Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • scription 1. Conwnlesw:R Ol: Comparison Sampling Techniques

    Încărcat de

    annfai
    17 vizualizări1 pagină
    This document compares and contrasts various sampling techniques, including both nonprobability and probability methods. Nonprobability techniques like convenience and snowball sampling are low-cost but have high variability and bias. Probability methods like simple random and stratified sampling reduce errors but require more planning and resources. Overall, the document outlines the relative costs, advantages, and disadvantages of different sampling approaches.

    Descriere originală:

    Titlu original

    page17

    Drepturi de autor

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    This document compares and contrasts various sampling techniques, including both nonprobability and probability methods. Nonprobability techniques like convenience and snowball sampling are low-cost but have high variability and bias. Probability methods like simple random and stratified sampling reduce errors but require more planning and resources. Overall, the document outlines the relative costs, advantages, and disadvantages of different sampling approaches.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    17 vizualizări1 pagină

    scription 1. Conwnlesw:R Ol: Comparison Sampling Techniques

    Încărcat de

    annfai
    This document compares and contrasts various sampling techniques, including both nonprobability and probability methods. Nonprobability techniques like convenience and snowball sampling are low-cost but have high variability and bias. Probability methods like simple random and stratified sampling reduce errors but require more planning and resources. Overall, the document outlines the relative costs, advantages, and disadvantages of different sampling approaches.

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 1

    ilonprobabltlty $amptos

    CoBt ond
    &scription Dsgras ol Use Advanr.0Es Dlsadvantages
    1. Conwnlesw:R* Very low cost, extensively No need lor list ol population Variatrility and bias of es&
    searcher usos most con- used matss canrctbe
    venient sample or most or conUolled ; projecling
    economical sample. beyond sample
    2. Judgment:An otpert or Moderate mst, averags usc Useful br certain types of Bhs due to 6xpsrts'
    experienced researcher lorecasting; sample guaran- may make sample
    selects the sample to ful- teed lo m6eta specific sentativs; projecting datr
    lill a purpose, such as sn- obiqctitG yond SamBle
    suring all members harre
    a erlain characteristie.
    3. O{rola; Researcher clas- Modsrate coEt, very odgh- lntroduc€s some stfntifica- lntroduces bias in re- I .,i
    si{ies population b-y perd, siwly used tion of population; requires searcherb classification d
    n6nt propertio$, no list ol population subiects; nonrandom
    determines desired pro. tion wilhin classes mearx
    portion of samplefrom
    ermrfrom population
    each elass, flxes quotas be estimatod; polecting
    :1.:
    !
    br each interviewer. data beyo.nd sample
    ,15
    inappropriate
    4. $nowball: lnilial respon- Low cost, used.in special Useful in locating members High bias because sa
    dents are eelected by situations of rars populalions unilB nol irdeperdent; :
    probahility samples; addi- jecting data beyond
    iional respondents are inappropriate
    iic obtained'by rebrral lrom
    ,-,.€

    lnitial re$pordents.

    :,1::
    ::
    !
    ,i
    Figure 1 comparison of Nonprobability sampling Techniques
    iii;.

    Prcbabltltf Sarpha
    'ri:,

    z' Coetano
    i;\!
    IlesJrlptlon Oeg*oe of U*e &vantager Dhdvant&ges
    1- SimWnndom:Re- High cost, not fuquedty Only minimaladvance Bagulres sampling
    searcher assigns oacfi used ln prac'tice (except knowledge of pop.rtation urcrk from; &es not use
    t membsr of the sanpling
    frame a number, then se-
    random-digit dating) needed; easy to analyze
    data and compute error
    knordedge of
    researcher may have;
    lects samplo units by a
    ran&m method. enors br same sampi*
    lhan slratified
    Qs:
    jil 1
    spondents may be
    [a,,'
    2. Systemattc: Hesearcher dlspersed, henee
    fi,loderate cost, rnoderdety Simple to draiv sample;easy lf sampling intervat ls
    uses natural ordering or used to chect to a periodic ordering d
    ordarof sampling framg
    population, may
    selects an arbitrary start-
    ing point, then selsc{s
    increased variability
    ,:\.
    items al a presolocted in-
    terual.
    3- $tratified: Researcher Ji- Hi'gh cost, moderately used Assures representation of all
    vides the population inlo Hequires accurats
    groups in sample; charac{er- tion on proportion in
    istics of each stralum can be stratuml f $tratffted llsts
    estimated and comparisons not already arrallable,
    made; reduces varhbility br can be costly to prspare
    clude proportional, dis-
    same sample size
    -.6ft portional, and optimal
    fiocation of subsample
    eizgs.

    Figure 2 comparison of probability sampling Techniques

    SSlPage
    4le

    S-ar putea să vă placă și