DESIGN OFF RIGID PAVEMENT ( As Per IRC SP-62)

WHEEL LOAD : 51 KN
:
k VALUE :
From Table 1, The k Value Corresponding to a CBR Value of 4 : 0.0252 N/mm2/mm
:
Sub Base :
GSB : 150 mm
Effective k Value

Since a Sub Base is Provided, the k Value can be increased by 20 % (para 2.5)

Effective k Value : 1.2x21x10-3 25.2

: 25.2x10-3 N/mm2/mm

Concrete Strength

Adopt a 28 days compressive strength of 30 Mpa

3.834
Flexural Strenght ff = 0.7√ fc : 3.834 MPa
:
90 days Flexural Stength : 1.2x3.834 4.60
: 4.6 MPa
Thickness
Try a Thcikness of 200 mm

Edge Load Stress

By Equation σle= 0.529 P/h2(1+.54µ)(4log10l/b+log10b-.4048)

σle = 3.84

σle = Load Stress in Edge Region (Mpa)

P= Design Wheel Load (N) 51000 N
h= Pavement Slab Thickness mm 200 mm
E= Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete (Mpa) 30000 N/mm2
k= Modulus of Subgrade Reaction of Pavement Foundation (N/ mm3x 103) 25.2x10-3 0.0252
l= radius of raltive stiffness (mm)
l = 4√Eh3 /12(1-µ2 )k

l= 1083.90

b= radius of equivalent distribution of pressure

b = √1.6a2+h2 -0.675h for a/h < 1.724 = a for a/h ≥ 1.724
a/h = 0.76 mm < 1.724
b= 142.71
a= radius of contact assumed circular (mm)
a= (P/pπ)1/2 152.33 mm
p = Tyre Pressure 0.7 Mpa

Tempreature Stress

From Table-4, the tempreature differencial for gujarat for a slab thickness of 200 mm is 13.1 0
C table 2 of 58

Assuming a Contraction Joint Spacing of 5.50m and 5.50 m width.

σte = (Eα∆t/2)C L/l and W/l C

σte = 1.43 1 0
σte = Tempreature Stress in the edge region (Mpa) 2 0.04
∆t Maximum tempreature diffrential (o C) 13.1 3 0.175
α Cofficient of Thermal expansion of Concrete (o C) 10x10-6 1E-05 4 0.44
5 0.72
L 5500 mm 6 0.92
B 5500 mm 7 1.03
L/l 5.07 8 1.077
W/l 5.07 9 1.08
C 0.73 10 1.075
11 1.05
12 & above 1
Total Stress 5.28 < 4.6
Hence Safe
 RIGID PAVEMENT DESIGN

Road Name:-
Dist.:- PIU:-

Design

Present Traffic (A) = 18 CVPD

Design Life (n) :- = 20 Yrs.
r :- = 0.06
C = 365xA{(1+ r)n-1}
r
C = Cummulative number of axles during the design period.
A = Initial number of axles per day in the year when the road is operational
r = Annual rate of growth of commercial traffic (expressed in decimals)
n = Design period in years
20
C = 365 x 18 ( 1.060 ) -1 = 241681
0.06
Design traffic =25 per cent of the total repetitions of commercial vehicle = 60,420

Front axles of the commercial vehicles carry, much lower load and cause
small flexural stress in the concrete pavement and they need not be considered in
the pavement design. Only the rear axels, both single and tendem, should be consi-
dered for the design. In the example, the total number of rear axles is, therefore,
241,681 Assumming that mid point of the axles load class represent the group,
the total repetition of the single axles and tandem axle load are as follows.

from Survey
Single Axle Load
Axle Load Class,
% of Axle Load
Tons
9 to 11 21.5
Less than 9 78.5

Single Axle Load

Load in Tons Expected Repitition
10 12990
Less than 10 47430

Trial Thickness = 20 cm,

Subgrade modulus 6.9 kg/cm3 for 22.5cm granular subbase of thickness in cm
Design period = 20 Yrs,
Modulus of rupture = 45 kg/cm2
Load safety factor = 1.1

Stresse
Axle Load(AL), s kg/cm2 Stress Expected Fatigue Fatigue life
ALx1.1
tonnes from Ratio repetiotion Life, N consumed
chart

10.2 11.22 26 0.58 12990 5.8x 104 0.22

 The design is safe since cumulative fatigue life consumed should be less than 1.0

Check for Temperature Stresses

Edge warping stress = CEαt/2
E = 3 x105 Kg/cm2
h = 20 cm thickness of slab
k = 6.9 kg/cm 3
modulus of subgrade reaction 4.4 for subbase of thicknes
µ = 0.15 Poissons ratio
t = 13.1 C
o
For M.P region temperature difference
L = 437 cm
l = (√Eh3/12(1-μ2)k)1/4 Radiius of relative stiffness 2400000000
= 74 cm 80.937
L/l = 5.9
C = 0.9
0.90
Edge warping stress 17.7 Kg/cm 2

Total of temperature warping stress and the highest axle load stress = 26+18.7 =
kg/cm2 which is less than 45 kg/cm2, the flexural strength. So the pavement thickness
of 20cm is safe under the combined action of wheel load and temperature.
4 for subbase of thickness 22.5cm

74

43.7
 DESIGN OF CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT

Considering traffic volume of Vehicles 230 per day Consisting vehicles like agricultural
1 Traffic volume = tractors/trailers,light goods vehicles,heavy trucks,buses, animal drawn vehicles, motorized two wheelers
and cycles.

2 Wheel load = The wheel load appropriate for the traffic conditions is 5.1 T. IRC-SP-62 2004

3 CBR value = From test results considering average soaked CBR value
of the soil as 2.00 2.00

Avg CBR
2

Soaked CBR % 2 3 4 5 7 10 15 20 50

K value in
21 28 35 42 48 5 62 69 140
N/mm2/mmx10-3

k value corresponding to soaked CBR of 2.00 is

by interpolation from above table

21 - ( 21 - 21 ) x ( 2 - 2.00 )
( 2 - 3 )

k 21.00 x10-3 N/mm2/mm

4 K value = K value corresponding to a CBR value 2.00 is 21.00 x10-3 N/mm2/mm

5 Sub base = provide 150 mm thick GSB

6 Effective k value = Since sub base is provided , the k value can be increased by 20%
= 4.20 + 21.00 25.20 x10-3 N/mm2/mm
 7 Concrete strength = Adopted a 28 day compressive strength of 30 Mpa.
Flexural strength Ff 0.70 fc 0.70 30.00 3.83 N/mm2

28 day flexural strength = 3.83 N/mm2 or 37.61 N/mm2

90 days flexural strength = 1.2 x 3.83 N/mm2

= 4.60 N/mm2 or 45.13 N/mm2

8 Try a thickness of 20 cm

9 Edge load stress = From figure edge load stress for K value of 25.200 x 10-3 N/mm2/mm is
2.92 Mpa
10 Temperature stresses= The temperature differential for Gujarat for a slab thickness 2.92 N/mm2
delta T of 20 cm is 13 degree centigrade.

Assuming a contraction joint spacing of 5.50m and 5.50 m width , the radius of relative
stiffness l is as under:

L = 5500 mm

B = 5500 mm

l = radius of relative stiffness mm

/
modulus of
Eh 3
4 E = 3 x104 N/mm2 Elasticity of
12(1 - U2) K
concrete
thickness of
h = 200 mm
concrete slab

3 X 104 X 2003 x103 poisson's

=4 = 0.15
12 X (1 - 0.152) X49.36 ratio
 modulus of
k = 25.20 kg/cm2/cm sub-grade
=4 240000000000000 reaction
295.596

=4 811918970486.75 mm

= ( 811918970486.75 )(1/4)

949.24 mm

L/l = 5500 / 949.24 = 5.79

W/l = 5500 / 949.24 = 5.79

L/l is more critical and is adopted

Bradbury's Co-efficient chart

L/I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C 0.000 0.040 0.175 0.440 0.720 0.920 1.030 1.077
L/I 9 10 11 12
C 1.080 1.075 1.050 1.000
Bradbury's coefficient C = 5 C= 0.720
6 C= 0.920
by interpolation for 0.878 C= 0.88

using chart for C= 0.88

Edge temperature stress Ke = 1.75 Mpa 1.75 N/mm2 Chart

Total stresses = Edge load stress + Temperature stress from graph

 2.92 + 1.75 IRC 58/ pg 16

4.67 N/mm2 < 4.60 N/mm2 Allowable stree

8 Try a thickness of 21 cm

9 Edge load stress = From figure edge load stress for K value of 25.200 x 10-3 0.000 is
2.75 Mpa
10 Temperature stresses= The temperature differential for Gujarat for a slab thickness 2.75 N/mm2
delta T of 21 cm is 13 degree centigrade.

Assuming a contraction joint spacing of 5.50m and 5.50 m width , the radius of relative
stiffness l is as under:

L = 5500 mm

B = 5500 mm

l = radius of relative stiffness mm

/
modulus of
E h3
4 E = 3 x104 N/mm2 Elasticity of
12(1 - U2) K
concrete
thickness of
h = 210 mm
concrete slab

3 X 104 X 2003 x103 poisson's

=4 = 0.15
12 X (1 - 0.152) X49.36 ratio

modulus of
k = 25.20 kg/cm2/cm sub-grade
=4 reaction
240000000000000
295.596
 =4 811918970486.75 mm

= ( 811918970486.75 )(1/4)

949.24 mm

L/l = 5500 / 949.24 = 5.79

W/l = 5500 / 949.24 = 5.79

L/l is more critical and is adopted

Bradbury's Co-efficient chart

L/I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C 0.000 0.040 0.175 0.440 0.720 0.920 1.030 1.077
L/I 9 10 11 12
C 1.080 1.075 1.050 1.000
Bradbury's coefficient C = 5 C= 0.720
6 C= 0.920
by interpolation for 0.878 C= 0.88

using chart for C= 0.88

Edge temperature stress Ke = 1.75 Mpa 1.75 N/mm2 Chart

Total stresses = Edge load stress + Temperature stress from graph

2.75 + 1.75 IRC 58/ pg 16

4.50 N/mm2 < 4.60 N/mm2 Allowable stree

Corner stress
From figure corner load stress for wheel load 5.10 T
k = 25.20 x10-3 N/mm2/mm
Slab thickness= 200mm
Corner stress = 1.9 N/mm2 < 4.60 N/mm2
For 210 mm
2.75
0.878
For 210 mm
2.75
0.878
Rigid Pavement Design
Pavement Thickness
Design parameters
Design wheel load 3000 kg
Tyre pressure 5 Kg/cm2
Design period 20 years
Characteristics Strength of concrete 30 N/mm2
Flexural strength of concrete 3.83 N/mm2
90 days flexural strength 4.6 N/mm2
Modulus of elasticity 30000 Mpa
Poisson’s ratio 0.15
Coefficient of thermal expansion 1E-05 Per o C
Radius of relative stiffness
Length 3750 mm
Width 3750 mm
Radius of relative stiffness (l) 883.372
From fig-2 IRC:62-2004 Edge stress for
K 0.034
L/l 4.25
B/l 4.25
Bradbury’s coefficient “C” for L/l 0.51

Zonal Division of India

Zone States Temperature Differential oC in slabs
of thickness
150mm 200mm 250mm
II Bihar, West Bengal, 15.6 16.4 16.6
Assam and Eastern
Orissa, excluding hilly
regions and coastal areas

Concrete Pavement Thickness for rural roads for low traffic (wheel load-30kN)
28-day concrete strength Pavement thickness
(compressive) Mpa
Zone-I Zone-II, IV, V, Zone-III
VI
Temperature differential oC
< 15 oC 15.1 oC to 17 oC 17.1 oC
to 20.0
o
C

30 150 160 170

35 150 150 160
40 150 150 150

It has been found from computation of various stresses and CBR adopted, a slab thickness of 18 cm is
found to be satisfactory.
 240000000000000.00 487151382292.047 835.4413847
0.9775 492.66

L/l 4.49101796407186
W/l 4.49101796407186
C 0.55
1.4 Mpa
3.1 4.5

0.28 0.168
 Name of Work : Mehsana -Modhera Road Km 0/0 to 25/200 (S.H.134) (Section 5/200 to 25/200)
Name of Client : Deputy Executive Engineer, R&B Sub Dn. Mehsana
Job No : Report Date : 1/5/2019

A. Selection of Modulus of Sub Grade Reaction

1 Traffic Volume ( CVPD) 2496
2 Wheel Load
3 CBR 3.50%
4 K ( Modulus of Sub-Grade Reaction) 28 Mpa/m 1 Mpa = 1N/mm2
From Table - 2 Pg No.9 28 X 10^-3 N/mm2/mm 1 Mpa/m = 1X10^-3 N/mm2/mm
5 Sub Base GSB DLC/PCC Total
150 100 250 mm
6 Effective K 97 MPa/m Consider DLC For Compution of K.
From Table 4, Pg No.12

B. Selection of Flexural Strength of Concrete

Adopted a 28 day compressive strength of 30 Mpa

Flexural Strength of Concrete for 28 Days

Fcr = 0.7 x Fck

= 0.7 x 30

Fcr = 3.83 Mpa

Flexural Strength of Concrete for 90 Days

Fcr = 1.1 X 3.83

= 4.213 Mpa
C. Selection of Design Traffic for Fatique Analysis
Design Period (N) = 15 Years
Annual Growth Rate ( r ) = 0.06 %
Two Way Commercial Traffic
= 2496 CVPD
Volume per Day (A)
% of Traffic in Predominant of Total
= 50%
Direction Traffic

Total Two Way Commercial Vehicles during Design Period

C = 365 X A X 1 + r N
- 1
r

= 365 X 2496 X 1 + 0.06 15 - 1

0.06

= 21205340 CVPD

Average number of Axles = 2.35

Total Two Way Axle Load

Repetations
= 49832549 Axles

Number of axles in
Predominant direction
= 24916274.5 Axles

x
Design Traffic = 25% 24916274.5
6229069 Axles

Night Time Design Axle

= 60% X 6229069
Repetations
3737441 Axles
 DayTime Design Axle
= 40% X 6229069
Repetations ( 12 Hrs)
2491628 Axles

DayTime Design Axle

= 2491628 ./ 2
Repetations ( 6 Hrs)
1245814 Axles

For Bottom - Up Cracking

(Total Axles)
= 1245814 Axles

NightTime Design Axle

= 3737441 ./ 2
Repetations ( 6 Hrs)
1868721 Axles

% of Commercial Vehicle having Difference of Axle

Length < 4.5 mt) = 50%

For Top - Down Cracking

(Total Axles)
= 934361 Axles

Category - Wise Axle Category - Wise Axle

Proportion of
Axle Category Repetations for Bottom - Up Repetations for Top - Down
Axle Category
Cracking Analysis Cracking Analysis

Front ( Steering) Single 0.7 872070 654053

Rear Single 0.2 249163 186872
Tandem 0.1 124581 93436
 D.
Cumulative Fatigue Damage (CFD) analysis for Bottom - Up Cracking ( BUC) and Top - Down (TDC) and Selection of Slab Thickness
Shoulder Tied = No
K = 97 Mpa/m K = Effective Modulus of Sub Grade Reaction
E = 30000 Mpa E = Elastic Modulus of Concrete
µ = 0.15 µ = Poisson Ratio of Concrete
¥ = 24 Kn/m3 ¥ = Unit Wt of Concrete
Fcr = 4.213 MPa Fcr = Design Flexural Strength of Concrete
Td = 14.3 0
C Td = Maximum Day Time Tempreture (For Bottom Up cracking)
Tn = 12.15 0
C Tn = Night Time Tempreture (For Top Down cracking) ((Td/2)+5)

Consider ,
Thickness of Slab H = 0.25 mt
Radius of Relative Stifness I
I = E X H X H X H 0.25
12 X K X 1 - µ2

= 30000 X 0.25 X 0.25 X 0.25 0.25

12 X 97 X 1 - 0.0225

I = 0.801157465 m

Beta Factor = 0.9

Bottom Up Cracking Fatigue Analysis for Day - Time ( 6 Hr ) Taffic & Positive Temprature Differential
Rear Single Axles RearTandem Axles
Expected Stress Allowable Fatigue Expected Stress Allowable Fatigue
Axle Load Frequency Flex Stress Axle Load Frequency Flex Stress
Rep Ratio Rep Damage Rep Ratio Rep Damage
KN % ni Mpa SR Ni ni/Ni KN % ni Mpa SR Ni ni/Ni
150 0.5 1246 3.07 0.662 5515 0.226 310 1.69 2105 2.652 0.572 67375.564 0.031
140 0.5 1246 2.896 0.625 15431 0.081 290 1.26 1570 2.509 0.541 161569.62 0.01
130 2.62 6528 2.722 0.587 44396 0.147 270 3.9 4859 2.367 0.511 465275.36 0.01
120 2.65 6603 2.548 0.550 124526 0.053 250 5.19 6466 2.224 0.48 2402754 0.003
110 2.65 6603 2.374 0.512 446421 0.015 230 15 18687 2.081 0.449 Infinite 0
100 12 29900 2.2 0.475 3455963 0.009 210 17.73 22088 1.939 0.418 Infinite 0
90 45 112123 2.026 0.437 infinite 0 190 21 26162 1.796 0.388 Infinite 0
80 34.08 84915 1.852 0.400 infinite 0 180 34.23 42644 1.725 0.372 Infinite 0
100 249164 Fat Dam From Single Axles = 0.531 100 124581 Fat Dam From Tandem Axles = 0.054
 Top Down Cracking Fatigue Analysis for Night - Time ( 6 Hr ) Taffic & Negative Temprature Differential
Rear Single Axles RearTandem Axles
Expected Stress Allowable Fatigue Expected Stress Allowable Fatigue
Axle Load Frequency Flex Stress Axle Load Frequency Flex Stress
Rep Ratio Rep Damage Rep Ratio Rep Damage
KN % ni Mpa SR Ni ni/Ni KN % ni Mpa SR Ni ni/Ni
150 0.5 934 2.697 0.582 51019 0.018 310 1.69 1579 2.745 0.592 38633 0.041
140 0.5 934 2.602 0.561 91486 0.01 290 1.26 1177 2.65 0.572 67376 0.017
130 2.62 4896 2.507 0.541 161570 0.03 270 3.9 3644 2.555 0.551 120816 0.03
120 2.65 4952 2.412 0.520 326334 0.015 250 5.19 4849 2.46 0.531 221613 0.022
110 2.65 4952 2.317 0.500 762043 0.006 230 15 14015 2.365 0.510 485184 0.029
100 12 22425 2.223 0.480 2402754 0.009 210 17.73 16566 2.27 0.490 1286914 0.013
90 23.58 44064 2.128 0.459 16179928 0.003 190 21 19622 2.175 0.469 5682913 0.003
80 55 102780 2.033 0.439 Infinite 0 180 34.23 31983 2.128 0.459 16179928 0.002
99.5 185937 Fat Dam From Single Axles = 0.091 100 93435 Fat Dam From Tandem Axles = 0.157
Name of Work : Mehsana -Modhera Road Km 0/0 to 25/200 (S.H.134) (Section 5/200 to 25/200)

Name of Client : Deputy Executive Engineer, R&B Sub Dn. Mehsana

Job No : MAT./2911/01/A
Report Date : 1/5/2019

Crust Provided (As per IRC :58-2015)

Cumulative Fatigue Damage Values for Different Trial Thickness

CFD for BUC Case CFD for TDC Case
Slab
Due Due to Rear Due Safe
Thickness Due to Rear Total CFD Due Tridem Total CFD Total CFD
Tandem Single Tandem /Unsafe
(mt) Single Axles for BUC Axles for TDC (BUC+TDC)
Axles Axles Axles

1 2 3 4(2+3) 5 6 7 8(5+6+7) 9 10
0.25 0.531 0.054 0.585 0.091 0.157 0 0.248 0.833 Safe

As Total Cumulative Fatigue for BUC & TDC is < 1 ,Hence Thickness of Slab is Sufficient

Thickness
Layer
(mm)
M-30 250
DLC / PCC 100
Drainage Layer 150

Diameter Spacing
Length (mm)
(mm) (mm)
Dowel Bar 32 mm 450 mm 300 mm
Tie Bar (plain) 12 mm 580 mm 450 mm
Authorized Signature
 Table 1 Recommended Maximum Tempreture Differentials 0 C for Concrete Slabs
Maximum Tempreture Different
Zone State / Regions 0
C in Slabs Thickness
150 200
Hilly regions of Uttaranchal, West Bengal, Jammu &
I Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, and Arunachal Pradesh 12.5 13.1
Punjab,U.P., Uttaranchal, Gujrat, Rajstan, Haryana, and
II North M.P., excluding hilly regions 12.5 13.1
Bihar, Jharkhand, West Bengal, Assam, and Eastren Orissa,
III excluding hilly regions and coastal areas 15.6 16.4
Maharastra, Karnataka, South M.P., Chattisgarh, Andra
IV Pradesh, Western Orissa, and North Tamil Nadu, excluding 17.3 19.0
hilly regions,and Coastal Areas
Kerala and South Tamil Nadu excuding hilly regions, and
V Coastal Areas 15.0 16.4
VI Coastal areas bounded by hills 14.6 15.8
VII Coastal areas unbounded by hills 15.5 17.0

Table 2 Relationship Between K Value & CBR Value For Soil Subgrad
Soaked CBR (%) 2 3 4 5 7 10 15
K-Value (Mpa/m) 21 28 35 42 48 55 62

Table 3 K-Values for Granular and Cement Treated

Subbases
Effective K of untreated
K Value of Granular Subbase of Effective K of cement Treated
Subgrade Thickness (mm) Subbase of Thickness (mm)
(Mpa/m) 150 225 300 100 150 200
28 39 44 53 76 108 200
56 63 75 88 127 173 225
84 92 102 119 - - -

Table 4 K - Values for Dry Lean Concrete Subbase

K Value of Subgrade (Mpa/m) 21 28 42 48 55
Effective K for 100 mm DLC ( Mpa/m) 56 97 166 208 278
Effective K for 150 mm DLC ( Mpa/m) 97 138 208 277 300

Table 5 Recommended Dimesions of

Dowel Bars
 Dowel Bar Details
Slab Thickness
mm Dia, Length, Spacing,
mm mm mm
200 25 360 300
230 30 400 300
250 32 450 300
280 36 450 300
300 38 500 300
350 38 500 300

Table 6 Details of Tie bars of Longitudinal Joint

of Rigid Pavements
Tie Bar Details
Slab Thickness mm Max. Spacing mm Min Length mm
Dia mm
Plain Deformed Plain Deformed
8 330 530 440 480
150
10 520 830 510 560
10 390 620 510 560
200
12 560 900 580 640
250 12 450 720 580 640
12 370 600 580 640
300
16 660 1060 720 800
12 320 510 580 640
350
16 570 910 720 800
r Concrete Slabs
m Tempreture Differentials
C in Slabs Thickness
250 300 - 400

14.3 15.8

14.3 15.8

16.6 16.8

20.3 21.0

17.6 18.1
16.2 17.0
19.0 19.2
3

e For Soil Subgrade 2 21

20 50 100 3 28 -7
69 140 220 -1 -7
-1 28

50.33
28 39
56 63 4.86
28 24
5.67 58.14

86.14

ase 28
62 21 56
300 28 97 0
300 7 41 225.25
0 97
 Widening & Improvement of Kadi - Doriya - Detroj Road.Ch : 0+00 to 12+000, Ta : Kadi, Dist :
Name of Work :
Mehsana.

Input Data

Slab Thickness = 0.25

Lane Width (B) = 5.00 m
Coefficient of Friction, f = 1.5
Density of Concrete = 24
Allowable tensile stress in plain bars, Mpa = 125
Allowable tensile stress in deforms bars, Mpa = 200
Allowable bond stress for plain bars, Mpa = 1.75
Allowable bond stress for deformed bars, Mpa = 2.46

Design for Plain Bars

Select diameter of tie bar,dt = 12.00 mm
b x f x W
Area of plain steel bar required per metre width of Joint to resist =
Sst
the frictional force at slab bottom, As
= 360 mm2 / m
Cross sectional area of tie bar,As = 113.00 mm2
Perimeter of tie bar , P ptb = = 37.68 mm
Spacing of Tie Bar A/As = 313.89 mm

Hence Spacing of Tie Bar is 320.00 mm

Length of Tie Bar, L = 2 x Sst x A

P ptb x B

2 x 125 x 113.00
01.75 mm x 37.68 mm

428.42 mm

Increase length by 100 mm for loss of bond dure to painting and another 50 mm for tolerence in placemnet

There fore, the requirement length of tie bar = 428.42 mm + 100.00 mm + 50.00 mm
= 578.00 mm
= 580.00 mm

Dia meter of Plain Bar = 12.00 mm

Spacing = 320.00 mm
Length = 580.00 mm