Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Signalized intersection
1.Introduction
1.1 Background
2. Methodology
2.1 Crash data collection
Crash data of the city of Kolkata, for 4 years (2011-2014), was obtained from Kolkata
Police. The data included details like severity of crash, year of occurrence, place of
occurrence, types of vehicles involved, number of persons involved in the crash and the
time of occurrence of the crash. The entire city has been divided by Kolkata police in to
25 traffic guards for more efficient administration. This study is concerned with only
selected signalized intersections located across nine traffic guards. Crash data pertinent
to the intersections included in the study were extracted. Summary statistics of the crash
data included in this study are shown in Table-1.
As mentioned in section 2.3, 24 hour traffic volume was taken at one representative
location in the city of Kolkata. Hourly volumes were recorded at all other study
locations, and were multiplied with their respective Hourly Expansion Factors in order
to achieve 24 hour traffic volume.
The independent samples t-test is typically performed in order to compare the means
between two unrelated groups, and determine whether the means of those two groups
are significantly different or not. In this study, the factors which were thought to be
posing risk (or risk factors), were checked against their presence or absence in the
dataset. The null hypothesis and the alternate hypothesis are stated as follows.
The test statistic for the independent samples t-test is denoted as t. There are two
forms of the test statistic, one for equal and the other for unequal population variances.
When the two independent samples are assumed to be drawn from populations with
identical population variances (i.e., σ1 2 = σ2 2 ), the test statistic t is computed as:
Where,
x1 = Mean of first sample
x2 = Mean of second sample
n1 = Sample size (i.e., number of observations) of first sample
n2 = Sample size (i.e., number of observations) of second sample
S1 = Standard deviation of first sample S2 = Standard deviation of second sample
Sp = Pooled standard deviation
The calculated t value is then compared to the critical t value from the t distribution
table with degrees of freedom df = n1 + n2 - 2 and chosen confidence level. If the
calculated t value is greater than the critical t value, then the null hypothesis is rejected.
In this study, the statistical significance of the difference in mean crash frequency was
tested against two groups of intersections with certain exposure being present in one
group and absent in the other. A positive t value and a significance value of less than the
desired level of significance (α) indicates that the presence of the exposure is seen to
experience greater number of crashes than its absence. Such an exposure can be termed
as a risk factor. The results of the independent samples t-test are shown in Table-7. In
the table, only 95% confidence interval has been shown. Only variables which were
significant at least at a significance level of 0.10 were included in the table. N1
represents the number of locations where the exposure variable is present, while N2
denotes the number of locations where it is absent. As can be noticed in Table-7,
locations where the exposure variables belong under the headings of traffic volume and
infrastructural features were seen to have experienced significantly greater number of
crashes. On the other hand, the locations which saw the presence of protected right turn
signal phase were seen to have experienced significantly lesser number of crashes. It is
to be noted that, the t-test was not meant to be used as a screening method of variables
to be included in the multivariate models. By performing an additional test, we were
able to draw better insight regarding the causes of total and fatal crash occurrences in
the study area of Kolkata.
In order to associate crash data with junction parameters, traditional count data
models like Poisson regression model and Negative Binomial regression model were
employed [20-24]. Owing to the presence of overdispersion in the crash data, Negative
Binomial model was chosen to predict crash frequency [25-27]. In addition to that, a
Binary logistic regression model was used to calculate the probability of occurrence of
fatal crashes [29-31].
Before starting with the modeling process, a correlation analysis was performed in
order to find the independent variables which were highly correlated with crashes.
Initially, the correlation matrix was developed using all the 69 independent variables
and then the chosen variables were checked to avoid multi-collinearity as well as wrong
signs or questionable magnitudes in the estimated coefficients. In order to achieve only
the uncorrelated variables from the total set of independent variables, only one variable
among the correlated variables was taken which had the most significant and plausible
correlation with the dependent variable. Afterwards, during successive testing, the
variables coming out to be insignificant or having implausible signs were omitted one
by one. After several trials, the final model was selected based on their goodness of fit,
sign of the coefficients and their statistical significance. For modeling all types of
crashes and fatal crashes, Poisson regression model and negative binomial regression
models were developed, which are also termed as Safety Performance Functions.
Further a binary logistic regression model was developed to identify elements of
planning, designs and operations associated with the probability of fatal crash
occurrence.
The broad objective of the studding Signalized intersection was to identify such
factors whose improvement, presence or absence would reduce the likelihood of crash
occurrence and consequently enhance the safety of signalized intersections in Kolkata
city. In this study, a host of different statistical tools were used to identify risk factors.
Correlation analysis and independent samples t-test helped us in the identification of
factors that significantly impact the safety of signalized intersections. The results of
these tests indicated that high approach traffic volume, high minor road traffic volume,
high volume of heavy commercial vehicles, blockage of carriageways by car parking
and encroachment, presence of tram lines and absence of protected right turn phase
were risk factors. But they were unable to quantitatively predict how much the increase,
decrease, presence and absence of certain elements of planning, design and operations
would affect the number of crashes. With the help of the Safety Performance Function
and The Fatal Crash Prediction model, it was possible to predict the number of crashes
and the probability of fatal crash occurrence respectively, at any signalized intersections
of Kolkata. Based on the Safety Performance Function, it can be deduced that variables
like total approach traffic volume, blocked major carriageway, two way traffic and car
parking on minor road are positively affecting the number of crashes while a protected
right turn phase have been negatively affecting the same. From the Fatal crash
prediction model developed, it can be inferred that among all the variables, presence of
a protected right turn phase was found to be significantly reducing the probability of
fatal crash occurrence. Also, an increase in the ratio of minor road traffic volume to
major road traffic volume was found to enhance the safety of an intersection by
reducing the likelihood of fatal crashes. On the other hand, blocked carriageway,
percentage of NMT and total approach volume were found to be significantly increasing
the probability of fatal crash occurrence. It is to be noted that some factors such as
carriageway width, traffic volume, land use pattern, etc. which were found to be
significantly affecting the crash frequency and severity, are not always possible to alter.
However the analysis provides a clear direction as to the type of risk factors based on
which new traffic management strategies and operations could be adopted. For example,
reducing approach traffic volume at any particular intersection requires enormous
mitigating policies involving large investments, and hence not possible for a developing
nation like India. So, locations with high approach traffic volume clearly require greater
attention and improved police enforcement so as to get immediate benefit, and call for
improved traffic planning and design for the long run.
5. Conclusions
Based on the results obtained from several statistical tests and models conducted in
this study, the following conclusions may be made. The infrastructure and traffic related
risk factors identified from the study are in similar tone with those obtained elsewhere.
For example, higher approach traffic volume, wider carriageway width, absence of
exclusive signal phase for turning traffic are all established in safety literature, and this
study confirms these findings. However, this study provides insights about several other
risk factors which may be unique to Kolkata, or other cities of India or cities of other
developing countries. Such variables are car parking on approach lanes, encroached
carriageways, percentage of non-motorized traffic, which are found to be major risk
factors with regards to crash occurrence. Since the law enforcement tends to be less
strict in developing countries and road users are not always aware of traffic rules,
presence of the above mentioned elements are consistently found to be associated with
higher risk and came out to be highly significant. Hence, safety improvement initiatives
in cities of developing countries should pay specific attention on removal of such
factors. Similar to other studies, this study is not without its limitations. Based on the
site visits, several issues were identified with respect to road geometric features,
infrastructure, traffic control and human behavior (both drivers and pedestrians). Some
of the observed issues were road and footpath encroachment, unauthorized onstreet
parking, absence of footpaths in minor roads, improper road markings, blockage of sight
distance, permissive right turn and absence of all red time or dedicated pedestrian phase.
But, the biggest issue that was observed was the non conformance with the traffic rules
by road users. But this study has not taken into account the perception and behavior of
the road users and hence, incorporation of human factors and conduction of a perception
behavior analysis of road users would certainly help in a better understanding of the
safety issues. Also, an increase in sample size may lead to a better understanding of
safety issues which are yet to be 10 unearthed. The geographical stability of the models
is yet to be validated, but has served to give us important insights regarding safety of
urban signalized intersections in a major city like Kolkata. These are recommended as
future work.
REFERENCES
El-Hakim, O., W. Clyma, and E. V. Richardson. 1988. Performance
functions of border irrigation systems. J. Irrig. and Drain. Eng.,
ASCE 114(1):118-129.
Hart, W. E., H. G. Collins, G. Woodard, and A. J. Humphereys.
1980. Chapter 13: Design and operation of surface irrigation
systems. In Design and Operation of Farm Irrigation Systems.
ASAE Monograph No. 3. M. E. Jensen, ed. St. Joseph, Mich.:
ASAE.
Holzapfel, E. A., M. A. Marino, and J. Chevez-Morales. 1986.
Surface irrigation optimization models. J. Irrig. and Drain.
Eng., ASCE 104(3): 275-281.
Holzapfel, E. A., and M. A. Marino. 1987. Surface-irrigation
nonlinear optimization models. J. Irrig. and Drain. Eng., ASCE
113(3): 379-391.
Reddy, J. M. 1980. Irrigation system improvement by simulation
and optimization. PhD diss. Fort Collins, Colo.: Colorado State
University.
Reddy, J. M., and W. Clyma. 1981. Optimal design of border
irrigation systems. J. Irrig. and Drain. Div., ASCE 107(3):
289-306.
Shatanawi, M. R., and T. Strelkoff. 1984. Management contours for
border irrigation. J. Irrig. and Drain. Eng., ASCE 110(4):
393-399.
Strelkoff, T., and M. R. Shatanawi. 1985. Normalized graphs of