Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ADOPTION
DOMESTIC & INTER-COUNTRY
Adoption Concept:
AM NO. 02-6-06-SC
Effective: August 22, 2002
A. Domestic Adoption
Section 2 Objectives
a. The best interest of the child shall be the paramount consideration in all matters relating to his care, custody and
adoption.
b. The State shall provide alternative protection and assistance through foster care or adoption for every child who
is foundling, neglected, orphaned, or abandoned.
To this end, the State shall:
i. Ensure that every child remains under the care and custody of his parents and is provided with love, care,
understanding and security for the full and harmonious development of his personality. Only when such
efforts prove insufficient and no appropriate placement or adoption within the child’s extended family is
available shall adoption by an unrelated person be considered;
ii. Safeguard the biological parents from making hasty decisions in relinquishing their parental authority over
their child;
iii. Prevent the child from unnecessary separation from his biological parents;
iv. Conduct public information and educational campaigns to promote a positive environment for adoption;
v. Ensure that government and private sector agencies have the capacity to handle adoption inquiries, process
domestic adoption applications and offer adoption-related services including but not limited to parent
preparation and post adoption education and counselling;
vi. Encourage domestic adoption so as to preserve the child’s identity and culture in his native land, and only
when this is not available shall inter-country adoption be considered as a last resort; and
GROUP 1 2
ADOPTION [ra 8552 and ra 8043]
vii. Protect adoptive parents from attempts to disturb their parental authority and custody over their adopted
child.
Any voluntary or involuntary termination of parental authority shall be administratively or judicially declared so as to
establish the status of the child as “legally available for adoption” and his custody transferred to the Department of Social
Welfare and Development or to any duly licensed and accredited child-placing or child-caring agency, which entity shall
be authorized to take steps for the permanent placement of the child.
Important terms:
Child – a person below 18 years old
Child Legally Available for Adoption – child voluntarily or involuntarily committed to the DSWD, accredited child-
caring agency, freed of parental authority of his biological parents, or in case of rescission of adoption, his
guardian or adopters.
Voluntarily Committed Child – whose parents relinquished parental authority over him in favor of DSWD.
Involuntarily Committed Child – whose parents, known or unknown, have been permanently and judicially
1. A Filipino Citizen
a. With full civil capacity and legal rights
b. Of good moral character
c. Not convicted of any crime involving moral turpitude
d. Emotionally and psychologically capable of caring for children
e. At least 16 years older than the adoptee unless the biological parent of adoptee or the spouse of said parent
f. In a position to support and care for his children in keeping with the means of the family
2. Alien
a. Same qualification as Filipino Citizen
b. Additional requirements:
i. National of a country with diplomatic relations with the Philippines
ii. Has been certified by his diplomatic or consular office of any appropriate government agency to have
legal capacity to adopt in his country as adopted child.
iii. 3 year continuous prior residency and maintains such residence until adoption decree is entered.
Exceptions to 3 year continuous residency:
o A former Filipino adopting a relative within 4th degree of consanguinity or affinity
o Alien adopting the legitimate child of Filipino spouse
o Married to a Filipino seeking to adopt jointly with his spouse a relative within the 4 th degree of
consanguinity or affinity of the Filipino spouse.
3. Guardian
GROUP 1 3
ADOPTION [ra 8552 and ra 8043]
- May adopt ward after the termination of the guardianship and clearance of financial accountabilities.
1. A child voluntarily committed to the DSWD or judicially declared available for adoption.
2. Legitimate child of one spouse by the other spouse
3. Illegitimate child by a qualified adopter to raise the status of the former to that of legitimacy.
4. Person of legal age regardless of status who has been consistently considered and treated by the adopters as
their own child since minority.
5. Child whose adoption had been previously rescinded.
6. Child not otherwise disqualified by law or these rules.
SECTION 7. CONTENTS OF THE PETITION. The petition shall be verified and specifically state at the heading of the
initiatory pleading whether the petition contains an application for change of name, rectification of simulated birth,
voluntary or involuntary commitment of children, or declaration of child as abandoned, dependent or neglected.
1) If the adopter is a Filipino citizen, the petition shall allege the following:
(a) The jurisdictional facts;
(b) That the petitioner is of legal age, in possession of full civil capacity and legal rights; is of good moral
character; has not been convicted of any crime involving moral turpitude; is emotionally and psychologically capable of
caring for children; is at least sixteen (16) years older than the adoptee, unless the adopter is the biological parent of the
adoptee or is the spouse of the adoptee’s parent; and is in a position to support and care for his children in keeping with
the means of the family and has undergone pre-adoption services as required by Section 4 of Republic Act No. 8552.
The requirements of certification of the alien’s qualification to adopt in his country and of residency may be waived if the
alien:
(i) is a former Filipino citizen who seeks to adopt a relative within the fourth degree of consanguinity or affinity;
or
(ii) seeks to adopt the legitimate child of his Filipino spouse; or
(iii) is married to a Filipino citizen and seeks to adopt jointly with his spouse a relative within the fourth degree of
consanguinity or affinity of the Filipino spouse.
3) If the adopter is the legal guardian of the adoptee, the petition shall allege that guardianship had been terminated and
the guardian had cleared his financial accountabilities.
4) If the adopter is married, the spouse shall be a co-petitioner for joint adoption except if:
GROUP 1 4
ADOPTION [ra 8552 and ra 8043]
(a) one spouse seeks to adopt the legitimate child of the other, or
(b) if one spouse seeks to adopt his own illegitimate child and the other spouse signified written consent thereto,
or
(c) if the spouses are legally separated from each other.
5) If the adoptee is a foundling, the petition shall allege the entries which should appear in his birth certificate, such as
name of child, date of birth, place of birth, if known; sex, name and citizenship of adoptive mother and father, and the
date and place of their marriage.
6) If the petition prays for a change of name, it shall also state the cause or reason for the change of name.
Form of Petition
• Verified
• With certificate against forum shopping
• Specifically states at the heading of initiatory pleading whether the petition includes:
a. Application for change of name
b. Rectification of simulated birth
c. Voluntary or involuntary commitment of children
d. Declaration of child as abandoned, dependent or neglected child (AM 02-06-02 SC)
• Married to a Filipino and seeking to adopt jointly with the spouse a relative within the 4 th degree of consanguinity
or affinity of the Filipino spouse
Guardians
• Guardianship has been terminated
• Guardian has been cleared of all his financial accountabilities
Foundling adoptee
• Allege entries which should appear in his birth certificate:
– Name
– Date of birth of child (if known)
– Place of birth
SECTION 8. RECTIFICATION OF SIMULATED BIRTH. – In case the petition also seeks rectification of a simulated of
birth, it shall allege that:
(a) Petitioner is applying for rectification of a simulated birth;
(b) The simulation of birth was made prior to the date of effectivity of Republic Act No. 8552 and the application
for rectification of the birth registration and the petition for adoption were filed within five years from said date;
(c) The petitioner made the simulation of birth for the best interests of the adoptee; and
(d) The adoptee has been consistently considered and treated by petitioner as his own child.
SECTION 10. CHANGE OF NAME. – In case the petition also prays for change of name, the title or caption must
contain:
(a) The registered name of the child;
(b) Aliases or other names by which the child has been known; and
(c) The full name by which the child is to be known.
Section11. Annexes to the Petition- The following documents shall be attached to the petition:
A. Birth Certificate, Baptismal or foundling certificate, as the case may be, and school records showing
the name, age and residence of the adoptee;
B. Affidavit of consent of the following:
D. If the petitioner is an alien, certification by his diplomatic or consular office or any appropriate
government agency that he has the legal capacity to adopt in his country and that his government
GROUP 1 7
ADOPTION [ra 8552 and ra 8043]
allows the adoptee to enter his country and that his government allows the adoptee to enter his
country as his own adopted child unless exempted under section 4 (2);
E. Home study report on the adopters, if the adopter is an alien or residing abroad but qualified to
adopt, the home study report by a foreign adoption agency duly accredited by the Inter-Country
Adoption Board; and
F. Decree of annulment, nullity or legal separation of the adopter as well as that of the biological
parents of the adoptee, if any.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Birth Certificate, Baptismal or foundling certificate, as the case may be, and school records showing the name, age
and residence of the adoptee;
2. Affidavit of consent of the following:
The adoptee, if ten (10) years of over; Abad. Acosta. Araneta. Aribal. Dujali. Fabula. Macariola. Malinao. Senoron
The biological parents of the child, if known, or the legal guardian, or the child-placement agency, child-caring
agency, child agent agency, or the proper government instrumentality which has legal custody of the child;
The legitimate and adopted children of the adopter and of the adoptee, if any, who are ten (10) years of age over;
The illegitimate children of the adopter living with him who are ten (10) years of over; and
The spouse, if any of the adopter or adoptee.
EXEPTIONS
1. Parents abandoned the child
Ordinarily, abandonment by parents to justify the adoption of his child without his consent is a conduct which evinces
a sole purpose to forego all parental duties. The term means neglect and refusal to perform the filial and legal
obligations of love and support. If a parent withholds love, care and opportunity to display filial affection, the
parent in effect abandons the child.
The court may acquire jurisdiction over the case even without the written consent of the parents or one of the parents
provided that the petition for adoption alleges fact sufficient to warrant exemptions from compliance therewith.
This is in consonance with the liberality with which this Court treats the procedural aspect of adoption. (Cang v.
CA, September 25, 1998)
OTHER ATTACHMENTS
Section 12. Order of Hearing- If the petition and attachments are sufficient in form and substance; the
court shall issue an order which shall contain the following;
1. The registered name of the adoptee in the birth certificate and the names by which the adoptee has been known
The newspaper shall be selected by raffle under the supervision of the Executive Judge.
5. A directive to the social worker of the court, the social service office of the local government until or any child-
placing or child-caring agency, or the Department to prepare and submit child and home study reports before the
hearing if such reports had not been attached to the petition due to unavailability at the time of the filing of the
latter; and
6. A directive to the social worker of the court to conduct counselling sessions with the biological parents on the
matter of adoption of the adoptee and submit her report before the date of hearing.
At the discretion of the court, copies of the order of hearing shall also be furnished the Office of the Solicitor General
through the provincial or city prosecutor , the Department and the biological parents of the adoptee, if known.
If change in the name of the adoptee is prayed for in the petition, notice to the Solicitor General shall be mandatory.
ORDER OF HEARING
CONTENTS
1. Caption shall state registered name of adoptee in the birth certificate and names by which adoptee has been
known
2. Purpose of petition
3. Complete name to be used by the adoptee if petition is granted
4. Date and place of hearing to be set within six (6) months from the date of issuance of order or, if change of name
is prayed for, four (4) months after last publication of the notice or more than 30 days prior to an election
5. Directive on the publication of the notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the province or city where court
sits
6. Directive to the social worker of the court, the social service office of the local government unit or any child placing
or child caring agency , or the DSWD to prepare and submit child and home study reports before the hearing if
such reports had not been attached to the petition due to unavailability at the time of filing of petition
7. Directive to social worker of the court to conduct counselling sessions with the biological parents on the matter of
adoption of the adoptee and submit her report before the date of hearing
GROUP 1 9
ADOPTION [ra 8552 and ra 8043]
To be furnished to:
o Office of the Solicitor General through the provincial or city prosecutor – mandatory if change of name is also
prayed for
o DSWD
o Biological parents of adoptee, if known
Facts:
There was a petition for adoption filed. The petitioner sought to take the deposition of certain
witnesses applying Rule 24 because the same applies in special proceedings. But the petitioners were
asking for the deposition taking, the petition was not yet published.
Held: Yes.
The deposition taking is allowed. While it is true that when an action in personam is essential for the
court to acquire jurisdiction over the person of the defendant – in an adoption case which involves
the status of a person, there is no particular defendant to speak of since the proceeding is one in
rem. In such case, jurisdiction over the person of the defendant is a non-essential condition or the
taking of the deposition, for the jurisdiction of the court is based on its power over the RES to render
judgment in respect to such thing or status.
Publication of the scheduled hearing for the petition for adoption is necessary for the validity of a
decree of adoption. This means there could be no decree of adoption without publication. But it is not
necessary for the purpose merely of taking a deposition. In taking a deposition, no substantial rights
are affected since the deposition may or may not be presented or may even be objected to when
formally offered as evidence in the trial of the case later on.
Section 13. Child and Home Study Report. –In preparing the child study report on the adoptee, the
concern social worker, shall verify with the Civil Registry the real identity and registered name of the
adoptee. If the birth of the adoptee was not registered with the Civil Registry, it shall be the
responsibility of the social worker to register the adoptee and secure a certificate of foundling or late
registration, as the case may be.
The social worker shall establish that the child is legally available for adoption and the documents in
support thereof are valid and authentic, that the adopter has sincere intentions and that the adoption
shall inure to the best interests of the child.
In case the adopter is an alien, the home study report must show the legal capacity to adopt and
that his government allows the adoptee to enter his country as his adopted child in the absence of
the certification required under Section 7(b) of Republic Act No. 8552.
If after the conduct of the case studies, the social worker finds that there are grounds to deny the
petition, he shall make the proper recommendation to the court, furnishing a copy thereof to the
petitioner.
HOME STUDY REPORT- Abad. Acosta. Araneta. Aribal. Dujali. Fabula. Macariola. Malinao. Senoron
Study made by court social worker of the motivation and capacity of the prospective adoptive
parents to provide a home that meets the needs of a child
If adopter is an alien, social worker must show:
Adopter’s legal capacity to adopt
Adopter’s government allows the adoptee to enter his country as his adopted child in
the absence of the certification required under Section (b) RA 8552
If the child is below seven (7) years of age and is placed with the prospective adopter through a pre-adoption placement
authority issued by the Department, the court shall order that the prospective adopter shall enjoy all the benefits to
ADOPTION
DOMESTIC & INTER-COUNTRY
SEC. 16. Decree of Adoption. – If the supervised trial custody is satisfactory to the parties and the
court is convinced from the trial custody report and the evidence adduced that the adoption shall
redound to the best interests of the adoptee, a decree of adoption shall be issued which shall take effect
as of the date the original petition was filed even if the petitioners die before its issuance.
The decree shall:
A. State the name by which the child is to be known and registered;
B. Order:
1) the Clerk of Court to issue to the adopter a certificate of finality upon expiration of the 15-day
reglementary period within which to appeal;
2) the adopter to submit a certified true copy of the decree of adoption and the certificate of finality to
the Civil Registrar where the child was originally registered within thirty (30) days from receipt of the
certificate of finality. In case of change of name, the decree shall be submitted to the Civil Registrar
where the court issuing the same is situated.
3) the Civil Registrar of the place where the adoptee was registered:
a. to annotate on the adoptee’s original certificate of birth the decree of adoption within thirty (30) days
GROUP 1 12
ADOPTION [ra 8552 and ra 8043]
SEC. 17. Book of Adoptions. – The Clerk of Court shall keep a book of adoptions showing the date of
issuance of the decree in each case, compliance by the Civil Registrar with Section 16(B)(3) and all
incidents arising after the issuance of the decree.
Effects of Adoption
1. Transfer of Parental Authority. – Except in cases where the biological parent is the spouse of the adopter, all
legal ties between the biological parent(s) and the adoptee shall be severed and the same shall then be vested
on the adopter(s). (sec. 16 RA. 8552)
2. Legitimacy. – The adoptee shall be considered the legitimate son/daughter of the adopter(s) for all intents and
purposes and as such is entitled to all the rights and obligations provided by law to legitimate sons/daughters
born to them without discrimination of any kind. To this end, the adoptee is entitled to love, guidance, and
support in keeping with the means of the family. (sec. 17 RA. 8552)
3. Succession. – In legal and intestate succession, the adopter(s) and the adoptee shall have reciprocal rights of
succession without distinction from legitimate filiation. However, if the adoptee and his/her biological parent(s)
had left a will, the law on testamentary succession shall govern. (sec. 18 RA. 8552)
Issuance of a new certificate and First name and surname of the adoptee
1. The adoption decree shall state the name by which the child is to be known (sec. 13 RA 8552)
2. Civil Registry Record. – An amended certificate of birth shall be issued by the Civil Registry, as required by
the Rules of Court, attesting to the fact that the adoptee is the child of the adopter(s) by being registered with
his/her surname. The original certificate of birth shall be stamped "cancelled" with the annotation of the issuance
of an amended birth certificate in its place and shall be sealed in the civil registry records. The new birth
certificate to be issued to the adoptee shall not bear any notation that it is an amended issue. (sec. 14 RA 8552)
GROUP 1 13
ADOPTION [ra 8552 and ra 8043]
3. All records, books, and papers relating to the adoption cases in the files of the court, the Department, or any
other agency or institution participating in the adoption proceedings shall be kept strictly confidential.
If the court finds that the disclosure of the information to a third person is necessary for purposes connected with
or arising out of the adoption and will be for the best interest of the adoptee, the court may merit the necessary
information to be released, restricting the purposes for which it may be used. (sec. 15 RA 8552)
SEC. 19. Rescission of Adoption of the Adoptee. – The petition shall be verified and filed by the adoptee
who is over eighteen (18) years of age, or with the assistance of the Department, if he is a minor, or if
he is over eighteen (18) years of age but is incapacitated, by his guardian or counsel.
The adoption may be rescinded based on any of the following grounds committed by the adopter:
1) repeated physical and verbal maltreatment by the adopter despite having undergone counseling;
3) sexual assault or violence; or Abad. Acosta. Araneta. Aribal. Dujali. Fabula. Macariola. Malinao. Senoron
4) abandonment or failure to comply with parental obligations. Adoption, being in the best interests of
the child, shall not be subject to
rescission by the adopter. However, the adopter may disinherit the adoptee for causes provided in Article
919 of the Civil Code.
Effects of Rescission.
If the petition is granted, the parental authority of the adoptee's biological parent(s), if known, or the legal custody of the
Department shall be restored if the adoptee is still a minor or incapacitated. The reciprocal rights and obligations of the
adopter(s) and the adoptee to each other shall be extinguished.
The court shall order the Civil Registrar to cancel the amended certificate of birth of the adoptee and restore his/her
original birth certificate.
Succession rights shall revert to its status prior to adoption, but only as of the date of judgment of judicial rescission.
Vested rights acquired prior to judicial rescission shall be respected.
All the foregoing effects of rescission of adoption shall be without prejudice to the penalties imposable under the Penal
Code if the criminal acts are properly proven. (sec. 20 RA 8552)
AM NO. 02-6-02-SC
Section 20 Venue.
Petition shall be filed with the Family Court of the city or province where the adoptee resides.
The order and copy of the petition shall be served on the adverse party as the court may direct.
Section 23 Judgment
The court shall:
1) Order for the rescission of the adoption if the allegations of the petition are true
2) Order that the parental authority of the biological parent, if known, or the legal custody of the Department
shall be restored if the adoptee is still a minor or incapacitated and declare that the reciprocal rights and
obligations of the adopter and the adoptee to each other shall be extinguished
3) Declare that the successional rights shall revert to its status prior to adoption
4) Order the adoptee to use the name stated in his original birth of foundling certificate
5) Order the Civil Registrar to cancel the new birth certificate of the adoptee and reinstate his original or
foundling certificate
Section 25 Repeal
Supersedes Rule 99 on Adoption and Rule 100 of the Rules of Court
RA No. 8043 (1995) Rule on Adoption A.M. No. 02-6-02-SC (2 August 2002)
AMENDED IMPLEMENTING RULES AND REGULATIONS ON INTER-COUNTRY ADOPTION
Effective: April 16, 2007
Then on March 12, 2009, some provisions were amended by RA 9523 An Act Requiring Certification Of The DSWD
To Declare A "Child Legally Available For Adoption" As A Prerequisite For Adoption Proceedings
APPLICANT shall refer to a married couple or a single person who files an application;
BOARD shall refer to the Inter-Country Adoption Board which is the Central Authority in matters relating to inter-country
adoption and the policy-making body for the purposes of carrying out the provisions of R.A. 8043 and the Convention;
CENTRAL AUTHORITY shall refer to the key governmental entity which is responsible for carrying out the provisions of
the Convention;
CHILD refers to a person below 18 years of age or a person over 18 years of age but is unable to fully take care of
him/herself or protect himself/herself from abuse, neglect, cruelty, exploitation, or discrimination because of physical or
mental disability or condition (amended by RA 9523)
ABANDONED CHILD refers to a child who has no proper parental care or guardianship, or whose parent(s) have
deserted him/her for a period of at least three (3) continuous months, which includes a founding.
GROUP 1 15
ADOPTION [ra 8552 and ra 8043]
NEGLECTED CHILD refers to a child whose basic needs have been deliberately unattended or inadequately attended
within a period of three (3) continuous months. Neglect may occur in two (2) ways:
(a) There is physical neglect when the child is malnourished, ill-clad, and without proper shelter. A child is
unattended when left by himself/herself without proper provisions and/or without proper supervision.
(b) There is emotional neglect when the child is maltreated, raped, seduced, exploited, overworked, or made to
work under conditions not conducive to good health; or is made to beg in the streets or public places; or when
children are in moral danger, or exposed to gambling, prostitution, and other vices.
DEPENDENT CHILD is one who is without a parent, guardian or custodian; or one whose parents, guardian or other
custodian for good cause desires to be relieved of his care and custody; and is dependent upon the public for support.
CHILD LEGALLY AVAILABLE FOR ADOPTION refers to a child in whose favor a certification was issued by the DSWD
that he/she is legally available for adoption after the fact of abandonment or neglect has been proven through the
submission of pertinent documents, or one who was voluntarily committed by his/her parent(s) or legal guardian.;
FOREIGN ADOPTION AGENCY OR FAA shall refer to the State Welfare Agency or the licensed and accredited agency
in the country of the foreign adoptive parents that provides comprehensive social services and is duly recognized by the
Board;
INTER-COUNTRY ADOPTION shall refer to the socio-legal process of adopting a child by a foreign national or a
Filipino citizen permanently residing abroad where the petition for adoption is filed, the supervised trial custody is
undertaken, and the decree of adoption is issued in the foreign country where the applicant resides thereby creating a
permanent parent-child relationship between the child and the adoptive parents;
ILLEGAL ADOPTION shall refer to an adoption that is effected in any manner contrary to the provisions of RA 8043,
these Rules, established State policies, Executive Agreements and other laws pertaining to adoption;
MATCHING shall refer to the judicious pairing of the applicant and the child to promote a mutually satisfying parent-
child relationship;
VOLUNTARILY COMMITTED CHILD is one whose parent(s) or legal guardian knowingly and willingly relinquished
parental authority to the DSWD or any duly accredited child-placement or child-caring agency or institution.
1. Voluntarily committed;
Proviso: the physical transfer of said child shall be made not earlier than 6 months from the date of
execution of the Deed of Voluntary Commitment by the child’s biological parent/s or guardian. Provided
further, that this prohibition against physical transfer shall not apply to children being adopted by a
relative or to children with special medical conditions
2. Involuntarily committed;
3. Abandoned; or
4. Neglected.
a) Is at least twenty-seven (27) years of age and is at least sixteen (16) years older than the child to be adopted at
the time of the filing of the application, unless the applicant is the parent by nature of the child to be adopted or
is the spouse of such parent by nature;
b) Has the capacity to act and assume all the rights and responsibilities incidental to parental authority under his/her
national law;
e) Is eligible to adopt under his/her national law; Abad. Acosta. Araneta. Aribal. Dujali. Fabula. Macariola. Malinao. Senoron
f) Can provide the proper care and support and give the necessary moral values and example to the child and, in
the proper case, to all his/her other children;
h) Files jointly with his/her spouse, if any, who shall have the same qualifications and none of the disqualifications to
adopt as prescribed above.
A. Application Form – an application form prescribed by the Board shall be accomplished by husband and wife and
shall consist of the following:
B. Home Study Report to be prepared by the Central Authority or an ICAB accredited Foreign Adoption Agency.
6. Latest income tax return or other documents showing the financial capability of the applicant; Clearances
issued by the Police Department or other proper government agency of the place where the applicants
reside
7. Clearances issued by the Police Department or other proper government agency of the place where the
applicants reside;
8. Character reference from the local church/minister, the applicant’s employer and a member of the
immediate community who have known the applicant(s) for at least five (5) years; and
9. A Certification from the appropriate government agency that the applicant is qualified to adopt under
his/her national law and that the child to be adopted is allowed to enter the country for trial custody and
reside permanently in the said place once adopted;
10. Recent postcard size pictures of the applicant, their immediate family members and their home; and
11. Self-Report Questionnaire (required when the Psychological Evaluation is inadequate).
NOTES:
Foreigners who file their petition for adoption in the Philippines under the Domestic Adoption Act of 1998 or RA
8552, the Court after finding the petition to be sufficient in form and substance and a proper case for inter-country
adoption, shall immediately transmit the petition to the ICAB for appropriate action. The ICAB shall then act on the
application following the procedures described in the Amended Implementing Rules and Regulations.
All documents must be officially endorsed by the Central Authority on Intercountry Adoption or ICAB accredited
Foreign Adoption Agency to the ICAB in the Philippines
All communications relating to adoption application and/or child referral shall be transmitted by the Central
Authority or by the ICAB accredited FAA directly to the ICAB.
All ICAB correspondence/communication shall be transmitted directly to the concerned Central Authority and/or
Foreign Adoption Agency.
All the process for the Philippine Intercountry Adoption (ICA) DOES NOT require the intervention of a
lawyer/attorney either in the Philippines or from the applicant’s country of residence.
1) Permanent resident of the Philippines. 1) Permanent resident of a foreign country;
5) Has not been convicted of any crime 5) Has not been convicted of a crime
involving moral turpitude; involving moral turpitude;
6) Emotionally and psychologically 6) Is eligible to adopt under his/her national
capable of caring for children; law;
GROUP 1 19
ADOPTION [ra 8552 and ra 8043]
Requirement of Joint Adoption by Abad. Acosta. Araneta. Aribal. Dujali. Fabula. Macariola. Malinao. Senoron Requirement of Joint Adoption by Spouses
Spouses
General rule: husband and wife shall jointly
adopt; otherwise, the adoption shall not be
allowed.
Exceptions:
1) If one spouse seeks to adopt the
legitimate son/daughter of the other; Rule: if the adopter is married, his/her spouse
must jointly file for the adoption.
2) If one spouse seeks to adopt his/her
own illegitimate son/daughter but the other
spouse must give his/her consent;
LIST OF CASES
FACTS: Diwata Ramos Landingin, a US citizen of Filipino parentage filed a petition for the adoption of 3 minors, natural
children of Manuel Ramos, the former’s brother, and Amelia Ramos. She alleged in her petition that when her brother
died, the children were left to their paternal grandmother for their biological mother went to Italy, re-married there and
now has 2 children by her second marriage and no longer communicates from the time she left up to the institution of the
adoption. After the paternal grandmother passed away, the minors were being supported by the petitioner and her
children abroad and gave their written consent for their adoption.
A Social Worker of the DSWD submitted a Report recommending for the adoption and narrated that Amelia, the biological
mother was consulted with the adoption plan and after weighing the benefits of adoption to her children, she voluntarily
consented.
However, petitioner failed to present the said social worker as witness and offer in evidence the voluntary consent of
Amelia Ramos to the adoption. Petitioner also failed to present any documentary evidence to prove that Amelia assent to
the adoption.
ISSUE: WON a petition for adoption be granted without the written consent of the adoptee’s biological mother.
HELD: No. Section 9, par (b) of RA 8552, provides that the consent of the biological parent(s) of the child, if known is
necessary to the adoption. The written consent of the legal guardian will suffice if the written consent of the biological
parents cannot be obtained.
The general requirement of consent and notice to the natural parents is intended to protect the natural parental
relationship from unwarranted interference by interlopers, and to insure the opportunity to safeguard the best interests of
the child in the manner of the proposed adoption.
The written consent of the biological parents is indispensable for the validity of the decree of adoption. Indeed, the
natural right of a parent to his child requires that his consent must be obtained before his parental rights and duties may
be terminated and re-establish in adoptive parents. In this case, petitioner failed to submit the written consent of Amelia
Ramos to the adoption.
Moreover, abandonment means neglect and refusal to perform the filial and legal obligations of love and support. Merely
permitting the child to remain for a time undisturbed in the care of others is not such abandonment. To dispense with the
requirements of consent, the abandonment must be shown to have existed at the time of adoption.
GROUP 1 23
ADOPTION [ra 8552 and ra 8043]
PUBLICATION
FACTS: There was a petition for adoption filed. The petitioner sought to take the deposition of certain witnesses
applying Rule 24 because the same applies with the special proceedings. But the trouble is when the petitioners were
asking for the deposition taking, the petition was not yet published.
Since the court has not yet obtained jurisdiction over the defendant, then, deposition taking cannot be allowed. Under
Rule 24 of the ROC, deposition taking can only be allowed with the leave of court after the court acquired jurisdiction
over the defendant or over the property which is the subject of the action. Since what confirms jurisdiction is publication,
one party said, therefore you cannot apply Rule 24 without publication.
ISSUE: WON notice to the defendant thru publication is an essential condition in order that the court could acquire
jurisdiction first over his person before deposition taking could take place with regards to petition for adoption.
Publication of the scheduled hearing for the petition of adoption is necessary for the validity of a decree of adoption. This
means there could be no decree of adoption without publication. But it is not necessary for the purpose merely of taking
a deposition. In taking a deposition, no substantial rights are affected since the deposition may or may not be presented
or may even be objected to when formally offered as evidence in the trial of the case later on.
So, it is obvious that deposition taking may be applied even prior to publication.
DECREE OF ADOPTION
FACTS: Respondent Chichioco filed a petition for the issuance of letters of administration and settlement of estate of the
late Elena Lising claiming that she was the niece and heir of Lising who died intestate. Respondent claims that real and
personal properties were allegedly in the possession of petitioner Ana Joyce S. Reyes, a grandniece of the deceased.
Petitioner Reyes filed an Opposition to the petition, claiming that she was an adopted child of Lising and the latter’s
husband and asserting that the petition be dismissed since she was the only heir of Lising who passed away without
leaving any debts.
Subsequently, petitioner filed a Supplement to the Opposition attaching thereto the certification of her adoption from the
local civil registrar’s office that the adoption decree was registered therein and also a copy of a Judicial Form and a
certification issued by the clerk of court that the decree was on file in the General Docket of the RTC-Tarlac.
Respondents filed a Comment to the opposition stating that reasonable doubts have been cast on Petitioner’s claim that
she was legally adopted due allegedly to certain “badges of fraud.”
The appellate court refused to dismiss the proceeding because it was incumbent upon the petitioner to prove before the
trial court that she was indeed adopted by the Delos Santos spouse since, “imputations of irregularities permeating the
adoption decree render its authenticity under a cloud of doubt.”
ISSUE: WON petitioner had to prove the validity of her adoption due to imputations of irregularities.
GROUP 1 24
ADOPTION [ra 8552 and ra 8043]
HELD: No. Petitioner need not prove her legal adoption by any evidence other than those which she had already
presented before the trial court.
An adoption decree is a public document required by law to be entered into public records, the official repository of
which, as well as all other judicial pronouncements affecting the status of individuals, is the local civil registrar’s office as
well as the court which rendered the judgment.
Documents consisting of entries in public records made in the performance of a duty by a public officer are prima facie
evidence of the facts therein stated. As such, the certifications issued by the local civil registrar and the clerk of court
regarding details of petitioner’s adoption which are entered in the records kept under their official custody, are prima
facie evidence of the facts contained therein. These certifications suffice as proof of the fact of petitioner’s adoption by
the Delos Santos spouses until contradicted or overcome by sufficient evidence. Mere “imputations of irregularities” will
not cast a “cloud of doubt” on the adoption decree since the certifications and its contents are presumed valid until proof
to the contrary is offered.
FACTS: Eleno and Rafaela Sayson begot five children, namely, Mauricio, Rosario, Basilisa, Remedios and Teodoro. Eleno
died on November 10, 1952, and Rafaela on May15,1976. Teodoro, who had married Isabel Bautista, died on March 23,
1972. His wife died nine years later. Their properties were left in the possession of Delia, Edmundo, and Doribel, all
surnamed Sayson, who claim to be their children.Mauricio, Rosario, Basilisa, and Remedios, together with Juana C.
Bautista, Isabel's mother, filed a complaint for partition and accounting of the intestate estate of Teodoro and Isabel
Sayson. Delia, Edmundo and Doribel filed their own complaint, this time for the accounting and partition of the intestate
estate of Eleno and Rafaela Sayson, against the couple's four surviving children. Both cases filed on the Lower Court were
decided in favor Delia, et al. on the basis of practically thesame evidence. The Lower Court declared that Delia and
Edmundo were the legally adopted children of Teodoro and Isabel Sayson by virtue of the decree of adoption . Doribel
was their legitimate daughter as evidenced by her birth certificate. Consequently, the three children were entitled to
inherit from Eleno and Rafaela by right of representation. Both cases were appealed to the Court of Appeals, where they
were consolidated. The appellate court affirmed that Delia, et al. are entitled to the intestate estate of spouses Teodoro
and Isabel Sayson. However, Delia and Edmundo are disqualified from inheriting from the estate of the deceased spouses
Eleno and Rafaela Sayson.
ISSUE: W/N the validity of adoption can be collaterally attack in the partition proceedings?
HELD: NO. The complaint should be dismissed. The sisters of the deceased brother cannot attack the validity of the
adoption collaterally in action for partition. There must be a direct proceeding. The validity of adoption cannot be resolved
as a side issue in another case.
NOTE/Grey area: Under the law only the adoptee can revoke the adoption and not the herein sisters.
NAME OF ADOPTEE
5. TECSON v. COMELEC
FACTS:
1. On 31 December 2003, Ronald Allan Kelly Poe, also known as Fernando Poe, Jr. (FPJ), filed his certificate of
candidacy for the position of President of the Republic of the Philippines under the Koalisyon ng Nagkakaisang
Pilipino (KNP) Party, in the 2004 national elections.
2. In his certificate of candidacy, FPJ, representing himself to be a natural-born citizen of the Philippines, stated his
name to be "Fernando Jr.," or "Ronald Allan" Poe, his date of birth to be 20 August 1939 and his place of birth to
be Manila.
3. Victorino X. Fornier, (GR 161824) initiated, on 9 January 2004, a petition (SPA 04-003) before the Commission on
Elections (COMELEC) to disqualify FPJ and to deny due course or to cancel his certificate of candidacy upon the
thesis that FPJ made a material misrepresentation in his certificate of candidacy by claiming to be a natural-born
GROUP 1 25
ADOPTION [ra 8552 and ra 8043]
Filipino citizen when in truth, according to Fornier, his parents were foreigners; his mother, Bessie Kelley Poe,
was an American, and his father, Allan Poe, was a Spanish national, being the son of Lorenzo Pou, a Spanish
subject.
4. Granting, Fornier asseverated, that Allan F. Poe was a Filipino citizen, he could not have transmitted his Filipino
citizenship to FPJ, the latter being an illegitimate child of an alien mother.
5. Fornier based the allegation of the illegitimate birth of FPJ on two assertions: (1) Allan F. Poe contracted a prior
marriage to a certain Paulita Gomez before his marriage to Bessie Kelley and, (2) even if no such prior marriage
had existed, Allan F. Poe, married Bessie Kelly only a year after the birth of FPJ.
6. On 23 January 2004, the COMELEC dismissed SPA 04-003 for lack of merit. 3 days later, or on 26 January 2004,
Fornier filed his motion for reconsideration.
a. The motion was denied on 6 February 2004 by the COMELEC en banc. On 10 February 2004, Fornier
assailed the decision of the COMELEC before the Supreme Court conformably with Rule 64, in relation to
Rule 65, of the Revised Rules of Civil Procedure.
b. The petition likewise prayed for a temporary restraining order, a writ of preliminary injunction or any
other resolution that would stay the finality and/or execution of the COMELEC resolutions.
c. The other petitions, later consolidated with GR 161824, would include GR 161434 and GR 161634, both
challenging the jurisdiction of the COMELEC and asserting that, under Article VII, Section 4, paragraph 7,
ISSUE: Whether FPJ was a natural born citizen, so as to be allowed to run for the offcie of the President of the
Philippines
HELD:
1. Section 2, Article VII, of the 1987 Constitution expresses that "No person may be elected President unless he is a
natural-born citizen of the Philippines, a registered voter, able to read and write, at least forty years of age on the
day of the election, and a resident of the Philippines for at least ten years immediately preceding such election."
2. The term "natural-born citizens," is defined to include "those who are citizens of the Philippines from birth without
having to perform any act to acquire or perfect their Philippine citizenship."
3. Herein, the date, month and year of birth of FPJ appeared to be 20 August 1939 during the regime of the 1935
Constitution
4. Through its history, four modes of acquiring citizenship - naturalization, jus soli, res judicata and jus sanguinis –
had been in vogue.
5. Only two, i.e., jus soli and jus sanguinis, could qualify a person to being a “natural-born” citizen of the
Philippines.
6. Jus soli, per Roa vs. Collector of Customs (1912), did not last long. With the adoption of the 1935 Constitution
and the reversal of Roa in Tan Chong vs. Secretary of Labor (1947).
7. Jus sanguinis or blood relationship would now become the primary basis of citizenship by birth.
8. Considering the reservations made by the parties on the veracity of some of the entries on the birth certificate of
FPJ and the marriage certificate of his parents, the only conclusions that could be drawn with some degree of
certainty from the documents would be that:
a. The parents of FPJ were Allan F. Poe and Bessie Kelley;
b. FPJ was born to them on 20 August 1939;
c. Allan F. Poe and Bessie Kelley were married to each other on 16 September, 1940;
d. The father of Allan F. Poe was Lorenzo Poe; and
e. At the time of his death on 11 September 1954, Lorenzo Poe was 84 years old.
9. The marriage certificate of Allan F. Poe and Bessie Kelley, the birth certificate of FPJ, and the death certificate of
Lorenzo Pou are documents of public record in the custody of a public officer.
10. The documents have been submitted in evidence by both contending parties during the proceedings before the
COMELEC.
11. But while the totality of the evidence may not establish conclusively that FPJ is a natural-born citizen of the
Philippines, the evidence on hand still would preponderate in his favor enough to hold that he cannot be held
guilty of having made a material misrepresentation in his certificate of candidacy in violation of Section 78, in
relation to Section 74, of the Omnibus Election Code.
GROUP 1 26
ADOPTION [ra 8552 and ra 8043]
12. Fornier has utterly failed to substantiate his case before the Court, notwithstanding the ample opportunity given
to the parties to present their position and evidence, and to prove whether or not there has been material
misrepresentation, which, as so ruled in Romualdez-Marcos vs. COMELEC, must not only be material, but also
deliberate and willful.
13. The petitions were dismissed.
Case No. 1
G.R. No. 100835 October 26, 1993 Abad. Acosta. Araneta. Aribal. Dujali. Fabula. Macariola. Malinao. Senoron
James Hughes, a natural born citizen of the United States of America, married Lenita Mabunay, a Filipino
Citizen, who herself was later naturalized as a citizen of that country. The spouses jointly filed a petition
with the RTC to adopt the minor niece and nephews of Lenita, who had been living with the couple even prior to the
filing of the petition. The minors, as well as their parents, gave consent to the adoption. The RTC rendered a
decision granting the petition.
Issue:
Held:
While James Anthony unquestionably is not permitted to adopt under any of the exceptional cases
enumerated in paragraph (3) of the aforequoted article, Lenita, however, can qualify pursuant to paragraph (3) (a).
Lenita may not thus adopt a l o n e s i n c e A r t i c l e 1 8 5 r e q u i r e s a j o i n t a d o p t i o n b y t h e husband
and the wife, a condition that must be read along together with Article 184. Art 185 provides: Art. 185. Husband
and wife must jointly adopt, except in the following cases: (1) When one spouse seeks to adopt his own
illegitimate child; or (2) When one spouse seeks to adopt the legitimate child of the
other .A s a m e n d e d b y E x e c u t i v e O r d e r 9 , Presidential Decree No. 603, had thus made
it mandatory for both the spouses to jointly adopt when one of them was an alien. The law was silent when
both spouses were of the same nationality.
Case No. 2
On July 29, 1988, the spouses Claude and Jumrus Miller, both American citizen, filed with the Regional Trial
Court a petition to adopt the minor Michael Magno Madayag. On May 12, 1989, the trial court rendered decision granting
the petition for adoption. The Republic of the Philippines, through the Solicitor General, appealed originally to the Court of
Appeals from the decision of RTC granting the petition of respondent spouses to adopt the minor Michael Magno
Madayag. In its decision promulgated on April 17, 1996, the Court of Appeals certified the case to the Supreme Court
because the petition raised question of law.
Issue:
Whether or not the court may allow aliens to adopt a Filipino child despite prohibition of the Family Code,
effective August 3, 1988, when the petition for adoption was filed on July 29, 1988, under the provision of the Child and
Youth Welfare Code which allowed aliens to adopt.
Ruling:
Yes. An alien, who filed a petition for adoption before the effectivity of the Family Code, although denied the right
Case No. 3
Toledano, respondents.
On February 21, 1990 Alvin Clouse, a natural born citizen of America and his wife Evelyn A Clause, Filipino at
birth who later became a natural citizen of the United States petition to adopt Solomon Joseph Alcala. On June 20, 1990
the judge decree said Filipino minor be their child by adoption.
Republic of the Philippines, the petitioner here, appealed that the lower court erred in granting the petition for
adoption for the spouses are not qualified to adopt under the Philippine Law.
Issue:
Whether or not the spouses Alvin and Evelyn Clouse being an alien are
disqualified to adopt under the Philippine law.
Ruling:
Yes. The spouses are disqualified to adopt the Filipino child Solomon. Article 184, paragraph (3) of Executive
Order No. 209 expressly enumerates the persons who are not qualified to adopt, viz:
(3) An alien, except: (a) A former Filipino citizen who seeks to adopt a relative by consanguinity;
(b) One who seeks to adopt the legitimate child of his or her Filipino spouse; or (c) One who is married to a
Filipino citizen and seeks to adopt jointly with his or her spouse a relative by consanguinity of the latter. Aliens
not included in the foregoing exceptions may adopt Filipino children in accordance with the rules on
inter-country adoption as may be provided by law. Private respondent Evelyn A. Clouse, on the other h a n d ,
m a y a p p e a r t o q u a l i f y p u r s u a n t t o p a r a g r a p h 3 ( a ) o f Article 184 of E.O. 209. She was a former Filipino
citizen. She sought to adopt her younger brother. Unfortunately, the petition o r adoption cannot
GROUP 1 28
ADOPTION [ra 8552 and ra 8043]
Case No. 4
LANDINGIN, petitioner,
vs.
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, respondents.
Diwata Ramos Landingin, a citizen of the United States of America (USA), of Filipino parentage and a resident
Issue:
Whether or not the petition for adoption is invalid for lack of consent of the biological mother?
Ruling:
No. The general requirement of consent and notice to the natural parents is intended to protect the natural
parental relationship from unwarranted interference by interlopers, and to insure the opportunity to safeguard the
best interests of the child in the manner of the proposed adoption. When she filed her petition with the trial court, Rep.
Act No. 8552 was already in effect. Section9 thereof provides that if the written consent of the biological parents cannot
be obtained, the written consent of the legal guardian of the minors will suffice. If, as claimed by petitioner, that the
biological mother of the minors had indeed abandoned them, she should, thus have adduced the written consent of their
legal guardian.