Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
tensioned Girders
Challenges in Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials, Volume 2 pp 87-94 | Cite as
Conference paper
First Online: 10 August 2018
2 Readers
190 Downloads
Part of the Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series book series (CPSEMS)
Abstract
The structural behavior of precast concrete segmental bridges largely depends on the behavior of the joints
between segments. In this research, series of static tests were carried out to investigate the behavior of full-scale
post-tensioned segmental girders with different types of joint configuration; multi-key joint, single key, and plain
key joint. The reference specimen was monolithically cast girder and the other specimens consisted of five
segments for each one joined together with epoxy paste. The testing measurements included deflection, elongation
of strands, cracking load, ultimate strength and strains at different locations and loading stages. The general theme
abstracted from the results of cracking loads tests reflects an approximate similarity in the behavior of the four
types of girder with slight differences. In the segmental girders with different types of joints, it was noticed that the
cracks at the joints occurred in the concrete adjacent to the epoxy mortar which can be attributed to the high
tensile strength of the used epoxy in comparison to concrete.
Keywords
Bridges Segmental girders Post-tensioning Experimental Joint key
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
References
1. Tito, J.A., Gomez-Rivas, A.: Design, construction, and test of a post-tensioned segmental beam. In: Ninth
LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference (LACCEI’2011), Medellín, 3–5 Aug 2011 (2011)
Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Tito%2C%20J.A.%2C%20Gomez-
Rivas%2C%20A.%3A%20Design%2C%20construction%2C%20and%20test%20of%20a%20post-
tensioned%20segmental%20beam.%20In%3A%20Ninth%20LACCEI%20Latin%20American%20and%20C
aribbean%20Conference%20%28LACCEI%E2%80%992011%29%2C%20Medell%C3%ADn%2C%203%E2%
80%935%20Aug%202011%20%282011%29)
2. Yuan, A., He, Y., Dai, H., Cheng, L.: Experimental study of precast segmental bridge box girders with
external unbonded and internal bonded posttensioning under monotonic vertical loading. J. Bridg. Eng.
20(4), 04014075 (2015)
CrossRef (https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000663)
Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?
title=Experimental%20study%20of%20precast%20segmental%20bridge%20box%20girders%20with%20ex
ternal%20unbonded%20and%20internal%20bonded%20posttensioning%20under%20monotonic%20verti
cal%20loading&author=A.%20Yuan&author=Y.%20He&author=H.%20Dai&author=L.%20Cheng&journal
=J.%20Bridg.%20Eng.&volume=20&issue=4&pages=04014075&publication_year=2015)
3. Jiang, H., Cao, Q., Liu, A., Wang, T., Qiu, Y.: Flexural behavior of precast concrete segmental beams with
hybrid tendons and dry joints. Constr. Build. Mater. 110(2016), 1–7 (2016)
CrossRef (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.003)
Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?
title=Flexural%20behavior%20of%20precast%20concrete%20segmental%20beams%20with%20hybrid%2
0tendons%20and%20dry%20joints&author=H.%20Jiang&author=Q.%20Cao&author=A.%20Liu&author=
T.%20Wang&author=Y.%20Qiu&journal=Constr.%20Build.%20Mater.&volume=110&issue=2016&pages=1
-7&publication_year=2016)
4. Wang, S., Fu, C.C.: Simplification of creep and shrinkage analysis of segmental bridges. J. Bridg. Eng. 20(8),
B6014001 (2015)
CrossRef (https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000728)
Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?
title=Simplification%20of%20creep%20and%20shrinkage%20analysis%20of%20segmental%20bridges&au
thor=S.%20Wang&author=CC.%20Fu&journal=J.%20Bridg.%20Eng.&volume=20&issue=8&pages=B6014
001&publication_year=2015)
5. Turmoa, J., Ramosb, G., Apariciob, A.C.: FEM study on the structural behavior of segmental concrete
bridges with unbonded prestressing and dry joints: simply supported bridges. Eng. Struct. 27(2005), 1652–
1661 (2005)
CrossRef (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.04.011)
Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?
title=FEM%20study%20on%20the%20structural%20behavior%20of%20segmental%20concrete%20bridge
s%20with%20unbonded%20prestressing%20and%20dry%20joints%3A%20simply%20supported%20bridg
es&author=J.%20Turmoa&author=G.%20Ramosb&author=AC.%20Apariciob&journal=Eng.%20Struct.&v
olume=27&issue=2005&pages=1652-1661&publication_year=2005)
6. Shamass, R., Zhou, X., Alfano, G.: Finite-element analysis of shear-off failure of keyed dry joints in precast
concrete segmental bridges. J. Bridg. Eng. 20(6), 04014084 (2015)
CrossRef (https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000669)
Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Finite-
element%20analysis%20of%20shear-
off%20failure%20of%20keyed%20dry%20joints%20in%20precast%20concrete%20segmental%20bridges&
author=R.%20Shamass&author=X.%20Zhou&author=G.%20Alfano&journal=J.%20Bridg.%20Eng.&volum
e=20&issue=6&pages=04014084&publication_year=2015)
7. ASTM A615/A615M-16: Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete
Reinforcement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken (2016)
Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?
title=Standard%20Specification%20for%20Deformed%20and%20Plain%20Carbon-
Steel%20Bars%20for%20Concrete%20Reinforcement&publication_year=2016)
Copyright information
© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 2019
Personalised recommendations