Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Project Management
Version 1.0
___________________________
Steven Manthei
Program Manager - Wildland Fire Information and Technology
Program Management Office
Version 1.0
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
Page 1 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
Table of Contents
1. Objectives of the Project Management Standard Operating Procedure .............................4
8. Definitions .....................................................................................................................42
Table of Figures
Figure 1 - Project Management – WFIT Decision Bodies ..............................................................................5
Page 3 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
1) Identify a standard WFIT project life cycle (PLC) by which an asset within the WFIT Portfolio can
be effectively managed by WFIT Leadership during its development and operational life;
2) To establish a standard and consistent process of information compilation and decision making
to competently advance investments through the PLC;
The PMSOP seeks to identify the information necessary to make competent investment management
decisions by the appropriate decision makers to maximize the effectiveness of WFIT investment
activities as identified by WFIT Leadership using the Investment Decision Standard Operating Procedure
(ID SOP).
This SOP identifies decision bodies as those responsible to approve the transition of an asset through
the PLC. WFIT decision bodies are also noted in the IDSOP as they have been formed to identify, select,
and manage of wildland fire investment activities. They are noted Figure 1 - Project Management –
WFIT Decision Bodies as groups A through F. Each group’s role and responsibility with respect to the
PLC are identified in the PMSOP to ensure their mission, objectives, and strategies are appropriately
considered during investment activities, and are aligned with their roles in the IDSOP.
This SOP identifies working groups to manage the information presented in the PLC processes. These
groups are identified Figure 1 - Project Management – WFIT Decision Bodies as groups 1 through 4.
They are comprised of subject matter experts (SMEs) aligned with the phases they support within the
PMSOP (e.g. Project Management Group is comprised of certified project managers, the Planning
Working Group is comprised of those individuals well versed in technical planning and agency financial
planning processes). The roles and responsibilities of these groups, with respect to the PLC, are detailed
in this document.
Page 5 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
This SOP identifies agency decision bodies whose roles are established to meet agency policy (primarily
budget, acquisition, and security). Their roles are defined by their respective agency’s objectives and
responsibilities. WFIT investment decisions and the processes identified in this SOP are intended to
align with their agency’s policies, expectations, and processes;
Finally, the wildfire community is comprised of many stakeholders. This SOP identifies informed
stakeholders who depend on information regarding the WFIT investments, and at times must be
consulted to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the community’s needs;
Each oversight body’s objective is identified in the IDSOP, and their primary oversight responsibility with
respect to the PLC is identified in detail in this document. For each deliverable, parties are identified
who are involved with the completion of the delivery, or notified of its results. These are noted with the
WFIT Activity RASCI Chart, shown in Figure 2 - WFIT Project Activity RASCI Chart and within this
document, below. The RASCI chart identifies roles that impact PLC activities:
1. Responsible: those responsible to complete the defined task – executes the necessary work
2. Accountable: those ultimately answerable for the completion of the task
3. Supportive: assists in completing the task
4. Consulted: opinions are sought (SMEs), or
5. Informed: kept up to date; one way communication
This chart is aligned with activities identified within the WFIT PLC, and is maintained by the WFIT PMO.
Roles noted in the RASCI Chart are briefly defined in Section 7 - RASCI Chart Roles.
Non-Federal and
A S = Supportinve to those responsible
Private Forestry
Working Group
Working Group
Working Group
WFIT Program
Acquisitions
USDA / DOI
Emerging
Technical
Business
Directors
Planning
Program
Manager
Manager
DOI Fire
Project
Budget
Budget
NWCG
ACIOs
Field /
CSSO
Board
USDA
Tribal
Users
USFS
WFIT
State
CIOs
Lead
Lead
OWF
O&M
IRBs
FMB
FAM
PRE
Fire
CIO
DOI
DOI
EB
Categories Activities
Common Project DISAA Standards C C C I A I R S S S S I S I I C C C
Components Services Stds. (Training, Helpdesk, Hosting, etc.) C C C I A C R S S S S C S I I C
Business Need / Intent I I I I I I R A I I I I C
Feasibility Assessment I I C I I I R A
Idea Preliminary Business Value Assessment I C I I I I R A I I I I
Identify Funding Required for Concept Phase I C I I I I R A C C C I
Pass Idea Gate I A C I I I R R I I I I
Provide Funding for Concept Phase I A I S I I R I S C C C
Establish Concept Project Team I I A I S I I S R C C C C
Initial Business Requirements I C I S I I A R I S S I I I I
Initial Business Value I C I S I I A R I S S I I I I
Technology Assessment I I C S I I A S R I R I I I I
Concept DISAA Assessment I I C S I I A I R I S
Services Assessment I I C S C C A C R C C
Proof of Concept I I C S I I A S R C S I I I
Prelim. Project Resource Requirements I I C S C C A C R I C
Identify Funding Req'd for Pre-Dev. Phase I I C S I I A S R I I
Pass Concept Gate I A C S I I R S S C S I I I
WFIT Activity RASCI Chart
E Business Requirements I C I C S I A R I S I I I I
x Business Case S C I C S I A R I S I I I I
e Pre-development Technology Requirements C I S C S I A I R I
c DISAA Requirements S I C C S C A C R C
u
Service Requirements I I C C S C A C R C
t
i Project Documents (Schedule, Resources, etc.) C C C C S C A R R C
o Pass Pre-Development Gate I I I A C C C I I I R I I C I I I I I
n Update 5 Year Plan I I I A R S S I I C I I I I I I I I
IRB Approval + Funding Status Gate A S S S S R I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Establish Development Team I I A R I S S S I I
Update Project Documentation C C S I A R R
Requirements Management C C C S C A R C C I I
Acquisition Management C I S C A C S R
Development Development Activities I I I S C A R R S S
Tracking + Reporting I I I I I I A R R I I I I
Project Management Reviews I C I A R S S S I I S S
O&M Plan Development C I C S C A S R
Project Deliverables I C C C I A R R C
Pass Development Gate (User Acceptance) I I I A C C C I I R S S C I I
Pass Development Gate (ATO) A A I I I I I I R S S I I I R
Transition to O&M Organization I I A R S I I I I I
Application Operations I I I A R S S I
Capability Change Management I C C A R C C C I
Operations and Maintenance
Status Reporting I I I I A R S S I I
Decommission Plan I C C C A R S S C C
Pass O&M Gate C C A C I R I I C I
Implement Decommission Plan I I I A S R S S I
Decommission
Decommission Notification I I I I I A I I I I R I I I I I I
Per the WFIT Portfolio Management Standard Operating Procedure (PtMSOP), assets within the
Portfolio are organized into three tiers. They are:
Tier 1 – those assets that are funded and managed by WFIT Leadership whose capabilities are
developed specifically for the betterment of wildland fire operations (e.g. WFDSS, FEPMIS, ROSS);
Tier 2 – those assets that funded by WFIT allocated funds but whose capabilities are prescribed by
the owner (e.g. NOAA subscriptions, FlamMap); and
Tier 3 – those assets whose capabilities are relied upon by the wildland fire community but not
prescribed, or funded, by WFIT (e.g. VIPER, ).
The PMSOP primarily considers Tier 1 assets. These assets considered as they involve managed
development activities, providing both schedule and resource oversight, as well as ensuring the resulting
asset delivers the expected capability, as prescribed via the Investment Decision Standard Operating
Procedure (IDSOP).
Tier 2 and Tier 3 assets are used by the wildland fire community and share information with Tier 1
assets, and so their impact must be understood and considered during the development and operation
of Tier 1 assets.
The PMSOP organizes the development, compilation, presentation and oversight of pertinent
information associated with asset development and steady state operations, as appropriate.
Page 7 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
To support informed investment decisions, the categorization of investments between development and
operations is valuable. These categories are generally defined in the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) as Development, Modernization and Enhancement (DME) and Operations and Maintenance
(O&M), respectively.
b) Activities that change or modify existing IT assets to: substantively modify or improve capability
or performance, implement legislative or regulatory requirements, or meet an agency leadership
request. Costs can include hardware, software development and acquisition costs, commercial
off-the-shelf acquisition costs, government labor costs, and contracted labor costs for planning,
development, acquisition, system integration, and direct project management and overhead
support.
a) Operations - the phase of the life cycle in which the asset is in operations and produces the
same product or provides a repetitive service, and
The Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) Statement of Federal Financial Accounting
Standards Number 10 identifies:
a) Maintenance costs as all costs (including all related personnel costs) needed to sustain an IT
asset at the current capability and performance levels, and specifically excluding activities
aimed at expanding the capacity of an asset, or otherwise upgrading it to serve needs different
from or significantly greater than those originally intended;”
b) Technology refreshment costs are those costs associated with the intentional, incremental
insertion of new technology (hardware or software), targeted at increasing capability, improving
reliability, maintainability, efficiency, or performance.
This SOP, identifies two categories aligned with OM’s and F!S! guidance, and aligned with the PLC
described in the ProjSOP. They are:
DME
aligned with OM’s DME category
aligned with F!S!’s technology refreshment category,
includes investment activities within the Idea, Concept, and Pre-development phases of the PLC
includes investment activities that modify any implementation, or use of, DISAA components
Software Purchase
Hardware Purchase
Data Updates
Data Improvements
O&M
aligned with OM’s O&M category,
aligned with F!S!’s Maintenance category
includes any investment activity within the O&M and Decommissioning phases of the PLC
End User Training
Equipment
Software Licensing
Hardware Licensing/Maintenance
Application Training
Acquisition Support
Data management
Page 9 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
The PLC organizes the management of assets within the Portfolio to:
1) Ensure new assets deliver the desired capabilities as identified via the IDSOP;
2) Ensure asset implementation supports the objectives of WFIT technology strategies;
3) Ensure asset implementations meet the policy of its stakeholder organizations,
4) Manage the delivery of assets within budgeted scope, schedule and resource expectations;
5) Ensure investment processes meet budgetary policy of its stakeholder organizations;
6) Ensure that existing assets continue to meet the needs of the wildland fire community in the
most effective and efficient manner; and
7) Communicate development status of an asset.
The PLC is summarized in the diagram depicted in Figure 3 as a standard stage-gate, phased approach to
product development. The components within the summary diagram are depicted in Figure 4, defined
in Section 6 of this document, and described in detail in this SOP by phase.
An asset enters into the PLC governance through two mechanisms. First, an idea may initially be
considered by WFIT by engaging the ETG to being formulating the idea into an asset that meets a
business need of the wildland fire community. This process can be initiated by any individual, or group,
with interest in wildland fire activities. Second, an asset whose capabilities have developed a level of
interest to the wildfire community, via interest by the FMB, may be injected into the PLC by the FMB
within the Concept Phase to evaluate the enterprise impact of the asset.
An asset moves through the PLC by meeting the exit criteria established at each stage-gate, as evaluated
by the oversight body. Any asset under the purview of WFIT, i.e. within the WFIT Portfolio, will continue
through the PLC until it is decommissioned and no longer under the purview of WFIT. This cycle is
depicted in Figure 5 - Flow of an Asset through the PLC.
The phase to which an asset is assigned is dependent on its level of development. At times it may occur
that an asset’s development status is impacted by development decisions, policy changes, and changes
in business need and development objectives. At that time, the asset may move back in phase to
accurately reflect its development status and ensure proper oversight of accomplished developments,
per the objectives of the PLC.
Page 11 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
Page 13 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
Objectives
Articulate the business need, feasibility, business value to wildland fire.
Engage the ETG to provide support
Developed Information/Activities
1. Business Need / Intent
Clarify idea’s ability to meet a business need of the community with respect to WFIT priorities.
Identify key deliverables and how they affect business needs. Creates first pass metric of each
delivery to clarify the deliveries intent.
Responsible Accountable Supportive Consulted
Page 15 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
Facilitating Group
ETG
Support development activities targeted at proving the idea through available tools and
collaboration opportunities.
Minimize duplicity by considering existing capabilities and capabilities in development
Maximize the idea’s value to Wildland Fire’s business priorities
Recognizing current WFIT enterprise infrastructure and resources
Recognize the requirements of WFIT foundational elements (DISAA)
Recognize the requirements of WFIT service elements (training, deployment, help desk, data
management)
Oversight Bodies
FMB
Evaluates new asset’s value to the wildland fire community and the ability to provide resources
to the development efforts, in line with WFIT priorities.
NWCG
Evaluate the ability of the asset to meet the business needs of the Wildland fire community.
Objectives
Solidifies business value with success measures
Validate technology concepts, areas of concern and evaluate risks
Identify technology requirements alignment with WFIT Foundational elements (DISAA)
Estimate development expenditure requirements
Identify funding source
Identify Pre-development phase team
Identify risks and potential mitigations
Page 17 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
Identify the Project Manager, Business Lead, and Technical Lead for Concept Phase activities.
Developed Information/Activities
1. Initial Business Requirements
Identify the business requirements delivered by the asset and their alignment with WFIT
priorities.
Responsible Accountable Supportive Consulted
TL PM PWG, ETG, PB
Informed – PMO, DWG, OMWG, BL, NWCG
5. Services Assessment
Page 19 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
Identify funding sources and levels for pre-development phase activities.
Responsible Accountable Supportive Consulted
TL PM PWG, BL PB
Informed – PMO, FMB, DWG, OMWG, NWCG, ETG
9. Pass Concept Gate
Arrange a meeting with representatives from the Concept oversight bodies to review delivered
information.
Responsible Accountable Supportive Consulted
Facilitating Group
Planning Working Group (PWG)
Reviews the technology aspects of the project with respect to WFIT enterprise requirements.
Drives activities towards Concept Stage-gate review.
Oversight Bodies
FMB
Identifies and approves a Business Lead
Ensures project business requirements address are aligned with WFIT priorities
Evaluates business value
Aligns efforts among other agency activities
PB
Identifies and approves a Project Manager, and Technical Lead
Validates technical approach, and DISAA elements
NWCG
Approves and document business requirements and success measures
Identifies and engages appropriate NWCG committees
Submission and successful completion of IRB processes are the prerequisite steps of the next Phase,
Development.
Objectives
Identify and compile all the necessary documentation to submit a project proposal to the
respective IRDB and IEC processes for the managing agencies.
Compile Development Plan (approach, costs, schedule, risks)
Obtain approval to proceed with development activities and associated funding expenditures.
Identify Project team – team is in a position to execute the project;
Solidify business requirements and success measures
Solidify the Project Charter
Solidify the Core Team
Solidify Funding plan
Risk register and mitigation plans
Develop project proposal for submission to IRDB processes
Engage the PMO to ensure WFIT Program priorities are considered
Page 21 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
Developed Information/Activities
1. Business Requirements
Establish a list of business requirements with success criteria by which to evaluate with respect
to WFIT business need priorities and measure success of project completion.
Responsible Accountable Supportive Consulted
Facilitating Groups
Planning Working Group (PWG)
Page 23 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
Primary owner for this phase of a project. It provides guidance, and support, to the Project
Manager to develop a comprehensive project development package.
Oversight Bodies
EB
Approves formal proposal; ensures appropriate budgetary authorities (i.e. IEC and\or IRDB) are
advised of desire to approve project funding; Validation that the resulting application meets
business needs; providing executive sponsorship and leadership; ensures business alignment
FMB
Reviews and submits formal proposal; provides support as needed to resolve interagency
concerns
PB
Oversight and assistance to the PWG in the development of the proposal.
NWCG
Provides input and assistance as needed in the development of proposal package
Status-gates are implemented at intervals specified by the Program Board to provide updates to
WFIT leadership on progress, and provide an opportunity for desired oversight.
The initial gate (budget) is to submit funding request information to the appropriate agency IRB
process and obtain funding. Once this gate is competed, and funds are available, development
activities are initiated.
Subsequent gates (status) are noted to provide development status information at regular intervals,
as identified by the Program Board.
A status gate is identified as a User Acceptance Gate, at which time the delivered functionality of the
asset is reviewed with respect to its intended capability.
The final gate is identified as having obtained the Authority to Operate (ATO) from the appropriate
agency CIO and CSSO.
Objectives
Engage in respective IRDB processes
Achieve funding approvals
Delivery of objectives as identified within the project charter
Manage all activities related to a delivering the defined objectives, within the schedule defined,
and resources identified in the Pre-development phase
Compilation of Operations and Management Plan
Status checks and reporting – Development Reviews
Issues reporting and mitigation
Risk management
Communication to stakeholders of expectations and status
Page 25 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
PMO EB FMB, PB PM
Informed – DOI / USDA CIOs, USFS CIO, DOI ACIOs, DWG, OMWG, BL, TL, NWCG, ETG,
FAM, OWF, DOI Fire Directors, Non-Federal and Tribal entities
2. IRB Approval + Funding Status Gate
The responsible agency executes the agency process necessary to secure funding for the project,
and funding is attained.
Responsible Accountable Supportive Consulted
Facilitating Groups
Development Working Group (DWG)
Primary owner for this phase of a project. It provides guidance, and support, to the Project
Manager to develop a comprehensive project development package.
Oversight Bodies
IRBs
Monitors progress, expenditures, issues, risks, and priority alignment
IRB submissions
IRB approval
Developed Information/Activities
1. Establish Development Team
With funding available, the development activities are initiated per the plan developed during
pre-development phase.
Responsible Accountable Supportive Consulted
Page 27 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
6. Tracking + Reporting
Initiate the communication plan for tracking and managing progress, issue identification and
mitigation.
Responsible Accountable Supportive Consulted
Develop the plan for managing the developed asset during the O&M phase of its life.
Facilitating Groups
Development Working Group (DWG)
Primary owner for this phase of a project. It provides guidance, and support, to the Project
Manager to develop a comprehensive project development package.
Oversight Bodies
Executive Board
FMB
Monitors progress, expenditures, issues, risks, and priority alignment
PB
Manages PLC activities
NWCG
Resolves development questions as pertaining to business needs
Facilitating Groups
Development Working Group (DWG)
Primary owner for this phase of a project. It provides guidance, and support, to the Project
Manager to develop a comprehensive project development package.
Oversight Bodies
OCIOs
Reviews security documentations and provides Authority to Operate
Page 29 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
Objectives
Scope, Schedule, Resource Status
Risks, issues, and mitigations
Baseline schedule review
Checkpoint approval document
Objectives: Ensure that all business, technical, and financial requirements have been met
Ensure user community is prepared for operational status of project
Ensure PB, OMWG, and appropriate CCBs are prepared to manage new capability
Page 31 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
The Office of Budget and Management, and WFIT Leadership, has defined modifications to an asset
that fall within the O&M category. They are defined in the Investment Management Standard
Operating procedure, and duplicated in this document in Section 4. Modifications to an asset’s
implementation that go beyond the definition of O&M modifications should be identified as a
separate project and entered into the appropriate PLC phase to ensure proper oversight, and
comprehensive implementation.
The Operations Standard Operating Procedure (OSOP) identifies in detail the processes used to
manage the Portfolio while assets are in the O&M phase of the PLC.
The O&M phase manages the decommissioning of an asset to ensure that needed capability is not
removed from wildland fire operations. The decommissioning of the asset is planned during the
O&M phase and executed in the Decommission phase.
Objectives
Effectively manage the asset to ensure it meets the capability requirements of Wildland Fire
operations and resolve any negative impacts to changing requirements or operational
conditions.
Manage the identification, and potential implementation, of minor incremental improvements
of an asset, as defined by OMB and WFIT expectations (see Section 4) via Change Control Board
(CCB) activities.
Management of the assets within established Service Level Agreements and at the planned cost
expenditure.
Considers, and plan, an asset’s discontinuance and decommissioning;
Monitor agency policy changes and identify required modifications to existing asset capabilities
or implementation.
Developed Information/Activities
1. Transition to O&M Organization
Transition operational information and accountability to the O&M working group.
Responsible Accountable Supportive Consulted
OMWG OMWG PM
Informed - PMO, FMB, BL, TL, NWCG, Non-Federal and Tribal entities, Field / Users
2. Application Operations
Execute operational processes for the asset.
Responsible Accountable Supportive Consulted
Page 33 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
Facilitating Groups
Operations and Maintenance Working Group (OMWG)
Coordinates and manages the activities of Operations and Maintenance for all WFIT assets with
respect to the OSOP.
Reports on cost and efficiency status of the steady state components of the Portfolio.
Identifies opportunities, consolidates and prioritizes opportunities for improvement to existing
assets.
Oversight Bodies
FMB
Monitors and manages expenditures; supports inter agency collaboration
PB
Identifies desired changes in the system and prioritizes them considering the asset’s scope,
budget and schedule. The Program Board and the FMB will determine if a proposed change
should be considered for implementation.
NWCG
Ensures there is a comprehensive understanding of any impacts on the user community.
Objective
The Decommission Phase executes an applications decommissioning in a controlled manner to
minimize any negative impact to the Wildland Fire community. A product Decommissioning Plan is
developed as part of the Operations and Maintenance Phase. Before preparing the plan, the
usiness Leads, through the hange ontrol oard, evaluate the investment/product’s current
and/or long-term relevance to the fire community.
Manage an asset’s end of life - Decommission
Manage impact of eliminated capabilities
Manage impacted stakeholders
Communicate
Mitigate risks
Developed Information/Activities
1. Implement Decommission Plan
Execute the decommission plan
Responsible Accountable Supportive Consulted
Facilitating Groups
OWMG
Manages the shutdown activities
Oversight Bodies
FMB
Ensures all issues associated with discontinuance of asset capabilities have been resolved.
Ensures all stakeholders have been properly informed that asset is no longer in the WFIT
portfolio.
Page 35 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
PB
Ensures all technical elements of the asset have been properly discontinued and any issues
resolved.
Page 37 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
Developed Information – each phase prescribes a set of information to be identified during that phase
of development. The prescribed information identifies key elements that ensure the quality of a
delivered asset, its alignment with WFIT implementation policy, its alignment with agency policy,
and in preparation for transition to the next phase. The breadth of information developed is
dependent on the phase, the asset’s scope, and the requirement of its stakeholders; !t the stage
gate for the phase, the oversight group will evaluate the compiled information against a prescribed
set of exit criteria to ensure readiness for the next phase within the PLC.
Exit Criteria – these are the specific criteria necessary for evaluation at the completion of each phase
and before transition into the next phase. In some cases the exit criteria may be information on a
projects deliverables, e.g. impacted NWCG committees, or it may simply be the recognition that a
design strategy was considered, e.g. cloud infrastructure evaluation.
Facilitating Groups – these are subject matter experts (SMEs) that understand details of a phase’s
developed information and/or exit criteria and support the development team during the phase.
For instance, these groups may be comprised of acquisition SMEs or security SMEs to support the
development team in identifying the details necessary to meet a phases Exit Criteria. Each Phase
has at least one facilitating groups to
The Office of Budget and Management notes these as Development, Modernization and
Enhancement (DME) and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) categories. Further explanation of
these categories with respect to OMB and WFIT expectations are noted in Section 4, Alignment of
Investment Activities with Fiscal Definitions.
Oversight Bodies – this group is comprised of representatives from stakeholders associated with the key
deliverables prescribed by the PLC phase for delivery at the phase’s checkpoint. This group ensures
that the developed information assembled at the completion of each phase meets the expectations
of stakeholders, and the goals of the investment activity.
Phase – the PLC is comprised of six phases, each prescribing a level of competency in the definition of an
asset in regards to its delivery objectives, funding, implementation definition, implementation
status, and operation status – each subsequent stage being more comprehensive. Forward
movement through stages occurs through a series of stage gates.
Stage Gates – a stage gate is an oversight activity during which a prescribed Oversight Bodies evaluates
the status of a project against the established Exit Criteria, and approves its transition to the next
phase. The PLC identifies six stage gates that implement a level of oversight to ensure the
competency required for an asset to transition to a subsequent phase. The oversight body is
defined in respect to the information being reviewed.
Status Gates – the PLC identifies status gates as times within the Development Phase to enable WFIT
Leadership to request the status of development prior to completion. This is particularly helpful for
long term development projects, multiphase projects, or project that impact other investment
decisions and WFIT Leadership desires closer attention to progress.
Page 39 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
Page 41 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
8. Definitions
Business Lead:
A representative of the business community responsible to:
Single point of responsibility for identifying the business requirements of an investment and the
business needs of the associates stakeholders
Provide direction to the project from the business community, including guidance and oversight
on application scope, goals, objectives, requirements, resources, and delivery of effort.
Provide project progress reports and feedback to business community
Represent the business aspects of the project to the FMB, NWCG, and other interested parties
Represent the project as spokesperson to the NFAEB, business community, and other interested
parties
Facilitates business issue resolution between the project and the business community
Provide PM performance assessment to the PM supervisor of record
Business needs:
The set of capabilities identified as necessary to execute the mission of managing wildland fire. These
are defined by the business and delivered via an asset (e.g. application).
Business requirements:
These are capabilities expected to be addressed by an activity. They are comprised of capabilities
(business needs) identified by the business and intended to be addressed by the investment activity. An
investment activity has associated with it a set of business requirements being addressed.
Capability:
The ability to perform or achieve certain actions or outcomes.
Capability gap:
A capability identified as a business need and not delivered by an asset.
Project Manager:
Provides project management support to the project.
Coordinates classic project management execution and reporting activities
Ensure Technical Approvals and USDA Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) waivers are
completed and approved on time
Ensure Capital Planning and Investment Control processes (CPIC) are completed and approved
on time for DOI and USDA Forest Service
Ensure relevant budget submission and approval processes are completed on time
Provide direction and staffing support for Project Management
Provide direction and staffing support for Business Case development
Provide direction and staffing support for Assessment and Accreditation (A&A)
Provide direction and staffing support for acquisition process
Technical Lead:
Provides a single technical point of responsibility for identifying the technical requirements of an
investment, their alignment with WFIT IT objective, and an investment’s technical approach;
WFIT Operations:
The set of activities and assets necessary to maintain the capabilities provide by the information and
technology assets used by the Wildland Fire community and supported by WFIT governance. These
consider assets owned and operated by federal agencies as well as non-federal assets contracted by the
government. For example (not intended to be a comprehensive listing):
Infrastructures – NESS, Microsoft Cloud
Management of DISAA Elements
Applications – WFDSS, VIPER
Hardware – MIMITs Trailers, Incident Response Team computing equipment, plotters, printers
Incident Response Centers
Decision making entities – the WFIT Decision Bodies, FAM IT,
Page 43 of 44
Wildland Fire Information and Technology
9. Revision history
A November 17, 2016 - As released to Program Board for comment
End of Document