Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
net/publication/277890120
CITATIONS READS
5 6,471
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Non-conservative Distributed Parameter Systems Attached to External Damping Sources View project
All content following this page was uploaded by John Bellos on 02 September 2017.
1. GENERAL ....................................................................................................................... 15
1.1 Eurocodes ....................................................................................................................... 15
1.2 Units of measurement ..................................................................................................... 16
1.3 Symbols ........................................................................................................................... 17
4 SLABS ............................................................................................................................. 75
4.1 General ............................................................................................................................ 75
4.2 Two-dimensional finite elements ...................................................................................... 77
4.2.1 Assumptions .................................................................................................................... 77
4.2.2 Stress resultants and deflections ..................................................................................... 84
4.2.3 Unfavourable loadings and envelopes of stresses – deflections ................................... 116
4.2.4 Clarifications .................................................................................................................... 129
4.3 Analyses using tables .................................................................................................... 134
4.3.1 Assumptions .................................................................................................................. 134
4.3.2 Application width of concentrated load on slab ............................................................. 134
4.3.3 Distribution width of concentrated load ........................................................................... 135
4.3.4 Support moments of continuous slabs ........................................................................... 140
4.3.5 Contribution of pinned slab supports ............................................................................. 141
4.4 Cantilevers .................................................................................................................... 142
4.4.1 Static analysis ............................................................................................................... 142
4.4.2 Deflection ...................................................................................................................... 142
4.5 One-way slabs ............................................................................................................... 146
4.5.1 Static analysis ............................................................................................................... 146
4.5.2 Deflection ...................................................................................................................... 150
4.5.3 Effective of live load on the static analysis of one-way slabs ........................................ 154
4.5.3.1 Accurate analysis method ................................................................................ 154
4.5.3.2 Simplified method for envelope estimation ....................................................... 162
4.6 Two-way slabs ............................................................................................................... 163
4.6.1 Shear forces and support reaction forces ...................................................................... 163
4.6.1.1 Simplified method ............................................................................................ 163
4.6.1.2 Czerny’s elasticity method ............................................................................... 166
4.6.2 Fundamental support and span moments – Deflections ............................................... 167
4.6.2.1 MARCUS method ............................................................................................ 167
4.6.2.2 CZERNY’s elasticity method ............................................................................ 171
4.6.3 Bending moments in continuous two-way slabs ............................................................ 171
4.6.3.1 Continuous strip method .................................................................................. 171
4.6.3.2 Accurate method (manual) .............................................................................. 173
4.6.3.3 Practically accurate method ............................................................................. 174
4.6.4 Influence of live load ...................................................................................................... 174
4.7 Slabs supported on three edges ................................................................................... 179
4.8 Slabs supported on two adjacent edges ........................................................................ 179
4.9 Exercises ......................................................................................................................... 180
APPENDICES
Α.1 Modelling slabs with finite elements in a structural frame ............................................. 337
Α.1.1 The frame behaviour in the regions close to columns................................................... 341
Α.1.1.1 Model using members ..................................................................................... 341
Α.1.1.2 Model with finite elements ............................................................................... 343
Α.1.1.3 First Conclusion ............................................................................................... 344
Α.1.2 Deflection of beams ...................................................................................................... 344
Α.1.2.1 Model using members ..................................................................................... 355
Α.1.2.2 Model using finite elements ............................................................................. 348
Α.1.2.3 Second Conclusion ......................................................................................... 351
Α.1.3 Torsional stiffness of beams ......................................................................................... 351
Α.1.3.1 Model using members ..................................................................................... 352
Α.1.3.2 Model using finite elements ............................................................................. 355
Α.1.3.3 Third Conclusion ............................................................................................. 358
Α.1.3.4 FINAL CONCLUSION ..................................................................................... 358
2.5 Exercise
The residential building of the sketch includes a basement of area 12×18 m2 and height 3 m, a
ground floor and four storeys of identical dimensions and a top floor of area 4×6 m2 and height
2.5 m. The masses at levels 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 are equal to MG=220 t and MQ=44 t, at level 5 to MG=180
t and MQ=44 t, while at the top level to MG=20 t and MQ=4 t. The building is situated in the seis-
mic area Z1 and the distribution of seismic accelerations is triangular. The design seismic accel-
eration of magnitude 0.12g is applied at the center of mass of the building.
The calculation of the seismic and wind forces as well as a comparison between them is asked.
Figure 2.5-1: The geometrical and loading model of the building's wind and seismic actions
Since the building is residential ψ2=0.30 and consequently during an earthquake the dynamic
masses are evaluated as M=MG+0.30⋅MQ. Thus, the dynamic masses at levels 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4
are equal to MG+0.30Q,i=0-4=220+0.30×44=233 t, at level 5 is equal to MG+0.30Q,5=180+0.30×44=193 t,
while at the top level is equal MG+0.30Q,6=20+0.30×4=21 t.
Figure 2.5-2: Wind forces Fw are less significant comparing to seismic forces Fs.
W [kN]: gravity loads Fw [kN]: wind forces Fs [kN]: seismic forces
30 Apostolos Konstantinidis
Static and Dynamic Analysis
The design acceleration at the CM is 0.12g. Therefore acceleration at the 1st level is equal to
a1=(3.0/9.0)×0.12g=0.04g. Respectively, at the rest levels:
a2=0.08g, a3=0.12g, a4=0.16g, a5=0.20g και a6=0.24g.
The seismic force imposed on level ‘i’ is:
Fs,i=MG+0.30Q,i⋅ai
therefore
Fs,0=0
Fs,1=233t·(0.04×9.81)m/sec2=91 kN
Fs,2=233t·(0.08×9.81)m/sec2=183 kN
Fs,3=233t·(0.12×9.81)m/sec2=274 kN
Fs,4=233t·(0.16×9.81)m/sec2=366 kN
Fs,5=193t·(0.20×9.81)m/sec2=379 kN
Fs,6=21t·(0.24×9.81)m/sec2=49 kN
The total seismic force (or the total seismic base shear force) Fs,tot is equal to the sum seismic
forces at different levels and its center of application is located at about 2/3 of the building
height.
Fs,tot=1146t⋅(0.12×9.81)m/sec2=1349 kN
11 Theoretically the less significant seismic forces could result in seismic area Ζ1 in soil type Α (S=1.0) with γI=1.0 and q=6.75. The interval
0.15≤T≤0.50 gives spectral acceleration Sd=γI⋅agR⋅S⋅2.5/q=0.16g⋅2.5/6.75=0.059g Fs,tot=1146t⋅(0.059×9.81)m/sec2=663kN.
Theoretically the most critical rectangular building plan of area 12×18=216 m2 with respect to wind forces is the one with sides aspect ratio
1/4 [EC8 4.2.3.2(5)], resulting to plan dimensions 30×7.2 approximately. The wind force for the side of 30 m width, is
Fw=30.0×3.0×1.50=135 kN for each storey while at the top floor remains Fw=6.0×2.5×1.50=22.5 kN. Therefore the wind load at the 6th lev-
el is Fw,6=22.5/2=11 kN, at the 5th level Fw,5=22.5/2+135/2=79 kN, while at the rest Fw,i=135/2+135/2=135 kN.
The total wind force is Fw,tot=11+79+4×135=630 kN.
Therefore, even in this extreme case, the seismic forces are greater than the wind forces.
Figure 3.1.4-1: Diaphragmatic behaviour of floor Figure 3.1.4-2: The displacements of a random
point i of the diaphragm due to φz
In a floor diaphragm of 20 main and 14 slave nodes, the number of the unknown displacements
(degrees of freedom) is equal to 20×3+3=63.
40 ΙApostolos Konstantinidis
Static and Dynamic Analysis
is indicated by the red dashed line at the Interface of the related software so that the engineer is
able to check the order of magnitude of the distribution of the seismic accelerations. Further-
more, using this method there is no need for additional dynamic response spectrum analysis.
Notes
• The main comparison is performed on seismic accelerations. This is based on the fact
that seismic forces provide the same fast visual outcome with respect to their vertical
distribution, provided that all floor masses are identical.
• When the principle system is inclined, for earthquake in x direction only, the seismic ac-
celerations are developed in both x, y directions. Τhe same stands for earthquake in y
direction only.
• The earthquake in x direction generates components in x direction only when the struc-
ture is symmetrical, otherwise it generates components in both directions.
Earthquake in Y Direction
Masses a/g H[kN] V[kN]
Figure 3.3.3-1: The structural model of the frame considering loadings: g and q and the seismic W
The general analysis of the frame subjected to vertical uniform load w, from table 1 is:
I 2 h 52.125 3.0
k= ⋅ = ⋅ = 1.47
I1 l 21.33 5.0
l2 ( 5. 0 m ) 2
H = H A = −H B = ⋅w = ⋅ w = 0.60 m ⋅ w ,
4h ⋅ ( k + 2 ) 4 ⋅ 3.0 m ⋅ ( 1.47 + 2 )
l 5.0m
VA = VB = ⋅ w = ⋅ w = 2.50m ⋅ w
2 2
h 3.0m
M A = −M B = ⋅ H = ⋅ 0.60m ⋅ w = 0.60m2 ⋅ w
3 3
2 2
M CA = M CD = M DC = −M DB = − h ⋅ H = − ⋅ 3.0m ⋅ 0.60m ⋅ w = −1.20m2 ⋅ w
3 3
The general analysis of the frame subjected to horizontal load W, from table 39 is:
W
H A = HB = − = −0.50W
2
3⋅ h ⋅ k 3 ⋅ 3.0m ⋅ 1.47
VA = −VB = − ⋅W = − ⋅W = −0.27 ⋅W
l ⋅( 6k + 1 ) 5.0m ⋅ ( 6 ⋅ 1.47 + 1 )
7 Τhis stress resultant, as well as most of the following, could be calculated by the simple observation of the symmetry both of structure and
loading. However this general process is handling asymmetries as well, e.g. as in the 2nd loading.
8 x is the point of zero shear force corresponding to position of maximum bending moment.
9 From structural analysis it is known that the maximum bending moment Mmax in a span i,j is located at the point m at distance x from the
end i, where shear forces become zero. The moment at that point is given by the expression Mmax=Mi,j + AV where AV is the area under
the shear forces diagram from the point i to the point m. In this example, since there is only uniform load, the area is AV=(Vi,j⋅x)/2.
50 ΙApostolos Konstantinidis
Volume B
Figure 3.3.3-14
Figure 3.3.3-15
Figure 3.3.3-16
52 ΙApostolos Konstantinidis
Static and Dynamic Analysis
64 ΙApostolos Konstantinidis
Static and Dynamic Analysis
Figure 3.3.6-3: Slab modelled with triangular finite elements (project <B_331>, pi-FES)
(a=beam-slab common deflection curve)
The model using both members and more accurate two-dimensional finite elements, takes into
account the slab frame behaviour in regions close to columns, in contrast to the inexpensive
approach of simply supported slab throughout its length. However, in order for the slab to be-
have as a common frame with the columns in the actual structure, the slab-columns connec-
tions (where strong negative bending moments are developed) should be reinforced with
strong, correctly placed and well anchored negative top reinforcement at slabs. For this reason,
the slab analysis using finite elements in common worksheets should consider pinned supports
on columns.
In case of members, the two main side joists (of slab) forming a common frame with the col-
umns, have greater torsional rigidity than the intermediate nearly simply supported main joists
and bear heavier loads, thereby to develop strong negative bending moments at their supports
and relatively low positive bending moments at their spans. The interim main joists develop
strong positive bending moments at their spans, while being supported on the end joists through
the secondary joists stressed by significant positive bending moments at their spans.
66 ΙApostolos Konstantinidis
Static and Dynamic Analysis
In the more accurate model using two-dimensional finite elements, the main side strips behave
intensively as frames. Τhe results are similar to those of using members with the following dif-
ferences: (a) In the main side strips (corresponding to the main side joists) the frame behaviour
is more intensive, since the moments at the supports are greater and moments at the spans are
smaller, (b) In the interim main strips (corresponding to the interim main joists) the span mo-
ments are smaller, (c) The span moments of the secondary strips (corresponding to secondary
joists) end up to be greater. This is due to the fact that the internal torsional stiffness of the slab
elements (torsion) is stronger than the respective of members.
Figure 4.2.1-1
The four slabs have identical dimensions of 4.0 mx6.0 m, thickness of 150 mm, covering load
ge=1.0 kN/m2 and live load q=5.0 kN/m2. Concrete class: C30/37.
78 Ι Apostolos Konstantinidis
Volume B
82 Ι Apostolos Konstantinidis
Static and Dynamic Analysis
Figure 4.2.1-8: The following button sequence displays the 3D deformation of the structure:
“Details” in FEM results, “Diagrams at Dx=Dy=0.1m”, “OK”, “Selection” , “Displacements” “Z” & “Diagrams” .
For better viewing “Light 2” is switched on.
Figure 4.2.1-9: In the previous screen button sequence “Menu” , “Full Screen Mode” and “4D” ,
provides stereoscopic display using “blue-red glasses”.
Displacements which induse stresses help the engineers understand better the structural
behaviour (engineering perception). When the deflected structure is concave upwards, the
bending moments are positive, considering that the fibers under tension are located at the
bottom face of the slabs.
Figure 4.2.2-10: In ‘Slab Results’ section: Button “Displacements” for 2nd time hides deformations.
In ‘FEM Results’ section: Button “Details” defines distribution per 0.1 m. Button sequence “Selection”, “Bending”, “V11”,
“Diagrams” displays the 3D view of the distribution of shear forces [Vx].
Figure 4.2.2-11: Button sequence “M”, “View”, “Options”, “Front”, “OK”, “Quad” displays the front view
of 3D distribution of shear forces [Vx].
Figure 4.2.2-12: Button sequence “View”, “Options”, “Rear” displays the rear view of the 3D distribution of shear forces [Vx].
Figure 4.2.2-16: Button “Selection”, “Bending”, “M11” “Diagrams” displays the 3D view of distribution of bending moments [Mx].
Figure 4.2.2-17: Button sequence “Selection”, “Bending”, “M11”, “Diagrams” displays the
3D view of distribution of bending moments [Mx].
Figure 4.2.2-18: Button sequence “View”, “Options”, “Rear” displays the rear view of the
3D distribution of bending moments [Mx].
Figure 4.2.2-20: Button sequence “View”, “Options”, “Front”, “Quad” displays the front view of the
3D distribution of bending moments [My].
Figure 4.2.2-21: Button sequence “View”, “Options”, “Rear” displays the rear view of the
3D distribution of bending moments [My].
90 Ι Apostolos Konstantinidis
Volume B
Figure 4.2.2-45: Distribution of shear forces [Vx] ([V11] in ‘FEM Results’, detailed per 0.10 m) in 3D.
Figure 4.2.2-46: Front view of the 3D distribution of shear forces [Vx] ([V11] in ‘FEM Results’).
Figure 4.2.2-47: Side view of the 3D distribution of shear forces [Vx] ([V11] in ‘FEM Results’).
Figure 4.2.2-52: Distribution of bending moments [Mx] ([M11] in ‘FEM Results’, details per 0.10 m) in 3D.
Figure 4.2.2-53: Front view of the 3D distribution of bending moments [Mx] ([M11] in ‘FEM Results’).
Figure 4.2.2-54: Side view of the 3D distribution of bending moments [Mx] ([M11] in ‘FEM Results’).
Figure 4.2.2-63: Shear forces [Vy] ([V22] in ‘FEM Results’, detailed per 0.1 m)
extend only in the regions of middle supports.
Figure 4.2.2-64: Front view of the 3D distribution of shear forces [Vy] ([V22] in ‘FEM Results’).
Figure 4.2.2-65: Side view of the 3D distribution of shear forces [Vy] ([V22] in ‘FEM Results’).
At the points of the slab (in this case of the cantilever) where fixed transverse support exist, nu-
merous peaks are created, mainly for shears (in this case 130.8 and 138.6 kN) and secondarily
for moments. These regions are forced to carry large part of the load of the adjacent slabs main-
ly near the supports. This is the reason why the occurrence of high shears shortly before and
shortly after the support. However, these shears are taken into account in detail by considering
their average values in a width, e.g. 1.0 m, which equals to 47.0 kN (‘Slab Results’).
Figure 4.2.2-67: Distribution of bending moments [Mx] ([M11] in ‘FEM Results’, detailed per 0.10 m) in 3D.
Figure 4.2.2-68: View of the 3D distribution of bending moments [Mx] ([M11] in ‘FEM Results’).
Figure 4.2.2-69: Side view of the 3D distribution of bending moments [Mx] ([M11] in ‘FEM Results’).
The positive peak moments forming a sharp “hole”, at the region of the support exactly behind
the cantilever, results from the negative load created at this region by the cantilever’s moment.
Notice that the influence of the strong cantilever, both in negative and positive moments, de-
creases in a small distance from the cantilever support.
The insignificant differences in values of moments Mx between ‘FEM results’ and ‘Slab results’
are due to the relatively small curvature of the 3D moment diagram Mx.
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4
5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 6
The problem becomes even more complicated when slabs are not arranged in a grid.
General and accurate analysis can only be achieved by means of the the finite element method.
However, the resources for such an analysis require sophisticated algorithms and modern com-
puters. The related software performs parallel processing of such algorithms on all available
cores of a personal computer providing solutions to such complicated problems within seconds.
The unfavourable loadings on the three previously resolved examples will be examined next.
Figure 4.2.3-2
Figure 4.2.3-1
Figure 4.2.3-7: Front view of 3D bending moment diagrams, corresponding to the envelope of [Mx]
Figure 4.2.3-8: Side view of 3D bending moment diagrams, corresponding to the envelope of [My]
Note that although the live load has a relatively high value, the differences between the bending
moments are small and less than15%.
The largest slab deflection is equal to y=-2.00 (-1.53) mm and y=+0.24 mm. It is concluded that
the slab is lifted, which is in contrast with the responseof the global loading case, due to sym-
metry of course.
Notice that the deflections are as high as 30% while opposite sign deformations also arise (blue
lines).
Figure 4.2.4-7: In module ‘BUILDING’, the interaction of the slabs with the structure is taken into account
resulting from point to point more or less favourable stresses compared to the module ‘SLABS’.
.
As explained in detail in chapter 3 and Appendix Α, the influence of beams and columns on the
behaviour of a building is very important. In this example, the bending moment of the slabs S1-
S2 is significantly smaller compared to the ‘SLABS’ module. The support moment, in this mod-
ule, is provided directly on the side faces of the beams, wherein the detailing takes place. How-
ever, the peak moment in the middle of the support (in the middle of the beam) is much higher.
Figure 4.2.4-8: The actual structure in 3D Figure 4.2.4-9: The structure’s model in 3D
For the slab analysis, the unfavourable loadings are created per floor, i.e. loading of any floor
slab has no effect on slabs of other floors. In “SLABS” module this effect is obvious while in
“BUILDING” module is rather insignificant.
Project <Japan5>, running only in the professional version, consists of 10 floors with an area of
200 m2. The following measurements are obtained using the following meshing parameters:
“Overall size” = 0.20 m, “Perimeter size” = 0.10 m.
Example:
The three slabs (previous figure) have L1=4.50 m, h1=180 mm, g1=10.0 kN/m2, q1=2.0 kN/m2, L2=4.00 m,
h2=140 mm, g2=5.0 kN/m2, q2=2.0 kN/m2, L3=4.00 m, h3=140 mm, g3=5.0 kN/m2, q3=2.0 kN/m2, where
loads g include self-weight. Perform static analysis considering global loading in ultimate limit state.
Design load in each slab is equal to pi=γg⋅gi+γq⋅qi=1.35⋅gi+1.50⋅qi, thus on 1.00 m wide strip, it is:
p1=1.35×10.0+1.50×2.0=16.5 kN/m
p2=p3=1.35×5.0+1.50×2.0=9.75 kN/m
The three-span continuous slab will be solved through Cross method.
Fundamental design span moments (table b3)
M10=-p1⋅L12/8=-16.5×4.502/8=-41.8 kNm
M12=M21=-p2⋅L22/12=-9.75×4.002/12=-13.0 kNm
M23=-p3⋅L32/8=-9.75×4.002/8=-19.5 kNm
Moments of inertia I
I01=Ic=1.0×0.183/12=4.86×10-4 m4
I12=I23=1.0×0.143/12=2.29×10-4 m4=0.47Ic
Stiffness factors k, distribution indices υ
3I 3 0.167
k10 = 4I ·L10 = 4×4.5 = 0.167 υ01 = 0.285 0.586
c 01
4I 4×0.47Ic 0.118
k12 = 4I ·L12 = 4Ic ×4.0
= 0.118 υ12 = 0.285 0.414
c 12
0.285 1.000
0.118
k21 =k12 = 0.118 υ21 = 0.573
0.206
3I23 3×0.47I 0.088
k23 = = 4I ×4.0c = 0.088 υ01 = 0.206 0.427
4Ic ·L23 c
0.206 1.000
1 2
0.586 0.414 0.573 0.427
+41.8 -13.0 +13.0 -19.5
-[+41.8-13.0]×0.586→ - 16.9 -11.9 →0.50 - 6.0
+ 3.6 0.50← + 7.2 + 5.3 ← 0.427×[-(+13.0-19.5-6.0)]
-[+3.6]×0.586→ - 2.1 - 1.5 →0.50 - 0.8
+ 0.3 0.50← + 0.5 + 0.3 ← 0.427×[-(-0.8)]
-[+0.3]×0.586→ - 0.2 - 0.1
+22.6 -22.6 +13.9 -13.9
M1=-22.6 kNm M2=-13.9 kNm
V01=16.5×4.50/2-22.6/4.50=32.1 kN
V10=-16.5×4.50/2-22.6/4.50=-42.1 kN
V12=9.75×4.00/2+(-13.9+22.6)/4.00=21.7 kN
V21=-9.75×4.00/2+(-13.9+22.6)/4.00=-17.3 kN
V23=9.75×4.00/2+13.9/4.00=23.0 kN
V32=-9.75×4.00/2+13.9/4.00=-16.0 kN
maxM01=32.12/(2×16.5)=31.2 kNm
maxM12=21.72/(2×9.75)-22.6=1.5 kNm
maxM23=16.02/(2×9.75)=13.1 kNm
4.5.2 Deflection
Slab member AB of length L, moment of inertia I, elasticity modulus E, is subjected to uniform
load p. Given shear force VA,R (at left support) and bending moment MA, calculate equation of
elastic line due to bending and maximum deflection.
p ⋅ z2
M ( z ) = M A + V A ,R ⋅ z −
2
d 2 y( z )
The basic equation of elastic line E ⋅ I ⋅ = − M ( z ) is solved in two steps:
dz 2
Step 1
dy( z ) 1 1 p ⋅ z2
φ( z ) = = ⋅ ∫ − M ( z )dz = ⋅ ∫ ( − M A − V A ,R ⋅ z + )dz →
dz E⋅I E⋅I 2
1 V ⋅ z2 p ⋅ z3
φ( z ) = ⋅ ( − M A ⋅ z − A ,R + + C1 )
E⋅I 2 6
Hence, the equation of the elastic line tangents is:
1 p V
φ( z ) = ⋅ ( ⋅ z 3 − A ,R ⋅ z 2 − M A ⋅ z + C1 ) ( 1 )
E⋅I 6 2
Step 2
1 p V
y( z ) = ∫ φ( z )dz = ⋅ ∫ ( ⋅ z 3 − A ,R ⋅ z 2 − M A ⋅ z + C1 )dz →
E⋅I 6 2
1 p 4 V A ,R 3 M A 2
y( z ) = ⋅( ⋅z − ⋅z − ⋅ z + C1 ⋅ z + C 2 )
E ⋅ I 24 6 2
y(0)=0 C2=0
Hence, the equation of the elastic line is:
1 p 4 V A ,R 3 M A 2
y( z ) = ⋅( ⋅z − ⋅z − ⋅ z + C1 ⋅ z ) ( 2 )
E ⋅ I 24 6 2
y(L)=0
3 2
1 p ⋅ L4 VA ,R ⋅ L M A ⋅ L2 p ⋅ L3 V A,R ⋅ L M A ⋅ L
0= ⋅( − − + C1 ⋅ L ) → C1 = − + + (3)
E⋅I 24 6 2 24 6 2
Thus, the equations of the elastic line tangents (1) and deflections (2) are determined.
The maximum deflection is at the location where the first derivative of the elastic line equation is
zero, i.e. at the point z where φ(z) =0.
2
p ⋅ z 3 V A ,R ⋅ z
(1) − − M A ⋅ z + C1 = 0 (4)
6 2
The real positive root of the cubic equation (3) gives the desired point zmax, which replaced in
equation (2) yields the maximum deflection ymax.
For L=4.5 m, p=16.5 kN/m, VA,R=32.1 kN and MA=0.0, expression (3) yields:
16.5×4.53 32.1×4.52
C1 =- + kN·m2 =45.7 kN·m2
24 6
(4) (16.5/6)⋅z3-(32.1/2)⋅z2-0+45.7=0 2.75z3-16.05z2+45.7=0 zmax=2.112 m
1
(2) y(z)= E·I ·(0.6875·z4 -5.35·z3 +45.7·z) (1.2)
1 59.8
y(2.112)= ·(0.6875×2.1124 -5.35×2.1123 +45.7×2.112)·103 N·m3 = ·103 N·m3
E·I E·I
For slab thickness h=180 mm and modulus of elasticity for concrete E=32.80 GPa:
I=(b⋅h3)/12=(1.0×0.183)/12=486×10-6 m4
E⋅I=32.8×109N/m2×486×10-6m4=15.9408×106 N⋅m2, therefore,
59.8·103 N·m3
y1,max =y(2.112)= =0.00375 m=3.75 mm
15.9408·106 N·m2
The elastic line of the continuous slab given by expressions (1.2), (2.2), (3.2) is illustrated in the
following figure:
Figure 4.5.2-2: The elastic line of the three slabs (from the equations)
Figure 4.5.2-3: Front view of the elastic line (from pi-FES with active module\SLABS)
Maximum support moments (void loading on adjacent spans and alternating with the rest)
Figure 4.5.3.1-4
Example:
Figure 4.5.3.1-5
The continuous slab shown in the figure, of span length L=5. 00 m and of thickness h=160 mm, is sub-
jected to covering load ge=1.0 kN/m2 and live load q=5.0 kN/m2. Concrete class C50/60. Calculate the
shear forces and bending moments envelopes for the three slabs, in ultimate limit state.
Solution:
Self-weight: go = 0.16m⋅25.0kN/m3 = 4.00 kN/m2
Covering load: ge = 1.00 kN/m2
Total dead loads: g = 5.00 kN/m2
Total live loads: q = 5.00 kN/m2
The design dead load for each slab is gd=1.00×5.0=5.0 kN/m and the total design load is
pd=γg⋅g+γq⋅q=1.35×5.0+1.50×5.0=14.25 kN/m.
Manual calculations: I=(b⋅h3)/12=(1.0×0.163)/12=341×10-6 m4
Modulus of elasticity for concrete C50/60 is equal to E=37.3 GPa.
E⋅I=37.3×109N/m2×341×10-6m4=12.719×106 N⋅m2
For I10=I12=I23=Ic, stiffness factors k distribution indices υ are:
3I 10 3 0.150
k10 = = = 0 . 150 υ01 = = 0 . 429
4 I c ⋅ L01 4 × 5.0 0.350
4 I 12 4 0.200
k 12 = = = 0 . 200 υ12 = = 0 . 571
4 I c ⋅ L12 4 × 5.0 0.350
0 . 350 1.000
Due to the symmetry of the structure : υ21 = 0.571 και υ 23 = 0 . 429
Loading 1: w1=w3=pd=14.25 kN/m, w2=gd=5.0 kN/m (V01,max, M01,max, M12,min, |V32,max|, M23,max)
Principal support moments from table b3
Μ10=Μ23=-w1⋅L2/8=-14.25×5.02/8=-44.5 kNm, Μ12=Μ21=-w2⋅L2/12=-5.0×5.02/12=-10.4 kNm
V01=14.25×5.0/2-24.1/5.0=35.63-4.82=30.8 kN
V10=-35.63-4.82=-40.5 kN
V12=5.0×5.0/2=12.5 kN
M01,max=V012/(2⋅w1)=30.82/(2×14.25)=33.3 kNm
w1⋅L2/8=14.25×5.02/8=44.5 kNm
M12,min=V122/(2⋅w2)+M1=12.52/(2×5.0)-24.1=15.6-24.1=
12
=-8.5 kN
w2⋅L2/8=5.0×5.02/8=15.6 kNm
01: (3)
C1=(-14.25×5.03/24+30.8×5.02/6)=54.1 kN⋅m2
(4)(14.25/6)z3-(30.8/2)z2-0+54.1=0
2.375z3-15.4z2+54.1=0 gives zmax=2.347 m
(2)y(z)=1/12.719×[(14.25/24)×2.3474-
(30.8/6)×2.3473+0×2.3472+54.1×2.347)]
y(2.335)=6.18 mm
Figure 4.5.3.1-6
Loading 2: w1=w3=gd=5.0 kN/m, w2=pd=14.25 kN/m (V01,min, M01,min, M23,max, |V32,min|, M23,min)
Principal support moments from table b3
Μ10=Μ23=-w1⋅L2/8=-5×5.02/8=-15.6 kNm, Μ12=Μ21=-w2⋅L2/12=-14.25×5.02/12=-29.7 kNm
V01=5.0×5.0/2-24.1/5.0=12.5-4.8=7.7 kN
V10=-12.5-4.8=-17.3 kN
V12=14.25×5.0/2=35.6 kN
M01,max=V012/(2⋅w1)=7.72/(2×5.0)=5.9 kNm
w1⋅L2/8=5×5.02/8=15.6 kNm
M12,max=V122/(2⋅w2)+M1=35.62/(2×14.25)-24.1=44.5-
24.1=20.4 kNm
w2⋅L2/8=14.25×5.02/8=44.5 kNm
01: (3)
C1=(-5.00×5.03/24+7.7×5.02/6)kN⋅m2=6.0 kN⋅m2
(4) (5.00/6)z3-(7.7/2)z2-0+6.0=0
0.833z3-3.85z2+6.0=0 gives zmax,1=1.53 m και zmax,2=4.21
m
(2) y(z1)=1/12.719× [(5.00/24) ×1.534-(7.7/6)
×1.533+0×1.532+6.0×1.53) y(1.53)=0.45 mm
(2) y(z2)=1/12.719× [(5.00/24) ×4.214-(7.7/6)
×4.213+0×4.212+6.0×4.21) y(4.21)=-0.39 mm
12: Due to symmetry of both structure and loading
zmax=2.50 m
C1=(-14.25×5.03/24+35.6×5.02/6-24.1×5.0/2)kN⋅m2=
=13.9 kN⋅m2
(2) y(z)=1/12.719×[(14.25/24)×2.504-(35.6/6)
×2.50 +24.1×2.502/2+13.9×2.50) y(2.50)=3.18 mm
3
Figure 4.5.3.1-7
In case of a basement, seismic forces developed at its roof level have a zero value. However,
fixed end condition applies only to the base of the columns along the basement perimeter walls.
If the frame also comprises walls, as presented in the following paragraph, the stiffnesses and
the moment distribution of the walls differ between them. This difference becomes more distinc-
tive as the number of stories increase.
The total joint displacements and column stress resultants (shear forces and bending moments)
are obtained from the frame analysis. Quantities K, k and a derive from the previous results. The
apparent stiffness Ki of storey i derives from the expression Ki=Vi/δi, while the apparent stiffness
of column j of storey i from the expression Ki,j=Vi,j/δi.
Figure 5.3.1-2: Column frame type structure with triangular distribution of seismic forces
(practical graphical representation)
Notes:
• In all types of structures, frame or dual, the sum of column shear forces of a storey is
equal to the sum of the seismic forces of all the above storeys. Indicatively, for the first
storey the sum is 54.3+71.4+54.3=180, while for the last 10.7+18.6+10.7=40. The middle
column of the first storey carries the 71.4/180=40% of the total shear force, while each of
the end columns carries 30%. In the last storey the middle column carries the
18.6/40=46%, while each of the end columns carries 27%.
• In both frame and dual systems, for each column Mo-Mu=V⋅h, where Mo is the moment at
the top, Mu is the moment at the base, V is the shear force and h is the height of the col-
umn. For instance, for the middle column of the previous structure 98.7-(-115.6)=71.4×3.0
(214.3≈214.2).
Figure 5.3.3-9: DUAL type structure comprising two columns Figure 5.3.3-10: Equivalent structure of
and one wall with cross-sections 400/400 and 2000/300 respectively. one fixed-ended column per storey
Notes:
• In the first storey, the sum is 10.6+158.9+10.6=180. The wall carries 158.9/180=88% of the
total shear force, while each column carries 11%. In the last storey, the sum is
13.8+12.5+13.8=40. The wall carries 12.5/40=32% of the total shear force, while each col-
umn 34%. It is concluded that the wall has a favourable effect on the first storey columns,
in contrast to that corresponding to the last storey.
• The expression Mo-Mu=V⋅h, applies for both columns and wall. Indicatively, for the first
storey wall -309.9–(-786.4)=158.9×3.0 (476.5≈476.7), while for that of the last storey 89.8-
52.3=12.5×3.0 (37.5=37.5).
• The maximum displacement of the dual type structure is equal to 8.08 mm, i.e. almost
three times smaller than the one corresponding to the frame type structure (22.51 mm).
Figure 5.3.3-11: FRAME type structure Figure 5.3.3-12: Equivalent structure of one
comprising three columns with cross-section 400/400 fixed-ended column per storey
Note:
It should be emphasised that in all previous examples, the comparison of the two struc-
tural systems is important rather than the absolute quantities, which after all derive from
specific values of the seismic forces. These values have been selected arbitrarily, yet
satisfying the triangular distribution rule.
Centre
of stiffness
Centre
of mass
Figure 5.4.3.1-2: Parallel translation of the diaphragm in both directions and rotation ,
due to a force Η applied to the centre of mass CM
(Χ0Υ initial coordinate system, xCTy main coordinate system)
When a horizontal force H acts on a storey level, all the points of the slab including the column9
tops move in accordance with the same rules due to the in-plane rigidity of the slab.
These rules induce the diaphragm to develop a parallel (translational) displacement by δxo, δyo
and a rotation θz about the centre of stiffness CT(xCT, yCT) in xCTy coordinate system, which is
parallel 10 to the initial coordinate system X0Y and has as origin the point CT.
The diaphragmatic behaviour may be considered as a superposition of three cases:
(a) parallel translation of the diaphragm along the X direction due to horizontal force component
HX,
(b) parallel translation of the diaphragm along the Y direction due to horizontal force component
HY,
(c) rotation of the diaphragm due to moment MCT applied at the centre of stiffness CT.
The horizontal seismic forces are applied at each mass point, while the resultant force is applied
at the centre of mass CM.
In case the direction of the force H passes through the point CT as well as CM the moment has
zero value and therefore the diaphragm develops zero rotation.
Figure 5.4.3.2: Parallel translation along the x direction due to force Hx applied at CT
9 Henceforth the term ‘column’ accounts for terms column and wall.
10 In the general case, i.e. in the case of columns with inclined local principal axes with respect to the initial system X0Y, the inclination angle
of the principal system with respect to the initial system is a≠0˚ (see Appendix C). Therefore, when the system of orthogonal columns is
parallelly arranged then KX=Kx, VX=Vx, KXY=Kxy=0, meaning that a horizontal force applied at the centre of stiffness in x direction results in
a displacement only along x (the same applies for y direction).
X CT =
∑ ( X ⋅ K ) , H x = K x ⋅ δxo where Kx = ∑( Kxi )
i yi
(4’)
∑( K ) yi
YCT =
∑ ( Y ⋅ K ) , H = K ⋅ δ where K y = ∑( K yi )
i xi
y y yo (5’)
∑( K ) xi
The displacement of the diaphragm consists essentially of a rotation θz about the CT, inducing a
displacement δi at each column top i with coordinates xi,yi in respect to the coordinate system
with origin the CT. If the distance between the point i and the CT is ri, the two components of the
(infinitesimal) deformation δi are equal to δxi=-θz·yi and δyi=θz·xi.
The shear forces Vxi and Vyi in each column developed from the displacements δxi, δyi are:
Vxi=Kxi⋅δxi=Kxi⋅(-θz⋅yi) Vxi=-θz⋅Kxi⋅yi and Vyi=Kyi⋅δyi=Kyi⋅(θz⋅xi) Vyi=θz⋅kyi⋅xi
The resultant moment of all shear forces Vxi, Vyi about the centre of stiffness is equal to the ex-
ternal moment MCT, i.e.
MCT=Σ(-Vxi⋅yi+Vyi⋅xi+Kzi) MCT= θz⋅Σ(Kxi⋅yi2+Kyi⋅xi2+Kzi)
Torsional stiffness Kzi of column i
Columns resist the rotation of the diaphragm by their flexural stiffness expressed in terms Kxi⋅yi2 ,
Kyi⋅xi2 (in N⋅m), and their torsional stiffness Kzi, which is measured in units of moment e.g. N⋅m.
11 The eccentricities eox, eoy are called structural because they depend only on the geometry of the structure and not on the external loading.
As presented in chapter 6, besides structural eccentricities, accidental eccentricities also exist.
Figure 5.4.4: Equivalent mass inertial ring (CM, ls) and torsional stiffness ellipse (CT, rx, ry)
A building is classified as torsionally flexible [EC8 §5.2.2.1] if either rx<ls or ry<ls is satisfied in at
least one diaphragm storey level. In this example both conditions are satisfied.
For a building to be categorized as being regular in plan, the two structural eccentricities eox, eoy
at each level shall satisfy both conditions eox≤0.30rx & eoy≤0.30ry [EC8 §4.2.3.2]. In this particular
example the first condition is satisfied eox=0.94 m ≤ 0.30rx (=0.30×3.91=1.173 m), whereas the
second one is not eox=1.34 m ≤ 0.30rx (=0.30×3.08=0.924 m). Therefore the building that compris-
es that specific floor diaphragm is not regular in plan.
Simplified seismic analysis may be performed, provided that the following conditions are met for
each x, y direction:
22 The analysis of the diaphragmatic floor is performed automatically by the software. Algorithms are verified using the tools provided by the
software. In this example with zero angle a of the principal system, all the diaphragm data may be calculated by two simple analyses and
by the equations of the special case a=0, already presented in the previous paragraphs. Here, the general case of columns arranged ran-
domly is been used, which applies even in the special case of the rectangular columns in parallel arrangement. The method is explained in
detail in Appendix D.
23 The horizontal seismic load is applied at the CM. The eccentricity of the loading can be given also as equivalent torsional moment
MCM,X=HX⋅cY, which in this case is equal to MCM,X=90.6×1.0=90.6 kNm. This additional eccentricity aims to increase the effect of the rota-
tion, i.e. to give larger displacements due to rotation, in order to calculate the torsion related data of the diaphragm more accurately.
24 In the special case of an one-storey building comprising only rectangular columns arranged parallelly to the axes X,Y, the horizontal force
acting in X or Υ displaces the diaphragm only in X or Υ.
25 The equations determining the CT coordinates are general and may be applied for each point.
Indicatively, for column 4:
Figure 5.4.5.4-8
3rd Loading:
HY=90.6 kN
Diaphragm restrained against
rotaion
Figure 5.4.5.4-10
Figure 5.4.5.4-9
Analysis results: Definition of the principal system26, of the torsional stiffness radii
The diaphragm is not rotated, and of the equivalent system (see §C.6):
but only translated in parallel to tan(2a)=2δXYo/(δXXo-δYYo)=0.0 2a=0° a=0°
the axes X, Y.
δxxo=δXXo=0.684 mm,
Each point of the diaphragm
(therefore and the CT) has the δyyo=δYYo=0.824 mm
same principal displacement: Kxx=Hx/δxxo=90.6×103m/0.684×10-3m=132.5×106 N/m
δYXo=0, δYYo=0.824 mm. Kyy=Hy/δyyo=90.6×103m/0.824×10-3m=110.0×106 N/m
The 3 rd analysis completes the MCT,X=90.6⋅yCM+90.6⋅cY=90.6×(3.316-2.500)+90.6×1.0=164.5 kNm
necessary series of analyses for
the determination of all dia- Kθ=MCT,X/θXZ=164.5/9.681×10-5=17.0×105kNm
phragm data. rx=√Kθ/Kyy=√17.0×108N/m/110.0×106N/m=3.931m
ry=√Kθ/Kxx=√17.0×108N/m/132.5×106N/m=3.582 m
XCT=X4-δYt,4 /θXZ=6.0-0.228×10-3m/(9.681×10-5)=6.0-2,355=3.645 m
YCT=Y4+δXt,4/θXZ=5.0-0.163×10-3m/(9.681×10-5)=5.0-1.684=3.316 m.
26 In this example, it is already determined that the angle of the principal system is zero, if the type of the structure is considered and the 2nd
analysis (according to which δXYo=0). The calculation has been performed for the sake of generality. To this end, other quantities have also
been calculated, such as the centre of stiffness, which in this case is obtained from the simple application of moment at the point CM.
• The area of the shear forces diagram and heights represents the total moment of the floors
and is larger in the triangular distribution than in the rectangular one.
• The maximum displacement, developed at the 10th level in column c13, is 70/10=7.0 times
greater than the one of the ground floor, i.e. δxx,10,13=7.0×5.60=39.2 mm and
δxy,10,13=7.0×0.97=6.8 mm.
The behaviour of the actual structure under orthogonal and triangular seismic force distribution
is subsequently considered. In the related software, in <project B_547-1>, the seismic forces
are input in the dialog “Seismic Forces” located at “Parameters”, “Horizontal Forces”. For or-
thogonal distribution input Hx=200 at all levels, while for triangular distribution input values from
364.0 to 36.4. Always check “Apply seismic forces”=ON in order to use in the analysis the given
seismic forces, instead of the default derived from the modal response spectrum analysis,. To
perform the analysis press “Solve Building” and finally to review the results press “Analysis Re-
sults”.
Figure 5.4.7.2-3: The actual structure of the building Figure 5.4.7.2-4: Seismic action with base shear 2000 kN
with the wireframe model and orthogonal distribution of seismic actions
Due to the bisymmetric geometry, in each diaphragm, the center of stiffness CT is located al-
most at the centre of the floor and therefore its displacement is almost equal to the average of
the displacements of columns c4, c13.
To compare all cases, the displacements are divided by a=0.4635 mm.
The displacements of the center of stiffness CT and of columns c4 and c13 are listed in the fol-
lowing table:
0.010
35
0.104 348
0.
72
02
334.8 t
2
348
0.015
72
3000
51
0.079 269
0.
13
01
340.7 t
0
7
618
0.013
58
3000
44
0.066 224
0.
17
01
340.7 t
8
4 842
0.014
48
3000
47
0.067 230
0.
22
01
340.7 t
7
4
1072
0.008
48
3000
28
0.070 238
0.
27
01
340.7 t
6
5
1310
0.006
50
3000
20
0.121
0.071 240
0.
32
01
340.7 t
7
5
1550
0.004
51
3000
15
0.074 251
0.
37
01
340.7 t
9
5
1801
0.003
52
3000
10
0.071 243
0.
42
01
340.7 t 9
5
2044
0.003
50
3000
10
0.053 180
0.
46
01
340.7 t
5
1
2224
0.003
36
3000
0.021 73
0.
48
00
340.7 t
0
4
2298
15
3000
Figure 6.3.1-1: Ten-storey building of mixed sys- Figure 6.3.1-2: Page from the software report
tem. Diaphragmatic and non-diaphragmatic Distribution of seismic
nodes. Project <B_547-2> accelerations-forces-shear forces
The nodal seismic forces HXX, HXY και HXZ are obtained from the nodal seismic accelerations
multiplied by the nodal mass. The seismic accelerations and forces due to a horizontal compo-
nent (X and Y) of the seismic action are not only developed in the direction considered but also
in the other horizontal direction and the vertical.
10 Seismic acceleration aXX means acceleration in X due to seismic action in X, aXY means acceleration in Y due to seismic action in X and
aXΖ means acceleration in Ζ due to seismic action in X.
Figure 6.4.1-11: Structure and model Figure 6.4.1-12: Seismic acceleration-forces-shear forces
Frame system with q=3.60 1st fundamental period:T1=1.012 sec, participation 85%
Figure 6.4.1-13: Displacements under seismic action in x Figure 6.4.1-14: Figure 6.4.1-15:
δmax=25.7 mm Ground floor column Ground floor column
0c2 (400/400) 0c6 (500/500)
Due to stronger cross-sections of footing beams compared to those of columns, the displace-
ment of the structure is slightly larger than that of assumed fixity at the base (25.7 against 24.5).
The structural system remains intact while the behaviour factor q is taken equal to 3.60.
The bending moments of columns at the footing neck are roughly the same as in the fixed con-
dition.
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS 319
Ι
Volume B
Figure 6.4.2-1: Structure comprising only columns and perimeter walls, project <B_642-1>
The structure derives from the frame type structure of §6.4.1 by replacing columns c2, c5, c8
and c11 of cross-section 400/400 with four perimeter walls of cross-section 2000/300.
The main mode shapes of the modal analysis of the first case of the wall system are illustrated
in the following page (The modes of the other three cases are similar). In the next four pages,
the characteristic quantities for all cases are presented.
It is extremely useful to compare between the variants of the wall system, but also between the
frame and wall systems.
1) In all cases, the natural period of the first mode shape is of the order of 0.70 sec. If however
the stiffnesses of the elements are taken as being 100% of the elastic, the value of periods
is of order of 0.50 sec (see §6.3.3).
2) The wall system behaviour is clearly better than the behaviour of the frame system, particu-
larly when in the presence of a basement with perimeter walls.
Figure 6.4.2-21: Structure and model Figure 6.4.2-22: Seismic acceleration-forces-shear forces
Ductile wall system in X and Y with q=3.60 1st fundamental period:T1X=0.643 sec, participation 61%
Figure 6.4.2-23: Displacements under seismic action in x Figure 6.4.2-24: Figure 6.4.2-25:
δmax=16.4 mm Ground floor wall Ground floor column
0c2 (2000/300) 0c6 (500/500)
The overall behaviour of the structure is much better compared to that of the strong foundation
at the ground floor approaching that of the assumed fixed conditions at the base.
APPENDIX D
DIAPHRAGMATIC BEHAVIOUR
OF MULTISTOREY SPACE FRAMES
GENERAL CASE
D.1 Subject description
The assessment of the behaviour of one-storey plane frames under horizontal seismic forces
was presented in paragraph 5.1, where the structural unit examined was the column (or wall). In
appendix Β’, the crossbar was used to assess the behaviour of the multistorey plane frame.
In this chapter, the composition of space frames, through beams and slabs, is considered. The
diaphragm is the structural unit for the assessment of coupled space frames.
Studying paragraph 5.4 and Appendices B and C is recommended in order to better understand
this chapter.
A diaphragm is the horizontal part of the floor consisting of slabs, connecting beams and col-
umns. A floor may comprise more than one diaphragm, as shown in the example building of the
present paragraph.
Figure D.1-2: The space frame structural model with bars of columns and beams and diaphragms
The most characteristic point of the diaphragm is the centre of stiffness, described in para-
graphs 3.1.4, 5.4.3.4 and C.5.
The centre of stiffness CT of a specific floor diaphragm is defined as the point about which the
diaphragm rotates, under horizontal seismic force H.
The CT point depends only on the geometry of the floor and is independent of the loadings,
meaning that regardless the magnitude of the force, which may become equal to 2H, or 3H, or
any other value, the centre of stiffness will remain the same. Of course, it depends on the ge-
ometry of the overlying and the underlying floors.
Principal axis system of diaphragm is defined as the orthogonal axis system xCTy, in which
when a horizontal seismic force H is applied on CT, along axis x (or y), it results in translating CT
only along axis x (or y respectively). The angle a of the principal system, as to the initial system
X0Y, is called principal angle of the diaphragm.
The above diaphragm data as well as the torsional stiffness Kθ and torsional ellipse stiffness el-
lipse (CT, rx, ry), should be calculated in a general way. The method to be used should deal with
more than one diaphragm per floor. Moreover, the general solution should account for the influ-
ence of non-diaphragmatic frames as well as the uneven level foundation. All possible special
cases met in practice are included in the example presented in this paragraph, except for foun-
dations, just for simplification reasons. Full scale analysis (including the foundation), can be per-
formed by the engineer using the related software.
Figure D.1-3: Floor plan of 5th level and diaphragm on the left examined next.
The cross-sections of columns, walls and beams are 500/500, 2000/300 and 300/500 respectively.
The behaviour of diaphragm on the left at the 5th level, analysed next is directly affected by the
L-type frame C21-C26-C27-C28 connected to it and indirectly by column C6 and the diaphragm on
the right, through the frames of other floors.
A general method for the calculation of the diaphragm data is presented next.
This method creates a condition allowing the diaphragm only to rotate about the centre
of stiffness CT, which remains stationary with respect to the ground.
The method comprises four steps, the first three of which include a space frame analysis.
Step 1: Analysis under force HΧ and concentrated moment MCM,X applied at the centre of
mass of diaphragm i.
Figure D.2-1: Loading: Force HX=100 and moment MCM,X on centre of mass CM of diaphragm i
Results: total displacements of structure and displacements of diaphragm i
The two displacements δXX1, δXY1 of point 1 of diaphragm i and its angle θXZ are required.
Any value may be given to force HΧ, as long as it is the same for the analyses of the three first
steps. In this example, HΧ is given equal to 100 kN. The application point of force H is irrelevant,
but for higher accuracy in calculations, the force is assumed applied at an arbitrary eccentricity
cy, e.g. 2.0 m, in relation to the centre of mass, in order to produce a significant rotation of the
diaphragm and thus achieve a higher accuracy in the calculations. That eccentricity is essential,
especially in cases where the centre of stiffness is close or coincides with the centre of mass.
Therefore, in addition to force HΧ, moment MCM,x=100kN2.00m= 200 kNm is also applied at CM.
The magnitude of force H needs to be important enough to result in significant diaphragm trans-
lations that can be distinguished from the translations due to moment.
The application of the sole moment in the absence of force H results in rotation, but also in
translations, which cannot be calculated since the centre of stiffness is still unknown.
Point 1 corresponds to column Κ2 joint, but could be any point of the diaphragm.
Figure D.2-2: The diaphragm displacements in plan, due to 2 parallel translations δXXo, δXYo and one rotation θXZ
The only results needed from this analysis are the translations of point 1 δXX1=2.681 mm, δXY1=-
0.231 mm and the angle θXZ=4.5613×10-5 of the diaphragm. The displacements of point 2 will be
used only to verify the generality of the method.
Step 2: Analysis under force HΧ applied at the centre of mass of diaphragm i with rota-
tional restraint.
The two translations of point 1 δXXo, δXYo, are only required, being identical for any point of the
diaphragm i, thus also for CT, since the angle of rotation of the diaphragm is zero.
Figure D.2-4: The 2 parallel translations of the diaphragm δXXo, δXYo, in plan.
All diaphragm points, thus also CT, have identical displacements.
Diaphragm is restrained against rotation, therefore θXZ=0.
Due to zero rotation of diaphragm i, point 1 has only two parallel translations, δXXo=2.103 mm and
δXYo=-0.047mm, being identical for all diaphragm points, thus also for CT. In other diaphragms
located in the same, upper or lower level, small, yet measurable rotations exist, thus every point
on them has different displacements.
Step 3: Analysis under force HΥ applied at the centre of mass of diaphragm i with rota-
tional restraint
Figure D.2-5: Loading: HY=100 on diaphragm i with rotational restraint Results: the total displacements of structure and the two
parallel translations of diaphragm
The two translations of point 1 δXXo, δXYo, are only required, being identical for any point of the
diaphragm i, thus also for CT, provided that the angle of rotation of the diaphragm is zero.
The angle a of the principal system of diaphragm i is calculated by means of the equation C.9.1
of §C.9 using the 2nd and 3rd analysis results:
tan(2a)=2δXYo/(δXXo-δYYo)=2×(-0.047)/(2.103-1.668)=-0216 2a=-12.2º a=-6.1º
Step 4: Analysis results from loading 1 minus analysis results from loading 2, meaning
that only moment and only rotation exists about the centre of stiffness CT, which
remains stationary with respect to the ground.
Using this trick, namely by subtracting analysis 2 results from analysis 1 results, the diaphragm i
develops only rotation, while the remaining diaphragms develop both translations and rotation.
However only diaphragm i is examined here. The most important result of this trick is that the
diaphragm i is rotated about CT, which remains stationary with respect to the ground, allowing
the calculation of its precise location. The rotation angle of diaphragm i is the rotation angle θXZ
calculated in step 1 under the corresponding loading.
δΧtj=δXXj-δXXo, δYtj=δXYj-δXYo
XCT=Xj-δYtj/θXZ
YCT=Yj+δXtj/θXZ
Figure D.2-8
In the example considered, for point 1:
δΧt1=δXX1-δXXo=2.681-2.103=0.578 mm
δYt1=δXY1-δXYo=-0.211-(-0.047)=-0.164 mm
The diaphragm rotation is identical to that of analysis 1, i.e. θXZ=4.5613×10-5.
The coordinates of point 1 are (6.0, 0.0), thus:
XCT=X1-δYt1/θXZ=6.0-(-0.164)×10-3/(4.5613×10-5)=9.6 m
YCT=Y1+δXt1/θXZ=0.0+0.578×10-3/(4.5613×10-5)=12.7 m
Note:
To verify the generality of the method, CT coordinates are calculated from point 2 (12.0, 0.0)
as well:
δΧt2=δXX2-δXXo=2.681-2.103=0.578 mm
δYt2=δXY2-δXYo=0.063-(-0.047)=0.110 mm
XCT=X2-δYt2/θXZ=12.0-0.110×10-3/(4.5613×10-5)=9.6 m
YCT=Y2+δXt2/θXZ=0.0+0.578×10-3/(4.5613×10-5)=12.7 m
In the same way, CT coordinates may be verified using any point of the diaphragm.
Each diaphragm has two lateral stiffnesses in the two principal directions.
Lateral stiffness of diaphragm Kxx (or Kyy) along the principal x (or y) direction, is defined as the
ratio of the seismic force H to the corresponding δxo (or δyo) displacement of the diaphragm,
when force acts on CT along the principal direction considered, i.e.:
Kxx=Hxx/δxxo , Kyy=Hxy/δxyo or equivalent: Kxx=Hyx/δyxo , Kyy=Hyy/δyyo
Using analysis 2, the external force HX=100 of the initial system X0Y is resolved into two equiva-
lent principal forces Hxx=100cosa and Hxy=-100sina (see §C.2) acting in x,y directions of the
principal system. In the present case, a=-6.154º, therefore Hxx=100×0.994=99.4 kN and Hxy=-
100×(-0.107)=10.7 kN.
Respectively, the two translations of the centre of stiffness in X0Y, derived from analysis 2, are
δXXo=2.103, δΧΥο=-0.047, which transferred in the principal system yield (§C.2):
δxxo=δXXocosa-δXYosina=2.103×0.994-(-0.047)×(-0.107)=2.090-0.005=2.085 mm
δxyo=-δXXosina+δXYocosa=-2.103×(-0.107)+(-0.047)×0.994=0.225-0.047=0.178 mm, άρα
Kxx=Hxx/δxxo=99.4×103N/2.085×10-3m=47.7×106 N/m
Kyy=Hxy/δxyo=10.7×103N/0.178×10-3m=60.1×106 N/m
Notes:
If analysis 3 is usedthen:
Hyx=100sina=-10.7 kN and Hyy=100cosa=99.4 kN
δyxo=δYXocosa+δYYosina=(-0.047)×0.994+1.668×(-0.107)=-0.047-0.178=0.225,
δyyo=-δYXosina+δYYocosa=-(-0.047)×(-0.107)+1.668×(0.994)=-0.005+1.658=1.653
Kxx=Hyx/δyxo=-10.7×103N/(-0.225×10-3m)=47.6×106 N/m
Kyy=Hyy/δyyo=99.4×103N/1.653×10-3m=60.1×106 N/m
Namely the same stiffness values are obtained, as expected.
The expressions C.9.2 and C.9.3 of §C.9 could be used for the calculation of stiffnesses Kxx,
Kyy, therefore:
Kxx=H/(δXXo+δXYotana)=100.0/(2.103-0.047×0.107)×106N/m=47.6×106 N/m
Kyy=H/(δYYo-δXYotana)=100.0/(1.668+0.047×0.107)×106N/m=60.0×106 N/m
In case the centres of mass and stiffness coincide, Kxx should be calculated from analysis 2,
while Kyy from analysis 3, avoiding division by zero.
Note:
Moment MXCT of external forces is the sum of MXH=36.2 kNm due to external force H and the
external moment MXM=200.0 kNm. Respectively, the rotation angle θΧΖ of the diaphragm is
the sum of
θXZΗ=(MXH/MXCT)θXZ=(36.2/236.2)× 4.5613×10-5=0.699×10-5 and
θXZM=(MXM/MXCT)θXZ=(200/236.2)× 4.5613×10-5=3.8622×10-5
Torsional stiffness distribution of diaphragm is the curve on which, if the idealised columns with
the same lateral stiffnesses as those of the diaphragm, are placed symmetrically with respect of
the centre of stiffness, the torsional stiffness derived is the same as that of the diaphragm.
Figure D.5
Torsional stiffness ellipse of diaphragm is defined as the ellipse having CT as centre and
rx=√(Kθ/Kyy), ry=√(Kθ/Kxx) as radii.
rx=√Kθ/Kyy=√[5178×106Νm/60.1×106N/m]=9.28 m
ry=√Kθ/Kxx=√[5178×106Nm/47.7×106N/m]=10.42 m
The location of the equivalent diaphragms is determined by translating the centre of stiffness to
point 0.0, 0.0. In this way the equivalent building is created and for its diaphragms i the following
relations apply:
δXXo_equal,i=Σ(δXXoΖ,k) όπου k=i έως 1 δXXo_equal,i=Σ(δXXo,i-δXXo,i-1)= (δXXo,i-δXXo,i-1)+ (δXXo,i-1-δXXo,i-2)+…+
(δXXo,1-0.0)=δXXo,i δXXo_equal,i=δXXo,i
Using the same logic δXYo_equal,i=δXYo,i , δYYo_equal,i=δYYo,i and θXZ_equal,i= θXZΜ,i
Therefore all diaphragm quantities Kxx_equal,i , Kyy_equal,i , Kθ_equal,i are equal to those of the actual
building.
Two analytical examples for the application of the method are presented in the following para-
graph.
The seismic assessment of the actual building can be performed in an easy, direct and
descriptive way by means of the equivalent building.
Notes:
In ground floor diaphragms, their torsional stiffness ellipse coincides with the ellipse of
the corresponding equivalent diaphragms.
1/Kθ_equal,i=Σ(1/KθΖ,j), 1<j ≤ i
1 Subscript Z, before, i denotes that the value of the quantity considered is relative rather than absolute.
2 Always dXYoZ,i=dYXoZ,i due to δXYo,i=δYXo,i and δXYo,i-1=δYXo,i-1, thus the same is valid for their difference.
3 Subscript M implies rotation angle of the diaphragm due to moment MM=Hc as described in the note of §D.4.
Figure D.6: The equivalent diaphragm of the diaphragm on the left of 4th floor
(n=4 equivalent columns of 567/621 cross-section)
D.7 Examples
Two examples are analysed applying the general method on the same simple structure of Ap-
pendix C.1. The choice of a simple structure is useful for easy monitoring of the results and the
comprehension of the diaphragmatic floor behaviour of floors.
Example D.7.1:
In the one-storey structure of project <B_d9-1> the two translations of node 5 (column C1) and
the diaphragm rotation θXZ should be calculated, using either the related software or any other
relevant software. Optionally, the translations of the remaining points of the diaphragm may be
calculated. All diaphragm data can derive based on these displacements.
After entering into “Element Input”, select “Tools” from the menu and then “Diaphragm calcula-
tion”. In the dialog opened, enter H=90.6 kN, cY=1.0 m, select “Use fixed columns=OFF1” and
press “ΟΚ”. The screen displaying the inertial mass ring, the centre of stiffness, the torsional
stiffness ellipse and the 4 columns equivalent structure of appears.
1 If “fixed columns=ON” then the results are based on the assumption of fixed-ended columns and the results are identical with those of the
first two cases. The slight differences in the results versus the ones obtained by the manual calculations, as well as the ones resulting from
the excel file are due to the small differences of the centre of mass, due to the uneven loads from the columns self-weight.
The remaining results are better displayed in 3D, by selecting from the menu “View”, “Dia-
phragm results”, “3D floor” combined with “free rotation analysis” or “fixed rotation analysis” or
“rotation only”, as presented in the two following pages.
Note:
In the one-storey structure considered the “only rotation” condition can derive directly
from the analysis by applying only moment as external loading, the reason being that the
centre of stiffness CT in one-storey diaphragms remains, by definition, stationary with re-
spect to the ground.
2 The software performs the calculations of the diaphragm automatically. The verification of the algorithms using the software tools is pre-
sented here.
3 The horizontal seismic force acts on the centre of mass CM. The loading eccentricity, cy=1.0, may also be given as equivalent moment
MCM,X=HXcY. In this case MCM,X=90.6×1.0=90.6 kNm. This additional eccentricity increases the effect of rotation producing larger transla-
tions due to rotation, thus leading to a more accurate calculation of diaphragm torsional data. Besides that, the moment induced by the ec-
centricity moment provides solutions even in cases that the centres of mass and stiffness are close or coincide.
Figure D.7.1-9
Loading 1 minus loading 2:
HX=0, MXCT=90.6(YCT-
YCM)+90.6
Figure D.7.1-11
Figure D.7.1-10
Subtraction results: Determination of stiffnesses and torsional radii:
The diaphragm only rotates by The lateral stiffnesses Kxx, Kyy are calculated using the expressions
θXZ about the centre of stiffness C.9.2 and C.9.3 of §C.9, with a=18.186° and tana=0.329:
CT. The translations of the first Kxx=H/(δXXo+δXYotana)=[90.6/(0.677-0.0600.329)]106N/m=
point due to rotation: = 137.8×106 N/m
δXt,1=δX,1-δXXo=1.178-0.677 Kyy=H/(δYYo-XYotana)=[90.6/(0.839+0.0600.329)]106N/m=
=0.501 mm, =105.5×106 N/m
δYt,1= δY,1-δXYo =-0.395+0.060
=-0.335mm and MXCT4=90.6(ΥCT-YCM)+90.6cY=90.6×(4.193-2.509)+90.6×1.0=
=243.2 kNm,
XCT=X1-δYt,1/θXZ= Kθ=MXCT/θXZ=243.2/11.952×10-5=20.3×105 kNm
=0.0+0.335×10-3/11.952×10-5 rx=√Kθ/Kyy=√[20.3×108Nm/105.5×106N/m]=4.39 m
=2.803 m ry=√Kθ/Kxx=√[20.3×108Nm/137.8×106N/m]=3.84 m
YCT =Y1+δXt,1/θXZ=
0.0+0.501×10-3/11.952×10-5
=4.192 m
Note:
The expressions determining the CT coordinates are general and they apply to any point
of the diaphragm. For instance, from column 4:
XCT=X4-δYt,4/θXZ=6.0-0.382×10-3m/11.952×10-5=6.0-3.20=2.80 m
YCT=Y4+δXt,4/θXZ=5.0-0.096×10-3m/11.952×10-5=5.0-0.80=4.20 m
4 Moment, rotation and torsional stiffness Kθ have the same values in both the initial system X0Y and the principal system xCTy. It is prefer-
able to work in the initial system, as the calculations are simpler.
Equivalent system:
In this example consid-
ered, since the structure
is one-storey (the same
applies to the ground
floor of any multistorey
building), the torsional
stiffness ellipse of the
equivalent system is
identical to that corre-
sponding to the actual
floor.
Selecting “Equivalent
system/Draw”=ON, the
torsional stiffness ellipse,
verified previously, with
the 4 equivalent columns
of 424/373 cross-section
located on its vertices,
are displayed by the
software (see figure D.7-
12). The equivalence of
these 4 fixed-ended col-
umns is checked next:
Figure D.7.1-12: Equivalent system of 4 columns of 424/371 cross-section
(at the “ Equivalent system” field enter k=1 n=4k=4)
The calculations are effected in the principal coordinates system, where each column stiffness
in its local system, is the same with that of the principal. Kx=12ΕΙx/h3 and Kx=12ΕΙy/h3 (see
§5.1.1), since in the example considered the shear effect, in any case insignificant had been
ignored, and therefore kva=1.
Ix=0.373×0.4243/12=23.693×10-4 m4, Iy=0.424×0.3733/12=18.336×10-4 m4
Given E=32.8 GP and h=3.0 m Kx=1232.8109Pa23.69310-4m4/3.03m3=34.54×106 N/m
Ky=1232.8109Pa18.33610-4m4/3.03m3=26.73×106 N/m
For 4 equivalent columns Kxx=Σ(Kx)=4×34.54=138.2×106 N/m,
Kyy=Σ(Ky)=4×26.73=106.9×106 N/m,
Therefore equal to the actual stiffness (slight differences are justified by the need to use integer
mm).
The torsional stiffness of the equivalent diaphragm is Kθ=Σ(Kxiyi2+Kyixi2+0.0) (expression 7,
§C.5) Kθ=2Κx3.8422+2Ky4.3902=234.54106N/m14.76m2 + 226.73106N/m19.271m2=
(10.2+10.3)×105 kNm =20.5×105 kNm, therefore equal to the actual torsional stiffness. It is obvious
that rx, ry values are also identical, being equal to the square root of the ratio of equal quantities
rxΖ=√(Kθ/Kyy)=4.39 m, ryΖ=√(Kθ/Kxx)=3.84 m.
The equivalent building may comprise only 4 columns, or any number of columns n=4k, where κ
is nonzero integer, e.g. 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, … These columns by groups of four, are placed sym-
metrically with respect to the centre of stiffness.
For instance, the case of 8 columns of 356/312 cross-section, yields:
Ix=0.312×0.3563/12=11.731×10-4 m4, Iy=0.356×0.3123/12=9.010×10-4 m4
Figure D.7.1-13: Case of 8 columns (k=2, n=4k=8) Figure D.7.1-14: Case of 16 columns (k=4, n=4k=16)
of 356/312 equivalent cross-section of 299/262 equivalent cross-section
Figure D.7.1-15: Case of 24 columns (k=6, n=4k=24) Figure D.7.1-16: Case of 48 columns (k=12, n=4k=48)
of 271/237 equivalent cross-section of 227/199 equivalent cross-section
Kθ=Σ(Kxiyi2+Kyixi2)= 2Κx3.8422+4Κx2.7172+2Ky4.3902+4Ky3.1052=
=[17.01×(29.52+29.53)+13.13×(38.54+38.56)]×103 kNM=[10.1+10.1]×105 kNM =20.2×105 kNM
Thus, the system of 8 fixed-ended columns is also equivalent to the actual structure.
In this way all systems with n=4k are verified to be equivalent to the initial actual structure.
Example D.7.2:
In the three-storey structure of project <B_d9-2> using the related software or any other rele-
vant software, for each of the three loadings in this particular example the two translations of
node 9 (column C1) and the rotation of the diaphragm of level 2 are calculated. Optionally, the
translations of the other diaphragm points may be calculated. All diaphragm data are computed
based only on the displacements of node 9.
After entering into “Element Input”, select “Tools” from the menu and then “Diaphragm calcula-
tion”. In the dialog opened, enter H=90.6 kN, cY=1.0 m, select “Use fixed columns=OFF” and
press “ΟΚ” and the diaphragm data of the current floor are displayed. Floor 1, that corresponds
to level 2 is then selected..
The coordinates of the centre of
stiffness CT are (2.847, 3.785), and the
torsional radii are rx=4.305 m, ry=3.979
m (versus the coordinates 2.688,
4.897, rx=4.411 and ry=3.381 derived
by the assumption of fixed-ended
columns). The cross-section of the
equivalent columns is 335/321 (versus
521/399 derived by the assumption of
fixed-ended columns).
All results are displayed analytically
by selecting from the menu “View”,
“Diaphragm results”, “report”. In level
2 θXZ=30.2962×10-5.
The rest of results are better dis-
played in 3D, by selecting from the
menu “View”, “Diaphragm results”,
“3D floor” combined with “free rota-
tion analysis” or “ restrained rotation
analysis” or “rotation only”, as pre-
sented in the two following pages.
Note:
In the structure considered, being multistorey, the “only rotation” condition of a dia-
phragm, i.e. with CT remaining stationary with respect to the ground, may only derive us-
ing the trick of the following general method,.
Figure D.7.2-9
Loading 1 minus loading 2:
HX=0, MXCT=90.6(YCT-
YCM)+90.6
Figure D.7.2-11
Figure D.7.2-10
Subtraction results: Determination of stiffnesses, torsional radii and equivalent system:
The diaphragm only rotates by The lateral stiffnesses Kxx, Kyy are calculated using the expressions
θXZ about the centre of stiffness C.9.2 and C.9.3 of §C.9 with a=21.49° tana=0.393:
CT. The translations of the first Kxx=H/(δXXo+δXYotana)=
point due to rotation:
=[90.6/(2.1712-0.12350.393)]106N/m= 42.7×106 N/m
δXt,1=δX,1-δXXo=
=3.3180-2.1712 =1.1468, Kyy=H/(δYYo-XYotana)=
δYt,1= δY,1-δXYo = =[90.6/(2.4362+0.12350.393)]106N/m= 36.5×106 N/m
=-0.9859+0.1235 =-0.8624 MXCT=90.6(ΥCT-YCM)+90.6cY=90.6×(3.785-2.525)+90.6×1.0=
and 204.8 kNm,
XCT=X1-δYt,1/θXZ= Kθ=MCT,X/θXZ=204.8/30.2962×10-5=6.759×105 kNm
0.0+0.8624×10-3/30.2962×10-5 rx=√Kθ/Kyy=√[6.759×108Nm/36.5×106N/m]=4.30 m
=2.847 m ry=√Kθ/Kxx=√[6.759×108Nm/42.7×106N/m]=3.98 m
YCT =Y1+δXt,1/θXZ=
0.0+1.1468×10-3/30.2962×10-5
=3.785 m
Note:
The expressions determining the CT coordinates are general and they apply to any point
of the diaphragm. For instance, from column 4:
XCT=X4-δYt,4/θXZ=6.0-0.9553×10-3m/30.2962×10-5=6.0-3.153=2.847 m
YCT=Y4+δXt,4/θXZ=5.0-0.3681×10-3m/30.2962×10-5=5.0-1.215=3.785 m
Equivalent system:
The equivalent system of
the three-storey building
comprises three dia-
phragms, equivalent to
the actual ones.
The results for both the
actual and the equivalent
diaphragms are given in
the “report” of the related
software. The two follow-
ing tables of the equiva-
lent diaphragms are tak-
en from the report.