Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
This is an extremely important text, full of information and ideas. The first
two chapters provide valuable in-depth reviews of existing literature regarding
the clinical presentations of ADHD and various models of the biological
etiology. He convincingly argues that it is a neurological disorder, on a
developmental continuum, with a substantial genetic component. Deriva-
tively, he argues against those who claim that ADHD is a result of poor
parenting and social ills, and argues for the essential role of stimulant medica-
tion in treatment. The next eight chapters are the core of his book and focus on
development of his major thesis. The final chapter provides very useful direct
clinical applications of his theory, as well as addresses several highly charged
scientific and political issues, such as the assumption of a central role for
inattention in the name of the entity.
There are also some problems with the book. Stylistically, some readers
will welcome the extensive elaboration of meaning, intent, and implications.
Other readers may find that such expansions clutter clarity and understand-
ing. More substantively, many might argue that Barkley' s description of both
ADHD and executive functions is too narrow. For example, while failure in
the inhibitory function is a universally recognized deficit in ADHD, failure
in activation and initiation are also often seen as central features. He omits
the latter. Finally, despite his very scholarly discussion of some.theorists'
notions of executive functions, he fails to convey the full spectrum of
component cognitive processes subserved under the construct (e.g., also
initiation, set-shifting , judgment, and self-perception). For the
neuropsychologically uninformed reader, this potentially obscures the full
breadth of possible problem areas in individuals with ADHD, and/or the
extent of intellectual debate regarding the meaning of executive functions
(e.g., Lezak, 1982; Spreen & Strauss, 1998).
Overall, this book definitely presents the first comprehensive theory of
ADHD, and will generate much discussion and research. Undoubtedly, with
time and collection of additional data, this model will become better delineated
and refined. The clinical implications are also very provocative, especially for
clinicians using cognitive or meta-cognitive techniques. Barkley is essentially
talking about derivatives of a deficit in maintaining the gap between stimulus
and response. In theory these derivaties can be addressed via ideational
interventions, limited only by the practitioners' creativity. Barkley's articula-
tion of highly salient facets within, and beyond, this gap, offers the potential
for the development of more pointed interventions. Although his position
might lead one to argue that cognitive awareness will not impact the inhibition
deficit (i.e., "it is not a problem with knowing, but rather with doing" . . .
Barkley, personal communication), outcome studies will ultimately clarify
this question. Despite its limits, this is a seminal contribution and worthwhile
reading for any serious student of ADHD.
Book Reviews 113
REFERENCES
Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive
functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin,
727(1), 65-94.
Lezak, M. D. (1982). The problem of assessing executive functions. International
Journal of Psychology, 17, 281-297.
Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). Executive functioning. In A Compendium of
Neuropsychological Tests (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
JEANETTE WASSERSTEIN
The Mount Sinai School of Medicine and
Comprechensive Neuropsychological Services (CNS)