Sunteți pe pagina 1din 4

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/260857442

Monte Carlo Simulation of Influence of Input Parameters Uncertainty on


Output Data

Article · January 2010


DOI: 10.1063/1.3295629

CITATIONS READS

0 176

1 author:

Lukáš Sobek
The Czech Academy of Sciences
4 PUBLICATIONS   4 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Latin Hypercube Sampling Parallelization on Grid Systems View project

Theoretical Chemistry and Nuclear Chemistry View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Lukáš Sobek on 21 April 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Monte Carlo Simulation of Influence of Input Parameters
Uncertainty on Output Data

Lukáš Sobek
The Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering
Břehová 7, Prague, Czech Republic

Abstract Input parameters of a complex system in the probabilistic simulation are treated by means of probability
density function (PDF). The result of the simulation have also probabilistic character. Monte Carlo simulation is widely
used to obtain predictions concerning the probability of the risk. The Monte Carlo method was performed to calculate
135 235
Cs
55 U
92
histograms of PDF for release rate given by uncertainty in distribution coefficient of radionuclides and .

Keywords: Monte Carlo simulation, nuclear fuel, geological repository


PACS: 28.41.Kw

INTRODUCTION predominantly used [1], iv) calculation of model


output for each sample set and aggregation of results
In the uncertainty analysis of a complex system for all samples, v) analysis of interaction between
two approaches are used. The first one is deterministic input and output data [2].
and the second one is probabilistic. Parts iii) and iv) are performed by computational
The deterministic approach is based on choice of software.
fixed set of values of some parameter. Typically, one The uncertainty in results depends on equations
can perform the worst-case analysis (choice of the describing the modeled system and probability density
most pessimistic value) or best estimate analysis functions of inputs. The number of simulations needed
(choice of most probable value). depends on accuracy, number of stochastic variables
The basic idea in probabilistic simulation is that the and their density functions [3].
input parameters are characterised by distributions. Very good example of the complex system suitable
These distributions are means of expressing the for probabilistic simulation is underground high-level
uncertainty in data giving the range of possible values nuclear waste repository, because radionuclide
and their likelihood and are represented like migration in the underground environment is affected
histograms. The histogram is a common form of by many parameters. These parameters have large
probability density function (PDF) and characterizes variability in space and time with uncertain values
the theoretical frequency of occurence corresponding leading to numerous sources of uncertainty which
to a given interval of values. Advantage of this method overlap and interfere in a complex manner [2].
is performing statistical analysis of relationship
between input and output data.
The probabilistic approach is typically COMPUTATIONAL DETAILS
implemented using Monte Carlo simulation involving
several steps: i) selection of input parameters, ii) System GoldSim (version 9.50) has been used for
construction of PDF for parameters, estimation of low probabilistic simulation. This system was developed
and upper level of values, iii) generation of set of by the Golder Associates Company (USA) [4].
input parameter values based on parameter Radionuclides
135
Cs and 235
U were selected for
55 92
distribution. Latin Hypercube Sampling technique is
performing the probabilistic simulation. These nuclei
represent one of the most relevant radionuclides in Total of a 1000 Monte Carlo simulations were
terms of release from the repository. Distribution performed for both radionuclides (U, Cs).
coefficient for adsorption, Kd was chosen for Monte Release rate of U and Cs from the repository was
Carlo simulation. Data for the computation are computed for the time scale from 1000 to one million
presented in Table 1 and were taken from Swedish years after beginning of radionuclide migration out
concept of repository presented in [2]. fuel matrix. Units of release rate were transformed
Probability distribution function for parameter Kd from g.year-1 into Bq.year-1.
of both radionuclides was used triangular. Triangular Histograms for release rate representing number of
probability density function is expressed by the Monte Carlo simulations corresponding to a given
following equation [1]: interval of values of release rate were computed. In the
2( x − a) case of Cs, histograms were computed for time
f(x)= , periods of 5000 years and 200 000 years, respectively.
(b − a ) ⋅ ( c − a ) In the case of U, histograms were computed for time
for a ≤ x ≤ b periods of 400 000 years and one million years,
respectively. These time periods were selected due to
where a is a minimal value, b most probable value, c
maximal value of the parameter. a fact that the difference in distributions of release rate
is maximal.

135 235
TABLE 1. Values of parameters for 55Cs and 92 U .Numbers in table are given in m3.kg-1 .
parameter U Cs

PDF triangular triangular


Minimal value Kd 3,6 0,0033
Most probable value Kd 63 0,02
Maximal value Kd 1113 0,11

135
FIGURE 1. Number N of Mote Carlo simulations for given value of release rate A (histograms). Histograms for 55Cs for
235
5000 and 200 000 year time period are presented in the upper part. Histograms U
for 92 for 400 000 and one million year time
period for are presented in the lower part.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION simulations covers much wider interval from 1 to 9
Bq.y-1.
As can be seen in Fig. 1, values of release rate It can be concluded that the Kd uncertainty in the case
135 of Cs has the gratest influence in shorter time period
for 55 Cs , 5000 years are distributed over wide range 235
while in the case of U has the gratest influence for
92
of release rate spanning values from 754 to
approximately 2900 Bq.y-1. Dispersion in release rate the longest time period.
declines abruptly in the time of 200 000 years, because It was demonstrated that Monte Carlo technique is
the major part of Monte Carlo simulations covers useful in predictions of influence of input parameter
interval from 449.41 to 449.46 Bq.y-1. incertainty on distribution of output values in different
235 times during the evolution of the system.
As can be derived from results for U , 400 000
92
years, major part of Monte Carlo simulations are
distributed in interval from 0 to 1 Bq.y-1 while for one
million years the distribution of Monte Carlo

REFERENCES
1. Sobek L. Modelilng of radionuclide transport in the near
field of high level waste repository (in Czech), diploma
thesis, CTU in Prague, 2006
2. S.Mischra, “Assigning probability distributions to input
parameters of performance assessment models” in Technical
report TR 02-11, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste
Management Co, Stockholm, 2002

3. S. Prváková, K.F. Nilsson, “Treatment of Data


Uncertainty for modelling of radionuclide migration in
Geological Repository” , European Commision, 2006

4. GoldSim User’s Guide. Version 8.01. GoldSim


Technology Group, Redmond, 2003

View publication stats

S-ar putea să vă placă și