Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
contradictory goals – yet achieved by Patagonia. Its business model(1) is based on the philosophy
that calls for making minimum environmental impact along overall value chain engagement to
increase the productivity of natural capital. At the core of this business model is the company’s
value proposition – Sustainability, which acts as both the primary source of its competitive
advantage and the basis of its differentiation strategy. To differentiate itself, Patagonia has
effectively positioned itself as a supplier of superior quality products and at the same time it has
continued its commitment towards minimizing its impact on environment – even if it calls for
Tradeoffs (e.g. by not using anti-odor chemicals or not using conventional cotton). Supply side
of the business comprises of activities and relationships along the value chain that provide the
finished goods and create value. Patagonia has been able to create value by creating Integrity in
its product and product’s performance, effective Signaling (e.g. through warranty and
replacements), using quality inputs (e.g. organic cotton), influencing customer experience (e.g.
catalogues), and linking its value chain to that of its suppliers (e.g. strict standards for quality and
social & environmental responsibility). On the Demand side Patagonia has created a social &
grants, donations, campaigns, & green benefits for its employees etc. This helped Patagonia
capture value because the differentiation resulted in consumers’ willingness to be associated with
purchasing a superior quality product from a company that they trust cares for the environment,
& such consumers are also willing to pay (2) more for Patagonia’s products.
B) Patagonia aspires to build a sustainable business model which is profitable, grows, and solves
environmental crisis. It includes value propositions that are social, environmental & economic.
To be successful, the model should be able to distribute these values along the whole market
1
Hasan Khan (212636692)
chain that includes suppliers, competitors, customers, employees and external environment.
Patagonia selected suppliers who were driven by the same set of values, and through selectivity
Patagonia enabled suppliers create value for various players along the value chain as this
selectivity ultimately resulted in lower defects for its products. Customers got a brand they can
trust for product quality and environmental wellbeing. The company thrived as reflected in
consistent growth in sales (6%) and gross margin (50% to 55 %), and employees benefited as
reflected in low annual turnover rate (5%). Patagonia also influenced the external environment
positively by providing advice on organic cotton to competitors such as Nike and Gap, on
environmental practices to Levi Strauss etc., and on strategy to senior executives of large
companies such as Walmart. Since Patagonia has positively influenced various players both in
the internal and external environment, so we can confidently say that it has been able to achieve
its goals.
consumer repeat purchases. This will be a Bikini business model – Sell Less, Make More. On
one hand the company intends to sell less of the physical product by extending its use through
repairs and reuse. On the other hand it aims to charge more by differentiating its product through
quality and value added (environmental benefits through recycling, reduced use of material etc.).
Patagonia may in-fact see an increase in sales through increase in number of buyers – attracted
through positive word of mouth publicity, or it could extend its reduce, repair, reuse, recycle
model in the backward direction of its value chain – working for retailers to recycle clothing that
is too worn to be sold. Either way, the Product Lifecycle Initiative aligns well with the existing
positioning of the company, and will act as a strong additive to its existing differentiating factor,