peakedness, direction and spreading
– Transformation from surface waves to velocity and period at the seabed
• Current:
– Velocity, boundary layer, direction
• Hydrodynamic Loads:
– Hydrodynamic loads due to wave and current
• Resistance:
Sand and clay
Pure friction + passive resistance
• Design:
- Design input data
- Design load condition
- Design method and acceptance criteria
 Vertical Stability
 Dynamic Stability Analysis
 Generalised Stability Method
 Absolute Stability Method

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
6. On-bottom Stability Design Eng. Solutions

•Methods to stabilize the pipe

 Concrete Coating (normally 38mm ≤ tconc ≤ 150mm)

 Increase Wall Thickness

 Trenching

 Burial

 Intermittent rock berms

 Structural Anchor

 Mattress (Concrete or Bitumen)

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani


MECHOCEAN
Questions Eng. Solutions

1. Write step by step procedure for on-bottom stability


assessment
2. What are the driving and resisting forces for lateral stability
and explain them through force balance equation.
3. Describe different design methods and acceptance criteria for
on-bottom stability
4. What are the design load combinations used for the stability
assessment?
5. What are the pipe-soil interaction parameters that cause the
reduction of hydrodynamic loads for on-bottom stability?
6. Write different methods to stabilise the pipe
7. Calculate total on-bottom wave velocity. Given zeroth and 2nd
order spectral moments are 6.07x10-3. Find out drag and lift
forces when current velocity is 0.46 m/s, CD = 0.7, CL = 0.9
and sea water density is 1025kg/m3
13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani
MECHOCEAN
Questions Eng. Solutions

8. Calculate the significant wave induced velocity at the


relevant water depth based on the given data and figure
Given Data Values
Significant Wave height Hs 16.0m
Peak period Tp 15.0s
Water Depth 100 m
Peakedness parameter 1.0

13-Aug-16 www.mechocean.com Dasharatha Achani

S-ar putea să vă placă și