The structural design of systems to resist wind loads is one
of the most interesting tasks that a structural engineer can
encounter in his career. The number of possible solutions are endless. This is the area in which one's imagination and judgment can be used in the development of innovative designs and to find unique solutions to the most important and difficult problems in the design of high-rise buildings. For structural engineers, the goal for wind load design might be defined as to produce structures that perform in a satisfactory manner under the influence of wind loads and, as always, at the least possible cost. The level of performance desired may vary with the type and use of the structure. For instance, a higher level of performance would be desirable for a hospital than for a speculatively built office building. In a hospital environment, it is probably not acceptable for the occupants to feel uncomfortable due to motion induced by wind load except under extraordinary circumstances. On the other hand, the owner of a speculative office building may well accept some disturbing motion on a more or less regular basis, say five or ten years. Galambos and Ellingwood (1986) suggest that an acceptable level of performance may be to expect some occupant annoyance one time in the life of an average lease—eight years. Thus, it may seem appropriate to establish separate levels of performance for strength and serviceability for different types of structures. For a hospital, one may wish to select a 100-year storm for strength and a 50-year storm for motion. For an office building, one may wish to use the code-required wind load (usually 50 years) for strength and a 10-year storm for motion. In any case, the deflection due to wind load must be limited to an amount that the building cladding and finishes can tolerate. Drift Limits The selection of an appropriate drift limit for a multi-story project is a problem faced by structural engineers since the inception of skyscrapers. It is now recognized that drift control will not necessarily insure satisfactory performance with respect to human perception of motion due to wind loading. In tall buildings (buildings over 300-350 ft), acceleration due to wind loading is the parameter which must be considered in evaluating the effects of wind-induced motion. For buildings under 25 to 30 stories, drift control will probably become more important in the near future. At this time full wind tunnel studies are probably not economically justified for the less tall buildings. Two references which describe the problem are "Structural Design of Tall Steel Buildings" (CTBUH 1978) and "Human Response to Tall Buildings Wind-Induced Motion" (Reed, Hansen and Van Marke 1972). Historically, recommended drift limits have varied widely (CTBUH 1979). Recently, a subcommittee of the ASCE Committee on Design of Steel Building Structures conducted a
Tall Buildings: The Proceedings of a Symposium on Tall Buildings with Particular Reference to Shear Wall Structures, Held in the Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southampton, April 1966