Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
2. Writing Process
Writing process is the process that going on during the
writing. A process approach to writing helps the students to write
as professionals at the writer do, choosing the topic and genres, and
writing for their own experiences or observations. According to
Oshima and Ann Hogue (2006: p.265-273) the process of writing
has roughly four steps.
a. Prewriting
Prewriting is a way to get ideas. In this step you choose a
topic and collect ideas to explain the topic.
b. Organizing
The next step in the writing process is to organize the ideas
into a simple outline. The writer wrote a sentence that named
the topic and told the main idea.
c. Writing
The next step is to write a rough draft, using your outline as
a guide. Write your rough draft as quickly as you can without
stopping to think about grammar, spelling , or punctuation. Just
get your ideas down on paper. You will probably see many
errors in you rough draft, this is perfectly usual and acceptable-
after all, this is just a rough draft. You will fix the error later.
7
a. Grammatical Cohesion
1.) Reference
Reference is one of Grammatical cohesion. According to
Renkama in Efendi “Reference is the act of referring to
preceding or following elemen, deals with a semantic
relationship”. Then, according to Richard & Schmidt (2002:
p.450) they said reference in its narrower sense is the
relationship between a word or phrase and a specific object, e.g
a particular tree or a particularanimal (Lestari,2015: p.12)
In addition, according to Gerot and Wignel in
(Nurhayati,2012: p.7) said that reference refers to systems
which introduce and track the identity of participants through
text. Moreover Halliday and Hasan in (Badrul,2015: p.10)
define reference refers to items of language that instead of
being interpreted semantically in their own right, make
reference to other item for which the context is clear to both
sender and reciver. Reference shows relation between the
language and the world.
Halliday and Hasan as cited in (Anom et al,2012: p.3)
classify refrence into two kinds, namely: ‘exophoric’ and
‘endophoric’. Exophoric reference directs the reader out of text.
In this case, the reference items are outside of a text. In
addition, as said by Halliday and Matthiessen (2004: p.552)
“Exophoric reference means that the identity presumed by the
reference item is recoverable from the invorenment of the text,
a in the example just give above. Here the reference links the
text, except indirectly when references to one and the same
referent can function in an anaphoric and cataphoric way.
Anaphoric reference points the reader ‘backward’ to a previous
mentioned entity. On the other hand, cathaphorical reference
points the reader ‘forward’. It draws the readers futher into the
text in order to identity the elements to which the reference
10
c) Demonstrative reference
Demonstrative reference is reference by means of
location on scale of proximity. It is essentially a form of
verbal pointing, as said before the speaker identifies the
referent by locating it on scale of proximity (Seken et
al,2013: p.3)
11
Example:
Last year we went to Devon for a holliday. The
holliday we had, there was the best we’ve ever had.
The demonstrative reference in example above is
there which has the function of far proximity. It refer to
Devon that is located far from the speaker now. In addition
it is indirect speech.
d) Comparative reference
In comparative reference, Halliday and Hasan
recognize two types general comparison and particular
comparison. Halliday and Hasan define comparative
reference is indirect referenceby means of identity or
similarity (Swastami,2014: p.16)
There are two kinds of comparative reference: General
and Particular comparison. General comparison deals with
comparison which is simply in terms of likeness and
unlikeness. Meanwhile, particular comparison means
comparison that is respect of quantity and quality (Anom et
al,2012: p.5)
Example:
(a) We have received exactly the same reportas was
submitted two months ago
(b) He’s a better man than I am
The example consist of general comparison reference. In (a)
same means, the report is like the report that was submitted
two months ago. Same is identity general comparison. In
(b), better is particular comparison which better i an epithet.
12
2.) Substitution
Hidayat (2016) stated that substitution is a relation within
the text body. A substitute is a short of couter which is used in
place of the repetition of a particular item. A word is not omitted,
but is substituted for another more general word.
Moreover, substitution has various types. According to
Halliday and Hasan (1997), substitution is divided in to three types.
1. Nominal substitution
Nominal substitution is perceived as substitution
one/ones.Example :The car’s price is too expensive. I can only buy
the cheaper one.
2. Verbal substitution
Verbal substitution substitutes the noun in the sentence use
of does, did, doing, and done.
Example :You think Sue already drink. I think everybody does.
3. Clausal substitution
Clausal substitution substitutes the clause in the sentence
used of so and not.
Example :It is going to rain ? I think so.
3.) Ellipsis
According to Seken et al (2013: p.4) ellipsis is an omission
of an element required by the grammar which is assumed obvious
from the context and need not to be raised. In other words, ellipsis
occurs when some important elements are omitted from a sentence
or a clause and can only be recovered by refering to an element in
the preceding text.
In addition, Thompson (2014) assumed that “ellipsis is the
set of resources by which full repetition of a clause or clause
element can be avoided, and by which it can be signalled to heares
13
that they should carry offer the wording from a previous clause
“(p.216). Futhermore Halliday & Hasan in (Andayani et al,2014:
p.3) assert that there are three types of ellipses : nominal, verbal,
and clausal.
a. Nominal ellipsis
Nominal ellipsis is with in the nominal group, where the
omission of nominal group is serverd common noun, proper
noun or pronoun.
Example :
Would you like to hear another verce – I know twelve
more
b. Verbal ellipsis
Verbal ellipsis refers to ellipsis with in the verbal group where
the elliptical verb depends on a preceding verbal group.
Example :
Have you do you read very much Kafka? – I am try in
c. Clausal ellipsis
Clausal ellipsis function as verbal ellipsis where the omission
refers to a clause.
Example :
Who taught you to spell ? – Grandfather did
4.) Conjunction
According to Halliday & Hasan as cited in
(Suningsih,2012: p.2) conjunction, since it is not simply an
anaphoric relation, is rather different in nature from other types of
cohesive relation, from both reference and substitution and ellipsis.
They state ,
Conjunction elements are cohesive not in them selves but
in directly, by virtue of their specific meanings they are not
primarily devices for reaching out into the preceding (or
14
4. Causal
Causal conjunction interprets the relationship between
the cause and consequence such as : because of this ,
for , so , it follows , because , hence , therefore ,
otherwise.
5. Temporal
Temporal conjunction expresses the relationship which
exit when the events in a text are related interms of the
timing of their occurrence. For example: first, then, after
that, next, in short, in conclution, just then, at last,
finally.
b. Lexical Cohesion
Lexical cohesion refers to relationships between and among
words in a text (Gerot and Wignell in Nurhayati,2012” p.26). It
involves the repetition of a noun phrase, or the use of another noun
phrase which bears a relation to the antecedent noun phrase.
Accoding to Eggins as cited in (Seken,2013: p.4) Lexical cohesion
refers to how the writer uses lexical items such as nouns, verbs,
adjectives, and adverbs to relate to the text consistenly to its area of
focus.
Halliday and Hasan define lexical cohesion as “the
cohesive effect achieved by the selection of vocabulary”.
Moreover, they divide lexical cohesion into two main categories:
reiteration and collocation (Anom et al,2012: p.5)
1) Reiteration
Reiteration is a mechanism of producing cohesion in a text
by means of repetition or two more lexical items that are
observable at the surface of the text (Halliday and Hasan in Anom
16
2) Collocation
Collocation is achieved trought the association of lexical
item that regularly cooccur . It pertains to lexical item that are
likely to be find together with in the same lexical environment
(Andayani,2014: p.4)
Example :
In a theatre review we would expect to find words as
actor, director, audience, cast.
Each of the bold words is collocated one to another.
does not fit the learning approach. Fourth, teachers may be less
experienced in dealing with complexity.
general idea that the writer wants the reader to find; the body
paragraphs contain some logical arguments that will answer the
thesis statement; and the conclusion is where the reader will find
the elaboration from all paragraphs above it. In the conclusion, the
reader is given suggestive sentence which is easy for the reader to
remember.
d. Related Studies
There are several previous researches which are relevant
with this study.The first one is conducted by Mubarak (2013)
entitled “An analysis of Students’ Ability in Building Cohesion
and Coherence in Argumentative Essays Written by the Fourth
Year Students of English Department of University of Bengkulu”,
in 2012/2013 Academic Year. The subject of the research was 72
students who were randomly chosen by using data sampling
technique. The data was analyzed by using percentage formulae
and scoring rubric. The researchresult showed that the students of
English Department at University of Bengkulu gained low score
which were in range 3 to 3.5 in constructing cohesion and
21
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A. Research Design
This research used a qualitative descriptive approach in this
study. According to Sukmadinata (2015: p.72) descriptive research
is research to describe phenomena that exist, either natural or
engineered. Furthermore, Sukardi (2013) state that descriptive
research is method that try to describe and interpret the appropriate
object (p.157). Therefore, this study tries to describe the cohesive
device manifest in the student argumentative essay.
2. Data display
After the data is reduced, then the next step is displayed
data. Data displayed can be done in the form of brief description,
charts relation between categories. This study, the data which
displayed in the form of table in order to know types of cohesive
devices used by the students as follow:
Note:
Rf : Reference
Sb : Subtitution
Ep : Ellipsis
Cj : Conjunction
Rt : Reiteration
Cc : Collocation
3. Conclusion drawing
The third step in the analysis of qualitative data is
drawing conclusion or verification . According to
(Sugiyono,2009: p.253) Conclusions in qualitative research is a
new finding that had not been there. Findings may be a
descripstion of an object that is still not clear so researched
became clear. The conclusion drawing in this research was
design in the form of description and explanation in order to
answer the problem stated in this study.
REFERENCES
25
Andayani, et. Al. (2014). An analysis of the cohesion and coherence of the
students narrative writings in smp negeri 2 Banjar.
Anom, D. , Seken, K., & Suarnajaya. W. (2013) An analysis of the narrative
writing the ninth grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Gianyar based
on text’s cohesion and coherence. Jurnal pendidikan Bahasa
Inggris,1.
Arikunto, S.(2013). Prosedur penelitian, suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta:
Rineka Cipta
Atmono, H. D., Rasyidah, U., & Kasyulita, E. (2015). An analysis of
Student’s writing skill in descriptive text of the second year
students at SMPN 2 Bangun Purba. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
FKIP Prodi Bahasa Inggris, 1 (1)
Halliday & Hasan.(2013).Cohesion in English. USA: Routledge.
Hasanah Nur Ina, (2017) A cohesion and Coherence on Students Exposition
Writing.
Hidayat. (2016). An analysis of grammatical cohesive device of the short
story the little match girl by Hans Christian Andersen, English
Education Journal.
Lestari,A. (2015). Cohesive device in students’ writing at second grade of
state Senior High School 6 Batanghari.Skripsi.IAIN Jambi.
Oshima & Hogue.(2007). Teaching english to children in asia. Hongkong:
Pearson.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.
Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono.(2016) Memahami penelitian kualitatif .Bandung: Alfabeta
Suningsih,S. (2016) The use of cohesive devices in students writing.
Thesis.Lampung University.
Yanri Ramdhano , Monalisa & Jamaluddin .(2016). The Tone of EFL
Learners’ Argumentative Essays