Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
(Project Acronym)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Qualification Statement...............................................................................................................iii
1 SCOPE...................................................................................................................................1-1
1.1 System Overview......................................................................................................................................1-1
1.2 Overview...................................................................................................................................................1-1
1.3 Performance Testing.................................................................................................................................1-1
1.4 Security Test and Evaluation...................................................................................................................1-1
1.5 System Compatibility Testing..................................................................................................................1-1
2 REFERENCED DOCUMENTS..........................................................................................2-1
2.1 Regulatory References.............................................................................................................................2-1
2.2 Department of Commerce Document References...................................................................................2-1
2.3 Project Specific Document References....................................................................................................2-1
2.4 Commercial Document References.........................................................................................................2-2
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3-1 Severity Rankings for Discrepancies....................................................................................................3-1
GENERAL comments on the Header and Footer. The footer date on the right should be
same as the cover date, which is also the deliverable date.
There is a slash and a version number following the date. You assign the version
number based on the iteration of the document (e.g., is this the first time the document
is being written = version 1; are you revising a version 1 document, which has been
delivered to USPTO = version 2 and so on ). The version number is NOT the AIS
version #, which is in the left header.
ii Month DD,YYYY/v.1
[Project Name] Testing Specifications and Procedures
QUALIFICATION STATEMENT
All product names and services identified throughout this document are trademarks or registered
trademarks of their respective companies.
1 SCOPE
The purpose of United States Patent and Trademark (USPTO) [project name and version #)
project is to enhance its existing system and further address customer needs. Add anything that
provides further insight into the project.
1.2 Overview
During System Integration Testing the System Development Lead (SDL) edits the Testing
[Specifications or Scenarios] and Procedures, which the testing staff then uses as a basis for
conducting Functional Qualification Testing (FQT) and determining the system’s ability to meet
requirements. The testing staff will update the Testing [Specifications or Scenarios] and
Procedures as needed during the FQT process.
This document does not address Performance Testing for [project acronym and version].
This document does not address Certification and Accreditation (C&A) Security Test and
Evaluation (ST&E) testing for [project acronym and version].
This document does not address System Compatibility Testing (SCT) for [project acronym and
version].
1 Month DD,YYYY/v.1
[Project Name] Testing Specifications and Procedures
2 REFERENCED DOCUMENTS
The following documents are either referenced in or were used in preparation of this document:
Quality Assurance for Automated Information Systems Technical Standard and Guideline,
IT- 212.2- 04, January 30, 1997.
Use the exact title of the AIS document rather than writing the skeleton/shortcut titles
shown below.
Keep month, day, and year together by using non-breaking spaces [CTRL + SHIFT +
Space] and NON-breaking hyphens [CTRL underline which means control + shift +
dash]
Do not write a shortcut name such as” QA Plan for ABC System,” rather, “Quality Assurance
Plan for Act Baseline Cat 2.5 (ABC 2.5), January 23, 2006.”
Requirements Specification for [name of AIS and version], Month XX, YYYY.
Requirements Traceability Matrix for [name of AIS and version], Month XX, YYYY.
Concept of Operations for [name of AIS and version], Month XX, YYYY.
Detailed Design Document for [name of AIS and version], Month XX, YYYY.
1 Month DD,YYYY/v.1
[Project Name] Testing Specifications and Procedures
Configuration Management Plan for [name of AIS and version], Month XX, YYYY.
Office of Procurement Check List for Processing EIT Request (Electronic Information
Technology), http://ptoweb/ptointranet/cio/section508/508.htm.
2 Month DD,YYYY/v.1
[Project Name] Testing Specifications and Procedures
Specific functionality and features of [project acronym and version] to be tested are included in
Appendix B, [Requirements or Use Cases] To Test Allocation Matrix.
The principal features to be tested are categorized into the following areas:
a) Accessibility (Section 508).
b) External Interfaces.
c) Performance.
d) Important feature.
e) Important feature.
f) Important feature.
[Copy the FIRST paragraph from Section 5.5 from the Test Plan.] [Testing will also not
include product features that have not been modified from the previous version.]
There are no changes to the testing approach that was defined in the [name of AIS] Test Plan.
[OR]
[Describe changes that have been made to the test approach. In particular, was §508 planned or
added? Are automated scripts now expected to be used to test system functionality? Are
Performance Testing scripts now planned? Has the expected location of testing changed?]
Any discrepancies identified are classified as one of three types defined in Table 3-1:
Table 3-1 Severity Rankings for Discrepancies
Severity Description
Critical Discrepancies that halt further program execution.
Example: run-time errors that cause the system to lock up in an unexplained or
unexpected manner.
Major Discrepancies that cause the application not to perform as functionally required.
Example: inability to print a report.
Minor Discrepancies that are not considered critical or major.
Examples: misspellings on a screen, ambiguous Help messages.
1 Month DD,YYYY/v.1
[Project Name] Testing Specifications and Procedures
See the Operator Action column for the detailed input specifications in Section 3.8.
See the Expected Results column for the expected outputs of each operator action in Section 3.8.
Copy the hardware and software from the Test Plan unless you have more current
information.
Include Testing Support software (Bobby, JAWS, etc.) in the Software subsection.
The SDL will supply the test environment and is responsible for building the test database.
3.7.1 Hardware
3.7.2 Software
2 Month DD,YYYY/v.1
[Project Name] Functional Qualification Testing
Remember to include testing Support software (Bobby, JAWS, etc.) in the Prerequisites or Setup.
Test Name: Test Case 1: Create Workload Navigator Basic Pie Chat Test Case.
Description: The Pie and Text Chart features should display independently for Assigned and Unassigned cases in Workload
Screen.
Requirement(s): TICRS-2.
Prerequisites: The user is logged on as an SLIE/BA.
Setup: Tester must point to Mock P drive in test environment. Verify that the most recent file is currently in
Trademarks\FAST 2.1\BIN\Fast Application.exe of the current CM Build. Create a desktop shortcut of the
FAST executable file from Mock P and launch the FAST exe.
Map to the TICRS drive(s):
Steps:
Step Operator Action Expected Results Observed Pass/
Results Fail
1. Logon to system as an SLIE user with valid ID. User should be able to log in the
system and Workload screen appears
for SLIE.
2. Click on the ‘Assigned’ tab. The Assigned work for Law Office in
which the SLIE is assigned by default
appears on screen. The Suspensions
cases appear in the work load screen.
3. Click on the ‘ Pie Chart.’ Pie Chat screen will appear.
4. Click ‘Close.’ Display Suspension cases screen.
5. Click on the ‘Unassigned’ tab. ‘Unassigned’ will be appear.
Month DD,YYYY/v.1
3
[Project Name] Functional Qualification Testing
Month DD,YYYY/v.1
4
[Project Name] Functional Qualification Testing
Steps:
Step Operator Action Expected Results Observed Pass/
Results Fail
1. Logon to system as an SLIE user with valid ID. User should be able to log in the
system and Workload screen appears
for SLIE.
2. Click on the ‘Assigned’ tab. The Assigned work for Law Office in
which the SLIE is assigned by default
appears on screen. The Suspensions
cases appear in the work load screen.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Month DD,YYYY/v.1
5
[Project Name] Functional Qualification Testing
Month DD,YYYY/v.1
6
[Project Name] Functional Qualification Testing
Specifications and Procedures
1 Month DD,YYYY/v.1
[Project Name] Functional Qualification Testing
Specifications and Procedures
1 Month DD,YYYY/v.1