Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
At the beginning of 2019, a house bill was passed by the House of Representatives of the
Philippines. The main purpose of the bill was to lower the minimum age of criminal liability in
the country from the current 15 years old to 9 years old, which was later changed into 12.
Minimum age of criminal liability or minimum age of criminal responsibility (MACR) refers to
the age wherein an individual can legally be held accountable for the crimes he or she has
committed. Upon the announcement of approval of the proposal of the House, certain groups of
people stood up against the idea, saying that children ages 9 to 12 are still too young to be
labelled as criminals. In fact, it was stated by UNICEF (2010) that the absolute minimum age of
criminal liability that they will consider is 12, and its members are encouraged to increase the
minimum age. Many child advocates claim that the MACR should not go any lower as they are
concerned with the welfare of the children. Indeed, welfare of the children must be protected.
However, the reason that children must not go to “jail” because of their age is flawed. Pleading
that these poor children must not be placed in the prison does not make sense as the Juvenile
Justice and Welfare Act of 2006 clearly defines that these children will not end up in jail, but
they will be placed at juvenile detention centers. Thus, this is the not reason the MACR should
not be lowered, but there are other reasons. The other reasons include the following: lowering the
MACR will not necessarily solve the problems as proposed by the government; even if the bill
gets approved as a law, the Philippines does not have adequate resources and budget to place all
the youth in juvenile centers; and the current law is enough to control and guide the juvenile
delinquency, it is just that they have to be kept. Lowering the minimum age of criminal liability
should be opposed not based on pity, but it should be based on the logical reasons mentioned
above.
First of all, according to the Salvador Leachon, the sponsor of the bill, one of the biggest
reasons they are aiming to lower the MACR is to protect the children from being exploited
(Roxas, 2019). This is because due to the age of the children, different gangs may task them to
commit the crimes for them. It is easier to use the children as they are below the age of 15, they
will surely be exempted from the criminal responsibilities. According to criminologist Atkinson-
Sheppard (2018), there are crime groups in Bangladesh that hires children to conduct crimes. The
gangs make the children carry weapons, smuggle and sell drugs, and even kill. Atkinson-
Sheppard also mentioned that the biggest reason these children agree to commit such crimes is
their vulnerability. These children live in the streets without any guidance from their parents, and
in order to survive, they participate in different crimes and receive money as rewards. Although
the setting of this case is in Bangladesh, it cannot be denied that the Philippines has a similar
problem. Since there are many children who are from the vulnerable sector of the country, they
This may allow the people to think that if this is the case, it is reasonable to lower the
MACR. However, this is not true because this is simply a way of avoiding the real problem,
which is the groups that are hiring these children. Even if the MACR is lowered to 12, these
groups are capable of finding other ways to achieve their goals. By lowering the MACR, it may
seem like the number of these cases are going to decrease, and the children will be protected.
However, as long as the source, the organized crime group, is present, the threat will be always
there. Thus, instead of lowering the MACR, the government should find alternative ways to
eradicate these criminal groups such as intensifying the punishment for these groups.
Secondly, Section 9 of Republic Act No 10630 (2013), the amended version of Juvenile
Justice and Welfare Act of 2006, states, “each province and highly-urbanized city (the LGUs)
shall be responsible for building, funding and operating a ‘Bahay Pag-asa’ within their
jurisdiction following the standards that will be set by the DSWD and adopted by the JJWC.”
Bahay Pag-asa center is an institution funded by the local government units in order to
rehabilitate the children within the age bracket of 15 to 18 who are in conflict with the law. The
facility aims to provide care for the children so that they will be able to return to the society
without going back to their old ways. However, the number of the facilities are lesser than what
Going back to Section 9, it is stated there that each province and highly urbanized cities
must have a Bahay Pag-asa center. There are 81 provinces in the Philippines (Number of
Philippine provinces, 2016). There are also 33 cities in the country that are classified as highly
urbanized (PhilAtlas, n.d.). Adding the two numbers, the country should have 114 Bahay Pag-asa
centers based on the law. However, according to Cabico (2019), as of 2019, there are only 63
Bahay Pag-asa nationwide, five of which are no longer operational. This means that there are
only 58 operating facilities, which is only about 51% of the required number.
Due to the lack of budget, there are only limited number of juvenile detention centers for
the children in conflict with the law. Even when the age bracket of the teenagers staying at these
facilities are from 15 to 18, there is already lack of the centers. However, if the age range is
increased from 12 or 9 to 15, the population that needs to go to these centers will surge. If there
will be no available slots in these juvenile detention centers, that may result to putting the
children in inefficient facilities, which are not capable of taking care of these children. In fact,
Cabico (2019) mentioned that there are some juvenile detention centers that are worse than
actual prison. This should not be the case as it is cleared stated in the law that the children in
conflict with the law must receive proper treatment and care so that they will be able to go back
to the community as responsible individuals. In order for them to receive proper care, more
Bahay Pag-asa centers must be established in the country. However, in order to do so, there must
According to Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon, 2.5 billion pesos must be
allocated as the budget of the construction and renovation of the Bahay Pag-asa centers (Legaspi,
2019). Drilon explains that 2.5 billion pesos is a reasonable budget as out of 58 operating Bahay
Pag-asa centers, 55 are run by the local government, and these centers are not in the condition
that satisfy the requirements given by the law. However, the actual budget that the government
allotted for this matter was 1 billion pesos (Cervantes, 2019). This is only about 40 percent of
what Drilon has suggested. With this, it can be said that the budget allocated by the government
is not enough to construct the targeted number of detention centers and to maintain and operate
the center in a good condition. On top of that, when more children in conflict with the law
(CICL) are added to these centers due to the lowering of MACR, the gravity of the problem will
intensify. If more children are added to poorly managed juvenile detention centers, the centers
will not be able to perform its purpose on rehabilitating the children. This will only further ruin
the lives of the children. Thus, it can be concluded that considering the quantity and the quality
of the juvenile detention centers in the country, no more children should be added to the
facilities, especially if the place is incapable of forming and rehabilitating the children.
Lastly, the priority of the government should not be about lowering the MACR, but it
should be about reinforcing the law that has already been implemented and amended. The
Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006 has a comprehensive solution in terms of forming and
guiding the CILC in order for them to have a better life. Juvenile Justice and Welfare Council
(JJWC) was even formed in order to supervise this problem. However, the law is not being kept,
and thus, it disturbs the welfare of the children who are affected by this law. One of which is the
problem of having inadequate number of facilities to guide the children. Once the law will be
reinforced throughout the country, there is a higher chance of the once detained children
experiencing better lives. This is because a part of the law is that the children in the juvenile
detention centers will be given different psychological and vocational training which will allow
them to acquire various skills to earn a living once they return to the society.
A lot of problems stems from when the mentioned law is violated. For example, if a
child was placed in a worse environment, unlike what is written in the law, there is a chance of
him learning worse crimes. Also, when the child is not able to receive proper counseling that is
needed to reflect and learn from his past, there will be a higher chance of him going back to his
old ways. This was seen in the documentary, “Bunso” by Ditsi Carolino, where one of the
children who was in the prison was not able to rehabilitate during his stay. Without realizing his
mistakes, he went back to his old ways, and he eventually died. If ever he was able to receive
proper counseling and treatments, things might have turned out differently.
According to Bayer and Pozen (2003), the recidivism rate depended on how the juvenile
detention centers were programmed. In for-profit management centers, there were higher
recidivism rate compared to the other types such as nonprofit and state-operated centers. This is
because in for-profit management centers had lower costs or had worse facilities in order to gain
profit from the operation. However, when the detention centers were properly supported by
having adequate budget, the recidivism rate was significantly lower. This proves that the
condition of the juvenile detention centers is capable of either neglecting or rehabilitating the
children in conflict with the law. With this, it can be concluded that if the children were treated in
accordance with the law, the recidivism rate of the children might have gone down. Thus,
lowering the juvenile crime rate as well. If only the law was reinforced strongly in a way that all
the sections of the law were abided by the entire nation, many problems that the country has
The solution to solving the different problems regarding juvenile delinquency is not by
lowering the MACR. Lowering the MACR may look like it is eradicating problems such as child
exploitation, but actually, it is just trying to solve the issues in a one-dimensional way. The target
of the government should not be the vulnerable children who are prone to exploitation, but it
should be the different criminal groups that hire these children for their convenience. Also, in the
country, there are not enough facilities that will rehabilitate the CICL. Increasing the number of
these children without proper detention centers will intensify the problem of high juvenile crime
rate as the children will not be given an opportunity to reflect on their actions. Lastly, as long as
the Republic Act 10630 is reinforced strongly, it is more than sufficient to control the juvenile
delinquencies. This is because it contains different sections that will guide and take care of the
CICL. The problem that the country should be concerned about is not how young the child has to
be in order to be sent to detention centers, but it is about how can it keep its children safe using
Atkinson-Sheppard, S. (2018). When crime is the best of many bad options. Retrieved from
https://www.dandc.eu/en/article/street-children-are-involved-organised-crime-bangladesh
Bayer, P., & Pozen, E. D. (2003). The effectiveness of juvenile correctional facilities: Public
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/28484/1/dp 030863.pdf
Cabico, G.K. (2019, January 22). CHR calls for establishment of more Bahay Pag-asa centers.
calls-establishment-more-bahay-pag-asa-centers
Cabico, G.K. (2019, January 22). Juvenile Justice and Welfare Council: Some Bahay Pag-asa
/headlines/2019/01/22/1887224/juvenile-justice-and-welfare-council-some-bahay-pag-
asa-centers-worse-prisons
Cevantes, F. M. (2019, February 13). P1-B ‘Bahay Pag-asa’ funds allotted in 2019 budget: Sotto.
Legaspi, A. (2019, January 31). Drilon proposes P2.5-B budget for Bahay Pag-asa construction,
683443/drilon-proposes-p2-5-b-budget-for-bahay-pag-asa-construction-operation/story/
Number of Philippine provinces, cities, municipalities, and barangays. (2015). Retrieved from
http://www.comelec.gov.ph/?r=2016NLE/Statistics/SumofProvCityMun
juvenile justice system in the Philippines. Quezon City, Philippines. Retrieved from
https://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2013/ra_10630_2013.html
Roxas, P. A. (2019, January 21). Hous e panel swiftly okays lowering age of criminal liability.
okays-lower-age-of-criminal-liability
tdad/index_56375.html