Geotech Report (Lambra To Shahkot) - 07-05-16

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………… 2
1.1 Project Background……………………………………………………………………. 2
1.2 Project Location………………………………………………………………………… 2
1.3 Objectives………………………………………………………………………………... 3
2.0 PLANNING OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROGRAMME…………………….. 3
2.1 Scope of Work…………………………………………………………………………... 3
2.2 Conducting Standard Penetration Test During Boring Operation…………….. 4
2.3 Collecting Disturbed/Undisturbed Soil Samples From The Boreholes………. 4
2.4 Summary of Proposed Laboratory Testing Programme………………………... 4
3.0 GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION OF THE REGION………………………………………….. 5
3.1 Location………………………………………………………………………………….. 5
3.2 Climate……………………………………………………………………………………. 5
3.3 General Geology…………………………………………………………………….……5
3.4 Seismicity………………………………………………………………………………… 6
4.0 METHODOLOGY OF INVESTIGATION………………………………………………………. 6
4.1 Boreholes………………………………………………………………………………… 6
4.2 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)…………………………………………………..... 6
4.3 Disturbed Samples in Boreholes……………………………………………………. 7
4.4 Undisturbed Samples in Boreholes…………………………………………………. 7
4.5 Laboratory Testing……………………………………………………………………….7
5.0 FOUNDATION ENGINEERING ANALYSIS……………………………………………………7
5.1 Open Foundation Basis of Approach…………………………………………………7
5.2 Pile Foundation……………………………………………………………………………8
6.0 LIST OF ANNEXURE ENCLOSED………………………………………………………….......8
6.1 Annexure-I - Engineering Bore Logs
6.2 Annexure II - Test Results For Soil Samples
6.3 Annexure III - Abstract of SBC
6.4 Annexure IV- Photographs
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Background
The PWD (B&R) Department of Punjab State Government represented by the Secretary PWD
(B&R) Government of Punjab for the Ministry of Shipping Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH),
Government of India, is entrusted with the Development to four-lanes with paved side shoulders of
Lambra – Shahkot section of NH-71 [New NH No. 52] from existing km 12.000 to 44.600 including
construction of Nakodar and Shahkot bypasses in the State of Punjab on EPC mode under NHDP-
IV.
1.2 Project Location
The proposed bypasses under study are a section of NH-71 in the state of Punjab. The project
corridor has two bypasses, Nakodar Bypass and the other one Shahkot Bypass Starts from Km
12.000 and ends at Km 44.600. The total length of two bypasses is 32.6 Kms. The details of By-
passes showing their starting points and end points are shown Table 1 :
Table 1 Start and End Chainage of Nakodar and Shahkot Bypass
Design Tentative Span

S.No. Name of the Bridge Existing Ch. Details of New
Ch. Arrangement
Construction
1 New /Existing Major Bridge on Main C/W
New Four Lane
1.1 Bhangi Chowk 16.200 16.13 5x21.450
Bridge
2 Road Over-Bridges (Railways)
2.1 Shahkot Village 38.800 38.66 1x19.50+1x50+1x19.5 -
2.2 Approach of ROB

3 VUPs
3.1 Start of Nakodar Bypass 21.500 21.75 1x20 2x2 Lane
3.2 Approach of VUP
MDR Crossing
3.3 - 25.045 1x20 2x2 Lane
(Kapoorthla)
3.4 Approach of VUP
3.5 End of Nakodar Bypass 26.900 26.500 1x20 2x2 Lane
3.6 Approach of VUP
3.7 Start of Shahkot Bypass 39.900 39.650 1x20 2x2 Lane

3.8 Approach of VUP
3.9 End of Shahkot Bypass 44.000 44.200 1x20 2x2 Lane
3.10 Approach of VUP
4 PUPs
4.1 At Gahiran Realingment - 18.100 1x7 2x2 Lane
4.2 Malsian Realingment - 35.382 1x7 2x2 Lane
4.3 Shahkot Bypass - 41.168 1x7 2x2 Lane
1.3 Objectives
Landmark Material Testing And Research Laboratory Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur has been appointed by M/s
Specialized Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. carry out the Geotechnical investigation work and
submission of all the geotechnical data and recommendations necessary for the design of the
structures vide their work order, Dt .19.01.2016
This report covers the details obtained by drilling for various locations of the proposed structures.
2.0 PLANNING OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROGRAMME

Based on nature of the project, borings under the structures were planned to:
(i) obtain soil samples, both representative and undisturbed (wherever possible)/disturbed for
classification tests and other laboratory tests for determining engineering properties;
(ii) conduct Standard Penetration test in the boreholes;
(iii)
conducting Laboratory tests and analyzing the test results to determine the bearing capacity at
each locations.
2.1 SCOPE OF WORK
Table 2.1:- The summary of the boring is given below and all the locations of boreholes were given by the client.
Existing Design Total No BH Depth

S.No. Name of the Bridge No Of BH
Ch. Ch. of BH (m)
1 New /Existing Major Bridge on Main C/W

BH-01,BH-02,BH-03,
1.1 Bhangi Chowk 16.200 16.13 6 30
BH-04,BH-05,BH-06
2 Road Over-Bridges (Railways)
2.1 Shahkot Village 38.800 38.66 2 BH-09,BH-10 35
2 BH-08,BH-11 15
2.2 Approach of ROB 2 BH-07,BH-12 20
3 VUPs
Start of Nakodar
3.1 21.500 21.75 1 BH-14 30
Bypass
3.2 Approach of VUP 2 BH-13,BH-15 20
MDR Crossing
3.3 - 25.045 1 BH-17 30
(Kapoorthla)
End of Nakodar
3.5 26.900 26.500 1 BH-20 30
Bypass
Start of Shahkot
3.7 39.900 39.650 1 BH-23 30
Bypass
End of Shahkot
3.9 44.000 44.200 1 BH-26 30
Bypass
4 PUPs
At Gahiran
4.1 - 18.100 1 BH-28 15
Realingment
4.2 Malsian Realingment - 35.382 1 BH-29 15
4.3 Shahkot Bypass - 41.168 1 BH-30 15
2.2. Conducting Standard Penetration Tests during boring operation.

2.3 Collecting disturbed / undisturbed soil samples from the borehole.
2.4 Summary of proposed Laboratory Testing program is given in table 2.2;
Table 2.2
Sl. Disturbed Soil Undisturbed
Relevant IS
No. Particulars of Properties Sample from Soil Samples
Code
SPT
1. Particle Size Distribution IS: 2720 (Part IV )

√ √
2. Bulk / Dry Density / Natural Moisture

IS: 2720 (Part II) √
Content
3. Specific Gravity IS: 2720 (Part III) √ √
4. Liquid Limit / Plastic Limit / Plasticity Index

IS: 2720 (Part V) √ √
5. Direct Shear Test (for non cohesive soils /

IS: 2720 (Part XIII) √
mixed soils)
6. Tri-axial Test (For cohesive soils) IS: 2720 (Part XI)

√
3.0 GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION OF THE REGION
3.1 Location
The proposed bypasses under study are a section of NH71 in the state of Punjab. The project
corridor has two bypasses, Nakodar Bypass starts and the other one Shahkot Bypass Starts from
Km 12.000 and ends at Km 44.600.
3.2 Climate
Project stretch is located on the Indo-Gangetic alluvial plains. Climate corresponds to semi arid
with high variation between summer and winter temperatures. Average annual rainfall is 70 cm.
The site has a humid subtropical climate with cool winters and hot summers. Summers last from
April to June and winters from November to February. Temperatures in summer vary from
average highs of around 48 degrees Celsius to average lows of around 25 degrees Celsius.
Winter temperatures vary from highs of 19 degrees Celsius to lows of -5 degrees Celsius. The
climate is on the whole dry except during the brief south-west monsoon season during July–
August.
3.3 General geology
The Indo-Gangetic Plains of N India cover an area of 740 000 km2, extending from N Rajasthan
and Punjab eastward to NE India. The Plains range in width from 480 km in the W to 150 km in the
E. They display a thick sequence of Pleistocene and Holocene alluvial sediments overlying a
basement of Archean and early Proterozoic (Vindhyan) rocks.
The soils along the highway alignment belong to the “Indo Gangetic Alluvium” and are river
deposits. The Pleistocene and Recent Deposits of the Indo-Gangetic Basin are composed of
gravels, sands, silts and clays with remains of animal and plants.
The older alluvium is rather dark coloured (locally called “Bhanger”) and is generally, rich in
concretions or nodules of impure calcium carbonate (kankars). The kankars are of all shapes and
sizes, varying from small sand sized grains to big grains and big lumps. The age of the
“Bhanger” alluvium is Middle to Upper Pleistocene.
The newer alluvium (locally called “Khadar”) is light coloured and poor in concretions. It contains
lenticular beds of sand and gravel as well as peat beds. It is merged by insensible gradations
into the Recent or deltaic alluvia and its age is Upper Pleistocene to Recent.
Legend
Recent- Quaternary
Tertiary
Paleocene- Cretaceous
Mesozoic
Gondwana
Early Palaeozoic
Late Proterozoic
Early Proterozoic
Archaean
3.4 Seismicity
The area under study and its surroundings are seismically active (Mostly in Seismic Zone – III)
and the tectonic elements of the area are considered capable of generating an earthquake of
moderate intensity. In seismic design Zone factor, Z of 0.24 is recommended.
4.0 METHODOLOGY OF INVESTIGATION
The investigation was planned to obtain the subsurface stratification in the proposed project site
and collect soil samples for laboratory testing to determine the engineering properties such as
shear strength, along with basic engineering classification of the subsurface stratum to arrive at
the foundation design parameters.
4.1 Boreholes
For Geotechnical investigation work, boring rig was installed at the specified borehole location.
Stability of rig was ensured by making level ground. The boreholes were progressed using a
mechanical shell and auger, where caving of the borehole occurred, 150 mm diameter
casing was used to keep the borehole stable as per IS specifications.
The depth of bore holes varies from 15m to 35m depth depending upon the type of structures.
4.2 Standard Penetration Tests (SPT)
Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) was conducted as per IS specifications. SPT split spoon
sampler of standard dimensions was driven into the soil from the borehole bottom using 63.5
kg Hammer falling from 75 cm height.The SPT weight was mechanically lifted to the specified
height and allowed to fall freely on the anvil with the use of cat-head winch with one to one and
half turn of the drum. Blow counts for the penetration of every 15 cm were recorded and the N is
reported as the blow counts for 30 cm penetration of the sampler leaving the first 15 cm penetration
as seating drive.
When the number of blows exceeded 50 to penetrate the first or second 15 cms length of the
sampler, the SPT N is regarded as more than 100 as described in IS 2131 -1981. The test is
terminated in such case and a record of penetration of the sampler under 50 blows or more is
made. SPT refusal is recorded when there is no penetration of the sampler at any stage and
also when a rebound of the sounding system is recorded.
SPT ‘N’ values are correlated with relative density of non-cohesive stratum and with consistency
of cohesive stratum.
CORRELATION FOR CLAY/PLASTIC CORRELATION FOR SAND/NON-PLASTIC

SILT SILT
Consistency Penetration Value Relative Density Penetration Value
Very Soft 0 to 2 Blows Very loose 0 to 4 Blows
Soft 3 to 4 Blows Loose 5 to 10 Blows
Medium Stiff 5 to 8 Blows Medium 11 to 30 Blows
Stiff 9 to 16 Blows Dense 31 to 50 Blows
Very Stiff 17 to 32 Blows Very Dense Above 50
Hard Above 32
4.3 Disturbed Sampling in boreholes
Disturbed soil collected in the SPT sampler was preserved in polythene covers and transported
to the laboratory. One more polythene cover was provided to prevent the loss of moisture during
the transit period.
4.4 Undisturbed Sampling in Boreholes
Undisturbed samples were collected using thin walled MS tubes provided with sampler head with
ball check arrangement. Undisturbed samples were not proved to be truly undisturbed in case of
Non-plastic sandy soils or hard clay soil.
4.5 Laboratory testing
The laboratory testing was done on collected material as per relevant IS codes mentioned
earlier in clause 2.4. The laboratory-testing program consisted of testing the soil index and
strength properties. The index tests were performed to determine the soil moisture content, unit
weight, specific gravity, gradation characteristics (gravel, sand and fines content – the silt &
clay fractions) and consistency limit. The strength tests were performed to determine the shear
parameters (cohesion, friction angle) of soil.
5.0 FOUNDATION ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
5.1 OPEN FOUNDATIONS - BASIS OF APPROACH
Based on sub-soil profile noticed, open foundations have been considered for various structures. IS-
6403 approach has been adopted idealizing the stratum as granular soil.
A. Net SBC calculations by General Shear Failure Approach
Net Safe bearing Capacity (SBC) is calculated by using procedure described in IS: 6403-2002. Ultimate
Net bearing capacity is given by,
Qu = c Nc sc dc ic +  D (Nq -1) sq dq iq + 0.5  B N s d i w’
Where, Qu = Ultimate net bearing capacity
c = Cohesion of stratum-Ignored
 = Bulk Density
D = Embedment depth of footing = Minimum 1.5m
B = Width of footing considered as 4m
Nc, Nq and N = Bearing capacity factors
sc, sq and s = Shape factors, dc, dq and d = Depth factors
ic, iq and i = Inclination factors,
w’ = Water table correction
 = Angle of internal friction

General shear failure condition to occur and assumed water table at the base of footing
B. SETTLEMENT CRITERIA (IS-8009 (Part-I) Approach)
The magnitude of settlement, when foundation loads are applied, depends upon the compressibility of
the underlying strata and rigidity of the substructure. The safe bearing pressure is evaluated for Total
settlement 75 mm for raft footing as per table 1 of IS : 1904.
From IS: 8009, for cohesionless soil, settlement for 10 t/m2 for various foundation widths varying from
1m to 6m is available depending on design SPT ‘N’ values. Safe bearing pressure is computed by
adopting design ‘N’ value at refusal strata as per IS-8009 (part-I) approach.
5.2 Pile Foundation

Based on soil design parameters, recommendations are presented below for 100cm &120cm
diameter cast in situ piles as foundation system for VUP,ROB & Flyover etc. The cut-off level has
been considered as 2.0 m depth below the ground / bed level for 100cm &120cm diameter pile.
While calculating the pile load capacity in seismic condition, over burden pressure / friction due to
liquefiable strata have been ignored.. For calculating horizontal load capacity in normal condition
maximum deflection of 1% of pile diameter is considered at cutoff level / scour level (which is
lower).
The pile capacities are based on the static analysis as per IS: 2911 Part-1, section 2 and include a
safety factor of 2.5. These capacities may be used as a guide line for design. Final capacities should
be confirmed on site by initial pile load test as per IS specification.
6.0 LIST OF ANNEXURES ENCLOSED
Annexure-I - Engineering Bore Logs

Annexure II - Test Results For Soil Samples
Annexure III - Abstract of SBC
Annexure IV - Photographs.
For Landmark Material Testing And Research Laboratory Pvt. Ltd.

BORELOG
Project: Geotechnical Investigation Work at Lambra to Shahkot Section of NH- 71 [New NH No. 52], New/Existing Major Bridge on Main C/W at Bhangi
Chowk,Design Chainage-16.13
Location: BH-1 Depth of bore hole: 30.00M

Date of commencement: 06.02.2016 Date of Completion: 07.02.2016
Depth of water table: 12.0 m Diameter of borehole: 150 mm
Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.
Standard Penteration Test data

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
Depth N Value Density
!!
" #
" #
" " " #
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
BORELOG

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
!!
&''
!!
!!
" " " #
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
BORELOG

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
&''
!!
" " " #
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
BORELOG

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
&''
!!
" " (
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
BORELOG

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
"
" " (
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
BORELOG

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
!!
" " " #
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
BORELOG
Project: Lambra to Shahkot Section of NH- 71 [New NH No. 52], Approch ROB at Shahkot Village

Depth of water table: Not Encountered Diameter of borehole: 150 mm
Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
"
" " #
" #
BORELOG

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata Depth N Value Density
#
BORELOG
Project: Geotechnical Investigation Work at Lambra to Shahkot Section of NH- 71 [New NH No. 52], ROB at Shahkot Village,Design Chainage-38.66

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
!!
" " (
"
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
BORELOG
Project: Geotechnical Investigation Work at Lambra to Shahkot Section of NH- 71 [New NH No. 52], ROB at Shahkot Village,Design Chainage-38.66

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
"
) *
) *
) *
) *
" #
+) *
#
+) *
" " #
+) *
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
BORELOG

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
) *
) *
) *
" !!
BORELOG

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
) *
) *
(
) *
!!
" " #
" #
BORELOG
Project: Lambra to Shahkot Section of NH- 71 [New NH No. 52], Approch of VUP at Nakodar Bypass.

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
&''
) *
"
!!
!!
" " (
#
BORELOG
Project: Lambra to Shahkot Section of NH- 71 [New NH No. 52], Approch of VUP at Nakodar Bypass.

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
&''
&''
) *
"
!!
" !!
" " (
!!
BORELOG
Project: Lambra to Shahkot Section of NH- 71 [New NH No. 52], Approch of VUP.

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
"
" !!
!!
" " (
#
BORELOG

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
" !!
!!
" " (
#
BORELOG
Project: Geotechnical Investigation Work at Lambra to Shahkot Section of NH- 71 [New NH No. 52], Start of Shahkot Bypass.

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
!!
" " (
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
BORELOG

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
!!
!!
" " (
#
BORELOG

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
" " #
#
BORELOG
Project: Geotechnical Investigation Work at Lambra to Shahkot Section of NH- 71 [New NH No. 52], End of Shahkot Bypass.

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
"
" #
" " " #
$ ! % #
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
$ ! % $ !
BORELOG

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
Strata
" " #
" #
BORELOG
Project: Lambra to Shahkot Section of NH- 71 [New NH No. 52], PUP at Gahiram Realingment.

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
" &''
"
#
BORELOG
Project: Lambra to Shahkot Section of NH- 71 [New NH No. 52], PUP at Gahiram Realingment.

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
!!
!!
!!
!!
BORELOG
Project: Lambra to Shahkot Section of NH- 71 [New NH No. 52], PUP at Shahkot Bypass.

Thickness of layer
Depth below G.L.

Remarks
Soil profile
" &''
" #
(
TABLE-1 : LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SHOWING SOIL CHARACTERISTICS
Location: Lambra to Shahkot Section of NH- 71 Date of FieldTesting BH.No Depth of Water Table Termination Depth Chainage Ref. Code
[New NH No. 52],
New/Existing Major Bridge on Main C/W at Bhangi
Chowk,Design Chainage-16.13 06.02.2016 to
1 12.0 m 30.0 m 16.130 Sr-53-0216
07.02.2016
Grain Size Distribution % wt retained Shear Strength

Sp.
Correction Corrected N Atterberg Limits % B.D. M.C. D.D.
Depth (m) Observed N Gravity
Soil Description Sand Gravel
from EGL Value Factor (Cn) Value (Nn) Silt and
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
Fine Medium Coarse Fine Coarse L.L. P.L. P.I. gm/cc % gm/cc
1.50 26 1.40 36.34 Silty Sand 26.10 68.25 2.15 0.25 3.25 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
3.00 31 1.17 36.15 Silty Sand 23.63 72.45 1.15 2.52 0.25 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
4.50 UDS - - Silty Sand 21.74 75.65 0.54 1.25 0.82 0.00 24 Nil NP 1.78 7.52 1.66 2.65 0.00 28
6.00 21 0.93 19.62 Silty Sand 31.82 62.41 0.28 2.28 3.21 0.00 27 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 26 0.86 22.35 Silty Sand 15.73 84.10 0.15 0.02 0.00 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
10.50 30 1.00 30.00 Clayey Silt with Sand 69.98 18.65 2.24 3.45 5.68 0.00 36 20 16 - - - - - -
12.00 38 1.00 38.00 Clayey Silt with Sand 65.81 29.65 1.21 1.05 2.28 0.00 34 19 15 - - -
13.50 UDS - - Clayey Silt with Sand 67.64 26.54 3.46 0.82 1.54 0.00 35 20 15 1.92 24.52 1.54 2.64 0.32 16
21.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
24.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
27.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
30.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[New NH No. 52],
2 9.0 m 30.0 m 16.130 Sr-53-0216
07.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 21 1.00 21.00 Clayey Silt with Sand 61.76 34.56 2.21 0.85 0.62 0.00 28 15 13.00 - - - - - -
3.00 9 1.17 10.49 Silty Sand 36.25 62.25 0.18 0.64 0.68 0.00 27 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 20 0.93 18.68 Silty Sand 25.08 72.82 0.92 1.18 0.00 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
21.00 DS - - Silty Sand 29.04 69.56 0.46 0.94 0.00 0.00 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
24.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
27.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
30.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[New NH No. 52],
3 9.0 m 30.0 m 16.130 Sr-53-0216
09.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 7 1.40 9.78 Silty Sand 40.33 56.65 2.48 0.54 0.00 0.00 28 Nil NP - - - - - -
3.00 21 1.17 24.49 Silty Sand 29.87 67.85 1.46 0.82 0.00 0.00 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 10 0.93 9.34 Silty Sand 26.64 70.56 2.62 0.18 0.00 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 22 0.86 18.91 Silty Sand 17.62 80.24 0.46 1.68 0.00 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
21.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
24.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
27.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
30.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[New NH No. 52],
4 9.0 m 30.0 m 16.130 Sr-53-0216
11.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 7 1.40 9.78 Silty Sand 38.78 58.12 2.25 0.85 0.00 0.00 27 Nil NP - - - - - -
3.00 11 1.17 12.83 Silty Sand 26.41 71.65 1.10 0.84 0.00 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 23 0.93 21.49 Silty Sand 34.31 62.41 1.82 1.46 0.00 0.00 28 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 22 0.86 18.91 Silty Sand 26.88 68.82 3.56 0.74 0.00 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
21.00 >100 - - Refusal _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
24.00 >100 - - Refusal _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
27.00 >100 - - Refusal _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
30.00 >100 - - Refusal _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

[New NH No. 52],
5 9.0 m 30.0 m 16.130 Sr-53-0216
10.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 10 1.40 13.98 Silty Sand 27.78 69.15 2.15 0.92 0.00 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
3.00 18 1.17 20.99 Silty Sand 34.75 58.63 4.62 1.48 0.52 0.00 28 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 20 0.93 18.68 Silty Sand 27.93 65.78 3.45 2.84 0.00 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 22 0.86 18.91 Silty Sand 20.51 70.56 5.41 3.52 0.00 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
10.50 24 0.74 17.66 Silty Sand 17.57 68.45 6.98 5.82 1.18 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
21.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
24.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
27.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
30.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[New NH No. 52],
6 13.0 m 30.0 m 16.130 Sr-53-0216
09.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 11 1.40 15.38 Silty Sand 38.12 50.78 6.70 2.56 1.84 0.00 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
3.00 27 1.17 31.48 Silty Sand 36.34 58.45 3.45 1.08 0.68 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 29 0.93 27.09 Silty Sand 36.57 53.50 6.45 2.74 0.74 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 20 0.86 17.19 Silty Sand 27.93 68.45 2.89 0.73 0.00 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
21.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
24.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
27.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
30.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - -

[New NH No. 52],
Approch ROB at Shahkot Village. 30.01.2016 to
7 Not Encountered 20.0 m - Sr-53-0216
01.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 16 1.44 23.09 Silty Sand 30.58 59.12 5.62 3.42 1.26 0.00 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
4.50 18 1.08 19.37 Silty Sand 30.74 55.62 7.12 3.70 2.82 0.00 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 22 0.97 21.27 Silty Sand 39.30 53.44 3.36 2.16 1.74 0.00 27 Nil NP - - - - - -
9.00 60 0.83 49.88 Silty Sand 24.84 70.78 3.15 1.23 0.00 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
[New NH No. 52],
ROB at Shahkot Village. 30.01.2016 to
30.01.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 15 1.43 21.48 Silty Sand 27.14 65.14 4.84 1.30 1.58 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
3.00 19 1.20 22.81 Silty Sand 21.54 70.42 3.74 2.78 1.52 0.00 23 Nil NP - - - - - -
4.50 16 1.06 17.04 Silty Sand 29.12 62.73 6.14 2.01 0.00 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 56 0.89 50.07 Silty Sand 26.73 64.61 5.21 2.76 0.69 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
9.00 56 0.83 46.65 Silty Sand 18.35 76.49 3.42 1.74 0.00 0.00 23 Nil NP - - - - - -
[New NH No. 52],
ROB at Shahkot Village,Design Chainage-38.66 31.01.2016 to
9 20.0 m 35.0 m 38.660 Sr-53-0216
04.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 14 1.42 19.85 Silty Sand 32.81 55.88 0.98 0.94 9.39 0.00 27 Nil NP - - - - - -
3.00 12 1.19 14.24 Silty Sand 29.10 60.45 1.85 2.46 6.14 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 54 0.95 51.54 Silty Sand 30.13 60.65 2.41 3.22 2.63 0.96 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 63 0.86 54.47 Silty Sand 28.65 58.44 1.56 6.14 5.21 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
10.50 64 0.75 48.13 Silty Sand 13.54 78.24 3.79 1.59 2.84 0.00 23 Nil NP - - - - - -
21.00 58 0.52 22.44 Silty Sand 39.27 53.65 4.52 0.98 1.58 0.00 27 Nil NP - - - - - -
24.00 DS - - Silty Sand 16.26 82.48 0.58 0.68 0.00 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
27.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
30.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
33.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
35.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[New NH No. 52],
ROB at Shahkot Village,Design Chainage-38.66 31.01.2016 to
10 20.0 m 35.0 m 38.660 Sr-53-0216
04.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 18 1.41 25.46 Silty Sand with Gravel 20.96 35.44 2.12 4.56 20.44 16.48 27 Nil NP - - - - - -
4.50 UDS - - Silty Sand with Gravel 12.32 28.59 3.26 8.38 35.89 11.56 25 Nil NP 1.94 16.78 1.66 2.64 0.00 27
7.50 57 0.85 48.44 Silty Sand 34.36 60.48 2.88 1.82 0.46 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
Clayey Silt with Sand &

12.00 68 1.00 68.00 63.84 26.05 2.46 3.41 3.16 1.08 32 20 12 - - - - - -
Gravel

13.50 UDS - - 66.26 15.68 2.07 4.36 5.37 6.26 33 20 13 2.08 18.02 1.76 2.67 0.54 12
Gravel

18.00 57 1.00 57.00 59.98 33.15 1.06 3.15 2.66 0.00 29 19 10 - - - - - -
Gravel
21.00 57 0.51 22.00 Silty Sand 27.48 67.80 1.74 2.14 0.84 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
24.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
27.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
30.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
33.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
35.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[New NH No. 52],
ROB at Shahkot Village. 04.02.2016 to
04.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
6.00 36 0.98 35.27 Silty Sand 28.49 67.63 2.14 1.74 0.00 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 50 0.89 44.52 Silty Sand 36.34 59.00 1.24 2.78 0.64 0.00 27 Nil NP - - - - - -
13.50 UDS - - Clayey Silt with Sand 66.77 29.65 2.14 0.98 0.46 0.00 31 20 11 - - - - - -
[New NH No. 52],
Approch ROB at Shahkot Village. 04.02.2016 to
05.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
6.00 39 0.97 37.64 Silty Sand 25.00 65.70 3.46 2.58 2.41 0.85 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
9.00 53 0.83 43.96 Silty Sand 30.62 66.49 1.64 0.83 0.42 0.00 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
10.50 DS - - Clayey Silt with Sand 74.22 20.84 2.76 1.66 0.52 0.00 34 21 13 - - - - - -
[New NH No. 52],
Approch of VUP at Nakodar Bypass. 20.02.2016 to
13 Not Encountered 20.0 m 21.500 Sr-53-0216
20.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 7 1.45 10.14 Silty Sand 25.57 55.21 9.74 6.12 2.15 1.21 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 18 0.99 17.74 Silty Sand 20.52 70.94 1.49 3.56 1.65 1.84 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 20 0.90 17.99 Silty Sand 28.53 60.31 2.80 5.48 1.62 1.26 28 Nil NP - - - - - -
18.00 UDS - - Clayey Silt with Sand 70.05 24.65 1.56 3.74 0.00 0.00 31 20 11 - - - - - -
[New NH No. 52],
Approch of VUP at Nakodar Bypass. 20.02.2016 to
20.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 7 1.45 10.16 Silty Sand 25.98 59.21 7.41 3.46 2.49 1.45 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 18 0.98 17.60 Silty Sand 22.28 70.94 1.46 2.48 1.74 1.10 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
9.00 12 0.86 10.27 Silty Sand 29.12 65.60 1.34 2.42 0.67 0.85 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
[New NH No. 52],
Approch of VUP. 21.02.2016 to
21.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 14 1.44 20.21 Silty Sand 14.22 65.98 10.21 5.76 1.18 2.65 23 Nil NP - - - - - -
3.00 18 1.21 21.81 Silty Sand 20.88 59.60 8.97 6.43 2.84 1.28 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 21 0.97 20.34 Silty Sand 14.26 73.32 2.94 5.73 2.44 1.31 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
9.00 27 0.83 22.35 Silty Sand 25.97 67.20 2.34 1.84 1.74 0.91 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
[New NH No. 52],
21.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 14 1.00 14.00 Silty Sand 65.86 32.18 1.14 0.82 0.00 0.00 31 20 11 - - - - - -
3.00 22 1.21 26.65 Silty Sand 30.40 62.78 2.65 1.15 3.02 0.00 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 21 0.98 20.58 Silty Sand 22.95 70.45 1.45 1.65 1.28 2.22 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 27 0.91 24.54 Silty Sand 27.29 64.21 2.45 1.82 3.21 1.02 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
10.50 27 0.80 21.50 Silty Sand 39.88 55.54 0.45 1.82 2.31 0.00 27 Nil NP - - - - - -
[New NH No. 52],
Start of Shahkot Bypass. 17.02.2016 to
23 15.0 m 30.0 m 44.200 Sr-53-0216
18.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
4.50 17 1.08 18.42 Silty Sand 22.92 72.46 0.64 1.46 2.52 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 27 0.98 26.40 Silty Sand 26.51 68.65 1.25 2.32 0.45 0.82 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
9.00 31 0.84 26.11 Silty Sand 31.58 59.87 4.24 1.26 3.05 0.00 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
27.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
30.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[New NH No. 52],
18.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
3.00 13 1.22 15.80 Silty Sand 24.21 67.87 2.45 1.65 3.82 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 35 0.98 34.43 Silty Sand 30.28 62.81 1.45 4.21 1.25 0.00 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 45 0.90 40.32 Silty Sand 26.13 66.25 3.45 1.65 2.52 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
10.50 36 0.78 28.20 Silty Sand 30.66 62.18 1.82 0.84 3.48 1.02 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
[New NH No. 52],
16.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 14 1.44 20.16 Silty Sand 23.63 74.62 1.05 0.24 0.46 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
3.00 22 1.21 26.57 Silty Sand 27.52 69.46 1.32 0.46 1.24 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 26 0.98 25.38 Silty Sand 29.36 66.54 2.64 1.46 0.00 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 33 0.89 29.45 Silty Sand 16.51 76.64 1.36 2.56 0.45 2.48 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
10.50 46 0.78 35.87 Silty Sand 25.99 67.82 0.46 2.68 1.82 1.23 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
[New NH No. 52],
End of Shahkot Bypass. 15.02.2016 to
26 20.0 m 30.0 m 44.200 Sr-53-0216
16.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 16 1.44 23.09 Silty Sand 29.87 62.45 3.54 1.46 2.68 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
3.00 25 1.21 30.29 Silty Sand 27.97 68.64 1.42 0.52 1.45 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 34 0.98 33.31 Silty Sand 32.95 64.24 0.45 0.62 1.74 0.00 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 41 0.91 37.11 Silty Sand 21.98 76.02 1.52 0.48 0.00 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
10.50 48 0.78 37.26 Silty Sand 21.85 72.82 1.45 0.58 2.72 0.58 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
13.50 DS - - Clayey Silt with Sand 70.33 26.52 0.45 1.62 1.08 0.00 34 18 16 - - - - - -
21.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
24.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
27.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
30.00 >100 - - Refusal - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[New NH No. 52],
16.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 17 1.43 24.35 Silty Sand 26.32 69.82 0.46 2.58 0.82 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
3.00 26 1.20 31.21 Silty Sand 23.15 72.05 1.26 1.48 2.06 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 30 0.97 29.06 Silty Sand 25.49 70.12 2.69 1.24 0.46 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 37 0.89 32.82 Silty Sand 33.38 62.52 0.46 0.32 2.86 0.46 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
[New NH No. 52],
PUP at Gahiram Realingment. 10.02.2016 to
10.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 8 1.44 11.55 Silty Sand 20.28 78.62 0.24 0.86 0.00 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
3.00 13 1.21 15.75 Silty Sand 31.71 64.25 2.14 1.62 0.28 0.00 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 19 0.98 18.62 Silty Sand 22.24 72.86 1.98 2.44 0.48 0.00 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 28 0.91 25.34 Silty Sand 27.40 66.32 0.46 3.08 2.74 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
10.50 35 0.78 27.42 Silty Sand 19.56 74.56 0.52 1.92 2.55 0.89 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
[New NH No. 52],
PUP at Malsian Realingment. 18.02.2016 to
18.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
3.00 35 1.20 41.89 Silty Sand 26.50 68.52 1.48 2.82 0.68 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 35 0.97 33.78 Silty Sand 30.40 64.25 2.46 0.52 1.48 0.89 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 42 0.89 37.40 Silty Sand 27.44 67.47 0.47 1.52 0.82 2.28 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
[New NH No. 52],
PUP at Shahkot Bypass. 16.02.2016 to
16.02.2016

Sp.
c kg/cm f Degree
2
Clay content
1.50 8 1.45 11.58 Silty Sand 27.14 68.24 1.46 0.62 2.54 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
3.00 17 1.22 20.66 Silty Sand 22.25 73.67 0.78 1.25 1.18 0.87 24 Nil NP - - - - - -
6.00 37 0.98 36.39 Silty Sand 27.12 67.84 0.72 2.87 1.45 0.00 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
7.50 46 0.91 41.81 Silty Sand 25.16 70.48 1.47 0.87 0.54 1.48 25 Nil NP - - - - - -
10.50 52 0.78 40.45 Silty Sand 30.66 62.74 0.52 2.18 2.48 1.42 26 Nil NP - - - - - -
Abstract of Net Safe Bearing Capacity (t/m2)
Geotechnical Investigation Work at Lambra to Shahkot Section of NH-71 [New NH No. 52]
Name of Design BH No Length of Vertical Safe Pile Capacity (T) Lateral Safe Bearing Capacity (T)
Structure Chainage Pile
(m) Diameter of Pile Diameter of Pile Diameter of Pile Free Head Fixed Head
(120 cm) (150 cm) (cm) Pile Pile
25 260.0 380.0 120 21.0 55.0
1
30 340.0 480.0 150 30.0 79.0
25 160.0 220.0 120 21.0 54.0
2
30 230.0 330.0 150 30.0 78.0
25 180.0 250.0 120 22.0 56.0
3
30 250.0 360.0 150 31.0 80.0
Major Bridge 16.13
25 180.0 250.0 120 17.0 44.0
4
30 250.0 370.0 150 24.0 63.0
25 190.0 260.0 120 15.0 40.0
5
30 270.0 390.0 150 22.0 58.0
25 260.0 380.0 120 22.0 57.0
6
30 340.0 500.0 150 31.0 81.0
Name of Design BH No Length of Vertical Safe Pile Capacity (T) Lateral Safe Bearing Capacity (T)
Structure Chainage Pile
(m) Diameter of Pile Diameter of Pile Diameter of Pile Free Head Fixed Head
(100 cm) (120 cm) (cm) Pile Pile
20 170.0 230.0 100 26.0 34.0
9 25 280.0 390.0
ROB 120 43.0 46.0
at 30 350.0 500.0
38.66
Shahkot 20 170.0 240.0
Village 100 28.0 36.0
10 25 270.0 370.0
30 340.0 480.0 120 45.0 48.0
BH Name of Design Size of Safe Net Bearing Capacity based Safe Bearing Pressure based on Recommended Allowable Safe
No. Structure Chainage Footing on Shear Failure Criteria (t/m2) Settlement Criteria (t/m2) Bearing Pressure (t/m2)
(m) 2.5 m 3.0 m 3.5 m 2.5 m 3.0 m 3.5 m 2.5 m 3.0 m 3.5 m
depth depth depth depth depth depth depth depth depth
from EGL from EGL from EGL from EGL from EGL from EGL from EGL from EGL from EGL
15 x 18 40.0 44.0 48.0 30.0 33.0 36.0

9
12 x 18 37.0 41.0 45.0 30.0 33.0 36.0
30.0 33.0 35.0
ROB
15 x 18 45.0 50.0 54.0 31.0 33.0 35.0
at
10 38.66
Shahkot
12 x 18 42.0 46.0 51.0 31.0 34.0 35.0
Village
8 6x8 41.0 48.0 54.0 26.0 33.0 41.0

26.0 33.0 41.0
11 6x8 31.0 36.0 41.0 28.0 34.0 41.0
Approach
7 1m (Strip) 31.0 39.0 47.0 11.5 17.5 20.5
of ROB at
38.66 11.5 14.5 18.0
Shahkot
12 Village 1m (Strip) 36.0 45.0 54.0 11.5 14.5 18.0
BH Name of Design Size of Safe Net Bearing Capacity Safe Bearing Pressure based Recommended Allowable
No. Structure Chainage Footing (m) based on Shear Failure on Settlement Criteria Safe Bearing Pressure
Criteria (t/m2) (t/m2) (t/m2)
2.5 m depth 3.5 m depth 2.5 m depth 3.5 m depth 2.5 m depth 3.5 m depth
from EGL from EGL from EGL from EGL from EGL from EGL
Approach of 6 x 10 40.0 49.0 10.5 13.0

13 10.0 12.50
VUP 7 x 10 42.0 51.0 10.0 12.5
[Start of 21.75
Nakodar 6 x 10 33.0 41.0 9.0 11.0
15 9.0 11.0
Bypass] 7 x 10 35.0 43.0 9.0 11.0
6 x 10 45.0 56.0 17.0 19.0
16 16.0 19.0
Approach of 7 x 10 48.0 58.0 16.0 19.0
VUP 25.045
6 x 10 51.0 63.0 18.0 20.0
18 17.5 20.0
7 x 10 54.0 65.0 17.5 20.0
Start of 6 x 10 32.0 40.0 22.0 24.0
23 Shahkot 39.650 21.5 24.0
Bypass 7 x 10 34.0 41.0 21.5 24.0
Approach of 6 x 10 47.0 58.0 25.5 27.5
24 VUP 39.650 25.0 27.5
7 x 10 49.0 60.0 25.0 27.5
End of 6 x 10 40.0 50.0 32.0 34.0
26 Shahkoy 44.200 31.0 34.0
Bypass 7 x 10 42.0 52.0 31.0 34.0
6 x 10 39.0 48.0 26.5 28.5
25 25.5 28.0
Approach of 7 x 10 41.0 50.0 25.5 28.0
44.200
VUP 6 x 10 52.0 65.0 28.0 32.0
27 27.0 32.0
7 x 10 55.0 67.0 27.0 32.0
BH Name of Design Size of Safe Net Bearing Capacity Safe Bearing Pressure based Recommended Allowable
No. Structure Chainage Footing (m) based on Shear Failure on Settlement Criteria Safe Bearing Pressure
Criteria (t/m2) (t/m2) (t/m2)
1.0 m depth 2.0 m depth 1.0 m depth 2.0 m depth 1.0 m depth 2.0 m depth
from EGL from EGL from EGL from EGL from EGL from EGL
PUP at
28 Gahiram 18.100 7 x 12 20.0 28.0 17.0 20.0 17.0 20.0
Realingment
PUP at
29 Malsian 35.382 7 x 12 28.0 39.0 23.0 25.0 23.0 25.0
Realingment
PUP at
30 Shahkot 41.168 7 x 12 19.0 27.0 24.0 26.0 19.0 26.0
Bypass

Geotech Report (Lambra To Shahkot) - 07-05-16

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Geotech Report (Lambra To Shahkot) - 07-05-16

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table 1 Start and End Chainage of Nakodar and Shahkot Bypass

Design Tentative Span

2.2 Approach of ROB

3.7 Start of Shahkot Bypass 39.900 39.650 1x20 2x2 Lane

2.0 PLANNING OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROGRAMME

(ii) conduct Standard Penetration test in the boreholes;

Existing Design Total No BH Depth

1 New /Existing Major Bridge on Main C/W

2.2. Conducting Standard Penetration Tests during boring operation.

1. Particle Size Distribution IS: 2720 (Part IV )

2. Bulk / Dry Density / Natural Moisture

3. Specific Gravity IS: 2720 (Part III) √ √

4. Liquid Limit / Plastic Limit / Plasticity Index

5. Direct Shear Test (for non cohesive soils /

6. Tri-axial Test (For cohesive soils) IS: 2720 (Part XI)

4.0 METHODOLOGY OF INVESTIGATION

4.2 Standard Penetration Tests (SPT)

CORRELATION FOR CLAY/PLASTIC CORRELATION FOR SAND/NON-PLASTIC

4.4 Undisturbed Sampling in Boreholes

4.5 Laboratory testing

5.0 FOUNDATION ENGINEERING ANALYSIS

5.1 OPEN FOUNDATIONS - BASIS OF APPROACH

A. Net SBC calculations by General Shear Failure Approach

Qu = c Nc sc dc ic +  D (Nq -1) sq dq iq + 0.5  B N s d i w’

Where, Qu = Ultimate net bearing capacity

D = Embedment depth of footing = Minimum 1.5m

B = Width of footing considered as 4m

Nc, Nq and N = Bearing capacity factors

sc, sq and s = Shape factors, dc, dq and d = Depth factors

ic, iq and i = Inclination factors,

w’ = Water table correction

 = Angle of internal friction

B. SETTLEMENT CRITERIA (IS-8009 (Part-I) Approach)

5.2 Pile Foundation

6.0 LIST OF ANNEXURES ENCLOSED

Annexure-I - Engineering Bore Logs

For Landmark Material Testing And Research Laboratory Pvt. Ltd.

Location: BH-1 Depth of bore hole: 30.00M

Standard Penteration Test data

" " " #

Location: BH-2 Depth of bore hole: 30.00M

Standard Penteration Test data

" " " #

Location: BH-3 Depth of bore hole: 30.00M

Standard Penteration Test data

" " " #

Location: BH-4 Depth of bore hole: 30.00M

Standard Penteration Test data

Location: BH-5 Depth of bore hole: 30.00M

Standard Penteration Test data

Location: BH-6 Depth of bore hole: 30.00M

Standard Penteration Test data

" " " #

Location: BH-7 Depth of bore hole: 20.00M

Standard Penteration Test data

Location: BH-8 Depth of bore hole: 15.00M

Standard Penteration Test data

Strata Depth N Value Density

Location: BH-9 Depth of bore hole: 35.00M

Standard Penteration Test data

Location: BH-10 Depth of bore hole: 35.00M

Standard Penteration Test data