00.executive Summary - P2

Feasibility study and Preparation of DPR for construction of four
laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road Package-II Final DPR

(Mancherial to Maharashtra State border) in the state of Executive Summary
Telangana.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
E.1 General
National Highways Authority of India acting through the Project Director (NHAI) is
engaged in the development of the State Highways. As part of this endeavor, the
Authority has decided to upgrade the State Highway 1 to Four lane configuration
from km 251.900 at Mancherial to km. 342.000 at Maharashtra Border on Hyderabad
– Karimnagar – Chanda Road.
National Highways Authority of India has appointed M/s Aarvee Associates Architects
Engineers & Consultants Pvt. Ltd. to provide consultancy services for detailed
engineering study for 90.100 km road section. As per the authority's letter the road
section of the project road is as follows:
• CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY AND

PREPARATION OF DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR FOUR LANING OF
HYDERABAD-KARIMNAGAR-CHANDA ROAD (MANCHERIAL TO
MAHARASHTRA STATE BORDER) IN THE STATE OF TELANGANA.
E.2 About the project
The project stretch is split into two packages. Package-II falls in the districts of
Mancherial and Asifabad starting from Km 288.510 located at Repallewada and ends
at Km 342 at the Border of Telangana and Maharashtra on Hyderabad – Karimnagar -
Chanda road in the state of Telangana. The Project stretch passes through major
built up areas of PuliKunta, Rebbena, Kharigaon, Motiguda, Burgada, Asifabad,
Wankadi, Neemgaon, Bambara, Gaogaon.
As per the Gazette of India: Extra ordinary release number SO: 4171(E), Ministry of
Road Transport and Highways declared the highway starting from its junction with
NH No. 63 near Indaram connecting Mandamarri, Bellampalli, Tandur, Rebbana,
Asifabad and terminating at Wankidi at Telangana/Maharastra border in the state of
Telangana as National Highway- 363 (Previously State Highways-1).
E-1
Telangana.
The development of the project in widening of the Existing road to four lane with two
lane service road will result in safe and efficient traffic operation and will serve a vital
role in accommodating the future growth of traffic.
Location of the Project Stretch is presented in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1: Location map of Project Stretch
E.3 Surveys and investigations
The details of Surveys including Inventory and Investigations carried out during the
preparation of Inception Report are presented below.
1. The Agreement for consultancy services was signed on 28 th Nov 2015 and
preliminary surveys have commenced on 4th Dec 2015.
2. Investigations of the sub-grade, collection of samples of the locations and

laboratory testing of the collected samples.
3. Collection of samples from pits along the proposed alignment to assess the sub-
grade strength.
E-2
Telangana.
4. Topographic surveys along the proposed alignment.
5. Identification of borrow areas for construction of Embankment and Subgrade,

material. Identification of Source for other different material which are used in
the pavement and bridge construction.
6. Traffic Surveys which includes TVC survey, TMC survey, Axle load survey, OD
survey, Pedestrain Survey.
E.4 TRAFFIC SURVEYS AND ANALYSIS
The road network has been thoroughly studied during the reconnaissance stage and
also with the help of existing road network maps to get a fair idea about the project
corridors and the roads merging and emerging from the study corridor. In order to
assess the requirement of widening to four lane configuration and with two lane
service road on either side in builtup areas, the Consultants have carried out
Classified Traffic Volume Count surveys for the project section at one strategic point,
i.e., at Km 325.000 (near Wankidi) on NH-363 (SH-1) by trained personnel, round
the clock for 7 days. Turning Movement Surveys from Mancherial to Maharashtra
border on Hyderabad–Karimnagar-Chanda Road section had been conducted at 2
major intersections i.e., at Km 294.300 and Km 302.500 along the project stretch,
where the project highway intersects or meets a NH/SH/MDR for a period of 24
hours from 8:00 am to next day 8.00 am.
To capture the traffic and travel characteristics of the commercial vehicles and to
improve the existing systems on the project corridor, the Origin & Destination
surveys by Number Plate method and Road Side Interview were conducted at km
.... Axle Load surveys for the project section were conducted at Km.... close to the
proposed locations of toll plaza.
E.4.1 Anual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) from the volume counts were accounted for the monthly
variations (within one year) to obtain the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT).
E-3
Final DPR
Executive Summary
Seasonal Variation Factor was applied for passenger traffic and for commercial traffic,
based on secondary data interpretation.
Table 1: Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)
Mancherial to Maharashtra
Border on Hyderabad-
Vehicle Type Karimnagar-Chanda Road
Km 325.000
Two Wheelers 1149

Three Wheelers 485
Car / Jeep / Van 327
Car Yellow board 13
Tata Magic 62
RTC Bus 51
Private Bus 3
School /College bus 10
Mini Bus 1
2 Axle 177
3 Axle 661
M Axle 1194
HEM 10
LCV/LGV 183
Mini LCV 155
Three Wheeler goods 57
Tractor 6
Tractor with trailer 38
Non Motorized Veh
64
and Others
Govt. Exempted Veh 15
Motorized 4597
Total Non
64
Vehicles Motorized
Total Traffic 4660
Total Motorized 10273
E-4
Telangana.
Mancherial to Maharashtra
Border on Hyderabad-
Vehicle Type Karimnagar-Chanda Road
Km 325.000
Non
179
PCUs Motorized
Total Traffic 10452
E.4.2 TRAFFIC FORECAST
Forecasting the traffic is an important element for planning and design of

infrastructure facility, especially when it is proposed to be taken up on a commercial
format. The present traffic demand will increase primarily due to the development of
existing road to four lane(which makes increase of commuters ply on the road)
besides socio – economic characteristics of the traffic in influencing regions.
Estimation of traffic growth rates is further needed for deciding suitable development
strategy and assessing the financial viability of the project.
The growth factor derived from past traffic data on the stretch supplemented by
registration trend and the statistical parameters would have been the ideal method.
However, due to irregular, erratic and insufficient past traffic data available, the
derivation of elasticity and growth factors was based on registration data of vehicles
and the economic parameters.
Growth rates are calculated as per regression model but keeping in view the
irregularity of data in the regression model, different growth rates are adopted.
Table 2: Growth Rates
Tractor
Car
Year 2W 3W Car Goods Buses Tractor with Mini Bus
(Y)
trailer
2016-2020 11.0% 7.5% 7.5% 7.0% 7.5% 2.5% 8.0% 11.5% 6.5%
2020-2025 10.5% 7.0% 7.0% 6.5% 7.0% 2.5% 7.5% 11.0% 6.0%
E-5
Telangana.
Tractor
Car
Year 2W 3W Car Goods Buses Tractor with Mini Bus
(Y)
trailer
2025-2030 10.0% 6.5% 6.5% 6.0% 6.5% 2.5% 7.0% 10.5% 5.5%
2030-2035 9.5% 6.0% 6.0% 5.5% 6.0% 2.5% 6.5% 10.0% 5.0%
2035-2040 9.0% 5.5% 5.5% 5.0% 5.5% 2.5% 6.0% 9.5% 4.5%
2045-2050 8.5% 5.0% 5.0% 4.5% 5.0% 2.5% 5.5% 9.0% 4.0%
E.4.3 CAPACITY AND LOS ANALYSIS
The Capacity of a facility is defined as the maximum hourly rate at which persons or
vehicles can reasonably be expected to traverse a point or uniform section of the
lane or roadway during a given time period under prevailing roadway, traffic and
control conditions. By comparing the present traffic volume with the capacity of
existing highways, their adequacy or deficiency can be assessed. Improvements and
changes in the geometric features, junction features, traffic control devices and
traffic management measures can be planned if capacity studies are considered.
The Highway Capacity Manual has introduced the concept of "Level of Service" to
denote the level of facility one can derive from a road under different operating
conditions and traffic volumes. It is defined as a qualitative measure describing the
operational conditions with in a traffic stream and their perception by motorists. The
level of service for urban and suburban roads can be related to the flow conditions,
average overall travel speed, load factor at intersections, peak hour factor and
service volume to capacity ratio. Project corridors in rural areas are normally
designed for LOS B, based on level of service criteria (IRC 64:1990).
The capacity analysis is presented in the Table below:
E-6
Telangana.
Table 3: Capacity Analysis at Km. 325.000
Capacity Criteria
Total Total
Total Tollable
tollable Traffic
Year Traffic Traffic Capacity for
traffic In divided V/C Recommend
volume in PCU's LOS
volume PCU's carriageway ratio ation
(PCUs/day)
2 lane
2021 6893 4047 14985 12739 30000 0.50 B undivided
with earthern
shoulders
2 lane
undivided
2023 8029 4625 17213 14564 36000 0.48 B
with paved
shoulders
4 lane
2036 20474 10163 39580 32046 80000 0.49 B
divided
6 lane
2046 36766 16017 65323 50546 120000 0.54 C
divided
E.4.4 VEHICLE DAMAGE FACTOR
The Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF) is an index characterizing the traffic loading for a
highway and is defined as a multiplier for converting the number of commercial
vehicles of different axle loads to Standard Axle Loads (SAL).
Axle Load surveys for the project corridor were conducted at Km 325.000, close to
the proposed location of toll plaza.
The VDF calculated for different categories of commercial vehicles at both directions
are as shown in Table –4.
E-7
Telangana.
Table 4: Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF)
S.No Mode Axle Load Survey at Km. 325.000
To Maharashtra To Mancherial
1 2 Axle 3.05 2.96
2 3 Axle 5.24 2.81
3 M axle 7.48 6.95
4 LCV 2.32 1.17
E.4.5 Turning Movement count
The traffic volume count stations at mid blocks (TVCs) have been located to capture
the pattern of the traffic plying on the project stretch. Apart from these traffic volume
counts, for the study of the road network around the project corridor, Turning
movement count were conducted at two major junctions along the project stretch. The
traffic pattern is considerably influenced by these junctions, either in case of
passenger vehicles or goods or both also. The traffic volume levels and their
characteristics at these intersections are presented in the below table. The survey was
conducted for a period of 24 hours.
Turning Movement Surveys from Mancherial to Maharashtra border on Hyderabad –

Karimnagar - Chanda Road section are conducted at 2 major intersections i.e., Km
294.300, Km 302.500 along the project stretch, where the project highway
intersects or meets a NH/SH/MDR for a period of 24 hours from 8:00 am to next day
8.00 am.
The following section discusses about the traffic movements at each intersection.
Goleti Intersection
This intersection is three-legged formed by the merging of Goleti road with HKC road.
Goleti is a small near by village to rebbana and mining regions are also present
E-8
Telangana.
nearer to the Goleti village. The summary of the vehicles coming from each leg are
presented in percentages.
Table 5: Traffic Flow Distribution in Percentage at Goleti Junction
Goleti Asifabad Bellampalli
Goleti - 52.66% 47.34%

Asifabad 33.62% - 66.38%
Bellampalli 36.37% 63.63% -
3,402 3,402
5,125 4,819
1,723 1,417
Asifabad BLPL
3,348 3,348
4,924 5,262
1,576 1,914
1,576 1,914
1,417 1,723
2,993 3,637
Goleti
Fig. 4: Turning Movement Traffic Volume Diagram for Goleti Junction
Khagajnagar Intersection
This intersection is three-legged formed by the merging of Kagajnagar road with HKC
road. Kagajnagar is the one of the major built up areas in the Adilabad district. The
summary of the vehicles coming from each leg are presented in percentages.
E-9
Telangana.
Table 6: Traffic Flow Distribution in Percentage at Kagajnagar Junction
Asifabad Rebbana Khagajnagar

Asifabad - 61.49% 38.51%
Rebbana 67.70% - 32.30%
Khagajnagar 49.68% 50.32% -
2,236 2,236
3,303 3,253
1,067 1,017
Rebbana Asifabad
2,293 2,293
3,297 3,729
1,004 1,436
1,004 1,436
1,017 1,067
2,021 2,503
Khagajnagar
Fig. 5: Turning Movement Traffic Volume Diagram for Khagajnagar Junction
E.5 MATERIAL AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
E.5.1 BORROW AREAS FOR SUB GRADE & EMBANKMENT MATERIAL
Reviews of the Feasibility surveys showed that there are sufficient borrow areas for
sub-grade/embankment materials conforming to design CBR of 10% and the same
are recommended as source for sub grade material having CBR more than 10%.
Samples were collected from respective borrow areas and following tests are in
progress viz. Grain size analysis, Atterberg limits, Free Swell Index (FSI), Moisture–
density relationship using heavy compaction i.e. Modified Proctor Test and CBR on
soaked samples at three energy levels.
E-10
Telangana.
E.5.2 COARSE AGGREGATES
Details of quarries and borrow areas found suitable for coarse aggregates, fine
aggregates and sand for construction of Embankment and Subgrade, material are
provided in the materials report.
E.5.3 CEMENT, BITUMEN AND STEEL
Cement, Bitumen and Steel are the manufactured materials. IS Certified cement, steel
are available in Hyderabad.
Bitumen of penetration grades or VG grades and Crumb Rubber Modified Bitumen-55

grade and Polymer Modified Bitumen SBS 70 grade are available from Hyderabad.
E.6 PAVEMENT DESIGN
Pavement is the most significant component of a road and therefore its design
strengths must be assured to support the projected traffic loading throughout the
design period. The objective is to determine the total thickness of the pavement
structure as well as thickness of individual structural layer components. Design
strength of pavement must be adequate to support the projected traffic loading
throughout the operation period.
Flexible pavement is proposed for main carriageway for the entire project length and
service/slip roads. Flexible Pavement shall be designed for design traffic of 75 MSA
for section from Km 42.000 to Km 94.602 for a minimum design period of 15 years.
Table 7: Pavement Composition details
Crust Composition in mm
H.S Eff
From To Km MSA VG DB
. CBR BC WMM GSB Total
M
42.000 to VG-
2 10 75 40 105 250 200 595
94.602 40
E-11
Telangana.
For the slip roads and service roads, a traffic of 10 msa has been used for design as
per the IRC guidelines. The pavement composition has been shown in Table 8 below
Table 8: Pavement Composition details for Slip Roads and Service Roads
Crust Composition (mm)

H.S. Eff. CBR MSA VG
BC DBM WMM GSB Total
1 10 10 VG-30 40 50 250 200 540
Due to a checkpost at chainage Km. 87.700 service roads are proposed for a length of
0.610 Km and designed for 75 MSA. The pavement composition has been shown in
Table 9 below
Table 9: Pavement composition for Service road at Chainage Km. 87.700
Crust Composition (mm)

H.S. Eff. CBR MSA VG
BC DBM WMM GSB Total
1 10 75 VG-30 40 105 250 200 595
E.7 IMPROVEMENT PROPOSALS
The scope of the project is widening of two lane to four lane with service roads in
builtup area and construction of four lane road in bypasses. The project corridor is to
be designed as a 'partially access controlled highway' by providing service roads, grade
separated intersections with an objective to segregate the local traffic from the
through traffic.
E.7.1 Cross sections
It is proposed to widen the existing road to four lane with two lane service road on
either side in built up areas and ROW of 45m will be followed in village boundaries
and 60m outside the boundaries throughout the stretch. The existing ROW varies
from 30 to 45 m for the project stretch. Considering the stretch, total nine cross
sections have been proposed. Description of each type of cross section is listed in
the Table – 10 below.
E-12
Telangana.
Table 10: Typical Cross Sections
Fig. no. TCS Description

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR 4-LANING WITH 4M RAISED MEDIAN(60m
Fig 2.4
PROW)
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR CONCENTRIC WIDENING WITH 4M RAISED
FIG 2.4(a)
MEDIAN(45m PROW)
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR ECCENTRIC(LHS) WIDENING WITH 4M
FIG 2.4(b)
RAISED MEDIAN(60m PROW)
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR ECCENTRIC(RHS) WIDENING WITH 4M
FIG 2.4(c)
RAISED MEDIAN(60M PROW)
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR APPROACHES TO 6-LANE CATTLE
FIG 2.4(d)
UNDERPASS
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR 4-LANING WITH 4M RAISED MEDIAN WITH

FIG 2.5(a)
SERVICE ROAD IN BYPASS
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR APPROACHES TO 6-LANE LVUP, VUP WITH
FIG 2.5(b)
SLIP ROADS ON BOTH SIDES IN BYPASS (60M PROW)
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR 4-LANE CONCENTRIC WIDENING SERVICE
FIG 2.6(a)
ROAD IN BUILTUP (45M PROW)
FIG 2.6(b)
SLIP ROADS ON BOTH SIDES 60M PROW)
FIG 2.6(c)
SLIP ROADS ON BOTH SIDES 45M PROW)
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR 6 LANE MINOR BRIDGE IN UNDERPASS
FIG 7.2B(a)
LOCATIONS
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR 4 LANE MINOR BRIDGE IN UNDERPASS
FIG 7.2B(b)
LOCATIONS
FIG. 7.3 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF 6 LANE BRIDGE AT DECK LEVEL
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF GRADE SEPARATED STRUCTURE 6-LANE

FIG. 7.8
LVUP/VUP
E-13
Telangana.
Fig. no. TCS Description

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF GRADE SEPARATED STRUCTURE 4-LANE
FIG. 7.8(a)
LVUP/VUP
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF GRADE SEPARATED STRUCTURE LVUP at

FIG. 7.8(b)
DESIGN CHAINAGE 93.992
The typical cross sections are represented in the following figures.
FIG 2.4: TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR 4-LANING WITH 4M RAISED

MEDIAN(60M PROW)
E-14
Telangana.
FIG 2.4(A): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR CONCENTRIC WIDENING WITH 4M

RAISED MEDIAN(45M PROW)
FIG 2.4(b): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR ECCENTRIC(LHS) WIDENING

WITH 4M RAISED MEDIAN(60m PROW)
E-15
Telangana.
FIG 2.4(c): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR ECCENTRIC(RHS) WIDENING

WITH 4M RAISED MEDIAN(60M PROW)
FIGURE 2.4(d): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR APPROACHES TO 6-LANE

CATTLE UNDERPASS
E-16
Telangana.
FIGURE 2.5(a): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR 4-LANING WITH 4M RAISED

MEDIAN WITH SERVICE ROAD IN BYPASSFIGURE
2.5(b): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR APPROACHES TO 6-LANE LVUP, VUP

WITH SLIP ROADS ON BOTH SIDES IN BYPASS (60M PROW)
E-17
Telangana.
FIGURE 2.6(a): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR 4-LANE CONCENTRIC

WIDENING SERVICE ROAD IN BUILTUP (45M PROW)
FIGURE 2.6(b): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR APPROACHES TO 6-LANE

LVUP, VUP WITH SLIP ROADS ON BOTH SIDES 60M PROW)
E-18
Telangana.
FIGURE 2.6(c): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR APPROACHES TO 4-LANE

LVUP, VUP WITH SLIP ROADS ON BOTH SIDES 45M PROW)
FIG 7.2B(a): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR 6 LANE MINOR BRIDGE IN

UNDERPASS LOCATIONS
E-19
Telangana.
FIG 7.2B(b): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR 4 LANE MINOR BRIDGE IN

UNDERPASS LOCATIONS
FIG. 7.3: TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF 6 LANE BRIDGE AT DECK LEVEL
E-20
Telangana.
FIG. 7.8: TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF GRADE SEPARATED STRUCTURE 6-

LANE LVUP/VUP
FIG. 7.8(a): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF GRADE SEPARATED STRUCTURE

4-LANE LVUP/VUP
E-21
Telangana.
FIG. 7.8 B: TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF GRADE SEPARATED STRUCTURE

LVUP at DESIGN CHAINAGE 93.992
E.7.2 Realignment
The existing road shall be improved to the standards as specified in the manual at
the following locations:
Table 11: Realignments
Chainage
S.No From (Km) To (Km) Length(km)
1 48.120 48.522 0.402
2 54.122 54.872 0.750
3 56.802 57.732 0.930
4 61.242 62.102 0.860
5 67.852 68.522 0.670
6 74.632 75.352 0.720
7 77.580 78.252 0.672
8 84.040 84.632 0.592
9 91.222 92.034 0.812
10 92.768 93.462 0.694
Total Length of Realignments is 7.102 km
E.7.3 Service Roads/Slip Roads

Service Road: Service Roads shall be constructed at the locations and for the
lengths indicated below:
E-22
Telangana.
Table 12: Service Roads
S. Design Chainage Length (km) Width Side Remarks

No. (Km) (m)
From To LHS RHS

1 87.430 88.040 0.610 0.610 7.0 Both Check Post@
87.700
2 68.522 68.900 0.378 0.378 7.0 Both
3 69.940 70.830 0.890 0.890 7.0 Both
Sub Total on 1.878 1.878
each side
Total 3.836
Note: The length of slip ins and slip outs to connect the service road to main
carriageway shall be in addition to length given in above table.
Slip Road: Slip roads shall be constructed at the locations and for the lengths
(excluding taper) indicated below:
Table 13: Slip roads
Sr. Design Chainage Length (km) Width Side Remarks

No. (Km) (m)
From To LHS RHS
1 47.300 48.120 0.820 0.820 7.0 Both
2 49.580 51.230 1.650 1.650 7.0 Both
3 55.180 56.390 1.210 1.210 7.0 Both
4 59.510 60.870 1.360 1.360 7.0 Both
5 62.350 63.330 0.980 0.980 7.0 Both
6 68.900 69.940 1.040 1.040 7.0 Both
7 70.830 72.640 1.810 1.810 7.0 Both
8 76.580 77.580 1.000 1.000 7.0 Both
9 83.080 84.040 0.960 0.960 7.0 Both
Length on each side 10.83 10.83
Total Length (Km) 21.660
Note: The taper portion of the slip roads shall be in addition to length given in above
table.
E.7.4 Indicative Widening Scheme
E-23
Telangana.
Table 14: Widening scheme
Sl.
Design Chainage LENGTH (m)
No.
From To
1 42 48.12 Concentric
Realignment
2 48.12 48.522
(LHS)
3 48.522 48.671 Eccentric
48.671 54.122 Concentric
Realignment
4 54.122 54.872
(LHS)
5 54.872 56.802 Concentric
Realignment
6 56.802 57.732
(LHS)
7 57.732 61.242 Concentric
Realignment
8 61.242 62.102
(LHS)
9 62.102 67.852 Concentric
Realignment
10 67.852 68.522
(LHS)
Realignment
11 68.522 71.882
(Bypass)
12 71.882 74.632 Concentric
Realignment
13 74.632 75.352
(LHS)
14 75.352 77.58 Concentric
Realignment
15 77.580 78.252
(RHS)
16 78.252 84.040 Concentric

Realignment
17 84.040 84.632
(LHS)
18 84.632 91.222 Concentric
E-24
Telangana.
Sl.
Design Chainage LENGTH (m)
No.
From To
Realignment
19 91.222 92.034
(LHS)
20 92.034 92.768 Concentric
Realignment
21 92.768 93.462
(LHS)
22 93.462 94.602 Concentric
E.7.5 Junction Improvements
In addition to the above improvements, all the major and minor junctions will be
improved as per MORTH and IRC standards. As per the pedestrian movement at
junction locations, pedestrian crossings and footpaths will be provided as per
IRC:103-2012. The following Table gives the list of junctions in the existing project
road.
Major Intersections:
Table 15: List of Major Junctions
Sr. Design Type of Leads to Category Carriageway

No. Chainage Junction of Cross width of
Left Right
(Km) Road cross road
1 47.653 T Golleti MDR Two Lane
2 55.912 T Kagaz MDR Two Lane
Nagar
3 59.932 T Navegaon ODR Single Lane
4 71.982 T-Junction Adilabad - MDR Two Lane
5 77.332 T Indhani VR Two Lane
6 83.468 T Boranji ODR Two Lane
Guda
E-25
Telangana.
Minor Intersections:
Table 16: List of Minor Junctions
Sr. Design Type of Leads to Category of Carriageway

No. Chainage Junction Left Right Cross Road width of cross
(Km) road
1 45.452 T Takkalapally ODR Single Lane

2 49.472 T Golleti VR Single Lane
3 52.312 T Nakkalagud ODR Single Lane
a
4 58.082 X Rampur Gondi VR Single Lane
5 64.132 Y Rajura ODR Single Lane
6 65.067 T Idulwada ODR Single Lane
7 76.312 Y Indhani Bari ODR Single Lane
8 79.702 Y Khagaj ODR Single Lane
Nagar
9 83.910 T Pipergunj VR Single Lane
10 84.802 T Neemgaon ODR Single Lane
11 90.208 T Sonapur ODR Single Lane
E.7.6 Geometric Improvements
For the purpose of this report, different alignment options are considered, evaluated
and recommendations are presented in the subsequent sections. The improvement
scheme are mentioned in below table.
Table 17: Improvement Scheme
Design Chainage(Km) Typical Cross

Section as per
Sr. No. From(Km) To(Km) Length(Km) Manual Remarks
1 42.000 42.200 0.200 Fig. 2.4 A
2 42.200 42.938 0.738 Fig. 2.4
3 42.938 42.946 0.008 Fig.7.3 MIB
4 42.946 43.800 0.854 Fig. 2.4
5 43.800 45.550 1.750 Fig. 2.4 A
6 45.550 46.550 1.000 Fig. 2.4
7 46.550 46.900 0.350 Fig. 2.4 A
8 46.900 47.300 0.400 Fig. 2.4
E-26
Telangana.

Sr. No. From(Km) To(Km) Length(Km) Section as per Remarks
Manual
9 47.300 47.638 0.338 Fig. 2.6 B
10 47.638 47.668 0.030 Fig. 7.8 VUP
11 47.668 48.120 0.452 Fig. 2.6 B
12 48.120 48.522 0.402 Fig. 2.4
13 48.522 48.671 0.149 Fig. 2.4 B
14 48.671 48.725 0.054 Fig.7.3 MIB
15 48.725 48.882 0.157 Fig. 2.4 B
16 48.882 49.000 0.118 Fig. 2.4
17 49.000 49.580 0.580 Fig. 2.4 A
18 49.580 50.617 1.037 Fig. 2.6 C
19 50.617 50.629 0.012 Fig. 7.8 A LVUP
20 50.629 51.250 0.621 Fig. 2.6 C
21 51.250 51.781 0.531 Fig. 2.4
22 51.781 51.789 0.008 Fig.7.3 MIB
23 51.789 53.507 1.718 Fig. 2.4
24 53.507 53.519 0.012 Fig.7.3 MIB
25 53.519 53.650 0.131 Fig. 2.4
26 53.650 54.122 0.472 Fig. 2.4 A
27 54.122 54.518 0.396 Fig. 2.4
28 54.518 54.530 0.012 Fig.7.3 MIB
29 54.530 54.872 0.342 Fig. 2.4
30 54.872 55.180 0.308 Fig. 2.4
31 55.180 55.897 0.717 Fig. 2.6 B
32 55.897 55.927 0.030 Fig. 7.8 VUP
33 55.927 56.390 0.463 Fig. 2.6 B
34 56.390 56.802 0.412 Fig. 2.4
35 56.802 57.125 0.323 Fig. 2.4
36 57.125 57.163 0.038 Fig.7.3 MIB
37 57.163 58.391 1.228 Fig. 2.4
38 58.391 58.401 0.010 Fig.7.3 MIB
39 58.401 59.500 1.099 Fig. 2.4
40 59.500 59.658 0.158 Fig. 2.6 C
41 59.658 59.670 0.012 Fig. 7.2 BB MIB
42 59.670 59.926 0.256 Fig. 2.6 C
43 59.926 59.938 0.012 Fig. 7.8 A LVUP
44 59.938 60.900 0.962 Fig. 2.6 C
E-27
Telangana.

Manual
45 60.900 61.659 0.759 Fig. 2.4
46 61.659 61.689 0.030 Fig.7.3 MIB
47 61.689 62.350 0.661 Fig. 2.4
48 62.350 62.826 0.476 Fig. 2.6 C
49 62.826 62.838 0.012 Fig. 7.8 A LVUP
50 62.838 63.330 0.492 Fig. 2.6 C
51 63.330 63.903 0.573 Fig. 2.4
52 63.903 63.915 0.012 Fig.7.3 MIB
53 63.915 64.100 0.185 Fig. 2.4
54 64.100 64.450 0.350 Fig. 2.4 A
55 64.450 68.191 3.741 Fig. 2.4
56 68.191 68.383 0.192 Fig.7.3 MJB
57 68.383 68.522 0.139 Fig. 2.4
58 68.522 68.900 0.378 Fig. 2.5 A
59 68.900 69.230 0.330 Fig. 2.5 B
60 69.230 69.260 0.030 Fig. 7.8 VUP
61 69.260 69.392 0.132 Fig. 2.5 B
62 69.392 69.400 0.008 Fig.7.2 BA MIB
63 69.400 69.504 0.104 Fig. 2.5 B
64 69.504 69.512 0.008 Fig.7.2 BA MIB
65 69.512 69.940 0.428 Fig. 2.5 B
66 69.940 70.830 0.890 Fig. 2.5 A
67 70.830 70.994 0.164 Fig. 2.5 B
68 70.994 71.010 0.016 Fig.7.2 BA MIB
69 71.010 71.967 0.957 Fig. 2.5 B
70 71.967 71.997 0.030 Fig. 7.8 VUP
71 71.997 72.640 0.643 Fig. 2.5 B
72 72.640 72.974 0.334 Fig 2.4
73 72.974 72.986 0.012 Fig.7.3 MIB
74 72.986 74.927 1.941 Fig. 2.4
75 74.927 75.073 0.146 Fig.7.3 MJB
76 75.073 75.352 0.279 Fig. 2.4
77 75.352 76.580 1.228 Fig. 2.4
78 76.580 77.326 0.746 Fig. 2.6 C
79 77.326 77.338 0.012 Fig. 7.8 A LVUP
80 77.338 77.580 0.242 Fig. 2.6 C
81 77.580 77.744 0.164 Fig. 2.4
E-28
Telangana.

Manual
82 77.744 77.774 0.030 Fig.7.3 MIB
83 77.774 81.255 3.481 Fig. 2.4
84 81.255 81.269 0.014 Fig.7.3 MIB
85 81.269 81.686 0.417 Fig. 2.4
86 81.686 81.692 0.006 Fig.7.3 MIB
87 81.692 82.875 1.183 Fig. 2.4
88 82.875 82.892 0.017 Fig.7.3 MIB
89 82.892 83.080 0.188 Fig. 2.4
90 83.080 83.462 0.382 Fig. 2.6 C
91 83.462 83.474 0.012 Fig. 7.8 A LVUP
92 83.474 84.040 0.566 Fig. 2.6 C
93 84.040 84.193 0.153 Fig. 2.4
94 84.193 84.253 0.060 Fig.7.3 MIB
95 84.253 84.632 0.379 Fig. 2.4
96 84.632 85.400 0.768 Fig. 2.4 A
97 85.400 86.166 0.766 Fig. 2.4
98 86.166 86.183 0.017 Fig.7.3 MIB
99 86.183 87.400 1.217 Fig. 2.4
100 87.400 87.430 0.030 Fig. 2.4 A
101 87.430 88.040 0.610 Fig. 2.6 A
102 88.040 88.100 0.060 Fig. 2.4 A
103 88.100 88.302 0.202 Fig. 2.4
104 88.302 88.310 0.008 Fig.7.3 MIB
105 88.310 89.880 1.570 Fig. 2.4
106 89.880 90.501 0.621 Fig. 2.4 A
107 90.501 90.511 0.010 Fig.7.3 MIB
108 90.511 91.222 0.711 Fig. 2.4 A
109 91.222 92.034 0.812 Fig. 2.4
110 92.034 92.768 0.734 Fig. 2.4 A
111 92.768 93.016 0.248 Fig. 2.4
112 93.016 93.024 0.008 Fig.7.3 MIB
113 93.024 93.462 0.438 Fig. 2.4
114 93.462 93.899 0.437 Fig. 2.4 A
115 93.899 93.989 0.090 Fig. 2.4 D
116 93.989 93.996 0.007 Fig. 7.8 B LVUP
117 93.996 94.099 0.103 Fig. 2.4 D
118 94.099 94.602 0.503 Fig. 2.4 A
E-29
Telangana.
E.7.7 Proposed Structures
After reviewing the existing stretch and existing structures, the proposed structures
are listed below
Table 18: List of Proposed Structues on Stretch
S.No Name of the structure No.
2
1 Major bridges
23
2 Minor bridges
34
3 No. of pipe culvert
52
4 No. of Box culvert
E.7.8 Major Bridges
Table 19: List of Major Bridges with Span Lengths
Sl. No. Existing Chainage Design Total proposed Total

(Km) Chainage (Km) length (m) proposed
width
(m)
1 Re-alignment 68.287 6 x 32.0 (Skew) 16(LCW)
16(RCW)
2 Re-alignment 75.000 1x20+4x26.50+1x 16(LCW)
20 (Skew) 16(RCW)
E.7.9 Bridges
Table 20: List of New Minor Bridges with Span Lengths
Sl. Existing Design Total proposed Total proposed Skew/

No. Chainage Chainage length (m) width (m) Normal
(Km) (Km) (Angle)
1 Re- 54.524 2 x 7.33 (Skew) 16(LCW) Skew
alignment 2 x 6.00 (Normal) 16(RCW) (35.00 D)
2 Re- 57.144 2 x 19.00 (Skew) 16(LCW) Skew
alignment 16(RCW) (21.00 D)
E-30
Telangana.
Sl. Existing Design Total proposed Total proposed Skew/

No. Chainage Chainage length (m) width (m) Normal
(Km) (Km) (Angle)
3 Re- 61.674 4 x 8.00 (Skew) 16(LCW) Skew
4 Re- 68.287 6 x 32.0 (Skew) 16(LCW) Skew
alignment 16(RCW) (19.00 D)
5 Asifabad 69.396 1 x 8.00 11+16.0(LCW) Normal
Bypass 11+16.0(RCW)
6 Asifabad 69.508 1 x 12.00 (Skew) 11+16.0 (LCW) Skew
Bypass 1 x 8.00 (Normal) 11+16.0(RCW) (48.20 D)
7 Asifabad 71.002 2 x 8.00 11+16.0 (LCW) Normal
Bypass 11+16.0(RCW)
8 Re- 75.000 1x20+4x26.50+1 16(LCW) Skew
alignment x20 (Skew) 16(RCW) (16.00 D)
9 Re- 93.020 1 x 9.54 (Skew) 16(LCW) Skew
Table 21: List of Minor Bridges shall be reconstructed as new bridges
Existing Design Existing Bridge Total Proposed Total Skew/

Sr. Chainage Chainage (Retained/Repa width of Bridge proposed Normal
No (Km) (Km) ir/ Re- length (Angle)
. construction)
1 289.450 42.942 Reconstruction 2X16.0m 8.0 Normal
3 306.400 59.664 Reconstruction 2X10.75(SR) 12.6 Normal
2X10.50(CW)
7 331.760 84.223 Reconstruction 2X16.0m 60.0 Skew
(Skew)
8 335.810 88.306 Reconstruction 2X16.0m 7.50 Skew
(Skew)
E-31
Telangana.
Table 22: List of Minor Bridges to be widened
Existing Bridge
Existing Design Total Skew/
(Retained/ Total Proposed
Sr. Chainage Chainage proposed Normal
Repair/ Re- width of Bridge
No. (Km) (Km) length (Angle)
construction)
16+8.5
1 295.250 48.698 Retain & Widen 51.00 Normal
2 300.050 53.513 Retain & Widen 2X16.0m 11.8 Normal

14.0
4 320.380 72.980 Retain & Widen 2X16.0m Skew
(Skew)
E.7.10 ROB/RUB
Table 23: List of ROBs
Sl.No. Location of Level Length of bridge (m)

crossing (km)
Nill
E-32
Telangana.
E.7.11 Culverts
Table 24: Reconstruction of existing culverts
Details of
Proposed
Existing Design Proposed Provision Structures Remarks
Sr. Chainage Chainage Type
Size of
No. (Km) (Km)
Vent (m)
No. of B or H
Vents Dia.
1 289.795 43.282 RCC Box Reconstruction 1 2.00 1.5
E-33
Telangana.
Details of
Proposed
Existing Design Proposed Provision Structures Remarks
Sr. Chainage Chainage Type
Size of
No. (Km) (Km)
Vent (m)
No. of B or H
Vents Dia.
E-34
Telangana.
Table 25: List of Widening Culverts
Details of
Proposed
Structures
Existing Design Size of
Sr.
Chainage Chainage Type Provision No. of Vent (m) Remarks
No.
(Km) (Km) Vents B or
H
Dia.
1 290.350 43.826 HPC Retain & Widen 1 1.20 -
2 292.150 45.617 HPC Retain & Widen 1 0.90 -
3 292.790 46.279 HPC Retain & Widen 3 1.20 -
4 295.900 49.363 HPC Retain & Widen 2 1.20 -
5 296.585 50.040 HPC Retain & Widen 1 0.90 -
6 296.870 50.323 HPC Retain & Widen 2 1.20 -
7 297.960 51.401 HPC Retain & Widen 1 1.20 -
8 299.190 52.630 HPC Retain & Widen 1 1.00 -
9 300.560 54.001 HPC Retain & Widen 1 0.90 -
10 303.020 56.355 HPC Retain & Widen 3 1.00 -
11 304.780 58.026 HPC Retain & Widen 2 1.00 -
12 304.940 58.164 HPC Retain & Widen 1 1.00 -
13 305.640 58.878 HPC Retain & Widen 1 1.00 -
14 305.900 59.131 HPC Retain & Widen 2 1.00 -
15 307.020 60.299 HPC Retain & Widen 2 1.00 -
16 307.585 60.850 RCC Box Retain & Widen 1 5.20 1.50
17 307.790 61.058 HPC Retain & Widen 2 0.90 -
18 307.900 61.150 HPC Retain & Widen 1 0.90 -
19 309.750 62.865 HPC Retain & Widen 1 1.20 -
20 312.230 65.398 HPC Retain & Widen 2 0.90 -
21 312.820 65.986 HPC Retain & Widen 3 1.00 -
22 314.615 67.856 HPC Retain & Widen 2 1.20 -
23 319.430 72.020 HPC Retain & Widen 1 0.90 -
24 321.850 74.462 HPC Retain & Widen 1 1.20 -
E-35
Telangana.
Details of
Proposed
Structures
Existing Design Size of
Sr.
Chainage Chainage Type Provision No. of Vent (m) Remarks
No.
(Km) (Km) Vents B or
H
Dia.
25 323.250 75.763 HPC Retain & Widen 1 1.20 -
26 323.730 76.251 HPC Retain & Widen 1 0.90 -
27 324.680 77.188 HPC Retain & Widen 1 1.20 -
28 325.870 78.327 HPC Retain & Widen 1 1.20 -
29 326.920 79.415 HPC Retain & Widen 2 0.90 -
30 327.850 80.393 HPC Retain & Widen 2 1.00 -
31 328.010 80.540 HPC Retain & Widen 2 0.90 -
32 328.240 80.711 HPC Retain & Widen 2 1.00 -
33 328.450 80.920 HPC Retain & Widen 1 1.00 -
34 334.025 86.568 HPC Retain & Widen 2 1.00 -
35 335.150 87.589 RCC Box Retain & Widen 1 3.50 2.00
36 335.617 88.087 HPC Retain & Widen 1 0.90 -
Table 26: List of New Culverts
Sl. Design Proposed Details Size of Vent in m Total width of

No. Chainage Type of structure in (m)
(km) Proposed
Structure
s
No. of B H
Vents
1 68.622 HPC 1 1.20 - 37.50
2 69.148 HPC 2 1.20 - 52.50
3 70.362 RCC Box 1 3.00 3.00 26.00
4 70.428 RCC Box 1 3.00 2.50 32.56
5 71.085 HPC 1 1.20 - 52.50
6 71.232 HPC 1 1.20 - 52.50
E-36
Telangana.
Sl. Design Proposed Details Size of Vent in m Total width of

No. Chainage Type of structure in (m)
(km) Proposed
Structure
s
No. of B H
Vents
7 71.446 RCC Box 1 5.50 4.00 52.22
8 91.682 RCC Box 1 2.00 5.00 26.00
9 93.200 RCC Box 1 2.00 5.00 26.00
E.7.12 Grade Separated Structures

Table 28: List of Underpasses with spans
Sr. Existing Design Clear Vertical Type of Remarks
Total
No Chainag Chainag span/ Clearance Structure
Width
e (km) e (km) opening
(m)
(m)
1 294.060 47.653 2 x 14.5 1 x 30 5.5 VUP Golleti Cross
Road(MDR)
2 297.030 50.623 2 x 10.5 1 x 12 4.0 LVUP Rebbana Built-up
3 302.320 55.912 2 x 14.5 1 x 30 5.5 VUP Kagaznagar
Cross
Road(MDR)
4 306.580 59.932 2 x 10.5 1 x 12 4.0 LVUP Navegaon Cross
Road(ODR)
5 309.586 62.832 2 x 10.5 1 x 12 4.0 LVUP Motuguda Built-
up
6 - 69.245 2 x 14.5 1 x 30 5.5 VUP Asifabad Bypass
7 - 71.982 2 x 14.5 1 x 30 5.5 VUP Asifabad Bypass
8 324.827 77.332 2 x 10.5 1 x 12 4.0 LVUP Indhani Cross
Road(VR)
9 331.000 83.468 2 x 10.5 1 x 12 4.0 LVUP Boranjiguda
Cross
Road(ODR)
10 341.513 93.992 2 x 15.5 1 x 12 4.0 LVUP
E.7.13 BUS BAYS WITH SHELTERS
The bus bay locations along the project road has been identified and reviewed with
respect to the access from the main carriageway and requirement of passengers.
E-37
Telangana.
Based on the study, it has been proposed to relocate some of the existing bus stops/
shelters and to provide additional number of bus bays near built-up areas. Bus-bays
shall be provided in accordance(IRC: SP: 84-2014).
Locations for bus bays and Bus shelters are presented in below table.
Table 28: Locations for Bus Bays
S.No Design Design

Chainage (LHS) Chainage (RHS)
(Km) (Km)
1 42.182 42.082
2 84.415 84.482
3 92.582 92.482
Location of Passenger shelters are presented below
Table 29: Locations for Passenger shelters
S.No Design Design

Chainage (LHS) Chainage (RHS)
(Km) (Km)
1 51.032 50.882
2 62.582 62.682
E.7.14 LIGHTING
Lighting system is proposed along the stretch, grade separators and underpasses.
E.7.15 ROAD FURNITURE
Road side furniture shall be provided in accordance with relevant sections of the
Manual of specifications and standards (IRC: SP: 84-2014). Road markings and road
standards shall be proposed as per IRC: 35 -1997 and IRC: 67 -2012 respectively.
Road and Traffic signs will be proposed at appropriate places as per relevant IRC
guidelines to give caution and to inform the traffic (vehicular and pedestrians) for
safe and smooth movement. Normally signs are placed on the left side of the road;
in certain cases however these may be placed overhead or on either side of the road
depending upon the site condition, for attracting attention of road users.
E-38
Telangana.
E.7.16 DESIGN STANDARDS AND CODES OF PRACTICES
The design standards and loading to be considered are generally based on the
requirements laid down in the latest editions of IRC and IS codes of practices &
standards specifications, and guidelines of Ministry of Road Transport & Highways.
Additional technical references were used wherever the provisions of IRC/IS codes
are found inadequate. Following Codes are used in the designs.
The design standards and loading to be considered are generally based on the
requirements laid down in the latest editions of IRC and IS codes of practices &
standards specifications, and guidelines of Ministry of Road Transport & Highways.
Additional technical references were used wherever the provisions of IRC/IS codes
are found inadequate. Following Codes are used in the designs.
✔ IRC:5-1998
✔ IRC:6-2010
✔ IRC:22-2008
✔ IRC SP:23 1983
✔ IRC 73-1980
✔ IRC:24-2010
✔ IRC:78-2000
✔ IRC 81-1997
✔ IRC: 83-Part II & Part III
✔ IRC:112-2011
✔ IRC SP: 84- 2014
✔ IRC 58-2015
✔ IRC 103-2012
✔ RELEVANT IS & BS SPECIFICATIONS
E.8 COST ESTIMATES
Cost estimation provides vital input to the financial evaluation of the project. The cost
estimates have been prepared for the project corridor separately including
strengthening /widening of the existing pavement, strengthening / widening of existing
E-39
Telangana.
bridge structures, construction of new bridges, rehabilitation and reconstruction /

widening of cross drainage structures, longitudinal drains, junction improvements,
vehicular underpasses, Pedestrian underpasses, road furniture, bus bays, truck lay
byes, way side amenities, toll plazas, etc.
Table-30: Summary of Cost Estimates
Item Description Total cost in Rs.
BILL NO: 1 - SITE CLEARANCE 139,450,735
BILL NO: 2 - EARTHWORKS 822,384,250
BILL NO: 3 - SUB-BASE AND BASE COURSES 1,056,057,590
BILL NO: 4 - BITUMINOUS WORKS FOR FLEXIBLE

1,362,480,056
PAVEMENT
BILL NO: 4(A) - RIGID PAVEMENT 51,733,595
BILL NO: 5 - CULVERTS 234,839,703
BILL NO: 6 - BRIDGES 1,073,194,256
BILL NO: 6 (A) - REPAIR AND REHABILITATION OF

4,027,640
EXISTING BRIDGES
BILL NO: 7 - DRAINAGE AND PROTECTION WORKS 1,368,198,758
BILL NO: 8 - JUNCTIONS 47,528,442
BILL NO: 9 - TRAFFIC SIGNS, MARKINGS AND

101,931,404
APPURTENANCES
BILL NO: 10 – MISCELLANEOUS 480,897,344
BILL NO: 11– MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION 29,881,879
Total Construction Cost 6,772,605,652
Project Length in Km 52.602
E-40
Telangana.
Item Description Total cost in Rs.
Construction Cost/ Km 12.875
E.9 TOLL REVENUE AND FINANCIAL VIABILITY
The total toll revenue that would be collected at all the toll plazas along different
sections of the project stretch during the concession period is given in the table below.
Toll Revenue calculations are done by considering the amendments of Toll Fee which
are December 2013 and January 2014. A summary of Toll revenues have been
presented below.
Table-31: Toll Revenue at Km. 81.532
Total Total Revenue Total Revenue in

Period
Revenue(Millions) in crores Lakhs per day
2016 2017 213.81 21.38 5.86
2017 2018 234.42 23.44 6.42
2018 2019 260.35 26.04 7.13
2019 2020 286.65 28.67 7.85
2020 2021 316.55 31.66 8.67
2021 2022 348.04 34.8 9.54
2022 2023 383.76 38.38 10.51
2023 2024 421.13 42.11 11.54
2024 2025 468.17 46.82 12.83
2025 2026 517.55 51.75 14.18
2026 2027 566.94 56.69 15.53
2027 2028 630.27 63.03 17.27
2028 2029 694.3 69.43 19.02
2029 2030 767.56 76.76 21.03
2030 2031 847.13 84.71 23.21
2031 2032 937.46 93.75 25.68
2032 2033 1032.46 103.25 28.29
2033 2034 1146.58 114.66 31.41
2034 2035 1265.91 126.59 34.68
2035 2036 1398.23 139.82 38.31
2036 2037 1548.53 154.85 42.43
2037 2038 1713.11 171.31 46.93
2038 2039 1899.58 189.96 52.04
2039 2040 2103.55 210.35 57.63
E-41
Telangana.
Total Total Revenue Total Revenue in

Period
Revenue(Millions) in crores Lakhs per day
2040 2041 2325.89 232.59 63.72
2041 2042 2576.06 257.61 70.58
2042 2043 2854.48 285.45 78.2
2043 2044 3160.09 316.01 86.58
2044 2045 3502.07 350.21 95.95
2045 2046 3879.88 387.99 106.3
2046 2047 4298.86 429.89 117.78
2047 2048 4770.49 477.05 130.7
2048 2049 5285.29 528.53 144.8
2049 2050 5803.27 580.33 158.99
Financial Viability
Table-32: Financial Analysis Results
Contin Cost
IC&Pre-
gencie Financin Escalation
Civil operative Equity
s (1% g Cost during Grant
Package Cost Expenses IDC TPC CP IRR
of on Debt Construction (%)
2017 (1% of (%)
Civil (1.5%) (5% per
EPC)
Cost) year)
Total 20
711.12 7.11 7.18 5.45 77.28 63.50 872 40 <0
Package Y
E.10 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the above financial analysis, the minimum return on equity of around 15%
could be considered satisfying the requirement of prospective concessionaire. In view
of this, it was concluded that the option with BOT (Toll) is not viable for taking up the
project on BOT-Toll basis.
Hence it is recommended that this project may be taken up under EPC.
E-42

00.executive Summary - P2

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

00.executive Summary - P2

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Feasibility study and Preparation of DPR for construction of four

laning of Hyderabad-Karimanagar-Chanda road Package-II Final DPR

• CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR FEASIBILITY STUDY AND

E.2 About the project

Location of the Project Stretch is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1: Location map of Project Stretch

E.3 Surveys and investigations

2. Investigations of the sub-grade, collection of samples of the locations and

4. Topographic surveys along the proposed alignment.

5. Identification of borrow areas for construction of Embankment and Subgrade,

E.4 TRAFFIC SURVEYS AND ANALYSIS

E.4.1 Anual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)

Table 1: Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT)

Two Wheelers 1149

Three Wheeler goods 57

E.4.2 TRAFFIC FORECAST

Forecasting the traffic is an important element for planning and design of

Table 2: Growth Rates

E.4.3 CAPACITY AND LOS ANALYSIS

The capacity analysis is presented in the Table below:

Table 3: Capacity Analysis at Km. 325.000

E.4.4 VEHICLE DAMAGE FACTOR

Table 4: Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF)

S.No Mode Axle Load Survey at Km. 325.000

1 2 Axle 3.05 2.96

2 3 Axle 5.24 2.81

3 M axle 7.48 6.95

4 LCV 2.32 1.17

E.4.5 Turning Movement count

Turning Movement Surveys from Mancherial to Maharashtra border on Hyderabad –

Table 5: Traffic Flow Distribution in Percentage at Goleti Junction

Goleti Asifabad Bellampalli

Goleti - 52.66% 47.34%

Fig. 4: Turning Movement Traffic Volume Diagram for Goleti Junction

Table 6: Traffic Flow Distribution in Percentage at Kagajnagar Junction

Asifabad Rebbana Khagajnagar

Khagajnagar 49.68% 50.32% -

Fig. 5: Turning Movement Traffic Volume Diagram for Khagajnagar Junction

E.5 MATERIAL AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS

E.5.1 BORROW AREAS FOR SUB GRADE & EMBANKMENT MATERIAL

E.5.2 COARSE AGGREGATES

E.5.3 CEMENT, BITUMEN AND STEEL

Bitumen of penetration grades or VG grades and Crumb Rubber Modified Bitumen-55

E.6 PAVEMENT DESIGN

Table 7: Pavement Composition details

Crust Composition (mm)

Table 9: Pavement composition for Service road at Chainage Km. 87.700

Crust Composition (mm)

E.7 IMPROVEMENT PROPOSALS

E.7.1 Cross sections

Table 10: Typical Cross Sections

Fig. no. TCS Description

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR 4-LANING WITH 4M RAISED MEDIAN WITH

FIG. 7.3 TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF 6 LANE BRIDGE AT DECK LEVEL

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF GRADE SEPARATED STRUCTURE 6-LANE

Fig. no. TCS Description

TYPICAL CROSS SECTION OF GRADE SEPARATED STRUCTURE LVUP at

The typical cross sections are represented in the following figures.

FIG 2.4: TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR 4-LANING WITH 4M RAISED

FIG 2.4(A): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR CONCENTRIC WIDENING WITH 4M

FIG 2.4(b): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR ECCENTRIC(LHS) WIDENING

FIG 2.4(c): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR ECCENTRIC(RHS) WIDENING

FIGURE 2.4(d): TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR APPROACHES TO 6-LANE