0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
129 vizualizări17 pagini
1. The document discusses barriers to effective communication, particularly the natural tendency to evaluate and judge others rather than understand their perspective.
2. It advocates for listening with empathy and understanding rather than just hearing words. Seeing issues from another's viewpoint without judgment can bring about meaningful personal changes.
3. Two approaches to communication are described - one aims to convince others while the other accepts differences and facilitates expression of diverse views. The latter approach tends to be more conducive to effective communication.
1. The document discusses barriers to effective communication, particularly the natural tendency to evaluate and judge others rather than understand their perspective.
2. It advocates for listening with empathy and understanding rather than just hearing words. Seeing issues from another's viewpoint without judgment can bring about meaningful personal changes.
3. Two approaches to communication are described - one aims to convince others while the other accepts differences and facilitates expression of diverse views. The latter approach tends to be more conducive to effective communication.
1. The document discusses barriers to effective communication, particularly the natural tendency to evaluate and judge others rather than understand their perspective.
2. It advocates for listening with empathy and understanding rather than just hearing words. Seeing issues from another's viewpoint without judgment can bring about meaningful personal changes.
3. Two approaches to communication are described - one aims to convince others while the other accepts differences and facilitates expression of diverse views. The latter approach tends to be more conducive to effective communication.
Mohammad Saad Baig – 18MBAA16 BACKGROUND Authors: 1. Carl R. Rogers 2. F.J. Roethlisberger Originally published in HBR July – August 1952 Re – published in HBR November – December 1991 Part I : Carl R. Rogers Emotionally maladjusted people – communication within themselves has broken down As a result, their communication with other has been damaged Psychotherapy is a good communication within and between people Good/Free communication, within or between people is always therapeutic Barrier: The Tendency to Evaluate We all have a natural tendency or an urge to evaluate, judge or approve/disapprove people and their statement We “Jump to conclusions” very often This reaction heightened in situations where feelings & emotions are deeply involved Stronger the feeling, less likely it is that there will be a mutual element in the communication There will be 2 ideas, 2 feelings, or 2 judgments and nothing that could be called “communication” in any real sense Gateway: Listening with Understanding It means: 1. Seeing the expressed idea and attitude from the other person’s point of view 2. Sensing how it feels to the person 3. Achieving his frame of reference about the subject being discussed Gateway: Listening with Understanding (contd.) This might sound simple, but it is not It is the most effective way found to alter a person’s basic personality structure & to improve the person’s relationships & communications with others Empathetic understanding: “Understanding with a person, not about her” Is so effective that it can bring about significant changes in personality EXERCISE WHY NOT :LISTENING? 1. Lack of Courage 2. Heightened Emotions Solution: 3rd Party to evaluate 3. Too Large a Group PART II: F.J. Roethlisberger Barriers to personal communication may be due to differences in background, experience, and motivation. At times it seems extraordinary that any two people can ever understand each other. Boss – Subordinate relationship: heightened potential for problems. How is communication possible when people do not see and assume the same things or share the same values? Two Schools of Thought SCHOOL A: assumes that the goal of communication is to get B to agree with A’s opinions, ideas, facts, or information SCHOOL B: assumes that communication is facilitated when A or B or both are willing to accept and express differences ILLUSTRATION Suppose Bill, an employee, is in his boss’s office. Boss: “I think, Bill, that this is the best way to do your job.” Bill: “Oh yeah?” A School – Bill’s reply is a sign of poor communication. B School – Bill’s reply is a sign of neither good nor bad communication; it is indeterminate. ILLUSTRATION (contd.) Smith – Boss from School A Jones – Boss from School B Given identical situations, each behaves differently Smith chooses to explain Jones chooses to listen “Oh Yeah?” Smith assumes that he understands what Bill means when he says “oh yeah?” It is much easier for Smith to perceive Bill as uncooperative or stupid “How dumb a guy can be?” is Smith’s attitude Unfortunately Bill will hear this more than Smith’s good intentions “Oh Yeah?”(contd.) Jones does not assume that she knows what Bill means when he says “oh yeah?” She assumes that Bill had not exhausted his vocabulary or his feelings Bill may mean not just one thing but several different things “Bill isn’t so dumb; he’s quite an interesting guy” becomes Jones’s attitude Bill feels understood and accepted as a person TAKEAWAYS Smith represents a very common pattern of misunderstandings Bill hears Smith’s attitude more clearly than the logical content of Smith’s words Jones’s method signifies emotional and intellectual achievement Bill sees Jones as a source of help &, in turn, becomes more cooperative TAKEAWAYS (Contd.) Students are trained to be logical and clear- but no one helps them learn to listen skillfully As a result, our educated world contains too many Smiths and too few Jones Effective communication includes essentially teaching people how to listen THANK YOU