Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ii
using boxes in an adjacent arrangement with either a cast-in-place concrete deck or
an asphalt paved surface or a spread arrangement with stay-in-place forming and a
poured concrete deck. ; While L-Beams (end beams) which have slabs on one side
only. In most of the reinforced concrete structures, concrete slabs are cast
monolithic. In a floor consisting of several beams cast monolithically with slab, the
intermediate beams acts as T-Beams whereas the beams at top of the corners of
the walls or beams around the staircase of lift openings. Thus, T-beams and L-
beams forms a part of the floor system together with slab. L-beams are typical floor
beams because of the reduced overall structural depth, the beams are in
prestressed or reinforced concrete.
Standards
1. National Structural Code of Code that provides minimum standards by regulating and controlling the design,
the Philippines construction, quality of materials pertaining to the structural aspects of all buildings
and structures within its jurisdiction. The provision of this code shall apply to the
construction, alteration, moving, demolition, repair, maintenance and use of any
building or structure within its jurisdiction, except work located primarily in a public
way, public utility towers and poles, hydraulic flood control structures, and
indigenous family dwellings.
2. PCI Design Handbook, 6th This book is from the Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, in which they
Edition disseminate such helpful guidelines about the prestressed and precast concrete.
This document offers general information on the use and design of buildings with
structural concrete. The document also provides information about flat slabs and
other structural systems/elements, with commentaries or recommendations from the
ACI committee based on their studies and experiments. This is a design guide for
precast and prestressed concrete that provides easy to follow design procedures;
numerical examples; and both new and updated design aids. It provides the
designer with comprehensive and efficient procedures for the safe design of both
architectural and structural precast and prestressed concrete products.
3. Prestressed Concrete This book is covers different topics about prestressed concrete design that the
Design, A Fundamental designers used for reference in analyzing the context of each structural member
Approached 5th Edition by that will be designed using prestressed concrete. This book helps the designers as
Edward Nawy it included necessary solving process that the designer used as guidelines in order
to solve for prestressing concrete components.
iii
TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES
938 Aurora Boulevard, Cubao, Quezon City
Submitted by:
De Mesa, Pia Francesca G.
Marin, John Dominic M.
Ortega, Marco C.
Paglicawan, Jeric James C.
Torio, Gerald C.
Submitted to:
Engr. Mico P. Cruzado
Date of Submission
iv
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 : PROJECT BACKGROUND......................................................................................1
1.1 Project Background...............................................................................................................1
1.2 The Project............................................................................................................................1
1.3 Project Location.....................................................................................................................4
1.4 Project Objectives..................................................................................................................4
1.4.1 General Objectives................................................................................................................4
1.4.2 Specific Objectives.................................................................................................................4
1.5 The Client..............................................................................................................................5
1.6 Project Scopes and Limitations..............................................................................................5
1.7 Project Development Plan.....................................................................................................5
Chapter 2 : DESIGN INPUTS...................................................................................................7
2.1 Description of the Structure..................................................................................................7
2.2 Elevations of the Structure....................................................................................................7
2.3 Design of Flexural Members Formula....................................................................................9
2.4 Partial Losses Formula (Pretensioned Beam).......................................................................10
2.4.1 Elastic Shortening (ES).........................................................................................................10
2.4.2 Steel Stress Relaxation (SR).................................................................................................10
2.4.3 Creep Loss (CR)....................................................................................................................10
2.4.4 Shrinkage Loss (SH).............................................................................................................10
2.5 Reinforced Concrete Formulas.............................................................................................11
2.5.1 Design of Slabs.....................................................................................................................11
2.5.2 Design of Columns...............................................................................................................16
2.6 Local Literature....................................................................................................................17
2.6.1 "Design Considerations for Precast Prestressed Concrete Building Structures in Seismic
Areas" by Alfred A. Vee, P.E., Dr. Eng................................................................................................17
2.6.2 “Effect of Cut Prestressed Steel Tendon Wires on the Structural Strength of Normal
Concrete” by Nahum L. Bravo...........................................................................................................17
2.6.3 “Experimental evaluation of the structural performance of deformed wide-flange beam
retrofitted with harped exterior post tension system” by . Lejano et al............................................18
2.6.4 “Panguil Bay Bridge, Northern Mindanao”..........................................................................18
2.6.5 “Structural Retrofitting of Simply Supported Reinforced Concrete Beams Using Turnbuckle
Exterior Post Tensioning” by: B. Lejano, D. Grimares, M. Peñamante, J. Roxas, and K. Toral...........18
2.7 Foreign Literature................................................................................................................19
2.7.1 Precast Prestressed Concrete Construction in Malaysia.......................................................19
2.7.2 Second Precast Prestressed Concrete Construction in Malaysia...........................................19
2.7.3 Elias Issa Saqan, Evaluation of ductile beam-column connections for use in seismic-resistant
precast frames, Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin, 1995.............19
2.7.4 Bindurani, P, A. Meher Prasad, Amlan K. Sengupta, Analysis of Precast Multistoreyed
Building - A Case Study, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and
Technology (ICEE 2013), 2013...........................................................................................................20
2.7.5 R. Vidjeapriya and K.P. Jaya, Behaviour of Precast Beam-Column Mechanical Connections
under cyclic loading, Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) Vol. 13, No. 2 (2012),
2011 20
i
2.7.6 P. K. Aninthaneni and R. P. Dhakal, Conceptual development: low Loss Precast Concrete
Frame Building System with Steel Connections, 2014 NZSEE Conference, New Zealand, 2014.........21
2.7.7 M.J.Gopinathan and K.Subramanian, High Performance and Efficiency of Joints in Precast
Members, M. J. Gopinathan et.al / International Journal of Engineering and Technology (IJET), 2009
22
2.7.8 Patrick Tiong Liq Yee, Azlan Bin Adnan, Abdul Karim Mirasa and Ahmad Baharuddin Abdul
Rahman , Performance of IBS Precast Concrete Beam-Column Connections Under Earthquake
Effects: A Literature Review, American J. of Engineering and Applied Sciences 4 (1): 93-101, 2011,
ISSN 1941-7020,2010 Science Publications, 2011.............................................................................22
2.7.9 G. Metelli and P. Riva, Behaviour of a Beam to Column “DRY” Joint for Precast Concrete
Elements, The World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China,
2008 23
2.7.10 M. N. KATAOKA, M. A. FERREIRA, A. L. H. C. EL DEBS, A study on the behavior of beam-
column connections in precast concrete structures: experimental analysis, Ibracon Structures and
Materials Journal, Volume 5, Number 5, 2012..................................................................................23
Chapter 3 :CONSTRAINTS, TRADEOFFS AND STANDARDS.....................................................24
3.1 Design Constraints...............................................................................................................24
3.1.1 Quantitative Constraints.....................................................................................................24
3.1.2 Qualitative Constraints.......................................................................................................25
3.2 Design Trade-offs.................................................................................................................27
3.2.1 TRADE-OFF 1: RECTANGULAR PRESTRESSED BEAM...........................................................27
3.2.2 TRADE-OFF 2: COMBINED PRESTRESSED INVERTED T-BEAM AND L-BEAM.......................29
Source:https://www.nordimpianti.com/Concrete-Elements/Inverted-T-Beams......................................29
3.2.3 TRADE-OFF 3: COMBINED PRESTRESSED RECTANGULAR BEAM AND L-BEAM..................31
3.3 Designer’s Raw Ranking.......................................................................................................33
3.3.1 Summary of Initial Total per Unit Cost Estimated Trade off Values.......................................34
3.4 Trade-off Assessment..........................................................................................................40
3.4.1 Economic Constraints (Project Cost).......................................................................................40
3.4.2 Constructability Constraints (Project Duration).....................................................................41
3.4.3 Risk Assessment (Lateral Displacement)................................................................................41
3.4.4 Sustainability Constraint (Maintenance Cost)........................................................................41
3.5 Design Standards.................................................................................................................42
3.5.1 National Structural Code of the Philippines 2015...............................................................42
3.5.2 PCI Design Handbook, 6th Edition........................................................................................42
3.5.3 Prestressed Concrete Design, A Fundamental Approached 5th Edition by Edward Nawy..42
Chapter 4 : DESIGN OF STRUCTURE.....................................................................................43
4.1 Design Methodology............................................................................................................43
4.2 Design Flowchart of Designing Beams..................................................................................44
4.3 Design Flowchart of Designing Slabs....................................................................................47
4.4 Design Flowchart of Designing Columns..............................................................................49
4.5 STRUCTURAL DESIGN...........................................................................................................51
4.5.1 Geometric Design................................................................................................................51
4.5.2 Framing Plans......................................................................................................................52
4.6 Load Diagrams.....................................................................................................................53
4.7 Design Results......................................................................................................................56
4.7.1 Results for Slabs..................................................................................................................56
4.7.2 Results for Beam.................................................................................................................56
4.7.3 Forces and Moments on Beams..........................................................................................59
4.7.4 Results for Columns.............................................................................................................59
4.8 Validation of Constraints with regards to Trade-offs...........................................................60
4.8.1 Final Cost Estimate..............................................................................................................60
4.8.2 Final Ranking.......................................................................................................................61
4.9 Sensitivity Analysis..............................................................................................................65
4.9.1 Sensitivity Analysis for Economic Constraint......................................................................65
4.9.2 Sensitivity Analysis for Constructability Constraint............................................................66
4.9.3 Sensitivity Analysis for Risk Assessment.............................................................................67
4.9.4 Sensitivity Analysis for Sustainability Constraint................................................................68
Chapter 5 : FINAL DESIGN....................................................................................................69
LIST OF FIGURES
It was quite a struggle in putting up a new educational system right after the Philippine–American War. New
buildings had to be constructed to provide the students’ need of classrooms due to their larger population
over this year. Pampangan native teachers had to learn the English language and had to be trained in new
methods of teaching. The cooperation of parents and local government officials had to be solicited also.
1.2 The Project
The project is said to be a two-storey prestressedPampanga Public High School Bldg. B in Brgy. Lourdes,
San Fernando, Pampanga. The proposed building will be located inside Pampanga High School (PHS) – a
public high school in the City of San Fernando, Pampanga.The principal requested for another building due
to over population of their students and the classrooms are not enough to sustain them. The school was
formerly known as Jose Abad Santos High School or JASHS.
1
PAMPANGA HIGH SCHOOL
Established: 1908
Grade 7 250
Grade 8 2,283
Grade 9 2,296
Grade 10 2,106
Prestressed concrete is a concrete which has been tensioned before the application of the loading. In
simpler explanation, concrete is strong in resisting compressive forces but is very weak in resisting tensile
forces (the compressive strength of concrete is nearly 10 times its tensile strength for a particular grade).
So therefore for structures which are expected to experience significant tensile loads (like pressure vessels
which may experience hoop tensile load due to internal pressure) concrete is prestressed initially so that it
is under compression. This pre compression will ensure that the concrete section will remain under
compression under the application of external tension producing forces. This is achieved by passing highly
stressed (in tension) cables through the concrete section. These tensile cables will take reaction from the
position at which they are anchored at the ends of the concrete section thereby causing the concrete
section to come under compression. This method can be achieved either through pre-tensioning or through
post-tensioning.
Prestressed concrete has the following advantages:
1. Crack resistance, good rigidity. Due to the prestressing of the components, the occurrence of cracks is
greatly delayed. Under the action of the applied load, no cracks may occur in the components, or the
cracks may be delayed. Therefore, the stiffness of the components is increased, and the durability of the
structure is increased.
2. Save materials, reduce weight. The structure must adopt high-strength materials, so it can reduce the
amount of steel bars and the cross-sectional dimensions of components, save steel and concrete, reduce
the weight of the structure, and has obvious advantages for large span and heavy load structures.
3. The vertical shear force and the main tensile stress of the concrete beam can be reduced. The pre-
stressed beam reinforced concrete beams (beams) can reduce the vertical shear near the bearings in the
beams. Because of the existence of prestress on the concrete cross section, the main tensile stress under
load is also reduced. This helps to reduce the web thickness of the beam, so that the self-weight of the
prestressed concrete beam can be further reduced.
4. To improve the stability of the pressure member. When the pressure member is relatively large and thin,
it is easily bent after being subjected to a certain pressure, resulting in loss of stability and destruction. If
the prestressing of the reinforced concrete column is applied, the longitudinal stressed steel tends to be
pulled tightly, not only the prestressed steel itself is not easily bent, but also the surrounding concrete can
improve the ability to resist bending.
5. Improve the fatigue resistance of components. Because of the strong prestressed reinforcement, the
magnitude of the stress change caused by loading or unloading during the service phase is relatively small,
so it can improve the fatigue resistance, which is very favourable for the structure subjected to the dynamic
load.
6. Prestressing can be used as a means of connecting structural members to promote the development of
new systems and construction methods for large span structur
START
PLANING /
CONCEPTUALIZATION
DATA GATHERING
ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED
PRESTRESSED PUBLIC
SCHOOL BUILDING
PROJECT CONSTRAINTS
AND STANDARDS
RESULT OF
EVALUATION
FINAL DESIGN
END
e2 M D e
fcs=
−Pi
Ac ( )
1+ 2 +
r Ic
Es
n=
Eci / Ec
py
V
(
∆ f pSH =8.2 x 10−6 K SH E ps 1−0.06
S )
( 100−RH )
Where: K SH = 1.0 for pretensioned
RH = Relative Humility
V
= Volume/Surface ratio
S
2.5 Reinforced Concrete Formulas
2.5.1 Design of Slabs
The moments in the middle strips are calculated using formula (1) and (2)
(1) 𝑀𝑎 = 𝐶a𝑤𝑙a²
(2) 𝑀𝑏 = 𝐶𝑏𝑤𝑙𝑏²
Where: Ca = moment coefficient from table
Cb = moment coefficient from table
w = uniform load (psf)
la = clear span length in short direction
lb = clear span length in long direction
1 Nu
V c=
6(1+
14 A g )√ '
f c bd
Where:
θ
d=h−cc−θLT −
2
Nu=Pu
V u=∅ ( Vc+ Vs )
This study Discusses the major design considerations necessary in the successful construction of
precast, prestressed concrete building structures situated in seismic areas. The Ramon Magsaysay
Building, Manila, Philippines, is a 18-story building (including basement) reinforced concrete
structure utilizes precast, prestressed concrete joists and composite in-place floor slabs. The
structural system to resist lateral forces due to seismic or wind loads is a shear wall system. The
shear walls are symmetrically clustered about the center of the building, thus eliminating eccentric
forces. This building experienced severe earthquake forces in 1968 and 1972 (Richter Scale 7.2)
and in July 1990 (Richter Scale 7.7) without suffering any structural damage.
2.6.2 “Effect of Cut Prestressed Steel Tendon Wires on the Structural Strength of Normal
Concrete” by Nahum L. Bravo
According to this study, the results indicate that the pre-stressed steel tendons have relatively no
significant effect on the compressive strength of concrete. On the other hand, cut prestressed steel
tendons added to a concrete mixture produced concrete specimens with significantly high flexure
(bending) strength. The flexure strength of concrete increased by as much as 50% compared to
ordinary concrete with the incorporation of 2.0% volume of cut pre-stressed tendons in the concrete
mixture. The incorporation of cut pre-stressed steel tendons also visibly reduced cracking in
concrete. The resulting concrete also exhibited less brittleness and disintegration at applied failure
loads.
2.6.3 “Experimental evaluation of the structural performance of deformed wide-flange beam
retrofitted with harped exterior post tension system” by . Lejano et al.
An innovative Exterior Post Tensioning (EPT) system is proposed which enables a structural beam
to be retrofitted by simply using a turnbuckle to induce the prestressing force was discussed in this
section. The use of turnbuckle instead of the usual hydraulic jack would greatly reduce the cost of
retrofitting. Previous studies conducted by Adiaz, et al showed that the application of EPT can be
utilized in retrofitting structural steel beams. However, it had failures primarily on the welds of the
anchorages; thus, not maximizing its full use. The solution proposed is to introduce harped tendons
jacked by a turnbuckle. Test results showed that the harped system was able to reach a maximum
significantly higher than the unharped system. The harped EPT also prevented early failure due to
welding failure at the connection.
In this study, the approach bridge will be a multi continuous pre-stressed concrete bridge based on
pre-stressed concrete box girders. The main and approach bridges will feature cast-in-place pile
foundations and will be built using free-cantilever and incremental launching methods respectively.
A primary reason for using continuity with precast, prestressed girders is the elimination of the
maintenance costs associated with bridge deck joints and deck drain-age onto the substructure.
2.6.5 “Structural Retrofitting of Simply Supported Reinforced Concrete Beams Using Turnbuckle
Exterior Post Tensioning” by: B. Lejano, D. Grimares, M. Peñamante, J. Roxas, and K. Toral
The T-EPT was effective in bringing the RC beam back to its original condition while still in the
elastic region of the RC beam. In the inelastic region of the RC beam, the T-EPT was only able to
go up to a certain extent to bring back the beam back to the original condition with at least 2mm in
deformation, on average. It is also concluded that the force produced by the T-EPT was able to
resist the load applied to the beam hence shows an increase to the flexural strength of the beam. In
terms of steel ratio and compressive strength, it is concluded that the higher the steel ratio, the
higher energy output that the T-EPT must produce in order to meet the original conditions of the
beam.
2.7 Foreign Literature
In this study, precast concrete construction showed how it started in Malaysia. The first precast
concrete building was built with the erection of 7 blocks of 17-storey flat, 4 blocks of 4-storey flat and
40 units of shop house opposite the Kuala Lumpur General Hospital at the intersection of Jalan
Pekeliling and Jalan Pahang (Zakaria, 2002). This maiden project used the Larsen-Nielson system
from Denmark. This was the brainchild of the minister and several officers of the Housing and Local
Authority Ministry who visited several countries in Europe to learn about precast concrete
construction.
The second construction project, which used precast concrete, was the construction of 6 blocks of
17-storey flat, 3 blocks of 18-storey flat and 66 units of shop house along Jalan Rifle Range,
Penang. This project used the French’s Estiot system (Tan, 2000). Since then, numerous precast
concrete structures such as high-rises, car parks, warehouses, factories, housings and retail units
have been built all over the country. Some latest examples are the Telekom Headquarter in KL,
townhouses in Cyberjaya, City Square in Johor Bahru, Flextronic Manufacturing Plant in Senai,
Putra Mosque in Putrajaya and Metal Pak Factory in Shah Alam (Eastern, 2004).
2.7.3 Elias Issa Saqan, Evaluation of ductile beam-column connections for use in seismic-
resistant precast frames, Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin,
1995
According to this study, four types of ductile connections were considered in this study.
Four half-scale models of prototype precast beam-column connections subjected to
reversed cyclic loads have been constructed and tested. The experimental study
demonstrated that it is possible to design and construct precast beam- column connections,
where beams and columns are joined with ductile connecting elements, to withstand
severe inelastic deformations resulting from earthquake forces. It was concluded from the
experimental program that the large forces required to be resisted by the perimeter lateral-
force- resisting frames resulted in large beam and column sizes and large amounts of
reinforcement that made detailing of the members extremely difficult. hence use of High
strength steel. Due to the jointed nature of precast frames, special attention must be paid to
the stiffness of the structure
This study presents the modelling of connections in a wall type precast building system. A case
study on a 23-storeyed building, made up of precast wall panels and slabs, to study the modelling of
vertical joints in terms of shear transfer, is presented in the paper. Two computational models were
investigated to find the effect of modelling the vertical joints between the wall panels, on the drifts
and the generated forces in the walls. It was observed that the model, which was not considering
any shear transfer through the vertical joints, tend to provide conservative results in terms of amount
of steel requirement. The emulative monolithic wall system seems to be adequate in moderate
seismic zones. The provisions of tie reinforcements, reinforced shear keys and dowel bars provide
the required structural integrity for the precast system to avoid progressive collapse. The emulative
monolithic wall system seems to be adequate in moderate seismic zones. The provisions of tie
reinforcements, reinforced shear keys and dowel bars provide the required structural integrity for the
precast system.
This study shows how the experiments were conducted on 1/3 scale models of two types of precast
beam-column connections and a monolithic connection. The precast connections considered are
the beam-column connections in which beam is connected to column with corbel using (i) J-bolt and
(ii) cleat angle. The specimens were subjected to reverse cyclic loading. The experimental results of
the precast specimens were compared with those of the monolithic connection. Axial load was
applied to the column using 400kN capacity actuator. The cyclic loading is applied in the beam
using another two actuators, one for positive load cycle and the other for the negative load cycle.
The hysteresis behavior, load carrying capacity, energy dissipation capacity and ductility factor were
measured and the performance for the precast and monolithic beam-column connections were
compared. Precast specimens showed increased stiffness in the negative direction due to the
presence of Corbel. In precast connection, the column reinforcements were free from strains
compared to that of monolithic connection.
2.7.6 P. K. Aninthaneni and R. P. Dhakal, Conceptual development: low Loss Precast Concrete
Frame Building System with Steel Connections, 2014 NZSEE Conference, New Zealand, 2014
The usage of precast concrete began about 70 years ago. Till now the technology has maintained
its status in the construction industry as “The Least Understood form of Construction”. The
advantages of the pre-cast construction are not explored by most part of the world especially by the
developing countries. In the competition between precast and monolithic structures, prefabrication
gains an ever increasing prominence because it is accompanied by the improvement of quality,
while the requirement in materials, working time and cost shows a decreased tendency. This paper
presents the results of a two dimensional 3-bay G+5 storeyed prefabricated frame subjected to
lateral loading. The joints in beam column junction and joints in beam to beam connection were
strengthened by specially designed steel bolts and L-angles by welding and bolting. The frame was
subjected to lateral cyclic load until failure. The results are compared with ANSYS model. The
efficiency and performance of beam-column joints and beam-beam joints were studied and the
behaviour of prefabricated frame is compared with monolithic frame.
2.7.8 Patrick Tiong Liq Yee, Azlan Bin Adnan, Abdul Karim Mirasa and Ahmad Baharuddin
Abdul Rahman , Performance of IBS Precast Concrete Beam-Column Connections Under
Earthquake Effects: A Literature Review, American J. of Engineering and Applied Sciences 4
(1): 93-101, 2011, ISSN 1941-7020,2010 Science Publications, 2011
The main objective of this study was to identify the most appropriate type of beam-column
connections to be introduced to precast concrete industry, particularly for regions of low to moderate
seismicity. Hence, this study presented a comprehensive literature overview of the findings from
studies conducted to analyze and investigate the behavior of precast concrete systems assembled
with typical connections or joints under simulated earthquake loading. The seismic performance of
precast concrete structure very much depended on the ductility capacity of the connectors jointing
each precast components, especially at critical joints such as the beam-tocolumn connections.
2.7.9 G. Metelli and P. Riva, Behaviour of a Beam to Column “DRY” Joint for Precast Concrete
Elements, The World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing,
China, 2008
In Italy, precast concrete structures are traditionally designed as moment resisting frames with
plastic hinges occurring at the column base and beams hinged to the columns. A ductile moment
resisting connection between the column and the beam can provide the advantage of designing a
seismic resisting frame which can develop plastic hinges at the beam-column joints, besides those
at the column base. This paper aims at presenting the results of experimental tests concerning the
cyclic behaviour of a particular beam column“dry” connection for precast concrete elements. The
joint is characterized by the use of high strength steel bars and of a fibre reinforced grout pad in the
“Z” shaped beam-column interface, increasing the shear resistance of the connection. The
experimental results show a good performance of the joint, in term of resistance, ductility and
energy dissipation, with little damage observed in the connected members.
Due to the large increase in the use of precast concrete structures in multistory buildings, this work
covers a study on the behavior of beam-column connection with emphasis on the continuity
provided by the slab reinforcement. Two prototypes were tested, each one with a different detail of
the continuity reinforcement distribution. In both connections, the steel area used on the concrete
cover of the hollow core slab was the same, varying the amount of bars that passed through the
column and the ones that were placed adjacent to the column. The experimental results showed
that the connection with bars adjacent to the column presented stiffness increase and a better
cracking control. According to the classification the two tested connections can be considered semi-
rigid. Based on this research, with two tests of connections, it was possible to analyze the behavior
of the beam-column connection between precast concrete elements which is widely used on sites
and also to test an experimental methodology which is not standardized in Brazil. The method used
to measure the rotation which employed the transducers placed on the corbels was very
satisfactory.
Chapter 3 :CONSTRAINTS, TRADEOFFS AND STANDARDS
3.1 Design Constraints
Constraints are the important factor that must be considered in designing to make an effective and efficient
project. Constraints are the limitation of what the designers can’t control yet a parameter that the designers
can consider being able to improve the design of the project. The process of managing constraints must be
practical and effective, for it might be the reason that the performance of the project will reduce or
eliminate.
In this project, the constraints are measured by using quantitative and qualitative engineering methods.
Quantitative constraints are those that can be measured by the designer’s estimation and perception while
the qualitative constraints are those that cannot be measured or calculated but only evaluated through the
designer’s perception and experience.
3.1.1 Quantitative Constraints
These things are measured through engineering methods. The following quantitative constraints to
be enumerated are considered in the design.
3.1.1.1 Economic (Project Cost)
The designers consider this as the governing constraint since this is significant for both parties, the
designers and to the client. Ideally, financial costs should account for the full costs during the life
cycle of the project, including initial installation composed of doing activities such as transporting
equipment, construction, and permitting. However, through this economic constraint, the designers
will be able to produce designs and examine a comparison among the listed tradeoffs below to
determine which of those could be the cheapest yet adequate, effective, and efficient without
sacrificing the quality and functionality of the design for the client.The allotted and approved budget
of the client for the project is Php. 50,000,000. Any further increase in costing will no longer be
negotiable.
3.1.1.2 Constructability (Project Duration)
On this constraint, the designers considered the time needed for how long a specific design can be
constructed. The duration of a project can only be estimated once you know what resources are
available. The manpower of the project must be able to meet the expected duration proposed by
the client. The project is expected to be done in a minimal amount of time if the designers would
consider maximizing the manpower. The designers must determine the accurate number of man-
hours required on the project because failure to estimate the duration properly can affect the overall
cost. The designers will compare which among all the tradeoffs will require a lesser amount of man-
hour for the whole process. The client wants to have an additional public school building for
students as soon as possible in order to provide additional classrooms to accommodate all of the
students in the area and to avoid congested classrooms. Depending upon which trade-off will satisfy
the condition set by the client which will not exceed in 2-year project duration.
3.1.1.3 Risk Assessment (Lateral Displacement)
For the risk assessment of the school building, it is the capacity of the building to withhold loads and
the factor of safety that it will impose in the design. Lateral displacement response is critical to the
prestressed concrete performance due to limited energy dissipation.The designer will take a look of
which trade-offs will show a lesser lateral displacement, when the loads are applied. It will be known
of which of the design will give greater efficiency and safety with less lateral displacement occurs in
a system. The risk assessment of the building pertains to the lesser lateral movement of the
structure when loads are applied.
3.1.1.4 Sustainability (Maintenance Cost)
Sustainability is the study of how natural systems function, remain diverse and produce everything
it needs for the ecology to remain balance. In this case, the sustainability will be measured by
design life of each trade-off. In accordance with the regulations from PCI Design Handbook 6th
Edition, the design life of prestressed concrete will last until 50 years. Hence, the limitation of the
design will focus only on the maintenance cost of the project throughout its design life. one of the
basic ideas in engineering design is that with greater design strength, there is an equivalent
increase in cost due to the need of higher quality material. It is undeniable that sustainability of
government projects is something that must not be overlooked to effectively choose the best
among the alternatives.
3.1.2 Qualitative Constraints
These are the things that are measurable only with one’s perception of its quality. Thus, anyone can
conclude by his or her own thinking, but no one can conclude that there is one standard
measurement for knowing the quality of a certain thing.
3.1.2.1 Social and political
In respect to the surrounding area where there are people living and are greatly affected or not
even affected but in the area near the construction, is where social constraints usually pop out.
This is where the surrounding neighbors of the structure is being understand and tried to be
recognized of what are their thoughts of the construction and their needs or possibly their demands
to approved to the construction. However their demands must be legal and has a basis of where
their rights as an individual is appropriate. This is done to prevent future conflict with the neighbors
because there is a chance that they do not want any noise or any disturbances while the
construction is being done. Furthermore, politics can hinder the construction of the building. Budget
cuts and unexpected transfer of funds can change the materials used, the personnel in charge and
even the final design.
3.1.2.2 Aesthetics
Aside from being functional of the trade-offs, the designers should also take into consideration the
beauty of the design. This constraint pertains to the appearance of the design in terms of shape,
proportion, balance, texture and color. Since the project is a public school building and the
beneficiaries of the design will be the students, so, the aesthetic impact of the school to the
community should be considered. The appearance of the building is highly required to use advance
technology and innovations in the architectural design and should blend naturally to the beauty of
the environment.
3.1.2.3 Environmental
In this constraint, the designers will take into consideration the factors that may affect the
environment while the construction phase of the project is on-going. The materials that will be used
should not have an environmental impact on the environment by using less hazardous materials.
Furthermore, it should promote the preservation of ecology that no habitat must be destroyed
during the construction phase. Additionally, the designers will also consider the weather
disturbances in which the construction of the building might slow down if calamity happens.
Typhoons, earthquakes and flash floods can affect the construction phase and the materials to be
used may be damage or ruined.
3.2 Design Trade-offs
The designers will design the beam with use of prestressed rectangular beam. Unlike the other two
trade-offs, the designers will only consider the rectangular beam all throughout the structure.
A pre-stressed rectangular beam is a horizontal structural member in a framed structure, made of
concrete and reinforced steel bars. It is “pre-stressed” by being placed under compression prior to
supporting any loads to provide additional strength to the structure. By the name itself, this beam is
rectangular in shape. The rectangular beam continues to demonstrate its flexibility by providing
design options using boxes in an adjacent arrangement with either a cast-in-place concrete deck or
an asphalt paved surface or a spread arrangement with stay-in-place forming and a poured
concrete deck.
Source:http://www.nppbeams.com/products-services/prestressed-concrete-box-beams/
Table 3-6 Advantages and Disadvantages of Rectangular Prestressed Beam
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Prestressed concrete members are free It is costlier than other rcc structures.
from cracks and the resistance to the effect Prestressing also reduces the
of impact, shock, and stresses are higher diagonal tension in concrete.
than rcc structures.
The main disadvantage of prestressing is The shear resistance of members
that it requires some special equipment like can be increased by using curved
jacks, anchorage etc, which pretends the tendons.
use of prestressing. It requires a smaller amount of
Longevity of prestressed structure is construction materials.
greater than rcc structure because the Prestressed members are lighter
reinforcement stays unaffected from outer in weight and easily
agencies. transportable.
High tensile steel is required for
prestressing that is very difficult to procure.
High compressive strength of concrete and
high tensile strength of steel are used for
prestressing that makes it more
economical.
It requires highly skilled workers and
should be prepared under expert
supervision.
Smaller sections can be used for longer span by
reducing the section of members.
Figure 3-8 Pre-stressed Rectangular Beam
In designing the beam of the structure, the designers will be going to use the combination of
prestressed Inverted T-Beam and L-Beam. The L-beam will be placed at the corner beams of the
structure while Inverted T-beam is for the interior beams.
Pre-stressed inverted T-beams have a swallow-tailed upper part and a rough surface giving a good
surface key. It is a pre-stressed concrete element having a constant in cross section. Like other pre-
stressed beams, they are manufactured using high tensile pre-stressed wires which are entrenched
within the element. It has many uses in construction and varies within certain limits; while L-Beams
(end beams) which have slabs on one side only. In most of the reinforced concrete structures,
concrete slabs are cast monolithic. In a floor consisting of several beams cast monolithically with
slab, the intermediate beams acts as T-Beams whereas the beams at top of the corners of the walls
or beams around the staircase of lift openings. Thus, T-beams and L-beams forms a part of the floor
system together with slab. L-beams are typical floor beams because of the reduced overall
structural depth, the beams are in prestressed or reinforced concrete.
Source:https://www.nordimpianti.com/Concrete-Elements/Inverted-T-Beams
https://www.slideshare.net/MatNik1/structure-reinforced-concrete?next_slideshow=1
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
The possibility to use them in many areas of Using these elements floors can be quickly
construction such as residential, and easily constructed because the element
commercial, and agricultural sectors itself works as a formwork
There is a considerable increase in There will be small savings in steel too
the shear stress at the junction of the (not a significant amount though)
flange and the web of the beam due to Excellent rigidity during the loading,
the change in cross section. So unloading, lifting and installation. When
casting should be done very carefully compared to other non-pre-stressed
to ensure both are bonded well. elements of the same height these products
Large production volumes with uniform offer more rigidity and less deformation
cross sections even with different cable under load and consequently are less likely
reinforcement configurations to suffer surface cracking
Since the beam slab is monolithic (rigid), it High load capability due to concrete with a
becomes very weak in resisting lateral low water/cement ratio able to be compliant
shear forces. (Cracks develops quickly). with even the toughest infrastructure
Hence usually in earthquake prone zones requirements
using t beams for high rise building is
reinforced with mechanical stiffeners in the
junction.
Source:https://www.nordimpianti.com/Concrete-Elements/Inverted-T-Beams
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
L-beams are typical floor beams because of the It requires high
reduced overall structural depth, the beams are in strength concrete and high tensile
prestressed or reinforced concrete. strength steel wires.
In bending the beams take tension forces and slabs The main disadvantage is
takes compression forces. construction requires additional
L-beams receive their loads from one side only, they special equipment like jacks,
are subjected to considerable amount of torsional anchorage etc.
moments It requires highly skilled workers
In most of the reinforced concrete structures, under skilled supervision.
concrete slabs are cast monolithic.
In a floor consisting several beams cast monolithically Construction cost is little higher
w/ the slab, the intermediate beams act as T-beams than RCC structures
whereas the beams at a corner of the walls or beams
around the staircase of lift openings.
Source: https://www.slideshare.net/honeysid/l-beams-or-flanged-beams-presentation
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Prestressed concrete members are free from It is costlier than other rcc
cracks and the resistance to the effect of impact, structures.
shock, and stresses are higher than rcc Prestressing also reduces
structures. the diagonal tension in
The main disadvantage of prestressing is that it concrete.
requires some special equipment like jacks,
anchorage etc, which pretends the use of The shear resistance of
prestressing. members can be increased
Longevity of prestressed structure is greater than by using curved tendons.
rcc structure because the reinforcement stays It requires a smaller
unaffected from outer agencies. amount of construction
High tensile steel is required for prestressing that materials.
is very difficult to procure. Prestressed members are
High compressive strength of concrete and high lighter in weight and easily
tensile strength of steel are used for prestressing transportable.
that makes it more economical.
It requires highly skilled workers and should be
prepared under expert supervision.
Smaller sections can be used for longer span by
reducing the section of members.
The designers used engineering methods to rate each tradeoff and tradeoff assessment in order to give the
client an accurate analysis and proposal on which is the most ideal design among them while taking into
consideration that the designers designed each trade-off based on constraints. Each tradeoff is measured
accordingly based on its importance on the designers' point of view. This process involves a modified
evaluation approach by Otto and Antonsson (1991). Originally, each trade-off was scaled from -5 to +5.
However, the criterion importance was revised into a scale of 0-10 provided that the computation for the
percentage difference remains the same. Each trade-off will be ranked following the concept of percentage
analyzation according to its ability to satisfy the given criterion.
h ig h ervalue−lowervalue
% Difference= × 10
h ig h ervalue
Subordinate Ranking = Governing ranking – (% Difference) x 10
On the designer's point of view, the governing rank is based on how significant each constraint is. And
since each person has their different perspective towards the constraints, different instances might occur.
According to Otto and Antonsson (1991), the subordinate rank is an entity or variable that corresponds to
its percentage distance from the governing rank.
As stated in this chapter, safety and cost indeed affect the outcome of the project. Time and quality is
merely an important factor that must be considered in project construction. If time is money, then the lesser
amount of time exerted in project completion would definitely save a lot of money. On the other hand, low
budget greatly affects the quality of the project hence might be costly in the long run.
With regards to the constraints, the designers deliberate about the rankings and the ability of each trade-off
to satisfy the criterions. The raw rankings are shown below.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
**Reference: Otto, K. N. and Anstonsson, E. K., (1991). Trade-off strategies in engineering design.
Research in Engineering Design, volume 3, number 2, pages 87-104. Retrieved from
http://www.design.caltech.edu/Research/Publications/90e.pdf on August 24, 2016
With regards to the result of the initial raw ranking, pre-stressed rectangular beam, combined pre-
stressed Inverted T-Beam and L-Beam and combined pre-stressed rectangular beam and L-Beam
has a subordinate ranking of 10, 9.22 and 9.33 respectively. In this constraint, the lower the project
cost is more economical because it should always take into consideration the allocation of budget
of the client all throughout the construction. With regards to this,pre-stressed rectangular beam
governs with a unit cost of Php. 86,557.60. Pre-stressed rectangular beam is followed by combined
pre-stressed rectangular beam and L-Beam, and combined pre-stressed Inverted T-Beam and L-
Beamwith unit cost of Php. 92,816.85 and Php. 93,871.23 respectively.
Based on the result of initial raw ranking, it says that the pre-stressed rectangular beam, combined
pre-stressed Inverted T-Beam and L-Beam and combined pre-stressed rectangular beam and L-
Beam has a subordinate ranking of 9.43, 10 and 9.33 respectively. The combined pre-stressed
Inverted T-Beam and L-Beam governs among the trade-offs as the higher the cost will lead to safe
in lateral displacement with a cost of Php. 93,871.23. It is followed by pre-stressed rectangular
beam and combined pre-stressed rectangular beam and L-Beam with Php. 92,816.85and
₱86,557.60 respectively.
With regards to the result of the initial raw ranking, pre-stressed rectangular beam, combined pre-
stressed Inverted T-Beam and L-Beam and combined pre-stressed rectangular beam and L-Beam
has a subordinate ranking of 10, 9.43 and 9.89 respectively. In this constraint, the lower the
maintenance cost is more favorable because it should always take into consideration the allocation
of budget all throughout the life span. With regards to this,pre-stressed rectangular beam governs
with a unit cost of Php. 4,327.88. Pre-stressed rectangular beam is followed by combined pre-
stressed rectangular beam and L-Beam, and combined pre-stressed Inverted T-Beam and L-Beam
with unit cost of Php. 4,640.84 and Php. 4,693.56 respectively.
This manual is from the Association Structural Engineering of the Philippines, Inc. which offers
information about structural components of the structure such as dead load, live load etc. The book
contains steps and set of standards in the design of the structure. The designers used this code as
their guidelines in the design process of some structural components of the design structure.
3.3.2 PCI Design Handbook, 6th Edition
This book is from the Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, in which they disseminate such helpful
guidelines about the prestressed and precast concrete. This document offers general information on
the use and design of buildings with structural concrete. The document also provides information
about flat slabs and other structural systems/elements, with commentaries or recommendations
from the ACI committee based on their studies and experiments. This is a design guide for precast
and prestressed concrete that provides easy to follow design procedures; numerical examples; and
both new and updated design aids. It provides the designer with comprehensive and efficient
procedures for the safe design of both architectural and structural precast and prestressed concrete
products.
3.3.3 Prestressed Concrete Design, A Fundamental Approached 5 th Edition by Edward Nawy
This book is covers different topics about prestressed concrete design that the designers used for
reference in analyzing the context of each structural member that will be designed using
prestressed concrete. This book helps the designers as it included necessary solving process that
the designer used as guidelines in order to solve for prestressing concrete components.
Structural design shows the design process that the designer undertook to design the Two Storey School
Building. The designer planned and assigned the structure model with the help of the software STAAD Pro
V8i, and the design specifications and specifications of materials that will be using to model the structural
model. In addition, this structural design shows the design of all trade-off that specify in CHAPTER 3 of this
paper. ‘
h= 20 in. h= 20 in.
h1= 12 in. h1= 12 in.
h2= 8 in. h2= 8 in.
h= 36 in.
h1= 24 in.
h2= 12 in.
Length (m) 10
Normal Weight Concrete
Designation 20LB36
No. Strand 168-S
See Appendix C for detailed computations.
Maximum Moment(kN-
2nd Floor Level Axial (kN) Shear (kN) m)
Beam label P/T Fy Mz
B-1 11.493 71.193 68.293
B-2 2.621 117.388 108.892
B-3 5.976 64.723 57.867
B-4 12.241 15.376 13.435
B-5 11.562 32.161 170.281
In this phase, the designers already gathered all the data needed for the final ranking of the proposed
trade-offs in Chapter 3. These data will be compared and evaluated. The designers will do the final ranking
which the trade-off that governs throughout tall the validation processes will be the winning tradeoff. The
winning trade-off with its results (project cost, project duration, lateral displacement, maintenance cost) will
be presented to the client as the best design for the project.
4.7.1 Final Cost Estimate
Trade-offs
Combined Pre-stressed Combined Pre-stressed
Constraints Pre-stressed
Inverted T-Beam and L- Rectangular Beam and
Rectangular Beam
Beam L-Beam
1. Economic
Php. 63,187,048 Php. 68,525,997.9 Php. 67,756,300.5
(Project Cost)
2. Constructability
376 calendar days 419 calendar days 398 calendar days
(Project Duration)
3. Risk Assessment
Php. 63,187,048 Php. 68,525,997.9 Php. 67,756,300.5
(Lateral Displacement)
4. Sustainability
Php. 3,159,352.4 Php. 3,426,299.895 Php. 3,387,815.025
(Maintenance Cost)
**Reference: Otto, K. N. and Anstonsson, E. K., (1991). Trade-off strategies in engineering design.
Research in Engineering Design, volume 3, number 2, pages 87-104. Retrieved from
http://www.design.caltech.edu/Research/Publications/90e.pdf on August 24, 2016
In this table, economic constraint having the importance factor of 10, the governing trade-off is trade-off 1.
In this table, constructability constraint having the importance factor of 10, the governing trade-off is trade-
off 1.
In this table, risk assessment having the importance factor of 10, the governing trade-off is trade-off 1.
In this table, sustainability constraint having the importance factor of 10, the governing trade-off is trade-off
1.
For each sensitivity analysis, trade-off 1 governs among all the trade-offs.
The designers have come up to a design of public school building (b) for Pampanga High School that is in
line with the code and standards by using multiple constraints and trade-offs that satisfies the criteria and
carefully assessed as per the constraints and carefully as per the constraints. The design had undergone
analysis, multiple assessments and design processes in accordance with the general objectives. The trade-
offs that were given by the designers were analyzed with supporting details and computations.
With the aid of the applications used, the designers were able to gather data for the design of trade-offs.
Microsoft Excel was used to create a program that can design column, slabs and beam structures to build a
public school building and provide Pampanga High School quality and safe building. The design analysis
for each trade-off is adequate and the final raw ranking and sensitivity analysis were validated to choose
which trade-off fits in the project in Brgy. Lourdes, San Fernando, Pampanga.
Concluding up the design of the canals, the designers will suggest the use of Prestressed Rectangular
Beam lining to the weighed trade-offs.
Combined Prestressed L-
4693.5615
beam and Inverted T-Beam
Combined Prestressed L-
4640.8425
beam and Rectangular Beam
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR
COLUMN – GRID 3
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR COLUMN – GRID 4
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR COLUMN – GRID 5
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR COLUMN – GRID 6
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR COLUMN – GRID 7
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR COLUMN – GRID 8
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR COLUMN – GRID 8
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR COLUMN - GRID 9
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR COLUMN – GRID 10
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR COLUMN - GRID 11
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR COLUMN – GRID 12
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR COLUMN – GRID 13
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR COLUMN – GRID 14
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR COLUMN - GRID 15
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR COLUMN - GRID 16
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
DESIGN FOR COLUMN – GRID 17
END 1
INTERNAL
END 2
Appendix E: FINAL COST ESTIMATES
a. Economic Constraints (Project Cost)
For Prestressed Rectangular Beam
Pre-stressed Rectangular Beam
Description Unit Unit Price
Mobilization/ Demobilization L.s 1
Safety and Health
PPE m.d 8,062
Safety and Health Personnel m.d 12
Signages and Barricades sets 6
Earthworks
Excavation cu.m. 246.87
Backfilling cu.m. 153.07
Embankment cu.m. 288.09
Gravel Bedding cu.m. 78.2
Termite Control Works
Soil Poisoning liter 259.98
Concrete Works
RC for Stair cu.m. 8.68
RC for Sun Breaker cu.m. 3.38
RC for Column Footing & WF cu.m. 57.03
Prestressed Rectangular
3159352.4
Beam
Combined Prestressed L-
3426299.895
beam and Inverted T-Beam
Combined Prestressed L-
3387815.025
beam and Rectangular Beam
Appendix F: Computations for Maximum Moment and Bar Dimensions and Spacing for
Columns
Ast=ρg × Ag
¿ 0.015 ×5002
¿ 3750 mm2
Spacing:
Use the minimum ties provided by the code:
Choose the smallest
< 16db
< 48 tie db
< Least dimension of column
db (main reinforcement diameter) = 25 mm
Tie db (shear reinforcement diameter) = 12 mm
16db = 16 x 25 = 400mm
48 tie db = 48 x 10 = 480mm
Least dimension = 500m Use 400mm o.c
along x along z
Pu = 794.331 kN Pu = 794.331 kN
kN- Max My
Max Mx = 9.029 m = 0.830 kN-m
ex = Mx/Pu ey = My/Pu
ex = 11.36 mm ey = 1.04494 mm
Ast=ρg × Ag
¿ 0.015 ×5002=3750mm 2
Using 36mm∅ Main Bars
3750
N= ≈ 8 pcs ≈ 8−25 mm ∅
π
( × 252)
4
Spacing:
Use the minimum ties provided by the code:
Choose the smallest
< 16db
< 48 tie db
< Least dimension of column
db (main reinforcement diameter) = 25 mm
Tie db (shear reinforcement diameter) = 12 mm
16db = 16 x 25 = 400mm
48 tie db = 48 x 10 = 480mm
Least dimension = 500mm
Use 400mm O.C.
ex = Mx/Pu ey = My/Pu
ex = 17.32 mm ey = 237.2392 mm
600 ( 440−260.36 )
fs= =414 MPa=414 Mpa As Yields
260.36
C=T
C+ C1−T 1=Pn
π π 600 ( 440−c )
0.85 ( 28 ) ( 0.85 c )( 500 ) +3 ()
4 () (
( 25 )2 ( 414−0.85 ( 28 ) ) −3
4
( 25 )2
c ) =Pn
883572.9338 ( 440−c )
10115 c +574616.9313− =Pn
c
Sum Moments @ T =0
0.85 c
415 Pn=10115 c 440− ( 2 )+574616.9313 ( 440−60 )
c=262.039mm
883572.9338 ( 440−262.039 )
10115 ( 262.039 ) +574616.9313− =PnPn=2625.07 kN
262.039
Pu=0.65 Pn=1706.298569 kN >503.77 kN
The Section of the Column is Adequate ¿ the Design Force
Spacing:
Use the minimum ties provided by the code:
Choose the smallest
< 16db
< 48 tie db
< Least dimension of column
db (main reinforcement diameter) = 25 mm
Tie db (shear reinforcement diameter) = 12 mm
16db = 16 x 25 = 400mm
48 tie db = 48 x 10 = 480mm
Least dimension = 500mm