Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Education has a very important role in producing qualified human resources
both seen from the individual or community life. School is one of the formal
institutions to hold a series of learning activities which are organized and well
structured including in learning- teaching process in classroom.
The education of mathematics in elementary school has a very important role
since on such as the level, the education of mathematics has the fundamental
foundation in determining the attitude, intelligence, and basic personality of the
children (Susanto, 2015 : 50). To create precise foundation, it is required teachers
who encourage the students to be more active during learning-teaching process. The
learning process is not centered on the teachers, however it rests on the students. The
teachers do not transfer the knowledge for the students, but to assist the students in
forming their own knowledge.
Sardiman (2011:125) states that teachers are as the component of human in
learning-teaching process who is actively in forming potential human resources in
the field of development. Also, it is stated that teachers are not only as to transfer the
knowledge to the students, but also as to educate and transfer of values and as
consultant to give guidance and to guide the students in learning.
Based on the results of observation in the environment of school, I found that
the teachers were dominantly using Teacher Center Learned in learning-teaching
process in class and the activities are more focused on the teachers. Less varied of
learning-teaching method led into less effective of teaching output. It was found that
the students were frequently lazy to join the subject and even do not care with their
lesson. For instance, during learning-teaching process, some students were actively
talking with other students, and even they do as what they like.
In school teaching, mathematics is one of the subject which is considered
difficult. It causes that the students are less interest in learning the subject. Low
interest of the students to study mathematics is caused by the mindset they have that
learning mathematics is hard. The researcher found similar experience during on job
training in which some students were not active in joining the subject of
mathematics in classroom. The students tended to be passive without any feedback in
asking questions and giving answer during the subject.
Theoritical Overview
In a narrow sense, “Learning means the efforts to master the material of the
science which is as a series of activities leading into the form of integrated
personality” (Sardiman, 2011 : 20). The view of cognitive psychology states that
learning is to develop various strategies in taking notes and getting various
information .
Syah (2012 : 153)The students should be active to find the information, and the
teachers do not control the stimulus, but to be the partner of the students in the
process of finding some information and meanings of the obtained information in
their learning.
Purwanto (2011: 38) states that learning is the process in the individual to
interact with environment in getting the change of attitude. The process of learning
may involve cognitive, affective and psychomotor aspects. Seen from the cognitive
aspect, the students are taught about the knowledge found in environment, and
from pscyhomotoric aspects, the students get the change through the skills found in
the individual.
Damyati and Mudjiono (2009:101-106) improve the motivation of learning
among other things: (a) optimization of the application of the principles of learning, (b)
optimization of the dynamic elements of learning and learning, (c) optimizing the
utilization of the experience and abilities of students, (d) the development of the ideals
and aspirations of learning.
Siregar(2010:51) Motivation means the courage or wish to study. Someone will
be success in studying if he/she has the wish to study. This is as the principle in
learning which should be kept in mind. Every student should be encouraged in
studying and motivated both in internal or external. By having motivation, the
students will be more motivated to follow the subject. The intention derived from
internal of individual is called as motive.
Shoimin (2014 : 175) states that there are 6 phases in the application of
Snowball Throwing Learning Model, namely (1) Delivering all goals in learning and
to motivate the students, (2) Delivering information regarding the material of learning
for the students, (3)Organizing the students in discussion learning group (Giving the
information for the students regarding the procedure in the application of Snowball
Throwing Learning Model, by dividing the students into groups consisting of 7
students for each group, (4)Guiding the discussion learning group (calling the head of
each group and describe the material of the topic to discuss, and asking the head of
the discussion to return to each group in order to discuss the topic given by the
teacher with his/her group, giving a piece of paper for each group and asking the
students to write questions in according with the material given by the teachers,
asking the students to write question in order to ask to other group and asking other
group to write their answer on the piece of paper given, (5)Evaluation (The teacher asks
each head of group to read the answer of the question given or accepted from other
group), (6)Giving the assessment /appreciation on the output of the group.
In this occasion, it is required good participation of the students and cooperation
for the application of Snowball Throwing Learning Model and it is with high impact
on teaching. Each member should understand the needs of its group, and by the
application of Snowball Throwing Learning Model, the students are trained to
cooperate and to reduce the egoism in studying. According to Huda (2014:226) in the
context of learning, the Snowball Throwing applied by throwing a geographical
description of paper to show the students had to answer a question from a teacher.
By the applying Snowball Throwing Learning Model, the students will be more
active in learning-teaching process. Also, it encourages the students to understand
the material of teaching better. It is expected that by applying Snowball Throwing
Learning Model, the motivation of the students will be better in studying.
Criteria :
Score 80%- 100% categorized as high motivation
Score 60%-79% categorized as medium motivation
Score 0%- 59% categorized as low motivation
From the results of the performance of teacher above, it can be seen that all
indicators have improved up to high category, such as apperception, the use of time
and learning strategy, the involved of the students in studying, interaction with the
students, evaluation and closing the lesson with high criteria.
Based on data analysis, on pre-class action research, it was obtained that 4
students (9.52%) reached high motivation in studying, 10 students (23.80%) reached
medium motivation and 28 students (66.66%) with low motivation. On post-cycle II,
37 students (88.09%) were highly motivated and 5 students (11.90%) have motivated
to study mathematics. On Cycle I of first meeting, it was obtained from the
observation that 1 student (2.38%) was categorized with high motivated, 4 students
(9.52%) with medium motivation and 37 students (88.09%) were categorized with
low motivation. On the second meeting, 3 students (7.14%) were highly motivated, 5
students (11.90%) with medium motivation and 34 students (80.95) were
categorized with low motivation. On Cycle II of first meeting, 26 students (61.90%)
were highly motivated, 12 students ( 28.57%) were categorized with medium
motivation and 4 students ( 9.25%) were with low motivation. On the second
meeting, 37 students ( 88.09%) were highly motivated, 5 students (11.90%) were with
medium motivation, and 0 (0%) or zero student with low motivation in studying
mathematics.
Diagram 1. The result of observation of student’s motivation
100,00%
persentase %
80,00%
60,00%
40,00%
20,00%
0,00%
Siklus I Siklus I Siklus II Siklus II
Pertemua Pertemua Pertemua Pertemua
nI n II nI n II
Siklus 39,62% 58,28% 79,06% 92,06%
From the table above, it can be seen that on Cycle I up to Cycle II, it has been
improved, either seen from Cycle I of first meeting showing that 39.62% were
categorized low, Cycle I of second meeting showing that 58.28% was categorized
low, Cycle II of the first meeting shoed that 79.06% were categorized medium and
on Cycle II of the second meeting, it was 92.06% with high motivation.
Hence, based on the results of research, it can be inferred that the application of
Snowball Throwing Learning Model may improve the motivation of the students in
learning Mathematics on the material of two –dimensional figure on grade V
elementary school 028227 South Binjai.
the figure of classical motivation was 61.57% and categorized low and on the last
condition, it was obtained the classical figure for 90.53% and categorized high.
3. From the result of observation for the motivation of the students, it showed that
there was the improvement of the motivation of the students, such as :
a. On cycle I in the first meeting, it was obtained 39.62% were categorized
with high motivation.
b. On cycle II in the second meeting, the data showed that 58.28% were with
medium motivation.
c. On cycle II in the first meeting, the data showed that 79.06% were with
medium motivation.
d. On cycle II in the first meeting, the data showed that 92.06% were highly
motivated.
4. From the observation results of teaching activity on cycle I of the first meeting,
it was obtained the score 55.68% with low motivation, on cycle I of the second
meeting, it was obtained the score 70.45% which categorized medium. And,
on cycle II of the first meeting, it was obtained from the result of observation
of teaching of the teacher, it was 78.57% were categorized medium and on cycle
II of the second meeting, it reached the improvement for 95.23% and highly
motivated.
5. Learning by applying Snowball Throwing Learning Model on the topic of two-
dimensional figure and the intersection of two-dimensional figure may reduce the
boredness of the students in studying mathematics.
From the conclusions above, the suggestions are given such as the following:
1. The headmaster should motivate those mathematics teachers to apply Snowball
Throwing Learning Model in order to make the students are more active in
following learning-teaching process.
2. To the teachers, it is expected to apply Snowball Throwing Learning Model in
learning mathematics in order to make the students are more active and to reduce
boredness in studying.
3. To the next researchers, it is expected to study more on similar problem by
applying Snowball Throwing Learning Model in order to improve the motivation
of the students in studying.
REFERENCES
Dewi, Rosmala, 2010. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Medan: Pasca Sarjana Unimed
Huda, Miftahul. 2014. Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta :
Pustaka Pelajar
Mudjiono. Dimyati. 2009. Belajar & Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Purwanto. 2011. Hasil Belajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sardiman. 2011. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo
Persada.
Shoimin, Aris. 2014. 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013.
Yogyakarta : Ar-Ruzz Media.
Siregar, Eveline. 2010. Teori belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Susanto, Ahmad. 2015. Teori Belajar & Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta:
Prenadamedia Group.
Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Syah, Muhibbin. 2012. Psikologi Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.