Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Steve,
Attached documents are our responses to your follow-up items. The first Word document — "Responses to
PHMSA 6-8-2007 follow-up items.doc" has the written responses with references to the other attached files. If you
have any questions, please let us know. Thanks.
Henry Wang
Director, Integrity Management
9 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2800 (RM 2611)
Houston, Texas 77046
Phone 713-479-8120 Cell 832-722-1417
Email: henry.wang@bw_p_mlp,com
Henry, thank you and Ray for taking the time to go to the Jindal Mill with rri and I on Friday. Below
are the follow-up items from the mill visit.
Gulf South will follow-up to PHMSA SW Region the following quality co trol information since the
mill re-started Gulf South's pipe in late- y:
1) Pipe Rolling and Coating Schedule June — September
2) Hydrotest — update of problem, howl g was the problem and how many pipe joints did it
affect
3) Weld seam fluoroscope — documentation Of calibration and rejects — number and % of pipe
4) Plate UT — number and % rejects and type, equipment calibration intervals
5) Pipe end UT — rejects and type — number and 'af of pipe
6) Doubling Jointing - x-ray repairs and cut-outs, niz ber of joints double jointed and % of pipe
repaired and cut-outs
7) Pipe tracking process due to hydrotester problem — is it being communicated/ pipe
marked/documented on pipe for plant workers to ensure . quality control traceability of the pipe
8) Oil contamination- how is oil contamination on pipe 1D/0 being handled and quality test
results.
9) Pipe internal and external chloride contamination and cleaning rocedures that were used at
Baton Rouge. Gulf South found chloride contamination of pipe at this facility. The pipe had been
11/10/2009
Page 2 of 2
shipped from India. How was the cleaned, pipe surface tested, and coating tested for QA? Please
submit documentation.
The above quality a • ur e documentation will be submitted to PHMSA- SW Region by Monday, June
25 by Henry Wang.
Thanks, Steve
Steve Nanney
PHMSA - Southwest Region
Office - 713-272-2855
Mob# - 713-628-7479
E-mail - steve.nanney@dot.gov
11/10/2009
Responses to PHMSA's questions:
2) Hydrotest — update of problem, how long was the problem and how many pipe
joints did it affect
Hydrotester went down on 5/25/2007 and came back up on 6/11/2007. The ram
cylinder and piston of the hydrotester got stuck up and had to be opened up. The
cylinder and the piston had actually got damaged therefore they were rebuilt and
machined to the original tolerances. None of the pipes got affected due to this as
none of the pipes were processed at hydrotester during this period. About 1309
pieces were set aside in the yard for hydro testing and processing.
6) Doubling Jointing - x-ray repairs and cut-outs, number of joints double jointed
and % of pipe repaired and cut-outs
There were total of 1892 double jointing welds with 1828 accepted x-ray or
3.38% rejection rate. There were 29 cut-outs due to repairs (1.53% cut-outs rate).
See attached spreadsheet (File name: Double Joint Summary) for details.
All the pipes on which oil was observed were 0.670" wall pipe kept aside after
expansion. The pipes had soluble oil inside them which is used at the expander for
lubrication in the expander head and between the pipe and expander dies to
reduce friction between moving parts.
This soluble oil is later rinsed at hydrotester and completely cleaned at inside
wash station before pipes are offered for final inspection. Therefore the oil was
visible on these pipes only because they were un-processed pipes which still had
to go through the process of cleaning through the regular cycle.
When these pipes feed back in the mill, they will be cleaned at the wash station
and inspected by the inspectors. Both ID and OD surface conditions will have to
meet the coating specifications before coating can be applied.
9) Pipe internal and external chloride contamination and cleaning procedures that
were used at Baton Rouge. Gulf South found chloride contamination of pipe at
this facility. The pipe had been shipped from India. How was the cleaned, pipe
surface tested, and coating tested for QA? Please submit documentation.
According to Gulf South coating specifications, if 5 [tg/cm 2 or more of chloride is
present, a phosphoric acid wash should be performed.
Clean Blast Services, Inc. provides the service and procedures to clean chloride
from the pipe internal surface at Bayou Coating Baton Rouge. The chloride
remediation procedures includes pre-rinse, acid wash and post rinse. See attached
document (File name . Clean Blast — Chloride Remediation Procedure.doc) for
detailed procedures. Acid wash is also performed on all pipe external surfaces.
For a quantitative measure the ASTM D512 Mercuric Nitrate test method was
used for chloride measurement. Tests performed after the acid wash indicates all
chloride levels are below the 5 1.ig/cm2 requirement. See attached spreadsheet (File
name: Chloride test results ASTM D 512 method 07.xls) Tab 6 -9 for test results
after acid wash.
Standard coating tests such as bend test, cathodic disbondment test, moisture
permeation test are performed per coating specifications on external FBE.
For internal coating, a portable adhesion tester was used to determine the
adhesion strength of the internal coating (Valspar 930 HS epoxy) applied to the
internal surface of the pipe with a finished product of 2 to 3 dry mils. The dollies
were glued and the pull test was performed and witnessed by Randy Fair. The
results are as follows.
All tests that were performed had a glue failure instead of a coating failure. Most
two part epoxy paints has a minimum failure @ 800psi and these tests well
exceeded that minimum. See attached document (file name: ID Pull Test.doc) for
details.