Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
HOME NEWS STIMULUS BUSINESS T&D END USE TECHNOLOGIES KEY PLAYERS VIDEOS EXTRA!
Commentary
Bringing the Smart Grid to the Smart Home:
It’s Not Only About the Meter
Jan 13, 2010
By Bill Ablondi
.
The market for residential energy management is poised to grow dramatically
due to increased consumer demand and new government and industry
initiatives. Frequently, and for good reason, the discussions about this
emerging market focus on the expansion of Smart Grids as these solutions
enable electricity distribution systems to manage alternative energy sources
(e.g., solar and wind), improve reliability, facilitate faster response rates to
outages, and manage peak-load demands.
Parks Associates forecasts that there will be over 40 million smart meters installed in U.S.
households by 2012 (Figure 1), but installing a smart meter on a residence is only the first step.
Questions remain on how best to put together all the Smart-Grid elements in a way that appeals
to consumers and employs technology in the most effective manner. The first, most fundamental
concern is whether or not consumers will use the smart meter once it is on the house. Smart
meters with the proper user interfaces allow consumers to read and respond to real-time
household power consumption, but will they be reluctant to pay for these devices? Will
consumers enroll in utility programs that employ the full capabilities of these meters?
.
© 2010 SmartGridNews
We need gutsy leadership on
energy issues – and Congress
Figure 1: Households with AMI-capable Meters isn't providing it
1 of 5 2/12/2010 9:58 PM
Smart Grid: Bringing the Smart Grid to the Smart Home: It’s Not Only ... http://www.smartgridnews.com/artman/publish/Technologies_Meterin...
· Less than 5% of households have any type of electronic lighting system, but 55% are
very interested in light-dimming systems that can save them money.
Smart Grids can be potent tools in helping consumers reduce their energy costs, but consumers
have several concerns that could inhibit adoption. In order to maximize Smart Grids, utilities and
suppliers of energy management solutions must first educate consumers about the benefits of
these advanced systems and then package these solutions so that capabilities and advantages
are obvious to consumers and easily integrated into their lifestyles.
The event features a unique combination of market research, featuring results from Parks
Associates' landmark Residential Energy Management service, and real-world expertise derived
from Austin Energy's Smart Grid, the largest working Smart Grid in the U.S. Visit
www.smartenergysummit2010.com for more information.
Bill Ablondi is Director of Home Systems Research for Parks Associates, a market analyst
and research company.
.
Related SGN resources ...
Home Area Networks
Metering
.
Stay connected with SGN …
· Get LinkedIn with Jesse
· Be a Fan on Facebook
· Follow Us on Twitter
· Try our RSS feed
· Get our email digest
As can be inferred from the Electricity Without Price Controls (EWPC) article, "Forget
Demand Side management (DSM); Think Demand Side Innovation (DSI)( http://bit.ly
/8LtybG )," the power industry will get to a dead end with regulated Investor Owned
Utilities Architecture Framework incremental extension DSM products, when what is
needed is a competition on DSIs that they will only know later on, as it happen in
other industries.
José Antonio Vanderhorst-Silverio, Ph.D. - 01/13/2010 - 14:12
2 of 5 2/12/2010 9:58 PM
Smart Grid: Bringing the Smart Grid to the Smart Home: It’s Not Only ... http://www.smartgridnews.com/artman/publish/Technologies_Meterin...
For the smart meters to be of any use to the consumer there must be some sort of
report on time of usage readily available. We got a smart meter when we had the PV
system installed. At first we received monthly printed reports from PG&E showing
power generated and used at the different rates. The reports are not as informational
these days, which is good in one way as they were many printed pages.
Smart meters are only useful for the utility unless means are made available to the
consumer to be able to adapt their usage. For now this will likely be a manual process,
but the utilities should also be helping their customers understand their options for
automatic adjustments.
Steve Buchholz - 01/13/2010 - 14:15
Measurement does not automatically mean that savings will be obtained. Home
owners are simply getting information about their consumption - whether this
translates into long term repeatable savings. The research suggests that there is often
an initial short term spike in energy savings, but after a 3-4 months consumer interest
drops and the in home displays end up in the kitchen drawer. I read an interesting
article which called this MTKD - mean time to kitchen drawer.
I am all for measurement - but it is really on the first step. Real energy saving benefits
are much more obtainable and sustainable through energy conservation measures,
efficient lighting, weatherisation, smart thermostats, reducing standby power, timers /
scheduling of loads etc. It appears to me that there is a disproportionate amount of
resource is being allocated to measurement where the resource could be better
allocated to energy efficiency.
I think dynamic pricing is very reasonable, and a good way for consumers to save
money based on real costs of their consumption. (Consumer behavior will even guide
the building of new capacity.) However, I predict a tsunami backlash against dynamic
pricing, because the average American has an IQ of 100 and may not figure out how
to use the system for a long time.
What we may see is 3rd party service providers working with people for a cut of the
savings, if there's enough money to go around.
People are comparing this to the personal computer revolution, but I'd offer another
comparison. We have good standards work out of the gate this time (UtilityAMI's
OpenHAN looks like a very good piece of work for this point in history). I think there
also isn't as much money on the table. The comparison I would offer is telephone
deregulation. (I was there, creak, wheeze!) The FCC had legal power to say whether
you could use a 3rd party phone, answering machine, or modem, and it might be a
dumb design in some cases, but it generally worked and didn't cause harm. Then we
got into alternate long distance service. Then competing dialtone providers (CLECs).
Now we have IP telephony (which some might say could use more regulation).
Standards have a huge role, and regulation shouldn't be neglected. Also, people need
help. Utilities need to provide well-designed education and assistance; real stuff, not
pro forma. And as I think of it, as other people have mentioned, we need to tie the
financial success of utilities to what's best for society, which isn't selling power.
3 of 5 2/12/2010 9:58 PM
Smart Grid: Bringing the Smart Grid to the Smart Home: It’s Not Only ... http://www.smartgridnews.com/artman/publish/Technologies_Meterin...
Mark me up as part of that 35%, BIG TIME. I'll gladly pay the extra cost to keep out
this intrusive big-brotherish garbage.
BTW, I'm not just some paranoid flunky. I'm a computer scientist, active in aerospace
for 22 years, specializing in both real-time flight control systems and large database
design. My hobby interests include radio frequency comm systems and electronics.
This type of construct for a common good such as energy shows the disingenuousness
of the majority of smart grid conversation.
Can anyone tell me what public utility will measure their success by the decrease in
power distributed and consumed AND reward the consumer one for one without
jacking up fees and service charges?
Just as the rate of those who do sell excess energy back to the grid get the short end
of the deal (wholesale versus retail rates) and just as the Government gets a set
share / rate of your 'gains' but limited write off of 'losses', this is a poorly designed
construct for the 'attested' goal.
The smart meter is simply the next generation of utility metering technology that has
the smarts to register closer to real time the cost of power generation and delivery.
However, the rates being charged to consumers are not in real time (e.g. 1-15 min),
but rather a concoction of averages called, on-peak , off-peak etc. An out-of-dated top
down strategy whereby the industry attempts to influence consumer behaviour. Large
commercial and industrial power users have had such metering with TOU rates for
some thirty years. With few exceptions this strategy never worked. And it wont work
in the residential classification either, unless the consumer has the information tools
to make their own decisions - bottom up with real time pricing.
Douglas Tideman - 01/15/2010 - 07:20
Getting the customer involved means using 'whatif' scenarios with them to introduce
the idea of dynamic tariffs and what they might do in reponse. This will give an insight
into which tariff structure - preset time of day, single time of use or predictive time of
use would actually give the best result. Crucially for the industry it will also show how
customer reaction can be developed in a way that is 'value effective' to both customer
and the business..... Engaging the customer in this way should lead to effective design
of the Smart Framework and also engender the necessary enthusiasm!!!
More discussion at
http://stephenbrowning.110mb.com/project/
4 of 5 2/12/2010 9:58 PM
Smart Grid: Bringing the Smart Grid to the Smart Home: It’s Not Only ... http://www.smartgridnews.com/artman/publish/Technologies_Meterin...
Email:
[?]
We will not post or give your email address to anyone.
Do not post commercial/sales messages here. They will be deleted. Try: pr@smartgridnews.com
PLEASE NOTE: All HTML codes will be removed from your comment.
[?]
The numbers (0) and (1) are not used.
Please type the characters you see into the box.
You can not edit or delete your comment once it is posted. Please check for spelling now.
Your IP Address is: 202.156.13.253
5 of 5 2/12/2010 9:58 PM