Sunteți pe pagina 1din 228

JANUARY 19, 2011 CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING AGENDA

CERTIFICATION

This certification is given pursuant to Chapter XI, Section 9 of the City Charter for the
City Council Briefing Agenda dated January 19, 2011. We hereby certify, as to those
contracts, agreements, or other obligations on this Agenda authorized by the City
Council for which expenditures of money by the City are required, that all of the money
required for those contracts, agreements, and other obligations is in the City treasury to
the credit of the fund or funds from which the money is to be drawn, as required and
permitted by the City Charter, and that the money is not appropriated for any other
purpose.

Date
City Manager

Edward Scott
City Controller
General Information Informacion General

EI Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Dallas. se reune regularr:nente


The Dallas City Council regularly meets on Wednesda~s
los rnlercoles en la Camara del Ayuntamiento en el sexto prsode
beginning at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers, 6th floor, ~Ity
la Alcaldfa, 1500 Marilla, a las 9 de la manana. Las reuniones
Hall, 1500 Marilla. Council agenda meetings are broadcast live
informativas se lIevan a cabo el primer y tercer rniercoles del
on WRR-FM radio (101.1 FM) and on Time Warner City Cable
meso Estas audiencias se transmiten en vivo por la estaci6n de
Channel 16. Briefing meetings are held the first and third
radio WRR-FM 101.1 Y por cablevisi6n en la estaci6n Time
Wednesdays of each month. Council agenda (voting) meetings
Warner CityCable Canal 16. EI Ayuntamiento Municipal se
are held on the second and fourth Wednesdays. Anyone wishing
to speak at a meeting should sign up with the City Secretary's reune el segundo y cuarto rnlercoles del mes para tratar asu~~os
presentados de manera oficial en la agenda para su aprobacion.
Office by calling (214) 670-3738 before 9:0~ a.m. on the r:teetlng
date. Citizens can find out the name of their representative and Toda persona que desee hablar durante la asamblea d~1
Ayuntamiento, debe inscribirse lIamando a la Secretana
their voting district by calling the City Secretary's Office.
Municipal al telefono (214) 670-3738, antes de las 9 de la
manana del dla de la asamblea. Para enterarse del nombre de
Sign interpreters are available upon request with a 48~hour
su representante en el Ayuntamiento Municipal y el distrito
advance notice by calling (214) 670-5208 V/TDD. The City of
donde usted puede votar, favor de lIamar a la Secretaria
Dallas is committed to compliance with the Americans with
Municipal.
Disabilities Act. The Council agenda is available in alternative
formats upon request.
lnterpretes para personas con impedimentos auditivos estan
disponibles si 10 solicita con 48 horas de anticipaci6n !Iamando
If you have any questions about this agenda or comments or
al (214) 670-5208 (aparato auditivo V/TDD). La Ciudad de
complaints about city services, call 311.
Dallas se esfuerza por cumplir con el decreto que protege a las
personas con impedimentos, Americans with Disabilties Act. La
agenda del Avuntamiento esta disponible en formatos
alternos si 10 solicita.

Si tiene preguntas sobre esta agenda, 0 si desea hacer


comentarios 0 presentar quejas con respecto a servicios de la
Ciudad, lIame al 311.
Rules of Courtesy
Reglas de Cortesia
City Council meetings bring together citizens of man~ varied
Las asambleas del Ayuntamiento Municipal reunen a ciudadanos
interests and ideas. To insure fairness and orderly meetings, the
de diversos intereses e ideologfas. Para asegurar la
Council has adopted rules of courtesy which apply to ~II
imparcialidad y el orden durante las asambleas, el Ayuntamiento
members of the Council, administrative staff, news media,
ha adoptado ciertas reglas de cortesia que aplican a todos los
citizens and visitors. These procedures provide:
miembros del Ayuntamiento, al personal administrativo, personal
de los medios de comunicaci6n, a los ciudadanos, ya visitantes.
That no one shall delay or interrupt the proceedings, or
Estos reglamentos establecen 10 siguiente:
refuse to obey the orders of the presiding officer.
Ninguna pesona retrasara 0 lnterrurnpira los procedimientos, 0 se
All persons should refrain from private conversation, eating,
neqara a obedecer las 6rdenes del oficial que preside la asamblea.
drinking and smoking while in the Council Chamber.
Todas las personas deben de abstenerse de entablar
Posters or placards must remain outside the Council conversaciones, comer, beber y fumar dentro de la carnara
Chamber. del Ayuntamiento.
No cellular phones or audible beepers allowed in Council Anuncios y pancartas deben permanecer fuera de la
Chamber while City Council is in session.
carnara del Ayuntamiento.
"Citizens and other visitors attending City Council meetings shall
No se permite usar telefonos celulares 0 enlaces
observe the same rules of propriety, decorum and good conduct
electr6nicos (pagers) audibles en la carnara del
applicable to members of the City Council. Any person making
Ayuntamiento durante audiencias del Ayuntamiento
personal, impertinent, profane or slanderous remark.s or w~o Municipal.
becomes boisterous while addressing the City Council or while
attending the City Council meeting shall be removed fro~ ~he
"Los ciudadanos y visitantes presentes durante las asambleas
room if the sergeant-at-arms is so directed by the presiding
del Ayuntamiento Municipal deben de obedecer las mismas
officer, and the person shall be barred from furthe.r aUdien~e reglas de comportamiento, decoro y buena conducta que se
before the City Council during that session of the City Council.
aplican a los miembros del Ayuntamiento Municipal. Cualqui~r
If the presiding officer fails to act, any member of the City Council
persona que haga comentarios impertinentes, utilice vocabulano
may move to require enforcement of th~ rules, an.d the obsceno 0 difamatorio, 0 que al dirigirse al Ayuntamiento 10 haga
affirmative vote of a majority of the City Council shall require the
en forma escandalosa, 0 si causa disturbio durante la asamblea
presiding officer to act." Section 3.3(c) of the City Council Rules
del Ayuntamiento Municipal, sera expulsada de la carnara si el
of Procedure.
oficial que este presidiendo la asamblea asl 10 ordena. Adernas,
se Ie prohlbira continuar participando en la audiencia ante el
Ayuntamiento Municipal. Si el oficial que preside I.a asambl~a. no
toma acci6n, cualquier otro miembro del Ayuntamiento Municipal
puede tomar medidas para hacer cumplir las reglas
establecidas, y el voto afirmativo de la mayorfa del Ayuntamiento
Municipal precisara al oficial que este presidiendo la sesi6n a
tomar acci6n." Segun la secci6n 3.3(c) de las reglas de
procedimientos del Ayuntamiento.
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2011
CITY HALL
1500 MARILLA
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201
9:00 A.M.

9:00 am Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance 6ES

Special Presentations

Open Microphone Speakers

VOTING AGENDA 6ES

1. Approval of Minutes of the January 5, 2011 City Council Meeting

2. Consideration of appointments to boards and commissions and the evaluation and


duties of board and commission members (List of nominees is available in the City
Secretary's Office)

ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION

City Secretary’s Office

3. Consideration of appointments to the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Board


of Directors for Places 1, 5 and 11 (Closed Session, if necessary, Personnel, Sec.
551.074, T.O.M.A.) (List of nominees in the City Secretary's Office)

Sustainable Development and Construction

4. Authorize an amendment to the Oil and Gas Lease dated February 27, 2008
between the City of Dallas, “Lessor”, and XTO Energy, Inc., “Lessee” by: (1)
extending the primary lease term by 30 months; (2) modifying Exhibit A and Exhibit
B of the Oil and Gas Lease to describe a total of approximately 703 acres of land;
(3) modifying Paragraph 5 by limiting drill sites to a maximum of three sites, each of
which will not contain more than four acres; and (4) adding a provision requiring the
pre-disclosure of all chemicals that would be used at the drill sites - Financing: No
cost consideration to the City
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2011

Briefings 6ES

A. Budget Workshop #2: FY 2011-12 Preliminary Outlook

B. Objectives and Strategies for FY 2011-12


- Key Focus Area Team Presentations
1. Public Safety
2. Economic Vibrancy
3. Clean, Healthy Environment
4. Culture, Arts & Recreation
5. Educational Enhancements
6. E3 Government

Lunch

C. Radio Technology Overview

PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED ACTIONS

Sustainable Development and Construction

DESIGNATED ZONING CASES - UNDER ADVISEMENT - INDIVIDUAL

5. A public hearing to receive comments regarding an application for and an ordinance


granting a Specific Use Permit for gas drilling and production on property zoned an
IR Industrial Research District on the south side of Jefferson Boulevard, east of
Hardy Road adjacent to the water canal in the westernmost quadrant of the Hensley
Field Airport and Naval Base
Recommendation of Staff: Approval for a ten-year period with eligibility for
automatic renewal of additional ten-year periods, subject to an existing site plan,
operation plan for drilling, operation plan for production and conditions
Recommendation of CPC: Denial without prejudice
Z090-211(WE)
Note: This item was considered by the City Council at a public hearing on January
12, 2011, and was taken under advisement until January 19, 2011 with the public
hearing open.

Closed Session 6ES


Attorney Briefings (Sec. 551.071 T.O.M.A.)
- Legal issues regarding Larry Bankston Trial Board Hearing
- Eneida Martinez, Claim No. 10271686
- Benjamin Booker III v. City of Dallas, Cause No. 10-04250-H
- Marcus Wood, et al. v. Tom Leppert, et al., Cause No. 10-14835-M

2
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2011

Open Microphone Speakers 6ES

The above schedule represents an estimate of the order for the indicated briefings and is
subject to change at any time. Current agenda information may be obtained by calling
(214) 670-3100 during working hours.
Note: An expression of preference or a preliminary vote may be taken by the Council on
any of the briefing items.

3
A closed executive session may be held if the discussion of any of the above agenda items
concerns one of the following:

1. Contemplated or pending litigation, or matters where legal advice is requested of the


City Attorney. Section 551.071 of the Texas Open Meetings Act.

2. The purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property, if the deliberation in an


open meeting would have a detrimental effect on the position of the City in
negotiations with a third person. Section 551.072 of the Texas Open Meetings Act.

3. A contract for a prospective gift or donation to the City, if the deliberation in an open
meeting would have a detrimental effect on the position of the City in negotiations
with a third person. Section 551.073 of the Texas Open Meetings Act.

4. Personnel matters involving the appointment, employment, evaluation,


reassignment, duties, discipline or dismissal of a public officer or employee or to
hear a complaint against an officer or employee. Section 551.074 of the Texas
Open Meetings Act.

5. The deployment, or specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or


devices. Section 551.076 of the Texas Open Meetings Act.

6. Deliberations regarding economic development negotiations. Section 551.087 of the


Texas Open Meetings Act.

4
Memorandum

DATE JANUARY 14, 2011


CITY OF DALLAS

ro HONORABLEMAYORAND
MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL

SUBJECT BOARD AND COMMISSION NOMINEESIRENOMINEES

The following Board and Commission nominee will be considered on


Wednesday, January 19,2011 for appointment.

The list represents the following category for your consideration:

• DFW Board Nominee (applications attached)

The nominee meets all qualifications for service on this board.

If you need additional information, please advise.

) O ~a~
. :tJ-tP eborah Watkins
City Secretary

c: Mary K. Suhm, City Manager


Thomas P. Perkins, Jr., City Attorney

"The Only ReasonYou And I Are Here Is To ServeThe Citizens Of Dallas"


CITY OF DALLAS BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
NOMINEES FOR DFW BOARD APPOINTMENT
CLEARED FOR COUNCIL ACTION

DFW DALLAS-FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOARD


01 BETTY CULBREATH RENOMINATED REC 11/11/2010
B F 05 C Member since: 02127/2009 Terms served:
Place 01 Dallas Member Term Exp 01/31/2013
Co-nominated by: V.HILL and ATKINS

05 BEN MURO RENOMINATED REC 11/11/2010


H M 11 C Member since: 05/31/2005 Terms served: 3
Place 05 Dallas Member Term Exp 01/31/2013
Co-nominated by: MEDRANO and SALAZAR, JASSO

11 BRENDA E. REYES RENOMINATED REC 11111/2010


H F 14 C Member since: 02128/2009 Terms served:
Place 11 Dallas Member Term Exp 01/31/2013
Co-nominated by: JASSO and ATKINS

91 JESUS G. GARCIA NOMINATED REC 11/11/2010


H M 03 C
Nominated For Pos. 11
Co-nominated by: MEDRANO and SALAZAR

City ofDallas Nominees Ready


City Secretary's Office 01/13/2011
AGENDA ITEM # 4
KEY FOCUS AREA: Economic Vibrancy

AGENDA DATE: January 19, 2011

COUNCIL DISTRICT(S): 3

DEPARTMENT: Sustainable Development and Construction

CMO: A. C. Gonzalez, 671-8925

MAPSCO: 51A H L M R 51B E J


________________________________________________________________

SUBJECT

Authorize an amendment to the Oil and Gas Lease dated February 27, 2008 between
the City of Dallas, “Lessor”, and XTO Energy, Inc., “Lessee” by: (1) extending the
primary lease term by 30 months; (2) modifying Exhibit A and Exhibit B of the Oil and
Gas Lease to describe a total of approximately 703 acres of land; (3) modifying
Paragraph 5 by limiting drill sites to a maximum of three sites, each of which will not
contain more than four acres; and (4) adding a provision requiring the pre-disclosure of
all chemicals that would be used at the drill sites - Financing: No cost consideration to
the City

BACKGROUND

This item authorizes an amendment to the Oil and Gas Lease dated February 27, 2008
between the City of Dallas, “Lessor”, and XTO Energy, Inc., “Lessee”, to (1) extend the
primary term by 30 months, from 36 months to 66 months; (2) modify Exhibit A and
Exhibit B of the Oil and Gas Lease to eliminate all tracts except Tracts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8,
and 9 for a total acreage of approximately 703 acres of land, located at Hensley Field;
(3) modify Paragraph 5 by limiting drill sites to a maximum of three at Hensley Field and
no drill site can contain more than four acres; and (4) add a provision that the Lessee
agrees that at least seven days before a Special Use Permit application is considered
by the City Plan Commission or City Council, Lessee will provide an accurate inventory
of chemicals to be injected into the well bore for the purpose of drilling or hydraulic
fracturing, or related well bore activities.

PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (COUNCIL, BOARDS, COMMISSIONS)

City Council approved Resolution No. 08-0720 authorizing Oil and Gas Leases on
February 27, 2008.

FISCAL INFORMATION

No cost consideration to the City


OWNER

ExxonMobile Corporation

XTO Energy, Inc.


Louis G. Baldwin, Chief Financial Officer & Director
Brent W. Clum, Treasurer

MAPS

Attached

Agenda Date 01/19/2011 - page 2


LA
FAIRFAX FAIRFAX
ASH 24
SUMMIT
16'}-_-r-'-r-..J..-y

16

11

73
t;
3:
DALLAS '"
~

~~ 51
51AG

~~O.~51Mi
copyrighte 2006 MAPSCO, Inc, OMi
51A-H L M R 51B-E J
I Scale 1 : 16 332
SUBJECT SlTt
HTS
COUNCIL CHAMBER

January 19, 2011

WHEREAS, on February 27, 2008, the City of Dallas entered into an Oil and Gas Lease
with XTO Energy, Inc.; and

WHEREAS, the City of Dallas and XTO Energy, Inc., agree to modify the Oil and Gas
Lease;

Now, Therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALLAS:

SECTION 1. That the City Manager is hereby authorized, upon approval as to form by
the City Attorney, to execute an amendment to the Oil and Gas Lease, dated as of
February 27, 2008, with XTO Energy, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as Lessee, and the
City of Dallas, as Lessor.

SECTION 2. That the modifications to this lease are:

(1) Section 2 of the Lease is modified by extending the primary term for 30
months, from 36 months to 66 months.

(2) Exhibit A and Exhibit B of the Oil and Gas Lease are modified by
eliminating all tracts except Tracts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 9 for a total
acreage of approximately 703 acres of land, located at Hensley Field.

(3) Paragraph 5 is modified by the addition of language limiting drill sites to a


maximum of three at Hensley Field and no drill site can contain more than
four acres.

(4) Adding a provision to the Lease that the Lessee will provide a list of
chemicals to be injected into the well bore for the purpose of drilling or
hydraulic fracturing, or related well bore activities and the disclosure shall
include every chemical to be used, along with the data sheets of the
chemicals to be used.
COUNCIL CHAMBER

January 19, 2011

SECTION 3. That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its
passage in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of Dallas, and it is
accordingly so resolved.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
THOMAS P. PERKINS, JR.
CITY ATTORNEY

By: _---'-'---_ _--=-=---'- _


Assistant City Attorney
AGENDA ITEM # 5
KEY FOCUS AREA: Economic Vibrancy

AGENDA DATE: January 19, 2011

COUNCIL DISTRICT(S): 3

DEPARTMENT: Sustainable Development and Construction

CMO: A. C. Gonzalez, 671-8925

MAPSCO: 51A Q R

SUBJECT

A public hearing to receive comments regarding an application for and an ordinance


granting a Specific Use Permit for gas drilling and production on property zoned an IR
Industrial Research District on the south side of Jefferson Boulevard, east of Hardy
Road adjacent to the water canal in the westernmost quadrant of the Hensley Field
Airport and Naval Base
Recommendation of Staff: Approval for a ten-year period with eligibility for automatic
renewal of additional ten-year periods, subject to an existing site plan, operation plan for
drilling, operation plan for production and conditions
Recommendation of CPC: Denial without prejudice
Z090-211(WE)
Note: This item was considered by the City Council at a public hearing on January 12,
2011, and was taken under advisement until January 19, 2011 with the public hearing
open.
HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19, 2011
ACM: A. C. Gonzalez

FILE NUMBER: Z090-211 ryvE) DATE FILED: May 25, 2010

LOCATION: South side of Jefferson Boulevard, east of Hardy Road


adjacent to the water canal in the westernmost quadrant of the
Hensley Field Airport and Naval Base

COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3 MAPSCO: 51A-Q, R

SIZE OF REQUEST: Approx. 3.67 acres CENSUS TRACT: 159.00

APPLICANT: XTO Energy Inc

OWNER: City of Dallas

REPRESENTATIVE: Dallas Cothrum


MASTERPLAN

REQUEST: An application for a Specific Use Permit for gas drilling and
production on property zoned an IR Industrial Research
District.

SUMMARY: The purpose of this request is to allow for the drilling, and
production of natural gas on a site at Hensley Field.

CPC RECOMMENDATION: Denial without prejudice

STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval for a ten-year period with eligibility for


automatic renewal of additional ten-year periods, subject to an existing site plan,
operation plan for drilling, operation plan for production and conditions.

DESIGNATED ZONING CASE

1
Z090-211(WE)

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
• The applicant’s request for a Specific Use Permit will allow for the operation and
production of natural gas on Hensley Field, a de-commissioned naval air base. The
applicant proposes to drill approximately 12 wells on a 3.67 acre site.

• The request site is one of several proposed gas well sites on Hensley Field. The
applicant could propose up to 9 additional drill sites on Hensley Field depending on
the success of this site. Additional sites will require Specific Use Permits.

• In September 2007, the City Council approved Ordinance No. 26920 requiring a
Specific Use Permit for gas drilling and production in all zoning districts.

• The City of Dallas has entered into an agreement with the applicant to lease the
property for gas drilling and production.

• The request site is zoned an IR Industrial Research District. An open channel water
canal separates the proposed gas drilling site from the single family uses. The
proposed wells are approximately 898 feet from the nearest residential use.

Zoning History: There has not been any recent zoning changes request in the area.

Thoroughfares/Streets:

Thoroughfare/Street Type Existing Proposed


ROW ROW
Jefferson Boulevard Principal Arterial 100 ft. 100 ft.

Land Use:

Zoning Land Use


Site IR Decommissioned Naval base
North IR Undeveloped, Hensley Field
South IR, R-7.5(A) Undeveloped, Lake
East IR, R-7.5(A) Undeveloped, Hensley Field
West IR Undeveloped

Comprehensive Plan: The comprehensive plan does not make a specific land use
recommendation related to the request, however the forwardDallas! Vision Illustration is
comprised of a series of Building Blocks that shows general land use patterns. They
are generalized patterns without well-defined boundaries that indicate where certain
types and densities of development might logically occur.

2
Z090-211(WE)

The request site lies within an Industrial Area Building Block. This Building Block offers
important employment opportunities, occupy large areas of land and usually are near
major roads and heavy rail lines. Evolving technology and the need for freight
movement through Dallas to the rest of the country and internationally means this sector
can offer good opportunities for jobs. Logistics and warehousing, a growing industry
with strong potential for upward mobility of skilled workers, would thrive in such areas.
Examples include Southport and the Agile Port, parts of West Dallas along I-30, and the
Stemmons industrial area. These areas include a mix of low- and medium-density
industrial buildings and industrial yards and have large surface parking for cars and
trucks. Industrial Areas rely on quality road access and may be linked to rail for freight
purposes. Street lanes are wide and intersections are large. Transit, sidewalks and
other pedestrian improvements are limited

STAFF ANALYSIS:

Land Use Compatibility: The 3.67 acre site is undeveloped and is located on Hensley
Field, a de-commissioned Naval air base, and is in close proximately to the City of
Grand Prairie. An open channel water canal, which is west of the request site, will act
as a buffer between the proposed gas site and an existing residential development.
The nearest single family development is approximately 898 feet from the proposed
site.

The applicant’s request for a Specific Use Permit will permit the operation and
production of gas drilling and extraction. In the Development Code, gas drilling and
production means the activities related to the “the extraction of any fluid, either
combustible or noncombustible, that is produced in a natural state from the earth and
that maintains a gaseous or rarefied state at standard temperature and pressure
conditions, or the extraction of any gaseous vapors derived from petroleum or natural
gas.”

The Development Code requires the applicant to provide the following site plans for a
gas drilling and production use:

• Site plan showing existing/original conditions;


• Site/operation plan for the drilling phase; and
• Site/operation plan for the production phase.

The applicant has submitted the following plans for the Specific Use Permit application:
an existing conditions plan, an operations plan for the drilling phase, and an operations
plan for the production phase. The operation plan for the drilling phase addresses the
natural-gas drilling. The plan shows the location of several temporary construction
trailers, water tanks, mud tanks, and drilling equipment. A drilling rig with an
approximate height of 160 feet will be on site during this phase. The building official will
consider this as a temporary structure, similar to a crane used in constructing a tall
building. The SUP conditions will limit the drilling phase for 90 days per calendar year,

3
Z090-211(WE)

because drilling (with lighting) will be done 24 hours a day, and noise could impact the
surrounding uses.

There are two methods for drilling: an open-loop system and a closed-loop system. An
open-loop system uses a lined mud-pit to hold mud. The mud-pit may be a safety
hazard and may have a negative impact on adjacent property. In contrast, a closed-
loop system uses tanks to hold the mud. There are fewer environmental concerns with
a closed-loop system and the applicant is providing a drilling phase plans that will
include a closed-loop system. The applicant is proposing to drill approximately 12 wells
on site in an area that is 70 feet by 170 feet.

The production plan shows an area in the southwest quadrant of the pad site that will
store the equipment (e.g., horizontal separators, water tanks and gas lift compressors).
The SUP area will be enclosed by an eight-foot-high chain link fence that will have a
vinyl coating. The equipment being used for the drilling phase consists of water pumps,
rigs floor, pumps, tanks generators and centrifuge.

The location of the request site is located on an undeveloped portion of land within a de-
commission naval air field. The request site is adjacent to an open channel water canal
and is near the City of Grand Prairie. The applicant proposes to drill approximately 12
wells to extract natural gas from the site. There are several measures that are in place
pursuant to the Dallas Development Code that requires the applicant to restore the site
back to it natural state after the wells have been capped. In addition, there are
additional provisions in the Code that require the right-of-ways (infrastructure) to be
restored.

Staff has reviewed the applicant’s request for a SUP for gas drilling and production and
is recommending approval for a time period of 10 years with eligibility for automatic
renewal of additional 10 year periods, subject to the attached plans and conditions. The
City Plan Commission had concerns regarding the potential health of the general public
and discussed holding the case under advisement until further studies/reports were
concluded by the City of Fort Worth and TECQ. The recommendations from the
proposed reports are projected to be released next year. The applicant requested that
the City Plan Commission vote on the zoning request because of their obligations under
the lease agreement. As a result of the applicant’s request, the City Plan Commission
recommended denial without prejudice.

The general provisions for a Specific Use Permit in Section 51A-4.219 of the Dallas
Development Code specifically state: (1) The SUP provides a means for developing
certain uses in a manner in which the specific use will be consistent with the character
of the neighborhood; (2) Each SUP application must be evaluated as to its probable
effect on the adjacent property and the community welfare and may be approved or
denied as the findings indicate appropriate; (3) The city council shall not grant an SUP
for a use except upon a finding that the use will: (A) complement or be compatible with
the surrounding uses and community facilities; (B) contribute to, enhance, or promote
the welfare of the area of request and adjacent properties; (C) not be detrimental to the

4
Z090-211(WE)

public health, safety, or general welfare; and (D) conform in all other respects to all
applicable zoning regulations and standards. The request does not appear to have an
adverse impact on the surrounding zoning and land uses.

Development Standards:

SETBACKS Lot Special


DISTRICT Density Height PRIMARY Uses
Front Side/Rear Coverage Standards
30’ adjacent
to 2.0 FAR overall Industrial, wholesale
IR 15’ residential 0.75 office/ retail
200’
80%
Proximity Slope
distribution & storage,
Industrial research 15 stories Visual Intrusion
OTHER: 0.5 retail supporting office & retail
No Min.

Landscaping: The proposed pad site for a gas drilling and production use will not
trigger any landscaping requirements that pertain to landscape requirements in Article
X, as amended. The request site is heavily screened with vegetation along the
southern and western portion of the Property. Due to the naval base being an
emergency air base for commercial aircraft, any additional planting materials around the
request area would not be recommended. Additional planting materials may attract
birds to the area and could cause problems, if the de-commissioned air base becomes
operational in the future.

Traffic: The Engineering Section of the Department of Sustainable Development and


Construction has reviewed the request and determined that it will not impact the
surrounding street system for the proposed development. The applicant proposes to
access the site from W. Jefferson Boulevard. Upon entering the naval base, the large
trucks will use the west taxiway to deliver the necessary equipment to the site. A
proposed 30 foot gravel access road will be constructed from the west taxiway to the
request site.

Miscellaneous – Conditions: Staff incorporated additional regulations in the Specific


Use Permit conditions that were proposed by the commissioner of the district even
though the City Plan Commissioners did not recommend approval of the request.
These additional conditions included: maximum number of wells, Chemical Additive
Reports, Evaporation and Land Farming, Dehydration Operations, Water handling,
Noise Management Plan, Leaks and Air and Production Samplings.

CPC Action (October 21, 2010)

Motion I: It was moved to recommend approval of for a Specific Use Permit


for gas drilling and production for a ten-year period with eligibility for automatic
renewal of additional ten-year periods, subject to an existing site plan,
operation plan for drilling, operation plan for production and conditions
(including conditions distributed at briefing) on property zoned an IR Industrial
Research District on the south side of Jefferson Boulevard, east of Hardy Road
adjacent to the water canal in the westernmost quadrant of the Hensley Field
Airport and Naval Base with the following additional changes to the conditions

5
Z090-211(WE)

distributed at the briefing: 1) Condition 14, NOISE MANAGEMENT PLAN (c)


to read as follows: “detail how noise impacts will be mitigated (e.g., including
the providing of acoustical absorption walls around the site to shield
neighboring uses), considering specific site characteristics, including, but not
limited to, the nature and location, proximity and type of adjacent development,
seasonal prevailing weather patterns, including wind directions, vegetative
cover on or adjacent to the site, and topography of the site.” 2) Condition 15,
LEAKS to read as follows: “All flow lines, compression equipment and shut-off
valves shall be inspected for leak detection at least annually, using infrared
cameras, filtered and tuned for the wavelengths of sunlight absorbed and re-
emitted by natural gas hydrocarbons, or other equally effective detection
devices. Reports of such inspections shall be delivered to the Gas Inspector
within 15 days of inspection, and no later than 90 days following the date of the
preceding annual report. The Gas Inspector shall promptly forward such report
to the Director and notify the Director of any potential violation.” 3) Condition
16, AIR SAMPLING to read as follows: “Ambient air sampling, prior to a
drilling permit being issued and drilling activity commencing, must be
performed to establish a baseline sample for air quality. A second sampling
must be taken within 60 days of the first well entering a production phase and
annually there after. Air samples must be taken by a qualified firm approved
the director of the office of environmental quality. Samples will be analyzed by
a qualified 3rd party laboratory, certified by industry standards, and all results
will be provided to the city Gas Inspector within 15 days of issuance of the
report. The Gas Inspector shall promptly forward such report to the Director
and notify the Director of any potential violation.” and 4) Condition 17,
PRODUCTION SAMPLING to read as follows: “Within 60 days of the first well
entering production, gas samples must be taken and analyzed by a qualified
3rd party laboratory, certified by industry standards, and all results provided to
the city Gas Inspector within 15 days of issuance of the report. The Gas
Inspector shall promptly forward such report to the Director and notify the
Director of any potential violation. Results must provide a thorough breakdown
of the gas and record any presence of benzene, hydrocarbons or other
constituents.”

Maker: Anglin
Second: Tarpley
Result: Failed: 6 to 7

For: 6 - Anglin, Bagley, Tarpley, Bernbaum, Wolfish,


Schwartz,

Against: 7 - R. Davis, Wally, M. Davis, Rodgers, Lavallaisaa,


Shellene, Peterson
Absent: 1 - Alcantar
Vacancy: 1 - District 6

6
Z090-211(WE)

Substitute Motion: In considering an application for a Specific Use Permit for


gas drilling and production on property zoned an IR Industrial Research District
on south side of Jefferson Boulevard, east of Hardy Road adjacent to the water
canal in the westernmost quadrant of the Hensley Field Airport and Naval
Base, it was moved to hold this case under advisement until April 21, 2011

Maker: Peterson
Second: Wally

Commissioner Peterson withdrew his motion.


Commissioner Wally withdrew her second.

Motion: It was moved to recommend denial without prejudice for a Specific


Use Permit for gas drilling and production on property zoned an IR Industrial
Research District on south side of Jefferson Boulevard, east of Hardy Road
adjacent to the water canal in the westernmost quadrant of the Hensley Field
Airport and Naval Base.

Maker: Peterson
Second: Schwartz
Result: Carried: 10 to 3

For: 10 - R. Davis, M. Davis, Rodgers, Bagley,


Lavallaisaa, Tarpley, Shellene, Bernbaum,
Schwartz, Peterson

Against: 3 - Wally, Anglin, Wolfish


Absent: 1 - Alcantar
Vacancy: 1 - District 6

Notices: Area: 1000 Mailed: 48


Replies: For: 0 Against: 3

Speakers: For: Dallas Cothrum, 900 Jackson St., Dallas, TX, 75202
Walter Dueease, 810 Houston St., Fort Worth, TX, 76102
William Cothrum, 900 Jackson St., Dallas, TX, 75202
Against: Raymond Crawford, 2647 Southwood Dr., Dallas, TX, 75233
Mariana Griggs, 1803 Marydale Dr., Dallas, TX, 75208
Marc McCord, 7660 La Bolsa Dr., Dallas, TX, 75248
Jennifer Land, 3905 Weeburn Dr., Dallas, TX, 75229
Timothy Ruggiero, 415 Star Shell Rd., Decater, TX, 76234
Cherelle Blazer, 4815 Darko Dr., Dallas, TX, 75232
Darryl Baker, 2606 Woodmere Dr., Dallas, TX, 75233
Molly Rooke, 5825 Palm Ln., Dallas, TX, 75206

7
Z090-211(WE)

Jim Schermbeck, P.O. Box 253, Slaton, TX, 79369


Jeffery Jacoby, 5920 La Vista Dr., Dallas, TX, 75206
Michele R. Vaughan, 5920 La Vista Dr., Dallas, TX, 75206
Lynn Rooks, 4413 Worth St., Dallas, TX, 75246
Kathryn Rowe, 3140 N. Hall St., Dallas, TX, 75204
Against (Did not speak): Peter Wilson, 8650 Southwestern Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75206
Kevin Vilbig, 8780 Park Ln., Dallas, TX, 75231
Ana Badillo, 4208 Lafayette, Dallas, TX, 75204
J.W. Fain Sr., 3134 Carlson, Dallas, TX, 75235
Daryel McCortt, 4509 Club Estates, Mesquite, TX, 75150
Emily Gammage, 1000 Liberty Cr., Hurst, TX, 76053
Joshua Rollins, 7575 Frankford, Dallas, TX, 75252
Cynthia Gaertner, 8033 Forest Trail, Dallas, TX, 75238
Jane Hoffman, 10720 Sandpiper Ln., Dallas, TX, 75230
Leslie Durlham, 9920 Ridgehaven Dr., Dallas, TX, 75238
Tony Nuncio, 1511 Briarcrest Dr., Dallas, TX, 75224
Justen Ray, 7407 Fair Oaks Ave., Dallas, TX, 75231
David McFatridge, 101 S. Mountain Ridge, Cresson, TX, 76035
Alisa Livingstone, 4207 Live Oak St., Dallas, TX, 75204
Anna Rowe, 5723 Charlestown Dr., Dallas, TX, 75230
Maralyn Hamaker, 1139 Haines Ave., Dallas, TX, 75208
Anita Hamakert, 1137 Haines Ave., Dallas, TX, 75208
Eric Harvey, 4216 Glenwood Ave., Dallas, TX, 75205
Noel Navarrete, 2019 Cloudcroft, Dallas, TX, 75224
Giovanni Salazar, 4420 Fair Vista, Dallas, TX, 75227
Alberto Nunez, 7106 Lovett Ave., Dallas, TX, 75227
Lauren Wyatt, 1240 Dalhart Dr., Richard, TX, 75080
Erica Peterson, 4421 Worth St., Dallas, TX, 75246
Sarah Semrad, 108 S. Rosemont Ave., Dallas, TX, 75208
Thao Reeves, 5804 Kenwood Ave., Dallas, TX, 75206
David Griggs, 13214 Glad acres Dr., Dallas, TX, 75234
Joen Mein, 1415 San Saba Dr., Dallas, TX, 75218
Emily Gossett, 7223 Fenton Dr., Dallas, TX, 75231
John Prude, 6967 Helsem Way, Dallas, TX, 75230
Patty Ballard, 8235 Hunnicut Rd., Dallas, TX, 75228
Roydrick West, 2309 Rexlawn Dr., Dallas, TX, 75227
Crisel Vargas, 6715 Overpark Ct., Dallas, TX, 75217
Amber Bynum, Address not given
Nicole Horn, 826 ½ N. Clinton Ave., Dallas, TX, 75208
Susan Read, 508 Edgeview, Grand Prairie, TX, 75052
Canoace Weinberg, 3930 McKinney Ave., Dallas, TX, 75204
City Staff: Bonnie Meeder, Sustainable Development and Construction
Kris Sweckard, Office of Environmental Quality

8
Z090-211(WE)

XTO ENERGY INC


OFFICERS

• Bob R. Simpson Chairman of the Board


• Keith A. Hutton Chief Executive Officer
• Vaughn O. Vennerberg II President
• Louis G. Baldwin Executive Vice President and CFO
• Timothy L. Petrus Executive Vice President – Acquisitions
• James L. Death Senior Vice President – Land
• Edwin S. Ryan, Jr. Senior Vice President – Land Administration
• Mark J. Pospisil Senior Vice President of Geology
• Timothy Mcllwain Vice President of Operations – FW Division
• Lindsey Dingmore Vice President of Government and Regulatory Affairs

PELOTON LAND SOLUTIONS, LLLP

• Aric A. Head Managing Partner


• Richard R. Payne Managing Partner
• Patrick A. Smith Managing Partner

9
Z090-211(WE)

STAFF’S PROPOSED SUP CONDITIONS

1. USE: The only use authorized by this specific use permit is gas drilling and
production.

2. SITE/OPERATION PLANS: Use and develop the Property must compliance with
the following attached site and operation plans:

(a) Site plan showing existing/original conditions;


(b) Site/operation plan for the drilling phase; and
(c) Site/operation plan for the production phase.

3. TIME LIMIT: Except as provided in Paragraph (4)(b), this specific use permit
expires on (ten year from passage of ordinance), but is eligible for automatic
renewal for additional 10-year periods pursuant to Section 51A-4.219 of Chapter
51A of the Dallas City Code, as amended. For automatic renewal to occur, the
Property owner must file a complete application for automatic renewal with the
director before the expiration of the current period. Failure to timely file a
complete application will render this specific use permit ineligible for automatic
renewal. (Note: The Code currently provides that applications for automatic
renewal must be filed after the 180th but before the 120th day before the
expiration of the current specific use permit period. The Property owner is
responsible for checking the Code for possible revisions to this provision. The
deadline for applications for automatic renewal is strictly enforced.)

(b) The Operator shall notify the building official in writing at least 10 days
before permanently stopping gas production (abandoning the well). Once the
Operator permanently stops production, this specific use permit expires after the
Operator restores the Property in accordance with Article XII. After the Operator
restores the Property, a new specific use permit is required for any other gas
drilling and production operation.

4. HEIGHT: Except temporary structures authorized by the building official, no


structure may exceed 24 feet in height.

5. TIME LIMITS ON OPERATIONS: The following limits on operations apply to the


gas drilling and production use:

(a) DRILLING PHASE: Gas drilling activities may occur 24 hours a day, seven
days a week. If a residential use is located within 600 feet of the operation site,
the Operator shall begin drilling all of the wells approved by the SUP within one
year after receiving a gas well permit for the first well. See Section 51A-
12.105(d)(6).

10
Z090-211(WE)

(b) FRACTURING and REWORKING PHASE:

(1) Except as provided in this subsection, fracturing may occur during


daylight hours, seven days a week, except that flowback operations
may occur 24 hours a day, seven days a week. See Section 51A-
12.105(m)(1).

(2) Except as provided in this subsection, reworking may occur 24


hours a day, seven days a week.

(3) If a residential use is located within 600 feet of the operation site,
fracturing and reworking may occur no more than 90 days in any
365 day period.

(c) PRODUCTION PHASE: Gas production may occur at any time of day, but
the Operator must make any repairs or improvements, other than fracturing or
reworking, between 6:00 am to 9:00 pm, Monday through Saturday, except that
emergency repairs may be made at any time.

6. MANEUVERING SURFACE: Vehicle maneuvering surfaces must be gravel or a


similar material in the locations shown on the site/operation plans.

7. PERMITS: The building official may not issue a certificate of occupancy for a
gas drilling and production use until the Operator obtains all required permits
from the Railroad Commission of Texas, Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, and all other state, federal, or city agencies.

8. SIGNS: Signs must comply with the provisions for non-business zoning districts
in Article VII and gas drilling and production in Article XII.

9. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF WELLS: No more than 12 wells may be on this site.

10. CHEMICAL ADDITIVE REPORTS: At least 10 days prior to commencement of


drilling or hydraulic fracturing operations, the Operator will deliver to the Gas
Inspector (both as defined in Sec. 51A-12.102.b) a completed Material Safety
Data Sheet ("MSDS") containing an accurate inventory of chemicals to be
injected into the well bore for the purpose of drilling or hydraulic fracturing, or
related well bore activities. Such MSDS reports shall disclose every chemical to
be used, including quantity, concentrations, combinations, and formulations,
sufficient to satisfy the Gas Inspector that full disclosure has been made. All
such reports shall be reasonably available to the public upon request. Any
failure or refusal to provide such MSDS reports to the Gas Inspector as provided
herein shall be a violation as defined in Sec. 51A-12.105(h) and Sec. 51A-
12.109.

11. EVAPORATION AND LAND FARMING: No open holding or evaporation pits or


"land farming" processes (as that term is commonly understood in the industry)

11
Z090-211(WE)

shall be allowed on the site, and all operations shall be conducted on a "closed
loop system" basis, as that term is defined in Sec. 51A-12.102(5).

12. DEHYDRATION OPERATIONS: Unless other equivalent means are proposed


by Operator and approved by the Gas Inspector, all gas dehydration operations
shall be handled by zero-emission separators to minimize fugitive emissions.

13. WATER HANDLING: Within a reasonable time (to be determined by the


Director) the Operator shall transmit a certified disclosure to the Gas Inspector
stating the amounts and sources of all water actually used in any hydraulic
fracturing operation. Within a reasonable time (to be determined by the Director)
the Operator shall transmit a certified disclosure to the Gas Inspector stating the
quantity of all flow-back or produced fluids recovered from each will. Within a
reasonable time (to be determined by the Director) the Operator shall transmit a
certified disclosure to the Gas Inspector stating the final destination of all fluids,
slurries and muds removed from the site for disposal or reprocessing.

14. NOISE MANAGEMENT PLAN: Prior to the issuance of a gas well permit and
the commencement of operations, the Operator shall submit a Noise
Management Plan detailing how the equipment used in the drilling, completion,
transportation, or production of the well(s) complies with the maximum
permissible noise levels set forth in the applicable city ordinance. The noise
management plan must:

(a) identify operation noise impacts;


(b) provide documentation of a professional 72-hour study establishing the
Ambient Noise Level prior to construction at the site; and
(c) detail how noise impacts will be mitigated (e.g., the providing of acoustical
absorption walls around the site to shield neighboring uses), considering
specific site characteristics, including, but not limited to, the nature and
location, proximity and type of adjacent development, seasonal prevailing
weather patterns, including wind directions, vegetative cover on or
adjacent to the site, and topography of the site.

The Operator shall be responsible for verifying to the Gas Inspector compliance
with this condition and with the noise management plan after the installation of
noise generating equipment. Approval of such Noise Management Plan by the
Gas Inspector shall be a prerequisite to issuance of a gas well permit for the site.

15. LEAKS: All flow lines, compression equipment and shut-off valves shall be
inspected for leak detection at least annually, using infrared cameras, filtered
and tuned for the wavelengths of sunlight absorbed and re-emitted by natural gas
hydrocarbons, or other equally effective detection devices. Reports of such
inspections shall be delivered to the Gas Inspector within 15 days of inspection,
and no later than one year following the date of the preceding annual report.

12
Z090-211(WE)

16. AIR SAMPLING: Ambient air sampling, prior to a drilling permit being issued
and drilling activity commencing, must be performed to establish a baseline
sample for air quality. A second sampling must be taken within 60 days of the
first well entering a production phase and annually there after. Air samples must
be taken by a qualified firm approved the director of the office of environmental
quality. Samples will be analyzed by a qualified 3rd party laboratory, certified by
industry standards, and all results will be provided to the city.

17, PRODUCTION SAMPLING: Within 60 days of the first well entering


production, gas samples must be taken and analyzed by a qualified 3rd party
laboratory, certified by industry standards, and all results provided to the city.
Results must provide a thorough breakdown of the gas and record any presence
of benzene, hydrocarbons or other constituents.

18. MAINTENANCE: The Property must be properly maintained in a state of good


repair and neat appearance.

19. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: Use of the Property must comply with all federal
and state laws and regulations, and City of Dallas ordinances, rules, and
regulations, including the gas drilling regulations.

13
Z090-211(WE)

EXISTING CONDITIONS

14
Z090-211(WE)

DRILLING PLAN
Closed loop mud system

15
Z090-211(WE)

PRODUCTION PLAN

16
Z090-211(WE)

17
Z090-211(WE)

Undeveloped

Undeveloped

Single Family

18
Z090-211(WE)

CPC RESPONSES

19
Z090-211(WE)

Notification List of Property


Z090-211
48 Property Owners Notified 3 Property Owners Opposed 0 Property Owners in Favor
Vote Label Address Owner
1 2233 MOUNTAIN CREEK PK MARNAT CREEK LTD PTNSHP
2 2233 MOUNTAIN CREEK PK TEXAS UTILITIES ELEC CO
3 2600 MOUNTAIN CREEK EXTEX LAPORTE L P
4 1774 NINA BEAZER HOMES TEXAS LP
5 1916 COURTSIDE DERRICK MAXWELL &
KRYSTAL
6 1901 COURTSIDE TCIF LLC
7 1905 COURTSIDE ROJAS ADELA &
8 1909 COURTSIDE VARGAS FELIX SR
9 1913 COURTSIDE SAYER JENNY
10 1917 COURTSIDE PADILLA OCTAVIANA J &
11 1921 COURTSIDE ALONSO ROXANNA &
X 12 1925 COURTSIDE TOMASZEWSKI SERGIO &
X 13 1929 COURTSIDE ALLEN FREDERICK E
14 1933 COURTSIDE HAWKINS IRVIN
15 1937 COURTSIDE BIRDOW AMERA M
16 1941 COURTSIDE NUNEZ CARLOS
17 1945 COURTSIDE SECRETARY OF HOUSING &
URBAN DEV
18 1949 COURTSIDE MOCTEZOMA ANGELICA
19 1953 COURTSIDE MAYORE DUKE O
20 1957 COURTSIDE GALLARDO PATRICIA A
21 1961 COURTSIDE DIEFER INVESTMENTS
22 1965 COURTSIDE ALVAREZ CRECENCIO III
23 1969 COURTSIDE MITCHELL MARTHA
24 1973 COURTSIDE KALENA KAREN M
25 1977 COURTSIDE BREINDEL TONI
26 1981 COURTSIDE ARENAS RICHARD

Friday, October 22, 2010

20
Z090-211(WE)

Vote Label Address Owner


27 1985 COURTSIDE CROCKETT CHARLES B &
28 1993 COURTSIDE MAE FANNIE
29 1997 COURTSIDE MARUPUDI KUMARA S
30 1602 NINA MARUPUDI LAKSHMI D
31 1606 NINA MARUPUDI LASKSHMI &
32 1926 COURTSIDE MARTINEZ IMELDA
33 1930 COURTSIDE ARRUBLA LUIS
X 34 1934 COURTSIDE WILSON COREY J
35 1938 COURTSIDE RAMIREZ ALFONSO &
36 1942 COURTSIDE HAYES SARITA
37 1946 COURTSIDE LOPEZ MARIA &
38 1950 COURTSIDE TREVINO FRANCISO & JUANA
39 1954 COURTSIDE MARTINEZ JOSE
40 1958 COURTSIDE UME GENEVIEVE
41 1962 COURTSIDE COLBERT MILTON
42 1966 COURTSIDE SHAMSHOIAN SID B
43 1970 COURTSIDE WILLIAMS TASHA
44 1974 COURTSIDE CONEJO TOMAS M &
45 1978 COURTSIDE URUETA ALEJANDRO
46 1982 COURTSIDE KIMBLE DONALD W &
47 1986 COURTSIDE DINH MAI & TUAN NGUYEN
48 1990 COURTSIDE GONZALEZ MARIO A &
BLANCA

Friday, October 22, 2010

21
Memorandum

DATE January 14, 2011 CITY OF DALLAS

TO
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

SUBJECT Budget Workshop #2: FY 2011 -12 Preliminary Outlook

This briefing provides an overview of the major issues the City will be facing as the
upcoming FY2O1 1-12 budget is developed. The FY2O1 1-12 revenues and expenditures
discussed in the briefing are preliminary estimates provided as a range of forecasts to
illustrate potential impact on the City’s budget. We will be updating and refining these
estimates as we receive more data. Additional briefings on the status of the budget will
be provided during the upcoming months.

Please let me know if I can provide any additional information.

Jeanne Chipperfield
Chief Financial Officer
C: Mary K. Suhm, City Manager
Thomas P. Perkins, Jr., City Attorney
Craig Kinton, City Auditor
Deborah Watkins, City Secretary
Ryan S. Evans, First Assistant City Manager
A.C. Gonzalez, Assistant City Manager
Jill A. Jordan, RE., Assistant City Manager
Forest Turner, Assistant City Manager
Jack Ireland, Director, Office of Financial Services

“Dallas, the City that works: diverse, vibrant and progressive”


Budget Workshop #2:
FY 2011-12 Preliminary
Outlook

City Council Briefing – January 19, 2011

1
Purpose

 Review schedule for development of FY


2011-12 budget
 Provide a preliminary outlook of general
fund and debt service budgets for FY
2011-12

2
Budget Schedule
 Development of FY 2011-12 budget is year-long process
 Began Oct 2010 with update of Strategic Plan and ends with
budget adoption in Sep 2011
 Budget being developed is for FY 2011-12 and covers
period from Oct 1, 2011 through Sep 30, 2012

Oct 19 Budget Workshop #1: Update on results of citywide Strategic Plan


Jan 19 Budget Workshop #2: (A) preliminary outlook of general fund and debt service fund
and (B) City Council confirm objectives and strategies for six Key Focus Areas (KFA)
Jan 25 Departments are invited to submit bids to accomplish City Council goals and objectives
Feb 16 Budget Workshop #3: Set overall “price” of government for FY 2011-12
Feb 25 Departments submit bids to CMO, OFS, and KFA Teams for funding consideration
Feb 28 “Price” (available funding) is allocated to each KFA
Mar 1-31 KFA Teams evaluate and prioritize bids/offers submitted by departments based on
Council confirmed objectives and strategies; and “draw the line” when money allocated
to KFA Team runs out

3
Budget Schedule
Mar 9 Public Hearing
Apr 1-30 City Manager’s Office reviews and refines rankings established by KFA Teams
May 18 Budget Workshop #4: Preliminary rankings
May 25 Public Hearing
May 26 Preliminary tax roll
Jun 15 Budget Workshop #5: Rankings and budget review
Jul 26 Certified tax roll
Aug 8 Budget Workshop #6: City Manager’s recommended budget
Aug 8–Sep 6 Begin town hall meetings
Aug 22 Budget Workshop #7: Topics TBD
Aug 24 Public Hearing
Sep 7 Budget Workshop #8: Topics TBD
Sep 14 Adopt Budget at First Reading
Sep 19 Budget Workshop #9: Council Amendments
Sep 21 Budget Workshop #10: Council Amendments (if necessary)
Sep 28 Adopt Budget at Second Reading

4
Preliminary Outlook
 Preliminary outlook is provided as range of forecasts to
illustrate potential impact (“lesser” to “greater”) that
various scenarios may have on revenues and
expenditures
 Forecasts are very preliminary and will change before
FY 2011-12 budget is recommended by City Manager on
Aug 8
 Forecasts are being made 9 months in advance of beginning of
the 12-month fiscal year that runs through Sep 30, 2012 (21
months in future)
 Limited new information is available since adoption of FY 2010-
11 budget in Sep 2010 (3 months ago)

5
Revenue Outlook

Revenues – Possible Adjustments – In Million Dollars “Greater “Lesser


Impact” Impact”
Property Tax – Decline of property tax base value forecast for FY 2011-12. ($27.1) ($1.7)
Possible range from 4.23% value loss to 0.27% value loss.
Sales Tax – Increase above current year budget may range from 1.2% +$1.7 +$5.0
growth to 2.5% growth.
Landfill Revenues – Decline in landfill revenue is forecast. Revenue decline ($4.4) +$12.8
could be offset and revenue could increase with implementation of “flow
control” for 12 full months of FY 2011-12.
Other Revenues - Includes franchise fees, fund balance, sale of surplus ($14.9) ($13.1)
property and abandonments.
Total Possible Revenue Adjustments ($44.7) +$3.0

6
Expenditure Outlook
Expenditures – Possible Adjustments – In Million Dollars “Greater “Lesser
Impact” Impact”
Police and Fire – Meet and Confer Requirements (assumes revenue triggers +$8.4 +$8.4
are not met for FY 2011-12).
•Retention incentive for recently hired officers.
•Restore overtime pay in-lieu of comp time at mid-year.
•Reduce mandatory city leave days from 5 to 3 for uniform personnel.

Public Safety adjustments include – +$13.2 +$13.2


•Hire police officers for half of attrition in FY 2011-12.
•Purchase 200 replacement marked squad cars.
•Purchase 19 ambulances.
•Full-year-funding for truck at Fire Station #10 (Frankford at Tollway).
•O&M for Fire Station #50 (Keeneland at Walton Walker).
•Purchase replacement protective equipment for firefighters.
•Fund assessment center for police and fire promotional exams.

Sanitation – Implementation of “flow control” at landfill will require increased n/a +$4.0
expense including equipment, personnel, permitting, infrastructure and
enforcement of ordinance.
7
Expenditure Outlook
Expenditures – Possible Adjustments – In Million Dollars “Greater “Lesser
Impact” Impact”
Electricity and Fuel – +$9.3 +$3.2
•Oncor has filed rate case which will impact transmission and distribution cost.
•Per gallon cost of fuel is expected to increase.

Civilian personnel – reduce mandatory city leave days. Range indicates +$4.1 +$2.4
reducing days from 8 to 3 or from 8 to 5. (Meet and Confer requires reduction
of mandatory city leave days from 5 to 3 for uniform employees.) Assume no
restoration of salary reductions implemented in current year for civilian
employees.

Employee/Retiree Health Benefits – Increased expense assumed at 4% and +$5.8 +$3.8


10%. City’s share of total cost is 50%.
Miscellaneous expenditure adjustments include – zoo obligation, HR total +$2.4 +$0.9
compensation study, transfer to State for Super Bowl, TIF adjustments,
ATTPAC, zoning and historic preservation.
Operation and Maintenance cost associated with capital improvement projects +$3.6 +$3.6
include – Woodall Rodgers tunnel maintenance/lighting, White Rock Hills
Branch Library, and Elm Fork Soccer fields.

8
Expenditure Outlook

Expenditures – Possible Adjustments – In Million Dollars “Greater “Lesser


Impact” Impact”
Debt Service adjustments include – +$4.5 +$4.5
•Decreased cost associated with debt issued prior to Dec 2010.
•Increased cost for full-year funding of commercial paper interest.
•Assumed issuance of GO Bonds to retire commercial paper.

Total Possible Expenditure Adjustments +$51.3 +$44.0

9
Outlook – Summary
Possible Adjustments – “Greater Impact” “Lesser Impact”
In Million Dollars
Revenue adjustments ($44.7) +$3.0
Expenditure adjustments +$51.3 +$44.0
Differential ($96.0) ($41.0)

 Preliminary outlook for FY 2011-12 indicates a


differential between revenues and expenses ranging
from $41.0m to $96.0m
 Differential will be eliminated by Aug 8 when City
Manager recommends balanced budget
 Council feedback and confirmation of Key Focus Area
objectives and strategies will be used in budget
development and balancing FY 2011-12
10
Other Considerations
 Federal Government’s efforts to address current year
spending levels which are still not final and FY 2011-12
budget (coming out on Feb 25), will possibly impact
City’s budget
 Areas likely to be affected are non-defense, non-homeland
security discretionary spending, including core local government
grant programs such as CDBG, HOME, and local law
enforcement assistance
 State Legislative action to close State’s significant
budget gap may possibly affect City’s budget
 Potential impacts include loss of franchise fees, loss of red light
camera revenue, loss of transportation funding, TCEQ fee
increases, additional State court costs tacked onto City issued
citations, and unfunded mandates

11
PUBLIC SAFETY
FY 11 - 12 BID PROCESS
Presented to the Dallas City Council
January 19, 2011
Public Safety
Team Members
Andy Acord, Dallas Police Department
Cassandra Wallace, Office of Emergency Management
Cyndi Mendez, Court and Detention Services
Daniel DeYear, Dallas Fire-Rescue
Jennifer Cottingham, Dallas Water Utilities
Ken Pyland, Parks & Recreation
LaVerna Mitchell, Communication and Information Services
Michelle Gonzalez, City Manager’s Office
Rodney Burchfield, Human Resources
Ryan Rogers, Office of Financial Services
Sonya Batts, Public Works & Transportation
Tracy Curts, City Manager’s Office
Vernon Young, Sustainable Development and Construction
William Madison, Office of Environmental Quality
2
Public Safety Road Map

1 2 3 4 5

VISION COUNCIL STRATEGY


STRATEGIES LINKAGES
STATEMENT OBJECTIVES MAP

3
Public Safety Vision

Ensure public safety where people live, work, and play.

4
Vision Statement
Dallas City

Council ACHIEVE RESPONSE TIMES

Objectives Maintain DPD response times for Priority 1


calls answered within 8 minutes at 75% or
CY 08
71.7%
CY 09
74.0%
CY 10
80.8%
better

Achieve Fire response time (1st Company) of


5 minutes, 20 seconds for 90% of calls FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10
(New National Fire Protection Association NA NA 80.53%
1710 standards)
Achieve EMS response time (1st Company) of
9 minutes for 90% of calls FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10
(New National Fire Protection Association 91.0 90.6% 90.1%
1710 standards) within 9 within 9 within 9
 minutes minutes minutes

REDUCE THE OVERALL REPORTED


CRIME RATE
CY 08 CY 09 CY 10
Reduce crime rate by 7.25% in CY 11
-10.3% -6.4% -10.1%

REDUCE DALLAS’ POSITION IN THE NATION ON CRIME
Short term: Stay out of the number one spot
 Among the nation’s most populated cities, Dallas ranked 2nd in CY 08 and 3rd in CY 09.
 2011 – Drop out of the top five spots in violent crime among most populated cities
Long term:
2013 – Drop out of the top eight spots in violent crime among most populated cities

5
Council Objectives
Dallas City 
Council INCREASE LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE
IN LAW ENFORCEMENT
FY 09 FY 10

Objectives Increase perception that police are effective


in dealing with neighborhood problems to 64.9% Next survey in 2011
75% by 2011

Increase perception that police are prompt


64.7% Next survey in 2011
in responding to calls to 75% by 2011

Enhance communication with the public via Facebook


social media, increasing the number of
DPD has 4,348 followers as of 10/01/10
DPD followers by 20% annually
Twitter
DPD has 2,803 followers as of 10/01/10
Nixle
DPD has 1,361 followers as of 10/01/10

YouTube
DPD has 38 videos on as of 10/01/10
 FY FY FY
REDUCE GRAFFITI
07 - 08 08 - 09 09- 10
Reduce the number of graffiti service
5,168 5,888 5,641
requests
Activities in
Provide anti-graffiti education to kids NA NA
18 libraries

6
Council Objectives
Public Safety •

Staffing
Continuing education
Strategy Map
Human
Resource • Employee development and retention
Development • Recruitment strategies

• Inter-agency collaboration
• Public-private partnerships Improve response times

• Collaboration with
community groups Reduce the overall reported
crime rate

Neighborhood Reduce Dallas’ position in the


Community
Vitality nation on crime Outreach

Increase level of confidence in


law enforcement
• Strong media relations
Reduce graffiti • Sustain public warning systems
• Mobilize community stakeholders
• Public education programs
• Reduce recidivism
• Pre-incident planning
• Equipment procurement Resource
• New technologies Management
• Visible staff

7
Strategy Map
Human Resources Development
COUNCIL OBJECTIVES
 Reduce the overall reported crime rate
 Increase level of confidence in law enforcement

STRATEGY
Strengthen citizen confidence through the development of human resources.

SUB-STRATEGIES
1) Ensure appropriate staffing levels Strategy Measures
• Officers per 1,000 residents
2) Promote continuing education programs
• DPD officer certifications
3) Encourage employee development and retention • DFR firefighter and inspector certifications
4) Enhance recruitment strategies to attract high quality • DPD Job Enrichment Program
applicants • Caruth Police Institute Leadership Development

8
Strategies
Human Resources
Development Measures
STRATEGY MEASURES FY 07 - 08 FY 08 - 09 FY 09 - 10

Police officers per 1,000 residents:


2.60 2.77 2.78
Goal – 3.00

Master: 1,859 1,872 1,892

DPD officer certifications Int./Adv: 583 859 1,024

Basic: 693 684 730

Master: 153 714 735


DFR firefighter
Adv: 74 110 116
certifications
Inter: 470 256 224

Master: 24 27 31
DFR inspector
certifications Adv: 7 9 11

Inter: 23 26 22

9
Strategies
Community Outreach
COUNCIL OBJECTIVES
 Reduce the overall reported crime rate
 Reduce Dallas’ position in the nation on crime
 Increase level of confidence in law enforcement
 Reduce graffiti

STRATEGY
Enhance community outreach by increasing involvement, communication, and education.

SUB-STRATEGIES
Strategy Measures
1) Strengthen disaster preparedness planning through
marketing and media relations • Fire safety and code inspections
• Number of Volunteers in Patrol (VIP)
2) Sustain public warning and notification systems
• Community Emergency Response Team (CERT)
3) Mobilize community stakeholders to proactively assist • Citizen Fire Academy participation
with public safety initiatives • Number of smoke detectors installed
4) Reduce recidivism through education and re-entry • Number of students impacted through outreach
programs programs

5) Provide public education and prevention programs

10
Strategies
Community Outreach
Measures
STRATEGY MEASURES

FY 07 - 08 FY 08 - 09 FY 09 - 10
Fire safety and code inspections
63,647 71,188 106,288
conducted

CY 08 CY 09 CY 10
Volunteers in Patrol (VIP) participants 2,240 2,723 2,345

Community Emergency Response CY 08 CY 09 CY 10


Team members (CERT) 390 682 921

Citizen Fire Academy classes FY 07 - 08 FY 08 - 09 FY 09 - 10


conducted per year 2 1 1

FY 07 - 08 FY 08 - 09 FY 09 - 10
Smoke detector installations
7,767 7,429 6,457

Fire prevention and education FY 07 - 08 FY 08 - 09 FY 09 - 10


programs 9,401 9,634 10,269

11
Strategies
Resource Management
COUNCIL OBJECTIVES
 Improve response times
 Reduce the overall reported crime rate
 Reduce Dallas’ position in the nation on crime
 Increase level of confidence in law enforcement

STRATEGY
Secure and effectively deploy resources for improved service delivery.

SUB-STRATEGIES Strategy Measures


1) Implement new technologies • DPD % response rate for Priority 1 calls within 8 minutes
• Overall crime rate reduction
2) Deploy staff to ensure visibility of public safety personnel
• Position in the nation for crime rate
3) Develop and exercise critical pre-incident plans • DFR 1st Company % response rate within 5.2 minutes
for 90% of calls
4) Promote equipment procurement and maintenance
• EMS % response rate within 9 minutes for 90% of calls

12
Strategies
Resource Management
Measures
STRATEGY MEASURES

DPD % response rate for Priority 1 calls CY 08 CY 09 CY 10


within 8 minutes
Goal: 75% 71.7% 74.0% 80.8%

Overall crime rate reduction year over year CY 08 CY 09 CY 10

- 10.3% - 6.4% -10.1%

Position in the nation for crime rate CY 08 CY 09 CY 10


2nd 3rd NA

DFR 1st Company % response rate within


5 minutes, 20 seconds for 90% of calls
FY 07 - 08 FY 08 - 09 FY 09 - 10
(New National Fire Protection Association
1710 standards) NA NA 80.53%

EMS % response rate within 9 minutes for FY 07 - 08 FY 08 - 09 FY 09 - 10


90% of calls 91.0% 90.1% 90.1%
(New National Fire Protection Association
1710 standards)

13
Strategies
Neighborhood Vitality
COUNCIL OBJECTIVES
 Reduce the overall reported crime rate
 Increase level of confidence in law enforcement
 Reduce graffiti

STRATEGY
Expand interdepartmental collaboration and community partnerships to cultivate thriving
neighborhoods.

SUB-STRATEGIES Strategy Measures


1) Form partnerships with other agencies to streamline multi- • Number of DPD 10-70-20 and Operation Restoration
agency collaboration programs established
2) Encourage public/private partnerships and community • Number of crime watch groups established
activities • Dallas Emergency Response Team (DERT)
• Number of special event permits reviewed
3) Collaborate with community groups to foster safer
neighborhoods

14
Strategies
Neighborhood Vitality
Measures
STRATEGY MEASURES FY 07 - 08 FY 08 - 09 FY 09 - 10

Number of DPD 10-70-20 and


13 18 29
Operation Restoration programs

Number of crime watch groups 864 740 848

Dallas Emergency Response


876 580 753
Team members (DERT)

Special event permits reviewed


705 651 583
by DPD

15
Strategies
Linkages to Other
KFAs

NEIGHBORHOOD HUMAN RESOURCES COMMUNITY OUTREACH


VITALITY Strengthen citizen Enhance community outreach by increasing involvement, communication, and
Expand Interdepartmental confidence through the education.
collaboration and community development of human
partnerships to cultivate resources.
Example: Example: Example:
thriving neighborhoods.
Example:  10-70-20 program  Super Bowl  Volunteers In
 Operation Patrol (VIP)
Example:  911 CIS improvements
and maintenance Restoration  Graffiti reduction
 Dallas Police
Department
partnerships with
Downtown Dallas

16
Linkages
ECONOMIC
VIBRANCY
Council Briefing Presentation
January 19, 2011
Team Roster

4 Hector Reynoso (Lead, Trinity Watershed Management)


4 Richard Ngugi (Budget, Office of Financial Services)
4 Cynthia Rogers-Ellickson (Housing)
4 Daniel Halter (Dallas Water Utilities)
4 Kirk Hemphill (Sanitation)
4 Regina Foster (Sustainable Development & Construction)
4 Robert Durham (Public Works & Transportation)
4 Samonia Jordan (Street Services)
4 Sushil Mathew (Aviation)
4 Tiffany Cherry (City Controller’s Office)
4 Tim Glass (Economic Development)
4 Zena Ayala-Fernino (DPD)
1
Table of Contents

• Vision Statement

• Council Objectives

• Overarching Considerations

• Strategy Map

• Strategies & Data

• Linkages

2
Vision Statement

A thriving economy
sustained by a healthy mix of
local & international
business opportunities,
housing choices, visitor
attractions, & city services

3
Council Objectives
Objective Current Data / Progress
Convention center hotel  Achieve substantial completion phase of hotel construction

open and operational by  Current projected opening: February 2012


Q1 2012.  Hotel project is on schedule & on budget

Establish or reinvigorate  Redeveloped 257,000 SF in 2009-2010 at Crest Plaza Shopping Center


on Lancaster Rd. & the Torre Vista Shopping Center on Lake June Rd. &
100,000 SF annually of Masters Dr.
retail space in the  Approved in 2010 redevelopment of Big T Plaza, 161,000 SF at I-35E and
Ledbetter Dr.
Southern Sector by  Southwest Center Mall - Fiesta Mundo construction anticipated
2011. completion by March 2011 (former Dillard’s property, Approx. 180,000SF)
 Southwest Center Mall – Investor-owner entered into a joint venture with
a retail group to pursue new tenants for the inline store space

Redevelop 4% of aging  Over 6% of the aging multifamily stock was demolished & the sites
prepared for redevelopment by mid-year 2010
multifamily housing
annually.  Focused multifamily redevelopment efforts underway in North Oak Cliff,
Skillman Corridor & Walnut Hill/Central area

Streetcar  Council approved construction contract in August 2010 to complete


the McKinney Avenue Trolley extension on Olive Street
Implementation Plan  Comprehensive streetcar system plan to serve the Central area of Dallas
(3 mile radius around Downtown) is being developed

4
Council Objectives

Objective Current Data / Progress


Increase the percentage  85% of businesses rate Dallas as a “good” or “excellent” place to do
business in 2008, with 42% rating Dallas as an “excellent” place to do
of customers rating the business.(Source: Dallas Business Survey)
City’s responsiveness  78% of citizens rate Dallas as a “good” or “excellent” place to do
business in 2009 while 69% of citizens rated the city’s responsiveness
as “good” or “excellent” as “good” or “excellent” (Source: 2009 Citizen’s Survey)
to 70% in FY10-11.  Conduct Citizen Survey in FY10-11

Establish at least one  Since indicator was established, three new water bottling production
facilities have been secured (Nestle, Niagara Bottling & Advanced H2O)
production facility with 428 associated new jobs
employing no less than  City facilitated the expansion of the Solo Cup manufacturing facility with
110 jobs - $13M investment
300 people in the  In 2010, Council approved two projects in the Southern Sector resulting
Southern Sector. in 130 new jobs and $12.8M in investment

Increase the appraised


value in the ten  From 2005-2010, real taxable property value in the ten opportunity
areas increased by 21.44% (about $2.01B)
opportunity areas by
$200M per year from
2009 to 2011.

5
Overarching Considerations

Consistency with Long Range Development Plans

 forwardDallas! Plan (Long Range Planning)

 Long Range Water Master Plan (Dallas Water Utilities)

 Mayor’s Southern Dallas Task Force (Economic Development)

 Strategic Engagement Plan (Economic Development)

 Balanced Vision Plan (Trinity River Corridor)

 Bond Programs (Public Works & Transportation)

 Downtown Dallas 360 Plan (Economic Development)

6
Strategy Map

J o es
bs

 Re io l & rc
to m

Im cr na S e
 Reg tai Fo
y o
lit nc

ag ui l/I m De

bi I

e t ta nte all ve

si ed

B rg rn B lo
R

ui e a u p

es ix
/A & e

e
ity lity oic

ld t tio sin m
cc M

in In n e en
or
im bi Ch

g du al ss t
k
o x rd a g
Pr o in A BU
 Af f u s
TT

st En es
 Ho

G Y R RA SIN

rie ga
I N NIT ET C E

s ge
S
U U EN TI SS
O RT TI ON
H O
O &
PP

m
N

en
O A thriving economy

t
sustained by a
healthy mix of business
opportunities, housing
choice, visitor attraction
D & City services.
ST EVE RE
T U
 IN AN LO C
C DA PM U
R ITY ce
 De EN R E T i
 D v L o
e
 Pro vel lop
e TI DS NT
VE & AS UA i li ty C h
Co c o m S FR Q ob tion
de es pm en IN /M ta ies
s
E n s E e nt t S t r t
es po tili
fo ffic In an c
c s U
rc ie ce da A ran lic
em nc n rd  T b
en y tive s  Pu
t s 

7
Business Attraction & Retention
Council Objectives
 Convention center hotel & ancillary open & operational Q1 2012
 Establish or invigorate two retail centers in the Southern Sector by 2011
 Have at least one production facility development by 2011
 Increase appraisal value in ten development opportunity areas by $200M/year

Strategy
Sustain & attract firms in targeted industry sectors and small businesses

Sub-Strategies
1) Recruit targeted industries in the Southern Sector
2) Facilitate land & commercial structure development/redevelopment
3) Grow economy through international & regional engagement
4) Expand retail in underserved areas
5) Support small business creation
6) Promote image as a “green” City & convention/visitor destination
7) Partner with local agencies toward market driven work force development

8) Create funding sources to facilitate development 8


Business Attraction & Retention
Council Objectives
 Convention center hotel & ancillary open & operational Q1 2012
 Establish or invigorate two retail centers in the Southern Sector by 2011
 Have at least one production facility development by 2011
 Increase appraisal value in ten development opportunity areas by $200M/year

Selected Sub-Strategies & Data


 Grow economy through international & regional engagement
 Conducted several trips abroad to recruit City of Dallas Regional Center
investors in 2010
 Recruited nine foreign corporations to open Dallas offices, creating 101 jobs
in FY 09-10
 Create funding sources to facilitate development
 City of Dallas Regional Center – FY 10-11 goal to raise $80M to finance
development in Dallas, and $100M to $150M annually thereafter
 New Markets Tax Credits – Allocated $55M by HUD for low income
neighborhoods
 Section 108 - HUD Funding for mixed-use affordable housing projects in
Downtown, the Southern Sector, and proximate to DART transit stations
 HUD Community Challenge Grant - $2.25M awarded for planning and land
acquisition related to development of affordable housing near DART stations

9
Housing Opportunity
Council Objectives
 Redevelop 4% of aging multifamily housing by 2011
 Establish or invigorate two retail centers in the Southern Sector by 2011

Strategy
Facilitate a range of housing choices across the income & geographic
spectrum

Sub-Strategies
1) Redevelop aging multifamily housing
2) Promote housing infill & rehabilitation
3) Integrate workforce housing with market rate housing
4) Promote mixed-use/transit-oriented developments
5) Increase percentage of home ownership
6) Encourage housing that is accessible to job opportunities
7) Develop affordable housing downtown

10
Housing Opportunity
Council Objectives
 Redevelop 4% of aging multifamily housing by 2011
 Establish or invigorate two retail centers in the Southern Sector by 2011
Selected Sub-Strategies & Data
 Promote mixed use development/transit-oriented development
 Approved Transit-Oriented Development TIF - linking development, jobs,
transit & housing
 Lancaster Sub-District – Lancaster Urban Village project: $26.8M Mixed-Use
Facility, Phase I is expected to begin Fall 2011 with 98 affordable housing units,
14,000 SF of retail and a parking garage, Phase II will be a 50,000 SF skills training
center for the Dallas Urban League
 Cedars West Sub-District
 Mockingbird/Lovers Lane Sub-District
 Cedar Crest Sub-District
 Develop affordable housing downtown
 Mercantile Continental Building
 Minimum 40 affordable residential units
 $18M TIF funding approved by Council
 Atmos Complex
 Minimum 117 affordable residential units
 $23M TIF funding approved by Council

11
Infrastructure Quality
Council Objectives
 Convention center hotel & ancillary open & operational Q1 2012
 Establish or invigorate two retail centers in the Southern Sector by 2011
 Have at least one production facility development by 2011
 Increase appraisal value in ten development opportunity areas by $200M/year

Strategy
Create & maintain the fundamental infrastructure systems necessary for
economic growth
Sub-Strategies
1) Promote access & mobility
2) Expand transportation choices & connectivity between alternative modes
3) Plan, manage, & maintain public infrastructure to support economic growth

12
Infrastructure Quality
Council Objectives
 Convention Center hotel & ancillary open & operational Q1 2012
 Establish or invigorate two retail centers in the Southern Sector by 2011
 Have at least one production facility development by 2011
 Increase appraisal value in ten development opportunity areas by $200M/year
Selected Sub-Strategies & Data
 Promote access & mobility
 Love Field Modernization Program (LFMP) – construction began in March 2009 for new terminal
& aviation facilities that will accommodate passenger & flight traffic increases at Love Field;
Customs & Border Protection (CBP) facility will open in January 2011 to service international flights
by general aviation aircrafts (20 Passengers or less)
 Woodall Rodgers Deck Park will provide walking access between CBD & Uptown area & recreation
areas; Phase III-final phase to include landscape & other visual aesthetics - completion summer 2012
 Santa Fe Trestle Trail – Multi-purpose hike & bike trail that promotes access to Trinity River Corridor,
construction began July 2010; anticipated completion May 2012
 Plan, manage & maintain public infrastructure
 Dallas Water Utilities
 East Bank/West Bank Interceptor was advertised for bids, completion will allow for future
abandonment of Cadiz Street pump station and free-up the 60-inch forced main to be used as a
water source for the Trinity lakes
 Awarded the 20-inch recycled water pipeline Phase I & II construction contracts; will result in 5.5
miles of pipeline to provide recycled water to Zoo & Stevens Park Golf Course
 Trinity Watershed Management
 Awarded the new Pavaho Pump Station $27M construction contract; construction began August
2010; anticipated completion Aug 2012
13
Development Standards & Incentives
Council Objectives
 Increase percentage of business customers that rate the city’s responsiveness
as good or excellent to 70% by 2011
 Have at least one production facility development by 2011
 Establish or invigorate two retail centers in the Southern Sector by 2011

Strategy
Ensure standards & incentives are in place to promote economic
development

Sub-Strategies
1) Manage a timely & efficient regulatory process
2) Promote standards that ensure high quality development
3) Implement incentives that promote beneficial development
4) Ensure fair enforcement of city codes

14
Development Standards & Incentives
Council Objectives
 Increase percentage of business customers that rate the city’s responsiveness
as good or excellent to 70% by 2011
 Have at least one production facility development by 2011
 Establish or invigorate two retail centers in the Southern Sector by 2011

Selected Sub-Strategies & Data


 Promote standards that ensure high quality development
 forwardDallas! Plan
 Green Building Ordinance
 Trinity River Corridor Project
 Transit-Oriented Developments
 Form Based Zoning
 Urban Forest Advisory Committee
 Sustainability Task Force
 Downtown Dallas 360 Plan

15
Ed
uc
ati
Strategy Map on Linkages
y al
fet En
Sa ha

J o es
nc

bs

 Re gio l & rc
to m
lic em

Im cr na S e
 e ai F o
y o
b en

lit nc

ag ui l/I m De
Pu


ts

bi I

e t ta nte all ve

si ed

B rg rn B lo
R

ui e a u p

es ix
/A & e

et rk
ity lity oic

ld t tio sin m
cc M

in In n e en
o
im bi Ch

g du al ss t
o x rd a g
Pr o in
A BU
 Af f u s
TT S

st En es
 Ho G ITY

rie ga
N R R IN
I E A

N TE CT ES

s ge
S
U TU N IO S
O
H OR TI N
P O &

m
P N

en
O A thriving economy

t
sustained by a
healthy mix of business
opportunities, housing
Gove

choice, visitor attraction

tion &
D & City services.
ST EVE RE

s
E3

Rec e, Art
TU
rnme

 IN AN LO C
RU ITY

r ea
C DA PM e
 De EN R E ic

tur
D v T L o

nt

e
 Pro vel op
e l TI DS NT AS UA i
y
lit C h

Cul
VE &
Co c o m S FR Q ob tion
de es m en p IN M s
s s/ rta itie
E n E e nt t S t s
e po til
fo ffic In an cc ns U
rc ie ce da A
 Tra blic
em nc n rd
en y tive s  Pu
t s 

Clean, Healthy Environment 16


Links to Other Key Focus Areas
Public Safety E3
Continuous Work Force Development Long-term Resource Management
Hiring Strategies Employ process improvement methods
Business Attraction & Retention through a
Resource Management
high-service low-cost government
Enhanced Customer Communication
Community Outreach
Clean, Healthy Environment
Resource Management
Educational Enhancements
Buy "green" & environmentally friendly
Resource Management goods & services
Meet maintenance & replacement Enhanced Customer Communication
schedules
Encourage Best Practices for companies &
Enhanced Customer Communication residents to minimize their environmental
Community Outreach footprint to promote the “green” goals of
Mayor & Council

Culture, Arts & Recreation


Provide Quality Infrastructure
Ensure economic growth in tandem with
cultural growth
Public facilities such as parkland, cultural
centers & libraries
17
Appendix
4 Unemployment Rate Gap – Slide 19

4 Labor Force Data – Slide 20

4 Leading Economic Indicators – Slide 21

4 Dallas Unemployment Rates – Slide 22

4 Total Taxable Property – Slide 23

4 Taxable Property Values (Personal, Commercial & BPP) – Slide 24

4 Real Taxable Property Value by Opportunity Area – Slide 25

4 Multifamily Development & Demolition Map – Slide 26

4 Dallas Travel Time – Slide 27

4 Dallas Love Field Total Passengers – Slide 28

4 Long Range Development Plans – Slide 29

18
Appendix: Economic Vibrancy Statistics
Monthly U.S. – City of Dallas Unemployment Rate Gap

In October 2010,
Dallas is 0.6 points
better than the
U.S.

Source is U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.


19
Appendix: Economic Vibrancy Statistics
Household Employment - Labor Force Data - Annualized
Table 1. Table 2.
ANNUAL AVERAGE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES CITY OF DALLAS LABOR FORCE
ANNUAL AVERAGE
(PERSONS)
FY FY Point Unemployed Labor Force
2009 2010 Change

City of Dallas 7.6 8.7 1.1 FY 2009 44,947 598,530

DFW MSA 7.3 8.3 1.0 FY 2010 52,818 605,307

Texas 7.0 8.2 1.2 Change 7,871 6,777

U.S. 8.5 9.7 1.2 % Change 17.5 1.1

Largest U.S. Cities 10.4 12.0 1.6


Avg.**
SOURCE: TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION, U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS
VALUES NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED.
•LARGEST U.S. CITIES EXCLUDING DALLAS ARE: NEW YORK, LOS ANGELES, CHICAGO,
HOUSTON, PHOENIX, PHILADELPHIA, SAN ANTONIO, SAN DIEGO, SAN JOSE & DETROIT.

20
Appendix: Economic Vibrancy Statistics
Leading Economic Indicators

The leading index is a projection of the City’s economic performance three to six months in advance. When the index consistently grows above its 12-month
average (the red line graph), the City’s economy will more likely continue to grow.

The index’s annual average reflected an economic downturn starting June 2007. The index declined for 22 months, then turned upward beginning March 2009.
The upward trend continued through May 2010 & has since moved in an irregular pattern. As of September 2010, the leading index stands at 87.9 (1997=100) & is
above the index’s 12 month average. The behavior since May 2010 reflects slowed economic growth.

Index elements consist of Single Family Building Permits, Monthly Regular Initial Claims for unemployment insurance, the West South Central Consumer
Expectations Index of the Conference Board, & the City of Dallas calculated Stock Index.
21
Appendix: Economic Vibrancy Statistics
Dallas Unemployment Rates - Historical
Percentage**

Year (CY) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Jan-Jun

Unemployed 29,109 40,228 55,915 55,212 48,634 33,233* 30,835* 27,398* 32,364* 48,433* 53,715

Change 11,119 15,687 -703 -6,578 -15,401 -2,398 -3,437 4,966 16,069 5,282

% Change 38.2% 39.0% -1.3% -11.9% -31.7% -7.2% -11.1% 18.1% 49.7% 10.9%

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) COD unemployment rate US unemploym ent rate * Reflects BLS revisions as of April 2010
** Percentages are non-seasonally adjusted

The unemployment rate reflects the percentage of City of Dallas resident labor force actively seeking employment. The Dallas (COD) annual average (calendar
year) unemployment rate in 2009 was 8.2 percent & the 2010 mid year average rate is 8.9 percent. Since 2007 the COD unemployment rate has equaled or out
performed (less in value than) the U.S. unemployment rate** (see above chart). Unemployment levels rose in 2008 & continued rising through 2010. This is as
much a reflection of the rise in the city’s working-age population through both in-migration & internal ageing as much as it is a reflection of the economy.

22
Appendix: Economic Vibrancy Statistics
Total Taxable Property

Fiscal Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Value $66.5 $66.5 $67.6 $70.8 $76.1 $84.5 $90.5 $87.3 $83.4
(in billions)

Change 0.0% 1.6% 4.8% 7.5% 11.0% 7.0% -3.6% -4.4%

Source: City of Dallas Office of Financial Services.

This & the following slide contain the summarized taxable values of real & personal property within the City of Dallas. The next page presents the Residential &
the Commercial subcategories of Business Personal Property (BPP) & Taxable Commercial Property. The taxable value of a property is the market value of the
property minus any exemptions. Below are definitions for additional key terms on this & the following page.

 Real property - Consists of l& plus anything permanently attached to the l& or legally defined as immovable (i.e. Real Estate).
 Residential Property - Non-farm detached, semidetached, or attached residence for one family (single family) & property that contains two or more living
units, including duplexes, apartment houses, & cooperatives that are assessed as a single entity (multifamily).
 Commercial Property - Any nonresidential real estate of a commercial enterprise.
 Business Personal Property (BPP) - Office equipment, fixtures, furniture, & merchandise.

Definition Sources: Census of Governments, U.S. Department of Commerce & ICMA


23
Appendix: Economic Vibrancy Statistics
Taxable Property Values

24
Appendix: Economic Vibrancy Statistics
Real Taxable Property Value by Opportunity Area - 2005 to 2010

As investment & job creation occurs, taxable property valuations increase. Changes
in the real taxable property values are a good indicator of economic vibrancy.

Change 2005-10 % Change 2005-10


2005 2010 (in 2010 Dollars) (in 2010 Dollars)

Residential Non-Residential Non- Non- Residenti Non-


Opportunity Area (2010) (2010) Residential Residential Residential Residential al Residential

West Dallas - Oak Cliff $150,853,167 $326,137386 $188,089,831 $319,855,053 $37,236,664 -$6,282,333 24.68% -1.93%

Stemmons Corridor 144,089,518 1,733,121,075 234,291,306 2,374,244,619 90,201,788 641,123,544 62.60% 36.99%

Fair Park & Surrounding


Area 279,877,217 596,565,626 350,769,657 683,557,744 70,892,440 86,992,118 25.33% 14.58%

Asian Trade District 121,260,152 1,091,771,977 95,017,508 1,054,611,942 -26,242,644 -37,160,035 -21.64% -3.40%

NAFTA Corridor 64,718,028 61,235,395 47,699,713 106,716,734 -17,018,315 45,481,339 -26.30% 74.27%

UNT Campus 40,452,796 9,116,996 30,844,923 7,758,045 9,607,873 -1,358,951 -23.75% -14.91%

Westmorel& Area 29,086,270 57,214,105 25,982,654 52,963,002 -3,103,616 -4,251,103 -10.67% -7.43%

Central Business District 78,352,033 2,629,761,727 172,062,156 2,695,124,390 93,710,123 65,362,663 119.60% 2.49%

Vickery Meadows 293,041,267 441,576,558 267,346,580 678,417,933 -25,694,687 236,841,375 -8.77% 53.64%

LBJ Corridor 353,921,141 2,623,955,192 326,864,346 2,375,883,979 -27,056,795 248,071,213 -7.64% -9.45%

Source: City of Dallas Department of Public Works & Transportation, CityGIS Division. Original data
from Dallas Central Appraisal District Certified Values. Area definitions & calculations by Dallas
Office of Economic Development, December 2010.

25
Appendix: Economic Vibrancy Statistics
Multifamily Development & Demolition Map

New development - 3,250 units

Demolition - 2,990 units


635
635

35
35
30
30
30
30

20
20

26
Appendix: Economic Vibrancy Statistics
Despite additional road space, Dallas travel time increases
Long-Term Change

Annual Hours of Delay per Traveler 1982 to 2007

Urban Area 1982 1997 2006 2007 Hours Rank

Very Large Urban Area Average 21 43 52 51 30

Dallas – Fort Worth – Arlington, TX 10 34 55 53 43 2

Washington, DC – VA – MD 16 52 59 62 46 1

San Francisco – Oakl&, CA 23 47 58 55 32 11

Atlanta, GA 19 56 59 57 38 5

Boston, MA – NH – RI 12 32 44 43 31 15

Miami, FL 15 35 48 47 32 11

New York – Newark, NY – NJ – CT 12 32 45 44 32 11

Seattle, WA 12 52 45 43 31 15

Chicago, IL – IN 15 35 43 41 26 23

Detroit, MI 24 48 53 52 28 21

Los Angeles – LBch – Santa Ana, CA 44 69 72 70 26 23

Houston, TX 29 39 56 56 27 22

Philadelphia, PA – NJ – DE – MD 16 28 38 38 22 36

Phoenix, AZ 35 35 45 44 9 70
27
Appendix: Economic Vibrancy Statistics
Dallas Love Field Total Passengers

CY 2009 CY 2010

Carrier Enplanements Deplanements Total Pax Enplanements Deplanements Total Pax % Change

CY9 to
CY10

American Eagle Airlines 23,033 23,386 46,419 - - - -100%

Continental Airlines 98,903 98,728 197,631 88,591 91,632 180,223 -9%

Delta Airlines 19,136 20,184 39,320 34,930 34,845 69,775 77%

Southwest Airlines 3,748,878 3,712,094 7,460,972 3,851,003 3,813,660 7,664,663 3%

Other - - - - - - 0%

Totals 3,889,950 3,854,392 7,744,342 3,974,524 3,940,137 7,914,661 2%

28
Appendix: Long Range Development Plans
Downtown Dallas 360 Plan (Economic Development)
360 is an action-oriented implementation plan crafted to build on recent momentum and make the Vision for Downtown Dallas a reality.
The plan promotes housing throughout downtown, enhancing the pedestrian environment downtown, improving local & regional
connectivity, concentrating energy & resources on Focus Areas and catalytic sites, and adopt policy language, symbols and messages
to position Downtown as an inclusive, open, welcoming place.
Balanced Vision Plan (Trinity River Corridor)
The Balanced Vision Plan, adopted by City Council in December 2003, envisions the Trinity River as a new centerpiece for Dallas,
creating an attraction that will support revitalization and renewal in the center of an urban area. It addresses flood protection,
environmental restoration and management, recreation, transportation, and community and economic development. The key to this
plan is that it successfully balances diverse and potentially conflicting goals for the Trinity River Corridor.
forwardDallas! Plan (Long Range Planning)
Adopted June 2006, the forwardDallas! plan is a collaboratively developed unified vision for the City. The Plan's core values are
derived from broad-based public input, and a palette of desired building blocks establish the development vision. The plan is a guide
for strategic and sustainable growth with policy guidance to encourage new development patterns, enhance the economy, make quality
housing more attainable, promote strong and healthy neighborhoods, enhance transportation and infrastructure, and protect the
environment.
Strategic Engagement Plan (Economic Development)
Strategic Engagement was adopted by the Council in September 2005 as Dallas’ official economic development strategy. The plan
identifies priority development initiatives and programs and sets performance objectives. The plan is due to be revised this fiscal year.
Long Range Water Master Plan (Dallas Water Utilities)
Working in cooperation with the Texas Water Development Board Region C Water Plan and other studies for the area, DWU is in the
process of implementing the 2005 Water Supply Master Plan to service the needs of the City of Dallas and DWU’s customer cities. The
availability of quality and ample supply of water is critical to the long-term growth, both economic and pollution-wise, of the region and
Dallas in particular. The 2005 Supply Plan plans for water supply until 2060.
Bond Programs (Public Works and Transportation)
The Citizens of Dallas authorize the City Council to issue debt in the form of bonds to finance infrastructure and construction projects.
A bond package has a listing of specific projects such as street improvement projects, flood protection, storm drainage projects, and
facilities improvement projects such as recreation centers and libraries. Authorizing the City to issue bond debt enables the city to
invest in itself and improve the quality of life for its citizens.
Southern Dallas Task Force (Economic Development)
The Southern Sector Task Force is designed to identify, qualify, prioritize and recommend to the Mayor, City Council and the City
Manager a range of implementable deliverables that support the achievement of redeveloping and repositioning Southern Dallas in the
near-term (2 years), mid-term, (2-5 years) and long-term (> than 5 years). Key economic development priorities are: Manufacturing
Facility (200 employees), Lancaster Corridor Transit-Oriented Development/Lancaster Kiest Shopping Center, two full service grocery
stores, Southwest Center Mall, South Dallas/Fair Park TOD, Lake June Green Line TOD, Executive Airport, Illinois/Westmoreland
TOD, International Inland Port of Dallas, Mountain Creek Industrial Park, Wynnewood Shopping Center, the Calatrava Bridge and
West Dallas.
29
Clean, Healthy Environment
City Council Planning Session
January 2011 1
Team Members
Daley Lehmann, CCO
Tim Moody, PKR
Renee Clay, DWU
Gloria Perez, DPD
Tayo Sokale, EBS
Erica Molett, HOU
Helena Stevens-Thompson, MCC
Laurie Knirk, OEQ
Haytham Hassan, PWT
Gary Middleton, SAN
Sirak Bahta, TWM
Crystal Lee, TWM
Ryan Lawler, OFS 2
Road Map
• Vision for the Future

• Council Objectives

• Strategy Map

• Strategies & Data

• Links to other KFAs

3
Vision For The Future:
Creating a Better Tomorrow

To provide a Clean, Healthy


Environment meeting the needs of
the present while enhancing
opportunities for future generations

4
Council Objectives
Indicator Current Data
Produce a “Cleaner” City: Top 3 Code Compliance service requests FY 09-10:
7% reduction in Top 3 Code 1. High Weeds: 37,449
Compliance Requests annually 2. Litter: 20,154
3. Obstruction Alley/Sidewalk/Street: 12,575
Total Code Compliance cases worked – 132,502

Change in requests from FY 08-09:


• High Weeds decreased 0.07%
• Litter decreased 7.2%
• Obstruction Alley/Sidewalk/Street decreased 9.5%
• Loose Aggressive Animals decreased 28.6%
Increase Household Recycling: All households have been converted to OneDay Dallas.
Increase from 8.2 lbs per month Household recycling has increased from 24 lbs per household in FY
in 2006 to 36 lbs per month by 08-09 to 31.45 lbs per household for FY 09-10
end of FY10-11
•The City won second place in the Community Partnerships category
of the North Texas Corporate Recycling Association Green3 Awards

5
Council Objectives
Indicator Current Data
Reduce Water Consumption: GPCD was:
Reduce from 212 gallons per 197 GPCD in 2008
capita per day (GPCD) in 2004 190 GPCD in 2009 surpassing the 2011 goal
to 195 GPCD by 2011, with an 171 GPCD in 2010
additional 5% reduction by 2016
Reduce Water Consumption: Dallas’ Water Conservation efforts have achieved regional and
Educate the public about Dallas’ national recognition as evidenced by the EPA’s 2010 Water Sense
water conservation & Award. Dallas’ Save Water- Nothing Can Replace It campaign
achievements; make 8,500 face- reaches 25% of the Texas population through our collaborative
to-face contacts per year and efforts with the Tarrant Regional Water District.
achieve 12 million media
impressions per year

6
Council Objectives
Indicator Current Data
Improve Quality of Air: In August 2010, EPA issued a determination of non-attainment for
Take a leadership role working the DFW area and proposed the area be bumped up from moderate
with regional partners to reduce to serious with a new attainment date of June 15, 2013. The City of
the number of ozone Dallas has taken a leadership role in regional coalitions, including
exceedence days by 5% the North Texas Clean Air Steering Committee and the North Texas
Clean Air Coalition, which are working to reduce emissions
contributing to ozone in the DFW area. During the 2010 Ozone
Season (May 1 – October 31), the North Texas Air Quality Region
exceeded permissible levels for the criteria pollutant ozone a total of
8 days. This number represents a 27% percent decrease from the
2009 ozone season in which there were a total of 11 ozone standard
exceedance days.
Improve Quality of Air: City was awarded a federal grant that enabled expansion of scope to
Reduce the use of cars via include development of a comprehensive complete streets manual
making the city more pedestrian and design for 15 demonstration projects.
and bicycle friendly by • “The Bishop Ave. Improvement Project” is an example of a project
development and adoption of that addresses the “complete street” concept. This project is
Complete Streets Policy currently under design and will be awarded for construction in the
spring of 2011.

7
Council Objectives
Indicator Current Data
Reduce Chronic Homelessness: In 2004, the City of Dallas adopted the 10-Year Plan to reduce
Reduce chronic homelessness by homelessness
10% each year through 2014
•Since 2004, the total number of chronically homeless individuals has
decreased 57%
•The 2010 Annual “Point in Time” Homeless count indicated a 14%
reduction in chronically homeless to 609 in 2009, to 514 in 2010
• 64% of homeless who indicated they have been homeless for 1 year
or longer are in transitional housing or permanent supportive housing
Green Initiatives: By Fall 2010, the City had provided 361 Dallas Citizens with Energy
Provide outreach programs and Efficiency and Water Conservation kits that help conservation resources
educational kits to a total of 1,200 and assist reducing household costs
residents
nd
Green Initiatives: Dallas is the nation’s 2 largest municipal purchaser of “green” power
Maintain renewable energy by percentage purchased; continued commitment to purchase 40%
purchase at 40% renewable power or nearly 334 million kilowatt-hours (kWh)

8
Council Objectives
Indicator Current Data
Green Initiatives: Both Zoning Ordinance Committee and City Planning Commission
Craft city policy to facilitate approved amendments to the Dallas Development Code regarding
community gardens Community Gardens and are now awaiting City Council action and is on
the Council’s scheduled for February 9, 2011

Green Initiatives: FY09-10 LEED Certifications:


All buildings over 10,000 sq ft are
3 Gold
designed to LEED Silver
6 Silver
standards
For a total of 19 City buildings LEED certified to date
Green Initiatives: On track to meet this commitment primarily through green power
Reduce greenhouse gas purchase and energy efficiency improvements
emissions by 7% by 2012

Green Initiatives: Reduced energy usage at City facilities (accumulated reduction from
Meet State-mandated 30% energy 2007 baseline):
reduction by 2013 (from 06-07 FY 08-09 3.6%
baseline) FY 09-10 7.5%

9
Municipal Leadership
COUNCIL OBJECTIVES
•Produce a “Cleaner” City
•Improve Quality of Air
•Reduce Water Consumption
•Increase Household Recycling

STRATEGY
Demonstrate environmental leadership through shared
knowledge, green initiatives, and ensure compliance
with health and environmental regulations

SUB-STRATEGIES
Communicate and coordinate environmental activities with other levels
1
of government and the private sector
Enhance and effectively enforce City Codes and Ordinances regarding
2
health and the environment
Creating pro-active initiatives and services to promote environmental
3
conservation and sustainable development through collaborative efforts
Comply with all federal, state and local regulations regarding health and 11
4
the environment
Municipal Leadership
• Leading Green Energy Purchaser
– #2 on U.S. EPA’s Top 20 Local Government list
– #10 on U.S. EPA’s National Top 50 list (includes all levels of government;
businesses and Fortune 500 companies)

• Reducing Air Emissions


– Alternative Fueled Vehicles comprise around 37% of the City fleet; Dallas
maintains one of the largest alternative-fueled fleet in Texas and in the
United States
– Updated signal timings at 241 signals for efficient traffic flow; resulting in
less fuel consumption and less air pollution. By the end of FY 10-11 a
second project will update 117 more signals

• Environmental Management System


– The City continues to manage and maintain an ISO 14001 certified
Environmental Management System to help reduce operational costs and
environmental impacts.
• Green Purchasing Policy being updated; several Departments following their own
policies to reduce chemical usage and increase resource conservation
• Number of COD spills reported to OEQ decreased by 14% from FY 08-09 to FY
09-10
• The certification allows the City to commit to the highest international standard for
environmental management. 12
Regional Collaboration
COUNCIL OBJECTIVES
•Improve Quality of Air
•Reduce Water Consumption
•Green Initiatives

STRATEGY
Work with citizens, surrounding governmental
entities, and businesses to improve the quality
of the environment

SUB-STRATEGIES
Take a leadership role in working with regional partners on control
1 measures for inclusion in the reconsideration of the State Implementation
Plan (SIP)
Encourage development which connects pedestrian, bike, transit and road
2
facilities, and expand transportation modal choices
3 Utilize a regional approach to enhance current water resource planning
Partner and support provision of cost-effective services by Dallas County
4
and other providers
13
Regional Collaboration
• Continued involvement with Dallas Sustainable Skylines Initiative
partners
– 40 Habitat for Humanity homes at Frazier Court received LEED Silver energy
efficiency upgrades yielding 10%-12% savings in three-bedroom homes and
21%-22% savings in two-bedroom homes
• Working with regional and national partners to foster sustainable
behavior
– Working regionally to secure grant funds which drive green redevelopment such
as TIGER grants, Bike Plan grant, Brownfields grant
– Hosted four training workshops to aid with regulatory compliance and reporting
requirements with attendees from across Dallas – Fort Worth and NCTCOG
area
• City staff worked as external EMS (Environmental Management
System) auditors to facilitate regional participation in voluntary
pollution prevention and environmental stewardship initiatives
– City of Coppell (2009), City of Garland (2009), Next Era Energy (Forney Plant,
2010), and DFW International Airport (2010)
• Hosted the 2010 Regional Water Quality and Green Infrastructure
Conference with U.S. EPA
– Attendees represented 20 municipalities in Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and
Arkansas, as well as a number of architectural and engineering consulting firms,
developers, landscape architects and academic institutions. 14
Environmental Initiatives
COUNCIL OBJECTIVES
•Green Initiatives
•Increase Household Recycling
•Reduce Water Consumption

STRATEGY

Promote positive environmental behaviors and


practices by the City of Dallas and its residents

SUB-STRATEGIES
Develop and implement initiatives to increase public awareness,
1
education and training related to the City’s environmental programs
2 Preserve open spaces for parks and community gardens
Engage businesses and residents to promote sustainability and
3 environmental stewardship, and reduce emissions and other
environmental pollutants
Identify services that will create and establish collaborative efforts and
4 15
synergies of a similar nature
Environmental Initiatives
•Water Conservation - Since the initiation of the DWU
Conservation Program in FY 02-03, water consumption in
gallons per capita per day (GPCD) decreased by nearly 23%
•Green Buildings - The number of LEED™ certified City-owned buildings in Dallas
since last year has increased from 13 to 19. The number of registered citywide
buildings went from 109 in 2009 to 152 in 2010, an increase of 39%

•Green Ride - During the 2010 Ozone Season, the online commute tracking
system indicated that City employees have saved a total of 1.8 million miles
traveled; this prevented about 2,197.7 tons in harmful emissions (April 1st –
October 1st)
•Too Good to Throw Away – Beginning in 2007, an initiative to increase the
quantity recycled from 8,000 tons a year to 43,600 by 2011 and double citizen
recycling participation from 25% to 50%
– In 2010, 44,713 tons were recycled and citizen participation increased to 62%

16
Community Enhancement
COUNCIL OBJECTIVES
•Produce a “Cleaner” City
•Reduce Chronic Homelessness
•Improve Quality of Air

STRATEGY
Enhance the lives of Dallas residents by
improving the quality and livability of their
neighborhoods

SUB-STRATEGIES

Improve neighborhood cleanliness by promoting compliance with codes


1
and environmental regulations
Enhance pride in the community through involvement with neighborhood
2
programs
3 Provide education on healthy lifestyles and natural resource stewardship
Continue to implement support services and housing opportunities that
4
create a safe and secure environment for chronically homeless individuals
Identify services that will create and establish collaborative efforts and 17
5
synergies of a similar nature
Community Enhancement
• The Bridge – Supporting strategies: establish central
entry point and street services for the homeless; increase
shelter capacity; provide array of health and human
services; prepare the homeless for housing, employment
and assimilation into the community
• Illegal Dumping Surveillance Camera Program – a
proposed surveillance program to target frequent illegal
dumping locations within the City
• Graffiti Abatement - The City received a gift of
$100,000 to fund anti-graffiti efforts. The funds will be
used for public outreach, education, and supplies for
graffiti abatement projects
18
Links to Other KFAs
Public Economic Culture Arts Educational E3
CHE Strategies CHE Sub-Strategies Safety Vibrancy & Recreation Enhancement Government

Environmental Management

Municipal Regulatory Compliance


Leadership Codes and Ordinances
City Services
Air Quality / The SIP

Regional Water Resource Planning


Collaboration Transportation Planning
Health Services

Sustainability
Clean Air
Environmental
Initiatives Clean Water
Solid Waste

Community Outreach

Community Neighborhood Quality


Enhancement Health and Well Being
Education

19
KFA Linkages

Having a Clean, Healthy Environment


creates the favorable conditions
necessary for the other KFAs to
succeed

20
Appendix
References and Relevant Data

21
Air Quality
58% of Dallas citizens
consider their air quality
to be fair or poor
- Citizen Survey 2009
(67% in 2006 survey)

Dallas Metroplex is
considered a
non-attainment area
for ozone
22
- EPA
8-Hour Historic Trends

Source: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality : http:ww.tceq.state.tx.us/cgi-


110

102 101 100 100 99


100
96 96
at AnyGivenMonitor (ppb)

95
91
Highest Average

90
86 86

80

bin/compliance/monops/8hr_exceed.pl
70

60

Background Ozone
50

**

**
*
0

9*
00

00

00

00

00

00
00

00

00

0*

1*
00

01

01
-2

-2

-2

-2
-2

-2

-2

-2

-2

-2
98

01

02

05
99

00

03

04

06

-2

-2
07

08

09
19

19

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20
Consecutive 3-Year Period

* Attainment Goal: Per EPA National Ambient Air Quality Standards, attainment is reached when 3-year average of the highest annual 8-hour average ozone
concentration at each monitor is less than 86 parts per billion (ppb) 23
** Attainment under 1997 Standard; current as of July 2009 ; *** Ozone Seasons have not yet occurred
Note: EPA has not yet determined the attainment status for the DFW area. Designations are anticipated in March 2010; On January 6, 2010, EPA provided notice
that they were considering implementation of a more stringent standard of 60-70 ppb.
8-Hour Ozone Exceedance Days
80

Purple (116-374 ppb)

Source: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality : http:ww.tceq.state.tx.us/cgi-


70
Red (96-115 ppb)
4
Orange (85-95 ppb)
60
Number of Exceedance Days

Orange (76-84 ppb)


7
50
7 3
8 3 40
5
40 2

bin/compliance/monops/8hr_exceed.pl
29
29 1 3
30 22
29
26 24 8
28 2 8

20
10
8
23 21 23
10 20 20
15 17
14 14 13
11 10

0
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Ozone Season (Year)
* Per the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard
24
** Per the 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard
Exceedance level indicates daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration in parts per billion (ppb)
Household Recycling Trends

FY 09-10

FY 07-08

FY 05-06

FY 03-04

FY 01-02

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Average pounds/household/month
Recycling Goal

25
Water Consumption Trend
225
Gallons per Capita per Day (GPCD)

Actual
Actual + Industrial
Budgeted Goal
205

2011

185
2016

165
FY 04-05

FY 05-06

FY 06-07

FY 07-08

FY 08-09

FY 09-10

FY 10-11
26
Top Code Compliance
Service Requests
60000
High Weeds

50000 Litter

Obstruction
40000 Alley/Sidewalk/Street
Bulky
Trash
30000
Junk Motor
Vehicle
20000

10000

0
FY 01- FY 02- FY 03- FY 04- FY 05- FY 06- FY 07- FY 08- FY 09-
02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10

Data Source: Customer Service Request Management System 27


Annual Code Compliance
Service Requests
200000

180000

160000
Total number of requests

140000

120000

100000
Service Request Trend
80000
Total Number of Requests
60000

40000

20000

0
FY 01-02 FY 02-03 FY 03-04 FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10
Year

Data Source: Customer Service Request Management System 28


Chronic Homelessness in Dallas since 2004

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
29
Environmental Outreach Efforts FY 09-10
Department/ Estimated # of
Program Participants Target Message(s)
Code Compliance – Animal 74,000 Reduce storm water contamination by picking up after pets.
Services Reducing effects of overpopulation through spay/neuter
DWU - Wastewater Cease-the-Grease: proper fat, oil and grease disposal
577,000

DWU - Water 165,209 Save Water. Nothing can replace it

Office of Environmental Quality 208,915 Green Dallas: Environmental Stewardship, Sustainable design,
lifestyles, Green Dallas, Clean Air
PWT – Storm Water 110,000 It Goes with the Flow: Stormwater pollution prevention,
Management pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, yard waste, used oil, pet
wastes; water resource stewardship
Sanitation Services 105,786 OneDay Dallas: Reduce-reuse-recycle

Texas Discovery Gardens 138,293 Restore, conserve,and preserve nature; principles of


organic gardening, botany, ecology,
Underlining denotes specific campaign or program name

30
Mayor’s Environmental Excellence Awards

31
References
• Dallas 2010 Annual Progress Report
• Metro Dallas Homeless Alliance 2010 Annual “Point in Time” Homeless
Count
• 2009 Dallas Citizen’s Survey
• Service Performance Reports FY 2008-09
(http://www.dallascityhall.com/scs/customer_service_reports_archives_year.html)
• Dallas Water Utilities website
(http://dallascityhall.com/dwu/water_interesting_facts.html)
• DART website
(http://www.dart.org/about/expansion/expansionmaps.asp)
• Green Dallas website
(http://www.greendallas.net/)
• Dallas Morning News - Dallas City Hall Blog
http://cityhallblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2010/05/dallas-mayor-honors-environmen.html

32
Culture, Arts & Recreation
Key Focus Area

Council Briefing
January 19, 2011
Team

Members
Kevin Acosta – Strategic Customer Services
• Gehan Asaad – Code Compliance Services
• Brittany Burrell – Office of Financial Services
• Genevieve Eversley – Human Resources
• Mark Fleet – Dallas Water Utilities
• Todd Gaston – Human Resources
• Pam McDonald – Civil Service
• Kevin Oden – Office of Emergency Management
• Gary Sanchez – Office of Cultural Affairs
• Laurietta Stewart – Code Compliance Services
• Denise Thomas – Strategic Customer Services
2
Roadmap
• Vision Statement
• Council Objectives
• Strategy Map
• Strategies and Data
• Links to other KFAs

3
Vision Statement
A city where citizens and visitors
experience and enjoy the
benefits of a vibrant, innovative,
diverse, and collaborative
system of cultural, arts, and
recreational opportunities
4
Council Objectives
1. Continue to develop Fair Park as a successful, year
round venue
2. Complete the Library Master Plan
3. Take steps to establish a world class downtown
venue with activities
4. Develop marketing plan for the City’s major
cultural and recreation aspects by 2012
5. Improve citizen impression of parks
6. Implement Trinity River Project

5
Council Objectives
Objective #1 Most Current Data

Continue to develop • Increase non-State Fair attendance


by 2% per venue and bring at least 4
Fair Park as a additional events to the Cotton Bowl
successful, year
round venue • Develop an advertising plan for Fair
Park rental facilities resulting in a 5%
increase (buildings, food and
beverage) annually

• Partner with Friends of Fair Park in


promoting events and marketing at
Fair Park museums and attractions

6
Council Objectives
Objective #2 Most Current Data

• Library Master Plan approved in 2001


Complete the Funded with $101.7 million in 2003 and
2006 bond programs which is 90-95%
Library Master Plan complete
• Library improvement projects underway
in FY 10-11:

• Central L-1 and Children’s Center opening


February 2011
• Central 1st Floor to become Downtown Branch
design phase
• Pleasant Grove replacement branch and Prairie
Creek new facility both opened November 2010
• Acquire replacement sites for Preston Royal, Park
Forest, and Forest Green branch libraries
• Complete the design and start construction for
Polk Wisdom and Highland Hills branch libraries
• Approve architect and start design of the North
Oak Cliff Branch renovation
• Design Phase of the Fretz Park and North Oak
Cliff Branch renovation

7
Council Objectives
Objective #3 Most Current Data

Complete development of Arts District


Take steps to Master Plan:
establish a world- • Annette Strauss Square opened
class downtown September 2010
venue with activities • City Performance Hall work continues;
projected completion in autumn 2012

Continued support of other downtown


cultural destinations

Proceed with the analysis of another D2


(Downtown Dallas) alignment:
• Adoption of a preferred alignment is
on hold pending approval of federal
planning grant

8
Council Objectives
Objective #3 Cont. Most Current Data

Downtown parks:
Take steps to
establish a world- • Continued construction of Woodall
Rodgers Deck Park and Belo Garden
class downtown • Renovate fountain at Ferris Plaza
venue with activities • Maintain viable partnership with
Downtown Dallas to provide enhanced
and supplemental maintenance,
events, programming and café in
Downtown Parks
Enhance the position of the Dallas Farmers
Market as a destination venue.
• Exploring alternative management
structure
• Continue dialogue with stakeholders
• Continue stormwater improvements

9
Council Objectives
Objective #4 Most Current Data

Develop marketing • Review and assess departments'


marketing efforts to determine
plan for City’s major efficiencies and partnership
cultural and recreational opportunities in order to maximize
outreach while remaining cost
aspects by 2012 effective
• On hold due to current economic
challenges
• Continue use of social media
(Facebook and Twitter) as well as viral
video marketing and e-marketing tools
as cost effective delivery methods
• Goal of doubling the number of social
media “fans” to 1,200

10
Council Objectives
Objective #5 Most Current Data

Improve citizen
• Target - 65% of citizens rate parks
“good” or "excellent"
impression of parks • FY08-09 Dallas Citizen Survey
findings:
Park and recreation services rated
most important are…
1. City Parks
2. Walking/biking trails in the City
3. Appearance/maintenance of
parks
 62% rate parks “good” or above
 65% rate accessibility of parks
“good” or above
 59% rate appearance
/maintenance of parks as “good”
or above
• Conduct Citizen Survey in FY10-11
11
Council Objectives
Objective #6 Most Current Data

• Projects scheduled to open in 2011


Implement Trinity River include:
Project • Margaret Hunt Hill Bridge
• Standing Wave whitewater feature
• Santa Fe Trestle Trail
• Levee Remediation Plan ongoing
• Texas Buckeye Trail ADA access at
Rochester Park complete
• Trinity Trail Phase I construction
ongoing
• Phase 2 under construction
• Phase 3 in design process
• FY 10-11 Projects:
• Baker pump stations
• Elm Fork Soccer Complex
• Gateway parks at I-20, Joppa, Moore &
Rochester
• Sylvan Ave Bridge Replacement
12
Strategy
Map
Pr
og

ons
ra
m

inati
s

Dest
eti ng
M a rk

13
Destinations

ns
Council Objectives

natio
1: Continue to develop Fair Park as a
successful, year round venue by

Desti
6: Implement Trinity River Project

STRATEGY
Develop, support and enhance the destinations where
people GO to encounter cultural and recreational
activities so as to ensure safety, upkeep and relevance
for the future.

Sub-Strategies
a Provide appealing, accessible and safe venues
b Continue to foster inter-departmental collaboration and/or promote cooperation with
public and private organizations
c Increase attendance throughout destinations as it relates to accessibility of programs
and venues
d Continue to support the City's green initiatives
14
Programs Pr
Council Objectives og
ra
m
2: Complete the Library Master Plan s
3: Take steps to establish a world class
downtown venue and activities

STRATEGY
Create and maintain signature programs that use all
available human and material resources in traditional
and non-traditional ways to ENGAGE people and their
participation.

Sub-Strategies
a Utilize City resources efficiently and effectively
b Embrace continuous improvement, technological trends, and diverse experiences
c Enhance programming by identifying and supporting individuals and organizations that
bring unique talents to the citizens and visitors of Dallas
d Support cultural, art, and recreational programs that enhance the quality of life for all
citizens of Dallas
15
Marketing
Council Objectives
4: Develop marketing plan for City's major cultural
and recreational aspects by 2012
5: Improve citizen impression of parks

STRATEGY
eti ng
Attract & engage local, national and international
audiences through effective marketing and M a rk
communication efforts to CONNECT all aspects of
the community.

Sub-Strategies
a Provide accurate and accessible information using appropriate media

b Allow customers the opportunity to provide input on meeting their needs and making
programs successful
c Promote programs to increase local, national and international exposure

d Promote and support volunteer opportunities and citizen participation


16
Strategies Recap
The Culture, Arts and Recreation Team is looking for bids that
create, support, operate and improve Dallas services:

DESTINATIONS
The places people GO to experience Cultural, Arts and Recreational
activities. These are places like Fair Park, Dallas Arts District or the
Central Library.

PROGRAMS
The things people ENGAGE in for leisure, fulfillment, relaxation,
and enrichment in Dallas. Programs come in all sizes- from an event for
thousands of people to one-on-one activity.

MARKETING
The way people CONNECT to Dallas’ Culture, Arts and Recreation programs and
destinations by cultivating awareness, participation and appreciation.
17
Links to Other KFAs
Educational and outreach programs
exist in the libraries, recreational outlets,
after school programs, arts district and
historical venues.

Vibrant culture, arts and recreation will


attract visitors and business to the City.

Destinations, Programs and Marketing


are efficient, effective and economical.

Parks and green spaces contribute to a


clean and healthy environment.

Libraries, cultural and recreational


centers contribute to neighborhood
safety.
18
The citizens and visitors of Dallas
experience and enjoy the benefits of a
vibrant, innovative, diverse and
collaborative system of cultural, arts and
recreational opportunities.

GO
ENGAGE
CONNECT
19
Council Presentation
FY 11-12
January 19, 2011

Educational
Enhancements
KFA Team Members
Jessica Duebner Code Compliance Services
Matina Garrett City Manager’s Office
Cindy Harper Equipment & Building Services
Mike Jones Code Compliance Services
Alyson Lawson Office of Financial Services
Tommy Ludwig City Manager’s Office
Bianca Moore Strategic Customer Service
Christina Worden  Dallas Public Libraries

2
Road Map

3
Vision Statement

Acknowledging that education is the foundation for 
achieving prosperity, health, and a better quality 
of life, the City of Dallas supports lifelong learning 
opportunities throughout the Dallas community 
and beyond.

4
Council Objectives
Objective Current Data/Progress

•Schedule joint meeting with City Council and DISD Trustees to


Build stronger engagement with DISD identify mutually beneficial strategies for the City and the District.

Support development of a public law school in •UNT to open law school in new building in Fall 2012.
•Renovation of 106 S. Harwood dependent on state funding.
North Texas •City to award exterior renovation contract in early FY11-12.

•Proposition 4 passed in November 2009 to create long-term


funding for the emerging research universities:
Pursue Tier One research university in Dallas
$50M in state funds to match $60M in privately raised funds.
by 2018 UNT, UTA and UTD received 34% of Texas Research Incentive

Program (TRIP) funds, a state program.

•3,260 students assisted in Dallas Public Library Homework


Hotline in FY09-10.
Continue After-School programs in parks and •1,960 students per month in Park after-school programs
libraries and Every Child Ready to Read (After- (Recreation Centers); 29,900 programming hours provided in
School program) FY09-10, up 3% from FY08-09.
•40,247 children affected in FY09-10 by Every Child Ready to
Read, up 30% from FY08-09.

5
Strategy Map

Educational
Enhancements

6
Strategies s

• Accommodation
• Locations
• Marketing
• Security
• Technology Access

Facilities
EE

7
Strategy:  Supporting Data

Strategy:  Access & Facilities

FY08‐09 FY 09‐10*
Number of visitors at recreation centers 1,859,000 1,606,805

Number of visitors at libraries 1,407,037 1,240,553


Since 2006:
Four new libraries have been completed
Four libraries replaced with new structures
Two  floors renovated at Central Library 

*Operating hours reduced in FY 09‐10

8
t
Strategies s i
e
• Activities
• People
• Personal Development
• Rewards

Motivators

EE

9
Strategy:  Supporting Data

Strategy:  Motivators

FY08‐09 FY09‐10*
Number in attendance in ESL classes 9,863 5,128

Number in attendance in GED classes 4,486 1,692


With the assistance of the business community, the Dallas Public Library has 
increased the number of Teen Centers from five to 26 locations and participation 
reached 4,100 teens in the last fiscal year.

*Operating hours reduced in FY 09‐10

10
Strategies s

EE

Community 
• Educational  Capacity
Institutions
• Individuals
• Opportunities
• Organizations

11
Strategy:  Supporting Data

Strategy:  Community Capacity/Engagement
FY 08‐09 FY 09‐10
Number of volunteers at libraries 42,253 52,391

Number of volunteers at recreation centers 6,548 6,678


Since FY08‐09, Dallas Businesses have contributed $636,490 to 
programs and services of the Dallas Public Library.  

In the 2009 Citizen Survey, 67% of Dallas residents rated educational 
opportunities as “Excellent” or “Good”.

12
Strategies s

EE
Outside 
The  • Families
• Job Skills
Classroom
• Early Childhood
• Environmental 
Education
• Lifelong Learning

13
Strategy:  Supporting Data

Strategy:  Outside the Classroom
FY08‐09 FY09‐10
Number in attendance in Children's programs at libraries 80,645 109,389
Number in attendance in Every Child Ready to Read 
30,241 40,247
program
Number in attendance at Bookmobiles 10,519 12,304
Number of computers available for public access in 
766 943
libraries
Number in attendance at computer classes 2,207 1,172

14
Linkages to other KFAs

• Public Safety
– Access & Facilities
• Safe Environments
• Prevention and preparedness
• Economic Vibrancy
– Community Capacity
• Public‐Private Partnerships
• Workforce Development
• Clean Healthy Environment
– Outside the Classroom
• Environmental Education Programs
• Civic Responsibility
• Culture Arts & Recreation
– Access & Facilities
• Shared Facilities
– Outside the Classroom
• Programming for Children & Youth
• E3 Government
– Outside the Classroom
• Employee Development
15
E3 GOVERNMENT
KEY FOCUS AREA TEAM

1
E3 Government Team Members

• Bilierae Johnson – Team Lead – Office of Financial Services


• Constance Reese – Code Compliance
• Moin Ahsan – Dallas Police Department
• Natasha Wade – Dallas Police Department
• Maria Frosch – Dallas Water Utilities
• Richard Wagner – Dallas Water Utilities
• Joy Hayden – Equipment Building Services
• Victor Kralisz – Library
• Daisy Torres – Office of Intergovernmental Services
• Kevin Hurley –Management Services; Environmental Quality
• Susan Alvarez – Public Works & Transportation; Stormwater
• Kamilah Thompson – Sanitation
• Terry Ryan – Office of Financial Services

2
Roadmap

3
E3 Government
Vision Statement

An innovative, responsible and customer-focused


government working collaboratively to provide
excellent services that enhance the quality of life in Dallas

Photo credit: Mike Walker at Trammell Crow Park 444


Council Objectives
OBJECTIVE CURRENT DATA
VALUE FOR TAX DOLLARS1 Next Citizen Survey will be conducted in
Increase the percent of residents stating they FY 10-11
somewhat to strongly agree that they receive
good value for their City tax dollars from 35% In the 2009 Citizen Survey, 39% of citizens
in 2007 to 75% by 2011, increase by 10% every “Somewhat” to “Strongly Agree” that they
other year receive good value for their tax dollars

-Review long-term effects of budget decisions–


both increases and decreases

PERCEIVED DISPARITY IN LEVEL OF Next Citizen Survey will be conducted in


SERVICE2 FY 10-11
Reduce the citizen’s perception of the disparity In the 2009 Citizen Survey, data shows a
in the level of service among the Council 15 point perceived disparity in level of
Districts from 17 points in 2007 to 9 points in service among council districts
2011
BUILD PRIDE IN CITY’S 294,259 volunteer hours provided to the
NEIGHBORHOODS City in FY 09-10; an 8.2% increase from
FY 08-09
Increase volunteerism by 2% annually

5
Council Objectives
OBJECTIVE CURRENT DATA
CITIZEN SATISFACTION1 Next Citizen Survey will be conducted in
Increase the percent of residents rating the FY 10-11
overall quality of City services (and
responsiveness) as “Good” or “Excellent” from In the 2009 Citizen Survey, 62% of citizens
48% in 2007 to 60% by 2011, increase by 10% rate the quality of services provided by
every other year the City as “Good” to “Excellent”

-Meet Citizens expectations for FY 10-11


budget; re-examine Service Level Agreements
in light of FY 10-11 budget and Citizen Survey

BUSINESS CUSTOMER SATISFACTION2 In the 2008 Business Survey, 85% of


Increase the number of business customers business customers rate Dallas “Good” to
who rate the City of Dallas “Good” or “Excellent” as a place to do business3
“Excellent” as a place to do business to 90%
by FY 11-12
BOND RATING4 The current GO Bond Ratings for the City
Maintain Aa1 rating with a Stable Outlook. are Aa1 (Moody’s) and AA+ (Standard and
Poor’s)

6
FY 2011-2012 E3 PERFORMANCE 

Government COMPLIANCE
MEASUREMENT
RESPONSIVENESS

Strategy Map BENCHMARKING


TRANSPARENCY

ACCOUNTABILITY

COLLABORATION CUSTOMER 
INTERACTION

LEADERSHIP COMMUNITY 
OUTREACH
ENHANCED
MARKETING &  LONG-
LONG-RANGE CUSTOMER
BRANDING STRATEGIC To be an innovative, COMMUNICATION MEDIA

PLANNING responsible and customer-


STRATEGIC  focused government SURVEYS & 
PLANNING
working collaboratively to FEEDBACK

SUCCESSION  provide excellent services


PLANNING
that enhance the quality of
life in Dallas

STREAMLINE   DIVERSITY
CONTINUOUS
PROCESSES RESOURCE
WORKFORCE
MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL 
DEVELOPMENT HIRING 
STRATEGIES
RESOURCES
MANAGING 
RISK &  MOTIVATION
LIABILITY
PHYSICAL  PROFESSIONAL 
INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY TO  TOTAL  DEVELOPMENT
DELIVER SERVICES COMPENSATION

7
Accountability
PERFORMANCE 
MEASUREMENT
COMPLIANCE
RESPONSIVENESS
COUNCIL
COUNCIL OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVES
BENCHMARKING TRANSPARENCY

VALUE FOR TAX DOLLARS


PERCEIVED DISPARITY IN LEVEL OF ACCOUNTABILITY
SERVICE
CITIZEN SATISFACTION
BUSINESS CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

SUB-STRATEGIES
1 Utilize benchmarking in performance measurement
2 Adhere to legal and regulatory requirements and professional standards
3 Provide an open and transparent business environment
4 Manage information through use of technology and print records

8
Accountability
ENSURE BUSINESS PRACTICES ARE CONDUCTED
IN A PROFESSIONAL MANNER

UTILIZE
UTILIZEPROVIDE Dallas
AN
continues to participate in the International City /
OPEN
County Management Association Center for
BENCHMARKING
BENCHMARKING IN
IN
AND TRANSPARENT
Performance Measurement (ICMA) 5
PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE
MEASUREMENT BUSINESS
Underway: Global City Indicators Program (Globally
MEASUREMENT standardized methodology that allow for comparability
ENVIRONMENT
of city performance / knowledge sharing)

PROVIDE
PROVIDE AN
AN OPEN
OPEN Citizens now have access to Citizen Surveys, Service
AND Performance Reports, City Auditor’s reports,
AND TRANSPARENT
TRANSPARENT
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, Annual
BUSINESS
BUSINESS Adopted Budget Book and Performance Measures
ENVIRONMENT
ENVIRONMENT books through the City’s website

The Office of Cultural Affairs has adopted a more efficient


MANAGE
MANAGE MANAGE
INFORMATION
INFORMATION and streamlined online application system for its Cultural
INFORMATION
THROUGH
THROUGH USE
USE OF
OF Services Contracts program
THROUGH
TECHNOLOGY
TECHNOLOGY USE OF
AND
AND Stormwater Management implemented a paperless field
PRINT
PRINT RECORDS
RECORDS inspection process that saves approximately $40,000 per
TECHNOLOGY AND year
PRINT RECORDS
9
Enhanced Customer Communication
CUSTOMER 
COUNCIL
COUNCIL OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVES INTERACTION

VALUE FOR TAX DOLLARS COMMUNITY 


OUTREACH
ENHANCED
PERCEIVED DISPARITY IN LEVEL OF CUSTOMER
SERVICE COMMUNICATION MEDIA

BUILD PRIDE IN CITY’S NEIGHBORHOODS SURVEYS & 


FEEDBACK
CITIZEN SATISFACTION
BUSINESS CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

SUB-STRATEGIES
1 Increase interaction with the community
2 Proactively use media outlets
3 Provide high quality, timely information to decision makers
4 Enhance internal and external customer service
5 Implement new or enhanced technology
6 Use effective methods of communication (traditional and nontraditional)
7 Obtain and use customer feedback
10
Enhanced Customer Communication
ENGAGE CUSTOMERS THROUGH INNOVATIVE METHODS OF COMMUNICATION

INCREASE
INCREASE INTERACTION
INTERACTION According to the Communication and Information Services
Department, the City’s websites received approximately
WITH
WITH THE
THE COMMUNITY
COMMUNITY 35,000 page views per day in 2010 6

In FY 09-10 City Secretary Office’s and Human Resources


launched new websites that make information more accessible
ENHANCE
ENHANCE INTERNAL
INTERNAL
AND 3-1-1 continues to enable the City to increase customer service
AND EXTERNAL
EXTERNAL and enhance customer satisfaction. In FY 09-10, 394,055 or
CUSTOMER
CUSTOMER SERVICE
SERVICE 95.7% of Service Requests were responded to on time7

USE
USE EFFECTIVE
EFFECTIVE Traditional methods: Newsletters ● Mass emails ● City
METHODS
METHODS OF
OF website / cable channel ● Radio advertising ● Dallas
Delivers District Update ● E-Alerts
COMMUNICATION
COMMUNICATION
Non-traditional methods: Electronic billboards ● Facebook /
(TRADITIONAL
(TRADITIONAL AND
AND Twitter pages ● Graphic art on City vehicles
NON
NON--TRADITIONAL)
TRADITIONAL) Provide verbal/written communication in various languages

11
Continuous Workforce Development
COUNCIL
COUNCIL OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVES
DIVERSITY
VALUE FOR TAX DOLLARS CONTINUOUS
WORKFORCE
PERCEIVED DISPARITY IN LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT
HIRING 
STRATEGIES
SERVICE
CITIZEN SATISFACTION MOTIVATION

BUSINESS CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


PROFESSIONAL 
TOTAL  DEVELOPMENT
COMPENSATION

SUB-STRATEGIES
1 Focus on frequent, specific, and timely employee recognition
2 Continue the diversity training program
Utilize innovative recruiting strategies particularly focusing on achieving
3
comparability of workforce and community population percentages
Offer an appropriate total compensation package, including emphasis on
4
wellness/fitness program
5 Provide innovative training and professional development
6 Evaluate and analyze employee competencies
12
Continuous Workforce Development
PROVIDE A KNOWLEDGEABLE AND CUSTOMER-FOCUSED WORKFORCE
THAT REFLECTS THE DIVERSITY OF THE CITY

FOCUS
FOCUS ON
ON FREQUENT,
FREQUENT, 857 employees recognized through the Wall of
SPECIFIC,
SPECIFIC, AND
AND TIMELY
TIMELY Honor Program in 20108
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE 1,148 W.O.W. Cards presented to employees in
RECOGNITION
RECOGNITION 2010

CONTINUE 9 departments completed the second of the


CONTINUE THE
THE
three-phase Diversity Training Program in 2010
DIVERSITY
DIVERSITY TRAINING
TRAINING with several departments moving into third
PROGRAM
PROGRAM phase9

Breeze (DPD in-service training): Approximately 4,500


PROVIDE
PROVIDE INNOVATIVE
INNOVATIVE individuals have been trained since 2008
TRAINING
TRAINING AND
AND Summit (HR safety training): 2,804 City employees have
PROFESSIONAL
PROFESSIONAL been trained in FY 09-10
DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT
Stormwater training: 318 City staff trained on online
modules in FY 09-10

13
Resource Management
COUNCIL
COUNCIL OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVES
STREAMLINE  
VALUE FOR TAX DOLLARS PROCESSES

RESOURCE
PERCEIVED DISPARITY IN LEVEL OF FINANCIAL 
MANAGEMENT
RESOURCES
SERVICE
MANAGING 
CITIZEN SATISFACTION RISK & 
LIABILITY
BUSINESS CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
PHYSICAL 
INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY TO 
BOND RATING DELIVER 
SERVICES

SUB-STRATEGIES
1 Efficiently procure resources
2 Utilize performance-based contract management
Promote diversity among City vendors, including opportunities for small
3
businesses
4 Anticipate appropriate level of resources
5 Address maintenance and replacement schedules
6 Buy "green" and environmentally friendly goods and services
7 Employ process improvement methods
8 Forecast and manage revenues and expenditures
9 Minimize risk and liability 14
Resource Management
PROCURE AND MANAGE RESOURCES TO DELIVER
EFFICIENT AND ECONOMICAL SERVICES

The City uses a centralized purchasing model which


EFFICIENTLY
EFFICIENTLY PROCURE
PROCURE enables control over the entire procurement process,
RESOURCES
RESOURCES allowing the City to purchase in the most efficient and
economical manner10

Equipment and Building Services’ Fleet Division achieved a


ANTICIPATE
ANTICIPATE 46% reduction in overtime from FY 08-09 to FY 09-10
APPROPRIATE
APPROPRIATE LEVEL
LEVEL Thru safety training, paid-injury claims were reduced by
OF
OF RESOURCES
RESOURCES approximately 54% from FY 08-09 to FY 09-10 (from
$291,064 to $135,235)

Quality: Courts and Detention Services improved their docketing


system resulting in $2.7 M additional in annual collections from
FY 08-09 to FY 09-1011
EMPLOY
EMPLOY PROCESS
PROCESS
Environment: 16,402 tons of waste were diverted by citywide
IMPROVEMENT
IMPROVEMENT residential recycling program - generating $689,554 in revenue
METHODS
METHODS and $430,540 in landfill airspace savings
Safety: City vehicle collisions were reduced from 952 in FY 07-08
to 873 in FY 09-10
15
15
Long-Range Strategic Planning
COLLABORATION

COUNCIL
COUNCIL OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVES
LEADERSHIP
VALUE FOR TAX DOLLARS
LONG-
LONG-RANGE
PERCEIVED DISPARITY IN LEVEL OF MARKETING & 
STRATEGIC
BRANDING
SERVICE PLANNING

CITIZEN SATISFACTION STRATEGIC 


PLANNING
BUSINESS CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
SUCCESSION 
PLANNING
BOND RATING

SUB-STRATEGIES
1 Develop, implement and update long range strategic plans
Ensure strong leadership through implementation of succession plans and
2
ISO management systems
3 Create, promote, and maintain a positive image for the City of Dallas

16
Long-Range Strategic Planning
ESTABLISH A CLEAR DIRECTION FOR CITY GOVERNMENT

Forward Dallas!
LONG
LONG RANGE
RANGE Strategic Engagement Plan

STRATEGIC
STRATEGIC PLANNING
PLANNING Fair Park Comprehensive Development Plan
Dallas Trail Network Master Plan
Underway: Citywide Aquatic Facilities Master Plan

ENSURE
ENSURE STRONG
STRONG ISO MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: Street Services increased its
LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP THROUGH
THROUGH pass rate on Internal Quality Assurance inspections from 88.5%
in FY 08-09 to 97.5% in FY 09-10, thus avoiding rework
IMPLEMENTATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF
OF
GROW YOUR OWN: Grant awarded to Library to provide funding
SUCCESSION
SUCCESSION PLANS
PLANS AND
AND for staff towards earning a Masters degree. 10 staff members
ISO completed program with 6 promoted to Librarian
ISO MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS
SYSTEMS

Financial Soundness – Aa1 Bond Rating


CREATE,
CREATE, PROMOTE,
PROMOTE, Recycling Program Initiatives
AND
AND MAINTAIN
MAINTAIN AA Investment in City’s streets and infrastructure
POSITIVE
POSITIVE IMAGE
IMAGE FOR
FOR Beautification Initiatives
THE
THE CITY
CITY OF
OF DALLAS
DALLAS Mayor/Council partnerships: Back to School Fair, Mayor’s
Summer Reading Program, Dallas Graffiti Wipeout, Earth Fest

17
Links to Other Key Focus Areas

18
FY 2011-2012 E3 PERFORMANCE 

Government COMPLIANCE
MEASUREMENT
RESPONSIVENESS

Strategy Map BENCHMARKING TRANSPARENCY

ACCOUNTABILITY

COLLABORATION CUSTOMER 
INTERACTION

LEADERSHIP COMMUNITY 
OUTREACH
ENHANCED
MARKETING &  LONG-
LONG-RANGE CUSTOMER
BRANDING STRATEGIC To be an innovative, COMMUNICATION MEDIA

PLANNING responsible and customer-


STRATEGIC  focused government SURVEYS & 
PLANNING
working collaboratively to FEEDBACK

SUCCESSION  provide excellent services


PLANNING
that enhance the quality of
life in Dallas

STREAMLINE   DIVERSITY
CONTINUOUS
PROCESSES RESOURCE
WORKFORCE
MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL 
DEVELOPMENT HIRING 
STRATEGIES
RESOURCES
MANAGING 
RISK &  MOTIVATION
LIABILITY
PHYSICAL  PROFESSIONAL 
INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY TO  TOTAL  DEVELOPMENT
DELIVER SERVICES COMPENSATION

19
E3 Government
Vision Statement

An innovative, responsible and customer-focused


government working collaboratively to provide excellent
services that enhance the quality of life in Dallas
Photo credit:
2020
credit: Mike Walker at Trammell Crow Park
APPENDIX

21
Sources
1. National Research Center, Inc. The National Citizen Survey Report of Results for
the City of Dallas, Texas. (CO: NCS, 2007 and 2009).
2. National Research Center, Inc. The National Citizen Survey Geographic
Comparisons for the City of Dallas, Texas. (CO: NCS, 2007 and 2009.)
3. National Research Center, Inc. City of Dallas 2008 Business Survey (October
2008).
4. General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010. Official Financial Statement. (November
10, 2010.)
5. City of Dallas, Texas. Human Resources, Risk Management and Communication
and Information Services briefing to the Finance, Audit & Accountability
Committee. ICMA Benchmarking Project FY 2007 Data Report. (November 26,
2007).
6. City of Dallas, Texas. Communication and Information Services. (December 2010).
7. City of Dallas, Texas. 2010 Service Request Performance Report (2010).
8. City of Dallas, Texas. City Manager’s Office. (December 2010).
9. City of Dallas, Texas. Human Resource Department (December 2010).
10. “Chapter 3: Structure for Municipal Purchasing” In Municipal Purchasing:
Organization, Techniques & Strategies for Public Procurement, (CO: Colorado
Municipal League, 1996).
11. City of Dallas, Texas. ISO 9001 Surveillance 2 Audit. Courts & Detention Services
briefing to City Council; (November 15, 2010)

22
Links to Other Key Focus Areas
• Economic Vibrancy
– Resource Management
• Employ process improvement methods
– Accountability
• Benchmarking
– Long-Range Strategic Planning
• Marketing & Branding
• Culture, Arts & Recreation
– Resource Management
• Physical Infrastructure
– Enhanced Customer Communication
• Community Outreach
• Educational Enhancements
– Resource Management
• Address maintenance and replacement schedules
– Continuous Workforce Development
– Enhanced Customer Communication
• Community Outreach
• Public Safety
– Continuous Workforce Development
• Hiring Strategies
– Resource Management
– Enhanced Customer Communication
• Community Outreach
• Clean, Healthy Environment
– Resource Management
• Buy "green" and environmentally friendly goods and services

23
Radio Technology Overview

January 2011
Presentation Objectives

• The objective of this presentation is to:


– Review terms as related to radio technology
– Review the challenges facing the City
o FCC mandate to Narrowband by January 1, 2013
o State’s goal to achieve P25 compliancy by January 1, 2015
– Explain the current state of the City’s Radio Network
– Review how the City will address the two challenges
o FCC mandate to narrowband by January 1, 2013
o State’s goal to achieve P25 compliancy by January 1, 2015

2
Terms and Definitions

3
Review of Terms as Related to Radio
Technology
• Frequency
• Analog vs. Digital
• Digital’s Advantage
• Narrowbanding (UHF / VHF)
• P25 (Project 25)
• Patching

4
Frequency
• Frequency – The location of a radio signal on the radio
spectrum that contains desired information.
Radio Frequency Spectrum
Low
Band * VHF **UHF “New 700” “800”

39 150
450 – 512 MHz 700 MHz*** 800 MHz
MHz MHz

Definitions:
* VHF – Ultra High Frequency (150 MHz)
** UHF – Ultra High Frequency (450 - 512Mhz)
• Types of frequencies include: *** MHz denotes a measure of frequency that equals
one million cycles completed in one second.
– AM/FM radio
– Wireless broadband
– Television broadcast
– Government radio
• The current frequency spectrum is congested and new
techniques are being developed to conserve it.
5
Frequency Coverage
• VHF (150 MHz) carries further in Rural Areas
• UHF (450-512 MHz) works well in Suburban Areas
• 700 / 800 MHz works better in
buildings

6
Analog vs. Digital
• Analog • Digital
– Is a process of taking audio – Is a process of taking an audio signal
(human voice) signals and and breaking it up into a binary format
represented as “1”s and “0”s.
translating them into  For example, it’s similar to the recent
electronic pulses called change in televisions from the old “rabbit
ear” (analog) antennas to the cable box
frequency modulation. (digital)
– The frequency modulation
produces a continuous wave
with the audio signal.

7
Digital Advantage
• Digital features include:
– Enhanced Audio Quality
– Integrated Voice & Data Capability
– Better Coverage
– Spectrum Efficiency
• Modifications / Changes can be made over the air through
software updates
– Easily
– Inexpensively
– Quickly
• Allows for Ongoing Use of Investment
– Hardware (e.g., transmitters, receivers, etc.) upgrades are very
infrequent
– Software is updated
• Allows for GPS capability in the radios 8
Narrowbanding
 Taking the current “wideband” frequencies and creating
new narrower frequencies in order to relieve congestion.
 Getting more capability out of the same space on the
radio spectrum.
 For example, it’s taking one large highway (“wideband”)
and utilizing the same space, dividing it into narrower
lanes which eliminates the congestion of one large
highway.

9
Narrowbanding

NEW
Technology
Narrow Lanes
=
MORE Lanes
in the same
space

10
Narrowbanding

FCC “Squeeze In More Talkpaths”…….

All of the City’s radios Frequency Frequency


utilize .025 MHz per 1 2
frequency
.025 MHz

FCC says: “2–to-1” Freq Freq


1 2

.0125
MHz

11
Project 25 (P25)

A digital industry standard developed by Homeland


Security to ensure radios made by different
manufacturers communicate with each other; these
radios are interoperable.

12
P25 (Cont.)
Current Standard…
• Developed between 1989 and 1995
• Government established requirements to:
– Double the Talkpath capacity
– Ensure interoperability among vendors…
so organizations can easily implement interoperable and
seamless joint communication in both routine and emergency
circumstances
– Allow P25 systems to communicate with data terminals and the
public telephone network
– Provide common encryption technology

13
P25 (Cont.)

Proposed Future Standard…


• Double channel efficiency over current
P25 capabilities (4x’s more efficient than the
City’s current radio system)
• Provide ability to perform Over the Air Programming
(OTAP) while the radio unit is in the field
• Provide integrated GPS that will transmit location of radio
unit

14
Why P25?
• Enables multiple vendors sourcing for cost
effective and competitive procurements with no
compromise in system capabilities.
• Enables Interoperability essential to multiple jurisdictions and joint
operations.
• Enables ease of operation for more rapid adoption
and training.
• Enables planned migration of systems and equipment
from old to new.

15
Console Patching

Console Patching is a manual connection from a


computer which allows two different frequencies to
communicate.
– Console Patching is inefficient because:
o All communications must come back to the
dispatch center
o Requires operator intervention per incident
o Delayed transmission
o Degraded voice quality

16
Console Patching

Police & Fire Non Public Safety


450 MHz System 800 MHz System

Dispatch Console

Audio Only Audio Only

Dispatch Center

17
Challenges

18
The Challenges Facing the City

• FCC Narrowbanding Mandate by 2013


• State of Texas P25 Goal by 2015
̶ Cannot be achieved without modernizing the
current radio network and replacing radios for non-
public safety departments.

19
FCC Narrowbanding Mandate
• FCC mandates that all Public Safety radio systems be “narrowbanded”
by January 1, 2013.

• Failure to comply with the narrowband mandate by the January 1, 2013


deadline may result in the following:
– Substantial FCC fines
– Revocation of FCC wideband licenses
– May overload narrowband receivers in adjacent municipalities

• The City of Dallas will achieve the FCC narrowband requirements by:
− Replacing handheld and mobile (in-vehicle) radios.
o 6000 Public Safety radios (currently replacing 850 radios)
o 1000 DWU radios
 Note: DWU radios must be replaced because DWU is on the same
segment of the radio network as DPD and DFR.
− Reprogramming the radio network receivers and transmitters.

• All replacement radios must work with the current network as well as the
future P25 network, regardless of the manufacturer. 20
State of Texas P25 Goal

• The State of Texas has set the goal that radio


communications of all first responders will be P25
compliant by January 1, 2015.
o To achieve this goal, the City will need to completely
modernize its entire radio system, including:
 Adding new antennas and radio towers
 Replacing transmitters, receivers, and radios for non-
public safety operations.
• State of Texas has mandated that no federal funds will
be made available for procuring radio equipment unless
the technology is P25 compliant.

21
City’s Radio Network

22
Current State of City’s Radio Network

− Is not narrowband compliant.


− Is not P25 compliant.
− Is over 40 years old.
The network consists of:
 11,000 Radios
 700 Receivers
 400 Antennas
 250 Transmitters
 23 Towers
− Is divided into two segments:
•Public Safety and DWU
•Other Civilian departments
Note: The difference between these two segments is that they are
on two different frequencies. i.e., they can’t talk to each
other without console patching.
23
Why Does the City Need a New Radio Network?
• Current Radio System is not P25 Compliant
• Current Radio Coverage is inadequate
– Some areas have weak signal strength
– Poor coverage inside buildings exists throughout the City
• Currently 70% of the radio equipment is not easily
supported by the manufacturer while the other 30% will not
be supported or easily acquired from third parties after
2012.
– Non supported radio equipment means:
 The manufacturer will not provide maintenance
 No new replacement parts will be made
 Search internet and/or barter to replace any broken parts
• To achieve the State of Texas P25 compliancy goal for
01/01/2015.
24
State of Current Network Coverage Map

New Tower

New Site

25
Addressing the Challenges

26
How the City Will Address the two Challenges
To meet the challenges of the 2013 narrowbanding mandate and
meeting the State’s 2015 P25 goal, the following must occur:
• Purchase new radios for Public Safety and DWU
• Replace the outdated Radio Network

27
Achieve the 2013 Narrowbanding Goal in
6 Steps
Step 1  2000 P25 Public Safety radios
 December 2010 Council approved Master Agreement for 2000 Radios
o 850 Radios for the Super Bowl
— 772 portable radios (Complete)
— 38 mobile motorcycle radios (Installation is in Progress)
— 40 mobile radios (Complete)
 January 2011
o Committee and Full Council Briefings
o Purchase 1150 mobile radios
 January 2011 – July 2011
o Install and configure 1150 Public safety mobile radios for narrowband

Step 2  Re-program Site Transmitters


 May 2011 – July 2011 re-program 23 site transmitters at the towers

28
Achieve the 2013 Narrowbanding Goal in
6 Steps

Step 3 Procure and Install the Remaining 5000 P25 compliant Radios for Public
Safety & DWU
 June 2011, Issue RFCSP for bid
 September 2011, Committee Briefings
 November 2011, Council award contract for 5000 P25 compliant radios
December 2011 – June 2012
o Install and configure 4000 Public Safety radios for narrowband
• 772 mobile radios
• 3228 portable radios
March 2012– June 2012
o 1000 DWU radios
• 600 mobile radios – Using Outside Contractors
• 400 portable radios

29
Achieve the 2013 Narrowbanding Goal in
6 Steps

Step 4  Re-program Site Receivers


 June 2012 through November 2012 re-program 23 site receivers at the towers

Step 5  Re-program radios to match Receiver Configuration in Phase 4


 July through November 2012
o 1922 mobile radios
o 772 portable radios used for Super Bowl
o 38 mobile motorcycle radios used for Super bowl
o 40 mobile radios used for Super Bowl

Step 6  Submit narrowband license to FCC


 December 2012

30
Funding Sources for Achieving
Narrowbanding

$27,029,450 in Public Safety Grant funds over the next 3


years and $4,000,000 in DWU funding.
– Grant funds will pay for all Public Safety handheld and mobile
radios and the industry radio expert consulting firm.

31
Achieve the 2013 Narrowbanding Goal in 6 Steps

In summary,
•To achieve these 6 narrowbanding steps the following
must occur:
̶ Procure the remaining 1150 radios off the current contract
o Council awarded contract on December 10, 2010 for 2000
radios from Motorola.
o 850 radios were purchased in December 2010 for the Super
Bowl.

̶ Procure the remaining 5000 radios


o Issues a bid (RFCSP)
o The radios must work with the current system, and
o Comply to the P25 standard

̶ Neither of these purchasing actions will preclude any


manufacturer from bidding on the new radio network.
32
Achieve the State’s P25 Goal in 4 Steps

• Partnering with Dallas County and Adjacent


Jurisdictions
̶ Dallas County is effected by the same challenges of upgrading their
current radio network as the City. The City and County have the
opportunity to partner in order to eliminate duplication and have a more
robust system.
̶ The City has been in consultation with Dallas County for two years
working on a consolidated plan to upgrade the City and Dallas County
Radio Networks.
̶ Provide adjacent jurisdictions with subscriber access to the City and
Dallas County consolidated Radio Network.
̶ The City and Dallas County will continue to explore options for
upgrading both radio networks jointly and will provide Council updates in
the future.
̶ The City and Dallas County are proposing to jointly hire an external
radio consulting firm.
33
Achieve the State’s P25 Goal in 4 Steps
Step 1  Acquire Services of External Radio Consulting Firm
 Issue RFCSP for bids – January, 2011
o Conduct Panel interview – March, 2011
o Public Safety briefing – May, 2011
o Finalize contracts – June, 2011
 June 2011 – Council awards External Radio Consulting Firm contract
Step 2 Develop P25 Radio Network requirements document
 June 2011- November 2011-- Industry Radio Expert
o Gather P25 radio network requirements from City of Dallas and
Dallas County
o Development of RFCSP for P25 Radio network replacement

Step 3 Selection of P25 radio network provider


 January 2012 -- Issue RFCSP for bids
 May 2012 -- Industry radio expert, City of Dallas and Dallas County
review proposals
 July 2012 -- Committee selects P25 radio network provider
 September 2012 -- Industry radio expert assists in negotiating the P25
radio network system
 September 2012 – Committee and full Council briefings
 October 2012 – Council awards P25 radio network provider
34
Achieve the State’s P25 Goal in 4 Steps

Step 4  Procure and Install P25 radio network system


 November 2012 – Bond election
 March 2013 – December 2014: Project management and installation of the
P25 radio system

35
External Radio Consulting Firm
Why do we need a consulting firm:
• To write the radio network requirements, which will become a key
part of the bid (RFCSP) document.

• To ensure the vendor proposed design is not proprietary.

• Establish appropriate evaluation criteria.

• Assist the City in conducting a thorough evaluation of the vendor


proposals.

36
External Radio Consulting Firm (Cont.)
Lessons learned from other cities:
• Repeat the successes of other cities, such as Houston, which
utilized the expertise of external radio consultants resulting in
significant savings. This translates into added value that more than
offsets the consulting expenses many times over.

• Risk reduction. For example, the City of Kansas City had to spend
in excess of $5 million dollars more to correct the deficiencies that
would have been mitigated by a qualified radio consultants review
of the specifications.

37
Funding Sources for Achieving P25 Goal

• The new P25 Radio Network cost approximately


$100,000,000, is a one time turnkey project which will
require capital bonds or other funding sources.
• Dallas County will contribute the funds for equipment that
is outside of the City.
• We will return at a later date with additional funding
information as we continue to work with Dallas County on
a consolidated radio network upgrade plan.

38
Summary Funding Sources
State of Texas P25
Estimated Cost and Funding Source

Grants Bonds/Other DWU


Sources
Step 1: Super Bowl and Narrow Banding

 Radios $   8,729,329

Step 2: Continue  Narrow Banding 

 Radios $17,000,000 $4,000,000

 Consulting Services $  1,300,000

Step 3: P25

 Public safety digital network $90,000,000

 4000 Non‐public safety radios $  7,000,000

 Non‐public safety digital network $  3,000,000 

Total Estimated Cost  $27,029,329 $100,000,000 $4,000,000

39
QUESTIONS?

40

S-ar putea să vă placă și