Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
VO1
The town of Bhuj looks freshly minted. New housing colonies, commercial buildings,
good roads betray no evidence of a tragedy that struck this Gujarat town in 2001. 25,000
new houses have come up here in the last few years to replace those that crumbled like a
pack of cards when the monster earthquake struck Bhuj and its neighboring areas, when it
was celebrating Republic Day on January 26, 2001. Since then the recovery has been
methodical, furious and targeted. How did this miraculous recovery come about?
Answers to this question are available everywhere.
VO 2
Hodka is 80 kilometers from Bhuj. About 1500-1600 Hindus and Muslims live in this
village peacefully. Till six years ago, the village did not look this. All the houses were
flattened by the earthquake that struck Gujarat and took people unaware.
Graphics
January 26, 2001
Time 8.46 am
Earthquake of a magnitude of 6.9 on the Richter scale struck Gujarat
Impacted 10 cities and 914 villages
Died 19,805 people
Injured 166,000 people
Destroyed 348,000 houses
Damaged 844, 000 houses
Rendered homeless 600, 000 people
Flattened 5,000 schools
Killed 20,000 cattle
Total loss US$ 5 billion
VO3
The world was shocked by death, damage and destruction. There was outpouring of
sympathy and relief from all over the world. Tons of relief material began to descend in
these parts. There was a flood of NGOs and individuals who wanted to help. Chaos
reigned.
Byte: Bhavsi
The NGO’s worked closely with the government and conducted surveys to assess the
damage the earthquake had caused to life and property. These surveys helped in
providing targeted rehabilitation.
VO5
The village panchayats and the NGOs worked very closely to ensure that no one was left
out. But collecting information was a gigantic task.
The NGOs initially told us not to build on the same location and advised us to relocate
the village. But the villagers did not agree. As 50% of the houses were still intact and
needed only repair work. These people did not want to shift. So after much discussion we
all agreed to rebuild on the same location and the Rs 90,000 was diverted to the NGO,
but the houses were rebuilt.
VO7
This was not an easy job, but the model provided by Gujarat government was more or
less accepted by the community and the rebuilding process was largely successful.
Byte: Iyengar/Sushma
One of the key features which have helped this was the owner driven construction policy
framework of the government of Gujarat. The communities were enabled by the
government and the state directly reconstructed their own housing and habitats. So they
got not only financial help but a range of enabling technical and social facilitation
mechanisms by which they could be constructed and that gave people a lot of options at
one hand as to how they wanted to reconstruct their houses. On the other hand, they also
got a lot of guidance on how they could improve their housing.
There was a good synergy between the state, the civil society and the effected
communities.
VO11
The earthquake resistant construction was carried out with great speed. The involvement
of the community at every stage of planning ensured their commitment. The idea was that
the communities should not be merely recipients of aid, but should be able to interact as
equal partners in the rehabilitation
VO 12
The construction has to be seismic safe. This was a complex process that needed
clearances at different levels. Public-private partnership that was introduced in
earthquake devastated Gujarat proved to be a workable model that was accepted by all
the stakeholders.
Byte: Iyenger/sushma
So it was handling a whole lot of facilitative needs from information management,
creating transparency, identifying needs on both ends and linking up the external
environment with the affected communities. After two years of rehabilitation and relief
has continued to play a facilitative bridge role in the development. It was not a
mechanism which was limited to being operational only post disaster but has actually
become a developmental mechanism and is similarly playing a bridge role now for
strengthening local self governance of the communities with a linkage to the civil society,
professionals, the state, government programmes and a lot of other sectoral expertise.
This got replicated when tsunami hit tamil nadu
VO13
The earthquake had a very severe impact on livelihood. More than 10,000 small and
medium industrial units stopped production due to damage to plants, factories and
machinery. Work at thousands of saltpans stopped after the earthquake. A large number
of craftsmen and artisans who live in Kutch lost their workshops and tools. There was a
heavy loss of livestock in the region, an important source of peoples’ livelihood. There
was a feeling of disempowerment and vulnerability. Lives had to be rebuilt and
livelihoods needed to be restored. It was an arduous task but stake holders performed
admirably.
VO14
Karsa bhai Khadi is the elected head of the local self government of village
Karapaswariya village in district Bhuj. He has played an important role in helping the
school upgrade its facilities during the time of reconstruction. Today this secondary
school boasts of a computer center where children are familiarizing themselves with
computer technology.
VO15
An important segment of the rehabilitation program consists of programmes aimed at
women’s empowerment. The government of Gujarat and the NGOs has involved women
in all the stages of programme implementation; today a majority of the women even share
the rights to their houses jointly with their husbands.
VO 16
Handicraft and handloom industry has contributed in creating livelihoods and incomes
for the women of this region. To support, maintain and enhance these traditional skills
and capacities of crafts people of Kutch Government supported a large number of
training programs and economic activities. This has helped in not only preserving the
crafts tradition but also enriching their art.
VO 17
The holistic approach adopted by the government incorporated the feedback from the
NGOs working in the impacted areas and developed need based livelihood packages
which helped enhance the already existing skills and resources. In brief the build back
better approach was inherent in all the measures adopted. Most of the evaluation reports
have praised the speed and quality of reconstruction. Most importantly the Gujarat model
is a scalable model and it can be replicated in communities that have been struck by
similar natural calamities.